| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Denner:
I absolutely agree with asmith about the Beware-warning.
By all means it's certainly NOT only this site but a beware for ALMOST every site.
So it's a question of taking a thorough look at every join-page, because most sites now got this PRE-Checked trials - AND as another warning: If you do not take care you risk a sudden full month member-charge after those 2-3 days....
|
09-30-08 10:45am
|
Reply
127
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Nick C:
Asmith, yes we do have a pre-checked for another site, but its WELL above the JOIN button and its CLEARLY stated, not HIDDEN.
Just want to make that clear!
|
09-30-08 09:43am
|
Reply
128
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from exotics4me:
Hey asmith12,
I also had a problem with the "moods" of the models on Met Art, I think I referred to as, "What is that on that far away mountain away from the cameraman?" They look like they are trying to pose naturally, like they are distant and caught in a moment of thought. My attempt to show that the pictures are too dramatic for their own good isn't working ha ha.
I do like the models, but one thing that really hurts is that a lot of the models have been seen on other sites, in much more playful, fun sets where they give off a whole other vibe. That's it! The models look too serious on Met-Art. On the basis of the site's quality though, there is very little, if anything to ever complain about as you pointed out. It just feels like the personality from the models is lacking. Great review.
|
09-29-08 11:39am
|
Reply
129
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Monahan:
Great review, asmith12. I couldn't nail my problem with Met Art until I read your comments. Then it hit me. There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics. Gorgeous babes shot beautifully, but something is missing.
And that explains why I found the videos to be unsatisfying; most of them are simply someone videotaping a photo shoot with all the emotion of an ice cube melting.
Private once had a series of videos of their hardcore shoots and it bombed out. Who wants to see a guy about to get a BJ being told to move over a little bit for a better angle, or a full vaginal insertion being delayed as the lighting is reset?
Porn is about fantasy and emotion. Met Art misses that element, IMO.
|
09-29-08 08:37am
|
Reply
130
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(asmith12's Reply)
Great, thanks for the reply. Put it on my list of things to check out. Seems like a unique thing, something I feel I need lately!
|
09-26-08 04:52pm
|
Reply
131
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from TheRizzo:
To you which do you prefer the buying the girl you want or the $15 option?
|
09-26-08 09:25am
|
Reply
132
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(asmith12's Reply)
Haha. Dont worry, I am sure they will get it fixed for you. I am not a perfectionist, shown very easily by more porn collection organization. I have stuff scattered everywhere, although it is betting a little better. I guess I am usually more worried about getting my stuff to work right and when I see something little at a free site I do not put much worry on it. Of course if I had all my stuff in order I might be more willing to give others a hard time! :)
|
09-25-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
133
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from badandy400:
(asmith12's Reply)
I do not usually look to much at the scores. I feel that at times they are weighed one way or another too much by people who are biased either direction.
Hopefully he sees his name and says "hey thats me!" I guess it really is not a big deal though, I did not even know the feedback history page was there until you mentioned it.
Anyway, glad I could make it make sense for you.
|
09-25-08 02:33pm
|
Reply
134
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(asmith12's Reply)
As mentioned, there are several factors that go into the score. I have asked the tech guy to look at it as to why the score isn't the same on both pages. My guess is, one page is using the new system and one is still using the old weighting of scores. But that's a guess. He'll be able to tell if it's a glitch and fix whatever is needed.
Thx for the heads up.
|
09-25-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
135
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(asmith12's Reply)
This is something that perhaps you should talk to Khan about. The one review was a year old and thus does not count as much toward the final score. You are correct though, the feedback history page is not showing everything.
Here it is:
The old review is a year old, thus it counts as 25%
The newer review counts as 100% still
Newer review score times 4 plus the older review score and divide all by 5 since there is five parts to the score. Much like calculating a students GPA
95*4+90=470
470/5=94 ---the displayed score
I hope this helps a bit. They do need a line on the feedback page to count the number of older reviews.
|
09-25-08 10:37am
|
Reply
136
|
Digamour
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from roseman:
Good review, thanks for the info.
|
09-25-08 12:46am
|
Reply
137
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from badandy400:
A few weeks ago PU staff sent use a newsletter. The newsletter explained that as a review gets older it becomes less of an impact on the scoring of a site. So if a review was a year old it would not be weighted the same as a review that was three days old.
