| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Tori Black
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
from Cybertoad:
How many video sets are there on the site ?
Thanks
|
09-17-11 05:09pm
|
Reply
2
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
from Cybertoad:
I have come back every few years to try it, never quite makes the mark
for me either.
|
03-04-10 10:22am
|
Reply
3
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
from propaGhandi:
Confirmed ... thx for the info.
|
02-15-10 10:54am
|
Reply
4
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(adrenalinrush's Reply)
I wouldn't be surprised if some day they do a re-design of the whole site behind the scenes and spring it on us - I could imagine fantasy navigation where you put your cursor over a pic of a model and get a few second of vid of one of her hottest scenes.
Maybe if they feel that they've done all the upgrading needed for a while in their content and equipment, they'll turn their eyes to the design.
Re-designs, though, can be one of those "be careful what you wish for" propositions - Babes.tv, for instance had an older-looking site, did a re-design and had a less distinctive looking site at the same time that their content fell off a cliff - so it wasn't exactly a cause for joy.
In the main, my view towards the overall design of a site is "if it ain't broke, don't worry about it." The key thing that ALS Scan needed to do was to get their navigation in hand - and they've done that in the main, since you can now see all of the solo content of a model by clicking on her pic - and get pointed to the group and bonus shoots that she was involved in.
|
02-10-10 05:52am
|
Reply
5
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
from PinkPanther:
They may be outmoded in design, but in terms of content, they're in the top tier in terms of the size and clarity of their pics and their HD vids.
|
02-09-10 06:34am
|
Reply
6
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(adrenalinrush's Reply)
It wouldn't bother me so much if the time between "announce-posting" the updates and the actual, internal posting of them didn't run for over an hour at times.
I could just wait until later in the day to check, of course, but that doesn't excuse the poor practice. I like FemJoy a lot, but it's been a bit of a sore point.
The guideline is "update from the inside out." Then you'll never have links up to stuff that isn't there, even for a second. I think it makes sense.
|
02-07-10 03:08pm
|
Reply
7
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
from Drooler:
Actually, I don't see it that way. Sure, there are scenes that are too arty, abstract, and lacking in warmth, but there are also recent sexy ones of girls like Maya, Chloe, Martina, Tess, Sasha, Masha, and Nastia.
Less "art" taken too far would be better, of course.
|
02-05-10 11:57pm
|
Reply
8
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
from Denner:
Disappointed too!
But also because MPL does so many videos/sets outdoor - been a member on and off for years, and it's getting worse.
MPL has a great selection of new and some almost exclusive models - they try to make the sets/videos sexy, but still way too much 'art'. - and that maybe 75 % of those videos/sets are made outdoors does not make it any better.
We've had that outdoor/indoor discussion before, but it's still a major item - most people (PUs anyway according to earlier threads) prefer the indoor with a little more erotica than art, so...
|
02-05-10 09:00am
|
Reply
9
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(adrenalinrush's Reply)
Fine info, adrenalinrush - thanks for heads up, here!
|
02-05-10 08:10am
|
Reply
10
|
Tori Black
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
from PinkPanther:
Actually, since my membership to PremiumPass expired recently, I'm in a position to know that you could download the contents of this site in a day or two - there's not a lot there.
PremiumPass has added the number of sites in the network, but the update schedule on each site is not impressive, web-cam shows are every 2 weeks or less by individual performers, and the CamZ network has gotten more glitchy as time has gone on - so some cam shows never happen or are full of freezes and crashes.
