Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
SOMETIMES A VERY NICE SPECIAL DEAL COMES ALONG.
I JOINED EROTIC BEAUTY (PART OF THE METART NETWORK) FOR $1/MONTH A FEW YEARS AGO.
THAT IS A LIFETIME PRICE.
I'M STILL A MEMBER (AT $1/MONTH).
SOME OTHER PU MEMBER RECENTLY MENTIONED THAT THEY SIGNED UP FOR THE SAME OFFER.
|
02-10-17 08:55am
|
Reply
152
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Nice gimmick.
But I've never tried the site, because I want to know how much it will cost before I try.
But it's good to know people are thinking up new ideas for porn.
That idea of a 30-day wait before a cancellation takes effect is a killer.
That website (Fetish Network) should go out of business, once members and prospective members catch on the trick.
|
02-09-17 07:27am
|
Reply
153
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Thanks for the warning.
I've never joined a site that required 30 days notice before cancellation takes effect.
Must have been a porn business-genius who thought up that one.
|
02-09-17 06:18am
|
Reply
154
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(skippy's Reply)
skippy, thanks for the MetArt tip on viewing options.
I've been a member of MetArt for over 10 years, off and on.
But just looked at the photos, almost never bothered to explore the options to make viewing easier.
LOL.
But I still find it's easier to brows a set of photos at Diesel.
View a photo, and click the mouse to go to the next photo, which opens immediately, in the same window, etc.
Faster and easier than the MetArt system, which requires more mouse clicks, whether you choose to open the photo in a new window, or in the same window.
If you still have a subscription to one of the Diesel sites, try viewing a photoset online. I think you will see what I mean.
As far as Diesel, I don't think there is any basis for deciding what content goes to which site.
I've mentioned years ago that the idea was to create separate sites to build revenue, instead of having a single site. Since more sites usually means more subscriptions.
Years ago, they sometimes had a video of a model, and the photoshoot of the video might be posted on a different site than the video was posted at. Proving, to me, at least, that the basis for selecting what content goes to what site was random.
I'm referring to 18 Only Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn.
When they still had their older sites, most of that content was specific to those sites (before they folded most of that content into 18 Only Girls, and deleted the rest of that content).
When I say that a video and its accompanying photo shoot could be posted at 2 different sites, it was not common, but it did happen. I thought it was funny.
|
02-09-17 05:25am
|
Reply
155
|
Yanks VR
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from Yanks:
Sorry "all girl" isn't your thing. No worries at all. However I would like to clarify something in your comment. The purpose of VR, like video is certainly not limited to one thing. Yanks.com was build on the premise of being the fly on the wall and observing women by themselves and with other women. YanksVR now takes you into the scene as if you were on the bed with them or watching from a very close position while offering all of the 3D effects that VR entails.
In regards to the size of the YanksVR site, we are about average right now in terms of quantity of scenes. Not the biggest and not the smallest, but right in the mix. In terms of the niche, All female and 100% female produced there is only us.
Hope you find what you are looking for and I appreciate you taking the time to comment.
Todd
|
02-07-17 04:39am
|
Reply
156
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(skippy's Reply)
I think heartcore's definition probably varies from person to person, but this is what I consider heartcore:
Artsy, lots of foreplay, non-penetration acts (especially kissing) that eventually leads into what is supposed to be passionate intercourse.
My biggest problem with heartcore porn is one I talked about in one of my reviews, maybe Sex-Art. They've got me convinced that male talent #1 is really in love with female talent #1. Then I watch a video of female talent #2 and she's with male talent #1. Then I watch 30 more different female talents and 25 of them are with male talent #1. I've always been known for complicating things when it comes to porn, but I'm fairly forgiving when it comes to fantasy aspects. For example, most Kink content has convinced me the women prefer harder sex. The step-sibling niche is another that I can at least see in fantasy, but the heartcore sites are trying to convince me or my fantasies that this one male talent really loves 25 women and they all love him too. Maybe that's it, I can accept almost any fantasy except for ones revolving around a real emotion like love.
|
02-04-17 10:15pm
|
Reply
157
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(skippy's Reply)
I joined Wow Girls on 2016-12-30, and was not given a choice of streaming only, versus streaming + download.
So I assume the option of streaming only started in either January or February 2017.
I joined through a special discounted offer (not through the PU link), for a 1-year term, which is why my membership would not automatically upgrade to diamond status, with access to all three sites, after 2 months. I would have to wait 12 months before I would be upgraded to diamond status.
(Normally, your membership is upgraded to diamond status after 2 months of continuous membership.)
So I paid $20 for the upgrade to diamond status.
So I guess that $20 is the current price to upgrade to diamond status.
Like I wrote earlier, the previous price to upgrade to diamond status was $70. Which caused a lot of complaints by PU members in their reviews of the Diesel network.
I assume very few people at PU took Diesel up on their $70 upgrade.