The point is that an old review may still hold some merit, but the newer review would be much more trustworthy (assuming all else equal) than the older one simply because the older one can not account for any changes over the last year or whatever.
This change was made at the same time as they began to allow us to update reviews. Which is nice because many of us like to revisit sites every six months or whatever. Now we can keep everything a little more up to date.
It was a good catch, so this proves that you are at least half paying attention. You can read about these changes on the bottom of the homepage in the news section. I believe it is the most current newsletter.
|
09-24-08 06:17pm
|
Reply
138
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from elonlybuster:
It's most likely from the users who just do the rating without posting a comment or review.
|
09-24-08 05:54pm
|
Reply
139
|
3D Stripper
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(asmith12's Reply)
Sure, I'll get back after joining.
And I'm still looking for more 3D-sites, but "the picking are slim"".
The japaneese Aime-thing is not it, and some - also - japaneese regular 3D-sites has censored scenes - quite weird...
|
09-23-08 07:10am
|
Reply
140
|
3D Stripper
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Denner:
Thanks for a thorough review, asmith...
Has had a thing about this 3D for some time - it's different, too - for sure. Fantasy-like...
But only ONE girl - that's a downer.
Wish there were more sites like this - but with several types of girls - guess there is a lot of work (and expences) in creating stuff like that.
Still, I'll go for it...
|
09-23-08 06:15am
|
Reply
141
|
Alexis Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Worshipper:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yes I did contact them both times about the issue: they simply reply that they have no control on the content of the website and that they notified the malfunctioning to the technical group or the website itself. I doubt it has any effect, since it keeps not working at all.
|
09-19-08 10:59am
|
Reply
142
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
If you go to the site and click on "pictures", you'll see what I mean. I have been in 88, but not being a member here, I don't know if they share content.
|
09-18-08 08:11pm
|
Reply
143
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Cybertoad:
(asmith12's Reply)
LOL but why non lol
Of course I undestand its subjective, but didnt say I wasnt joining ( wink) said I wasnt at the moment you may see a review from me in the future :-)
|
09-17-08 08:33am
|
Reply
144
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Cybertoad:
Im gonna pass for now.
Read more reviews
Its a tad high for the trouble MO.
Thanks.
|
09-16-08 11:01pm
|
Reply
145
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from jd1961:
I see that this is affiliated with 88square
|
09-16-08 09:31pm
|
Reply
146
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(asmith12's Reply)
It really did sound like something I would love to see. I am just worried about the downloading frustrations that might come with it.
I was the same way with ALS Scans. I really liked the content, I just could not stand the site. It was so hard to get around and downloading was terrible.
|
09-16-08 12:40pm
|
Reply
147
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from badandy400:
6 minute clips! Grrr...the site had my attention for a minute there. I really do not feel like needing to merge the videos together. A lot of simes site will have 3 or 4 splits and I can live with that, but 20 or so would be very annoying and need to be merged.
Sounds like a downloader's nightmare!
|
09-16-08 12:34pm
|
Reply
148
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Gray:
I actually desperately want to cancel my subsription to incredible pass .com but i cant see how to do it plzzz any help to do this would be of great appreciation
|
08-13-08 05:51pm
|
Reply
149
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Khan:
(asmith12's Reply)
errrrr ... actually, that was a past poll question.
See " What web browser do you use? "
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1604
|
07-29-08 06:27pm
|
Reply
150
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Drooler:
(asmith12's Reply)
Thanks. I went over your message and the Wikipedia article, too.
I guess in sum it amounts to interlacing just being a bad idea for computer-based consumption of video these days. It saves bandwidth (aha! my "compression" guess was in the ballpark), but too much to the detriment of visual satisfaction.
It reminds me of photos at Twistys, analogously anyway, which are stripped of too much data (overly compressed jpegs, which are lossy by nature anyway).
|
07-18-08 12:16pm
|
