| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I made it pretty clear that the "wait one month" rule was a rule that I enforced for myself and was not claiming that everyone else on this site should wait that length of time.
There are rules that I believe would help this site.
I just ran across a review for ALS Scan where the reviewer, in a later comment added to her review, said that she had not been a member prior to her review IN OVER A YEAR!!!!
That, to me, is just ridiculous, and should be grounds for that review being yanked from this site altogether.
|
09-14-07 07:43am
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I actually have a rule NOT to review a site within the first month. For myself, I just don't think it's a good amount of time to give a fair review - not to say that I consider all of the reviews done by others within the first month are unfair.
It's just that a site can have an inordinate amount of good or bad stuff posted right at the point that I join and if I'm reviewing right away, I'll be affected by that. I'm bound to give a more balanced review if I wait several weeks.
I agree with leaving reviews available to edit for a year - I think it would be a really good idea to show the before and after scores, though.
For instance: 84 on 1/07/07, 73 on 9/13/07 - with the date of the follow-up comments showing as well, similar to the way that TBP reviews work. If a site hasn't moved a reviewer to change the score within one year, the reviewer should just do a new review if they care to.
|
09-13-07 06:25pm
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
It's the difference between a professional web site that gives a damn about their members and a completely un-professional site that doesn't give a flying f about their members.
What difference does it make what the site's content is if you cannot access it after paying to do so?
Webmasters that ignore this critical piece of the business are missing the boat completely.
In my experience:
Hall of fame: Suze.net, DDF, Phil-Flash.com, ALS Scan - all responded quickly and professionally and took care of the issue with no hassle whatsoever
Hall of Shame: MyaDiamond.com (responded after weeks of hard work following them everywhere I could think of), stephanieswift.com (I had to track down the guy that designed the site to get access - I love Stephanie, but she needs someone to run her site for her), Asia Diva.com (HORRIBLE people to deal with!)
|
09-10-07 09:26am
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If it's a site I love, like Met Art or ALS Scan, well then, I'm damned sure going to take advantage of a multi-month deal - why not?
|
08-30-07 06:11pm
|
Reply
280
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I've used the regular e-mail form on the site about 10 time - never received a single response - the impression that they're giving me is that they don't give a flying fuck about their members, so if you've got a contact that doesn't feel that way and doesn't want that impression going around, please ask her to look at all of the e-mails about access problems to Mya's site sent to the Support e-mail address that nobody in the world has cared to respond to - not once!
|
08-19-07 04:57pm
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind a mix of Exclusive and non-Exclusive material, as with Twisty's and the Sexy Babes TV sites. There are sites that are just collecting lots of stuff from everywhere and those sites wind up having no personality and strike me as boring.
The sites that wind up being consistently the most exciting to me, Met Art, and especially ALS Scan, blow me away at their ability to provide high quality exclusive material on an ongoing basis - even more impressive with ALS Scan, since there is one man running the creative show.
|
08-17-07 09:29pm
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
If you've got an e-mail address for a Customer Service rep there, please share it - I haven't been able to get a soul to respond to many many many messages - e-mails, posts at their forum, messages at their Live Support, messages to their webmaster through the Billing Support - who are quite responsive, etc.
PS - I know you're a big fan of Anneta Keys - there is a gorgeous new set of her posted today at Met Art - mmmmmm!
|
08-17-07 09:24pm
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Freeones.com's reviews are fairly worthless. They are mainly about encouraging people to join the sites so that Freeones.com can get some money from that. But the message board/forum is very lively and can be quite informative.
|
08-16-07 07:08pm
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Not only does the Live Support not work, but I haven't been able to get a soul to answer me at any of their support e-mails, etc.
I am hating the company that runs these sites right about now! I wouldn't recommend them to my worst enemy!
|
08-16-07 07:06pm
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I like the forum at Freeones.com. When I was looking for a hot teen site to join, someone highly recommended Nubiles.com, which turned out to be a real winner - much better, for my taste, than sites that TBP recommends more highly, such as TeenDreams.com.
There's a LOT of activity at their forum so it's a good way to get a good amount of input and to see samples of a LOT of sites.
|
08-15-07 06:52am
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I've got a very bad feeling about Eve Angel's site and Mya Diamond's site. Not only aren't they being updated. I haven't had access to Mya's site in over a week. I've tried their Live Support. I've tried their support e-mail address. I've tried flagging down a moderator or webmaster in their forums. I've tried having Billing Support assist me.
They aren't updating and they aren't responding to member's issues.
It's not good!
|
08-15-07 06:50am
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's only fair to figure price into the whole package. A site charging a premium price had better deliver a premium product - both in quality and quantity. As exotic and others said, it's easier to cut a site charging less a bit more slack.
|
08-13-07 08:30pm
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never skipped work, but I have adjusted my schedule in order to get home to see cam shows that I would have otherwise missed - didn't regret it, either.
|
08-05-07 04:40pm
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
I like trial memberships. I've tried several. Some sites - like Action Girls - have a great deal on their trial membership but aren't worth joining for a full month for me.
