| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
High average-superior would be my guess. Good poll graymane. I think you're right in that the quality of reviews and contributions means there's a high IQ present here. Strange but true given the subject matter of the forum. However go to a forum on some of the porn networks and you will see porn fans aren't necessarily intelligent. This is the way PU has evolved.
|
11-01-12 05:09pm
|
Reply
177
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Review
Welcome to PU. Good effort for your second review.
The one thing you don't mention in the cons, is the use of condoms in 90% of their clips. That isn't necessarily a con for some, but means it's a definite no goer for me. Even if it isn't a con I think it needs mentioning.
|
10-30-12 07:22am
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't like it at all. I agree with messmer in that it is also present in comments accompanying a picture set. It's the same for forums. Given some of the comments by porn fans on sites like VideoBox it's the same stuff. Some love it, I hate it. Maybe it's harmless, maybe not. It does worry me a bit.
|
10-27-12 10:55am
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, they and the Wittyguy forum awards, were two of the PU highlights.
|
10-20-12 05:05pm
|
Reply
180
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pawn3d's Review
Likewise welcome to PU.
I suppose it's all a matter of taste, but I am stunned by the number of high 90's scores I see given to Brazzers, Reality Kings, and Bangbros, so this well below the norm sort of score is a welcome balance.
Personally I don't agree with 50, or the reason given, as they don't claim to be a teen site (Try 21 Sextury or Teen Mega World), but given some of the stuff that has been written by PU members about the negatives of these companies over the years, I don't mind seeing them getting a 50.
Virtually every company claims to be the "best" or "world's best." Each and every one of them, except for one, is lying. That's porn.
I hope you stick around and let us know what you think of the teen sites.
|
10-15-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
181
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I think most of the regulars read the regulars' reviews, but don't leave replies, so I would imagine quite a few will have read your review, and will have appreciated it, even though they don't comment. I read tons of great reviews, and have to admit I often don't leave a positive reply, when I should.
For me the most annoying thing about doing reviews is taking the trouble to do one, then ten minutes later seeing it replaced on the "front page" by one about ten lines long that took all of five minutes to throw together. No, it shouldn't bother me, and yes I know how PU works, but it does.
Yeah I occasionally now do the Ctrl V thing. It's when I don't that something usually goes wrong. For reviews I simply open a file and over the period of membership, jot down any pros, cons, and bottom lines, whenever I think of one, then begin to put it all together after a few weeks.
|
10-14-12 04:31pm
|
Reply
182
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Nearly all of the above.
|
10-14-12 06:20am
|
Reply
183
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Cheers graymane, it's obvious you take the trouble to put together a really good review (which applies to most of the regulars here).
I have to admit to mostly reading reviews by regulars. Some newbies take to it like a duck to water, others take time to get used to it, but the best reviews for me are the ones with the required facts along with a unique slant that only that particular taste and personality can bring.
I have more than once had an hour's plus hard work wiped out by pressing the wrong button (NOOOO!!!) or my computer having a mind of its own. That can't happen with pen and paper - unles you do a Richard Pryor while writing.
|
10-14-12 06:18am
|
Reply
184
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Excellent, well written and informative review. I shall take note of your warnings. Some may be expecting more, given the name behind the site, but it looks like one to avoid.
|
10-10-12 01:14pm
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Either not worth the effort or they're a scam, so I went for they're a scam.
|
10-07-12 06:20am
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Like Rusty I went for "never too much" because there wasn't a "not too much" option.
|
10-05-12 12:47pm
|
Reply
187
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes I nearly asked for my money back. It must have merely been a blip, but to have that happen first night, with what appears to be a dying network looked very bad. I am pleased I persevered with it, as there is some worthwhile material.
There are some familiar girls on this network, but as Pat pointed out elsehwere, they have different names than on other sites. I prefer newer faces and bodies though. and there are some girls I haven't seen much before.
I didn't have to search much to find material worth downloading, but for yourself and many PU members you would probably only find this material just okay because of the quality. I am willing to put up with a little less in spec quality of pics and vids for quality of material.
|
10-04-12 07:00am
|
Reply
188
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks toad, much appreciated! I figure this network is very much a matter of taste and opinion and depends on what you value most. Those who like lots of high spec updates wont like it, but I do.
|
10-03-12 04:10pm
|
Reply
189
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
There was no room to lay out the sequence of events for my first 24 hours of membership. Above is an abbreviated version. Here is the long unedited one. Incidentally since that first day, I have had no trouble accessing material.
First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible. I mailed customer services and unsurprisingly, given their record as documented on here, received no reply. I mailed Epoch who said to try a different browser. I had already tried that, however the next day the sites were functioning properly.
One download later and I received a message that I had been banned for logging in too many times. I mailed them to say that's because I tried to log in at a number of sites several times to see if any were working. I was supposed to apply to them to reset my password, but given their lack of any customer support, thought this would be impossible. I complained to Epoch, who said it wasn't their concern. I said it was their concern as they were supposed to be a reputable billing agent dealing with reputable websites. After a while with me talking about complaining to my credit card company, the Epoch person said they may refund me if I didn't hear in 24 hours from the network. Unbelievably, it was easy to reset my password as it appeared to be automated. Just as well, as no one seems to be in customer service at 1 Pass For All Sites. They should be renamed No Customer Support For Any Site.
The next day I finally heard from them saying they had temporary hosting problems, but now everything was fixed, and that if I wanted my money back to contact Epoch and they would refund. They also sent me a new password. My reply was "Customer support on your network seems awful, but the material although for the most part not updating, seems very good. As long as the network continues to function I am satisfied enough not to ask for my money back. The network happened to go down the very first night I was a member, and there is no customer support, so that is not a good impression if the site isn't merely laying down and dying, and scraping out a few last memberships - which is what it gives the impression of doing."
|
10-03-12 02:39pm
|
Reply
190
|
Czech AV
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Another informative review slutty, thanks for the well written piece. Also, congrats on the 100.
|
10-03-12 09:07am
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
It's over 50%, so I put answer one. This is mainly because I store on external drives.
|
10-03-12 08:46am
|
Reply
192
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Great review. Some of their material looks okay and this place would be on the list to join, but it's those fake breasts and tats that put me off. In fact I have been put off many sites I was thinking of joining, by seeing 7 out of 10 models on the preview either having fake breasts or tats.
|
09-18-12 08:58am
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Somewhere between always and usually. Occasionally you see a good(ish) pair, but even then, when I realise they're fake, it's like the model in question has had a mastectomy. To me, post op, they are no longer objects of sexual interest or desire. Instant turn off, just like a plastic doll.
|
09-17-12 10:46am
|
Reply
194
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review. Thanks for taking the time to explain clearly what this place is about. I have been considering joining this kind of site for a while. Now I hsve to decide which one.
|
09-14-12 07:31pm
|
Reply
195
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
merrell's Comment
I would say avoid any site with download limits to stop this sort of thing happening. If you don't pay your money they can't lock you out of the account.
|
09-14-12 01:50pm
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes somewhat, it depeneds on the site or network. If there are a number high on my list, those with a discount go to the top.
|
09-14-12 09:42am
|
Reply
197
|
Bears Fuck Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
No I agree with you. I far prefer those sites which have reputable billing agents. That doesn't mean those who do their own billing are bad, it's just there will be a few bad apples who will try to rip you off, and you jsut never know which ones that will be - until too late.
|
09-11-12 08:03am
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not since they killed Steve Irwin.
|
09-11-12 07:55am
|
Reply
199
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Super review! Good to see you still around, exotics.
|
09-11-12 07:46am
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, without a doubt, exceptional value.
|
09-07-12 06:17am
|