Diesel lacks a page inside or outside the site, spelling out the terms of service, which would list the cost of the upgrade to diamond status, that I can find.
|
02-04-17 10:10am
|
Reply
158
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Diesel network (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and All Fine Girls) now offers members a choice of streaming only or streaming with downloads.
30 days stream only $19.95/recurring
30 days stream/download $29.95/recurring
180 days stream/download $99.95/recurring
Those prices are for a membership to All Fine Girls or a different membership to Wow Girls plus Wow Porn.
But they tell you on the join page what your choices and prices are on the join page.
But a membership to all 3 sites costs extra. I got my upgrade for about $20 (a one-time fee).
But I don't know if that was a limited time offer or the current price for the upgrade.
The upgrade price used to be about $70 (a one-time fee).
Except that after a continuous 2-month membership, you are normally upgraded to the 3 site access.
Except that I got a discounted membership, and I would only upgrade after 12 months.
So I paid the $20 for the upgrade.
Which I only learned after joining, and writing their support. Because they don't bother to spell out every little detail about the sites/membership rules (that I can find, anyway).
|
02-04-17 06:09am
|
Reply
159
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from elephant:
Hi Skippy, yeah seen other sites going pay more for downloads, seems like they are thinking the people that pay for porn are the people we'll punish and can pay us more, it should be law though to explain this on sign-up not hard to see either, this will not stop piracy in anyway.
|
02-04-17 01:39am
|
Reply
160
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(skippy's Reply)
Thanks for clarifying that.
|
02-03-17 01:44pm
|
Reply
161
|
Czech VR
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from lk2fireone:
Interesting review.
Since I'm not into VR porn (don't have the VR equipment), I wouldn't be interested in joining the site.
Also, I like attractive models, and your review says most of the models are not conventionally attractive.
But I enjoyed reading your review. It seemed fresh, with nice details.
And a strong bottom line section.
Current reviews can earn zero, one or two points.
But I would give your review 3 points.
It impresses me.
|
02-03-17 04:40am
|
Reply
162
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(skippy's Reply)
I think I joined Passion HD and was then offered a network upgrade for a fair price (for an annual membership) so I jumped at it. If they had (or I had seen) the lifetime membership I'd have probably opted for that since this is an amazing network. I was maybe a month or so into the membership when they added Holed, which I had previously joined as a stand-alone site. To say that I was pleased with that addition would be a wee bit of an understatement. Holed was my favourite new site of 2016 and remains in my list of top few favourites. Lubed is another great site.
My annual membership runs for another six or seven months but I'm going to make a note to myself to look to see if the lifetime membership is still available. Thanks for the tip.
|
01-30-17 03:39pm
|
Reply
163
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(skippy's Reply)
skippy, thanks for the replies.
I did not base my comment on duplicated material at X-Art and Colette on what I saw at those sites.
I was repeating what I read at Indexxx.com.
The comments were regarding X-Art and Colette.
Not MetArtX or any of the other sites in the MetArt network.
Also, TMW is primarily Russian/Eastern European models, not US models.
The URL for the X-Art/Colette comments is:
https://www.indexxx.com/websites/293/x-art/
The 2 comments from Indexxx.com are copied below
omg ? - 2017-01-15 + 0 -
They are adding recycled material, video games scene was published on teenmegaworld long time ago. Even in the x-art info you can see that this model is already 28.
[Chile] pardiboy ? - 2016-12-19 + 0 -
Both x-art and colette sites suck! they posted another model called Tini, showing her old material from wtfpass websites from a couple of years ago. They did the same with Angelica. Does anyone knows what happened to colette/x-art? Did they sell those websites? X-art was one of my favorites :(
|
01-30-17 01:27am
|
Reply
164
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from SelenaMetArt:
(skippy's Reply)
Absolutely was my pleasure!
|
01-23-17 05:24pm
|
Reply
165
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(skippy's Reply)
Yeah I'm speaking for me and other people that are not into tats but its the human form in its beauty with addons that I love, I don't need decoration, fake eyelashes, tonnes of makeup, ink, piercing, I'm a simple guy that just like a woman in her natural state.
Ears pierced I can take though lol, thats about it.
|
01-22-17 02:24am
|
Reply
166
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from SelenaMetArt:
Hi, I am sorry to hear that there was any confusion regarding your signup. ECHST.net is one of our billing platforms, and an email should have gone out with your signup information.
I've looked at the open tickets for our Customer Care team, and am not seeing any that seem to match your situation. Would you mind to drop me a line so that I can ensure that we resolve any concerns, including the unwanted duplicate MetArt membership?
You can reach me at selena@metart.com . I look forward to hearing from you.
|
01-21-17 11:38am
|
Reply
167
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
ECHST SEEMS TO GET MORE COMPLAINTS THAN CCBILL OR EPOCH.
IF YOU DON'T HEAR FROM METART SUPPORT IN A COUPLE OF DAYS, I SUGGEST SENDING ANOTHER EMAIL TO THEIR SUPPORT, AND TELLING THEM ABOUT THE OVER-CHARGE FOR METART MEMBERSHIP.