Overall, this network became more frustrating than it was enjoyable.
|
02-04-10 06:12pm
|
Reply
11
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
from tangub:
When i click on the ccbill sign up page i get Ģ29.95 or a whopping $46.37 so i think i'll give that one a miss.
|
02-03-10 11:50pm
|
Reply
12
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from propaGhandi:
(adrenalinrush's Reply)
adrenalinrush, thank you for your review - itīs in line with mine.
mc-nudes.com is my recommendation and red-hot favourite in that niche.
|
02-03-10 01:57am
|
Reply
13
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from User1234:
(adrenalinrush's Reply)
Sorry pal, but I'm a real user. And I'm sorry you disagree with my review, but we're all entitled to our own opinions.
|
02-02-10 02:53pm
|
Reply
14
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
from anyonebutme:
Just an FYI, you may have noticed, x-art is comprised of work done up by some of the same contributors to femjoy, so probably not the best site to site transition if you're seeking for a new look. I'd suggest checking out watch4beauty.com , or mc-nudes.com
Like on the flip side, I reviewed breath-takers.com and even though the updates come slowly, I felt the quality and passion in the girls is there, then the replies from others were along the lines of "yeah, but not enough updates". Some people want quality, others just want the massive quantity.
To the other questions above, their videos are dedicated scenes, unlike what Met-Art puts out. They are usually 5 minutes in length with a song playing throughout. They certainly lean more art than porn. Not saying it as a bad thing, they are good videos, just don't go in to it expecting something else.
|
02-02-10 12:38pm
|
Reply
15
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(adrenalinrush's Reply)
Thanks.
I went back as you suggested and found the update schedule. They had a total of 4 new videos in January, not quite the 2 a week they promised in their preview site. But the previews they offer for the four appear to be quite well done.
But my other question is, what is your opinion about the quality of the videos? With about 300 videos, I am ready to sign up for a month at $30.00 to drain off the good stuff but before I do I'd like your opinion. Does your "passionless" observation apply also to the videos?
|
02-02-10 11:55am
|
Reply
16
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for the review. I liked your "passionless presentation of the girls" because that sadly appears to be true in many sites these days. You just saved me some money! :-)
|
02-02-10 09:56am
|
Reply
17
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
from Monahan:
Thanks for your review. I was aware of this site but it was not on my radar until I saw your review. I'm interested.
The preview site says they add 2 videos a week. Is that accurate?
As a video guy, I shy away from photo sites that have a few videos because they are usually just videos of photo shoots (MetArt, for example).
But the preview site of FEMJOY has some excellent previews of videos that make me want to check it out and drain off their video content, but before I do I'd like your opinion of the video content (quantity and quality).
Thanks.
|
02-02-10 09:17am
|
Reply
18
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
from Monahan:
The 1 month price is $29.95 (instead of $19.95), the 3 month price is $59.95 (instead of $69.95) and the 12 month price is $99.99.
|
02-02-10 09:12am
|
Reply
19
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
from Drooler:
This is a fair summary of the site. The webmaster replied to my comment in late July last year; seemed to think that the update frequency justified the price. You're the most recent here at PU to express disagreement with that opinion.
Great photos, but not enough, and not often enough. And I also think the addition of hardcore is incongruous with the type of site that it is. Or at least was.
|
02-01-10 02:51am
|
Reply
20
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
from Denner:
Well, well, well: 'A shitload of naked girls' a bit heavy there...
MetArt MAY be a bit overrated in score at TBP in some ways - but it's still a site who comes up with great amounts of entirely exclusive photosets of great - mostly great - euro/easteuro girls - you cannot take that away from them - og what are we here for - but 'naked girls'....ect.
Always had the main complaint: boring videos - but that's almost a historic fact - so skip those as a reason to join.
|
12-09-09 08:28am
|
Reply
21
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
from BE Production:
Hello! I have not seen any load problems or had any reported problems from our monitoring service. However anything is possible! If you continue to have problems please visit the Help Desk on EroBerlin so we can troubleshoot your connection. Thanks!
|
12-08-09 10:50pm
|
Reply
22
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
from Drooler:
I remember the '90's. I even have an old, faded copy of the Whole Internet User's Guide & Catalogue, published in '92.
Exaggeration does not lend itself to credibility.
|
12-08-09 07:08pm
|