Sites that invite you to try a trial membership and give you a scam deal are sure to give you a scam deal as a full member, so it's a good way of knowing to stay away from them.
Sites that treat their trial members well must treat their regular members well - that's what I assume and have found to be true in practice.
|
07-31-07 07:25pm
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I voted "too varied to say", which, to my mind, is as it should be. There are some reviewers who have very detailed analytical reasoning, ala Exotics. There are other reviewers who don't seem to be analytical at all, they just want to give a boost to a site that they like or hate on a site that has bothered them for one reason or another.
Luckily for all of us, there are more active reviewers in the first category than the second.
|
07-20-07 08:31pm
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with the prevailing sentiment here - girl/girl where the receiving girl seems to really be enjoying it - that's hot! ALS Scan and ALS Angels are the best for people that like this kind of action, in my opinion.
|
07-08-07 09:35pm
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
For me, it's overall body shape. If a woman with an average face has a luscious bod, I'll take the time to develop an affection for her face. If a woman with a pretty face has an unattractive bod, I'm moving on quickly.
|
07-03-07 09:10pm
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
For me, this is a dividing line - I want to see pics of hot babes that look like living women. Too many sites paint their pics to a point where, to me, they lose all eroticism. Find hot models, light them well, take the pics and I have no problem with doing some reasonable touch-up to make the pics look as good as they can, but I'm turned off by the lacquered or painted look that some sites go to.
Sites that put themselves on my Love List for avoiding unneccessary photo-painting:
ALS Scan
Met Art
DDGirls
and others with a similar style
Sites that keep me away with their insistence on painting pics to a degree that does away with the eroticism:
Pier 999
Ron Howard (though I like his close-up vids, despite his annoying talk)
A site that I wish got away from photo-shopping as much as they do: Twisty's - it's a great site and they have great models, but they're photo-sets would be hotter, from my perspective, if they messed with the pics less than they do, for the most part - I've got to say, though, that their stuff has been going in the right direction over time.
|
06-30-07 10:00am
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
For people like me that look at membership status when reading reviews, it would definitely be helpful if you noted - returning member here - or something that let people know that your entire experience was not less than 1 month. I have seen notes like that in reviews, possibly in yours, and it was note-worthy to me.
In any forum that has a good amount of people posting, we're going to have people capable of, or interested in, writing solid in-depth reviews, and others who write reviews that are more "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down". The good thing about the comments is that we can always try to draw people out some more if we care to.
Thanks for your comments.
|
06-16-07 01:40pm
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
The more important factor to me is info on whether the reviewer is a current member and how long a reviewer has been a member.
People who are reviewing sites where they haven't been a member for months aren't helping much, since good sites make significant changes - I remember one reviewer complaining about the DRM's at Danni.com weeks after that site had done away with DRM's.
Similarly, I personally don't find reviews all that helpful if the reviewer has been a member less than a month - they can give feedback on how much stuff a site has and the quality, but you don't really have the basis to comment on the consistency of updates or possibilities of technical problems if the reviewer just joined yesterday. To me that's the difference between this forum and the reviews by TBP's reviewers - I know that they're just dipping their toes in and giving their reviews from there.
Where this site can be more helpful is by having the feedback of people who have spent a good deal more time with a site.
|
06-16-07 12:31am
|
Reply
296
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I've seen it fake and that's just kind of pathetic - what's the point?
But when it's real, it can be rather awesome. ALS Scan's first true HD video was a long masturbation scene with Amber Rayne - that woman is crazed - like Debi Diamond crazed - and when she squirted all over the camera man and the lens and he's yelling "Jesus Christ!" in disbelief, - that was some great shit!
|
06-06-07 11:05pm
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I love this stuff! Tease me - please me - that's my slogan!
|
05-29-07 10:31pm
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
There are sites that are part of a network and that bonus content is definitely part of the value of the membership to me - but the "feed" bonuses are generally crap and I always feel that I'm risking viruses whenever I click on them, so I stay the hell away from them these days.
|
05-29-07 10:13pm
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
Models are definitely most important, but the other factors can't be neglected either.
I was a member of Jannah Burnham's site for one month. As soon as I became a member and realized that the site wasn't allowing members to save any pics, I knew I wouldn't stay a member no matter what else was going on.
Then there's resolution of pics and vids - quality standards at many sites are quite high, so all sites that are charging more than a nominal fee better be paying attention to this - there's just no excuse for posting pics and vids that aren't high res and expecting anybody to pay for it at this point.
Then there's "heat" and this is very subjective. The best example, for my taste, of a site that gets the Great Models and High Res parts right and the "heat" part neglected is InFocus Girls. I don't seem to be the only one since most reviews mention that this site is just lacking that "oomph" or "heat" factor - a deal-killer for me, despite the other things they get right.
Price - yeah, price is a factor - if a site is going to be charging a premium price, they damned well better be delivering premium content and lots of it. But, personally, I'm not going to stay a member of an inexpensive site if I don't find myself excited by what I find there.
|
05-17-07 06:10am
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
For me it depends on the site. I'll watch vids full screen if they look great full screen. If they are going to look better smaller, I'll watch them smaller.
|
05-09-07 07:24am
|