IF YOU READ SOME OF THE COMPLAINTS ABOUT ECHST, PEOPLE COMPLAIN ABOUT POOR/RUDE CUSTOMER SERVICE, AS WELL AS FRAUDULENT CHARGES TO THEIR CREDIT CARDS.
PLEASE LET US KNOW WHAT HAPPENS.
METART USED TO BE WONDERFUL WITH THEIR CUSTOMER SUPPORT. FAST AND RESPONSIVE AND CARING.
ECHST IS NOT A NEW BILLER COMPANY. BUT I'VE NEVER USED IT, EVEN THOUGH I'VE SIGNED UP WITH A LOT OF THE METART NETWORK SITES OVER THE YEARS.
|
01-21-17 01:51am
|
Reply
168
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
SEVERAL YEARS AGO THEY USED TO OFFER $10/MONTH MEMBERSHIPS TO ANYONE WHO BELONGED TO ONE OF THEIR SITES.
BUT THEY STOPPED THAT DISCOUNT YEARS AGO.
I THOUGHT IT WAS A NICE BONUS FEATURE FOR BELONGING TO ONE OF THEIR SITES.
ONCE IN A WHILE, THEY WILL OFFER A NICE DISCOUNT TO ONE OF THEIR SITES.
I FOUND AN OFFER TO JOIN EROTIC BEAUTY FOR $1/MONTH A FEW YEARS AGO, AND JOINED.
SO I'M STILL PAYING $1/MONTH FOR EROTIC BEAUTY.
BUT I'VE NEVER FOUND ANY OTHER OFFER THAT WAS THAT GREAT.
P.S.: I'M TYPING IN CAPITAL LETTER BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BEING RUDE. AS YOU GET OLDER, YOUR EYES DON'T SEE AS WELL.
BUT I STILL LIKE PRETTY PICTURES OF NAKED WOMEN. LOL.
|
01-18-17 09:58am
|
Reply
169
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment from skippy:
Hey, I was just reading this and wanted to mention that MPL Studios long ago resolved my issue and I am now a happy member there. I wrote a review of that site here on Porn Users.
|
01-18-17 07:41am
|
Reply
170
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from MargulisAZ:
(skippy's Reply)
yeah it's seriously sad man the top models do indeed have to do basically nothing to get paid a crap ton. Just tonight I was checking out the new models and a few of them are really cute, a couple trying hard and literally almost no one in the room.
|
12-21-16 09:41pm
|
Reply
171
|
Jerkoff Instructions
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from Colm4:
I joined this site a few weeks ago and disagree with some of your points.
First, you say the jerk-off hand gesture seems weird. I disagree. The site is called jerkoff instructions, as to instruct you. So I kind of expect them to 'help me'.
Second, not getting off with the sound off doesn't really apply to this genre. It's all about dirty talk and weird situations, like babysitters wanting a raise, the girlfriend of your son who likes older men or even (step)daughthers/sisters who get hot by seeing you jerk-off.
Totally unrealistic, sure, but I think it works.
And ofcourse with over 1500 scenes, you can't expect every scene to be perfect. Some scenes ARE bad and have no chemistry at all. Just skip to the next one, there's plenty.
And lastly, 30 seconds isn't correct. A typical scene is 8 minutes where about 30-40% is build up and the rest is about the 'instruction'.
I would also like the scenes to be a bit longer, but it's not that bad.
|
12-20-16 12:08pm
|
Reply
172
|
Met Art X
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from sonofzog:
I took them up on an email offer to join at $15/month and have been considering making the effort to write a review. They currently have 135 videos and 149 image sets. The photos are pretty lame but the videos are another thing. "Real orgasms"? Yeah, well, as real as they get in porn. Scenes are 11-12 minutes with a fair amount of teasing/stripping. Don't look for screaming and thrashing about; the masturbation is genteel and fairly quiet with few props that I've seen. Video quality is exceptional and the women mostly stunning. I got my money's worth in two videos of Mila Azul.
|
12-09-16 12:20pm
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(skippy's Reply)
skippy expressed my thoughts exactly. If a scene is much longer than 10 minutes and is just the same action I get bored.
|
12-01-16 11:22am
|
Reply
174
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from MargulisAZ:
I've been a cam site guy for 5 years or more now and MFC is just a different animal than some other sites. It's tailored a lot more for the model to interact with the room and they make a lot of money with the games and so forth. You can still find models to do privates with but the big name girls often won't do it because they make more money just hanging out in the public room playing games and not having to do the real sex work. If you want a site that's 100% just about let's get to dirty business now go to streammate. Chaturbate is a bit more like mfc also. Those are the big 3 sites.
|
10-19-16 08:09pm
|
Reply
175
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(skippy's Reply)
Although in your case there is always the possibility that some of your favorite magazines were digitized and exist somewhere on the net.
VHS porn movies didn't necessarily get the same chance and sadly those that did simply don't look all that clean and crisp now.
|
10-08-16 07:04pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
