| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Marcus:
(Monahan's Reply)
Oh I definitely agree with that, I would class that as being in a similar vein to pop ups and pop overs/unders in that it does interfere with your enjoyment of the website.
|
05-11-12 11:06am
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Beyond Bambi:
(Monahan's Reply)
I totally agree.
|
04-18-12 04:47am
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Capn:
(Monahan's Reply)
I think there is significantly less choice at the top end of the softcore niche.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Wait till you are 75, Monahan. then over fifty will look pretty darn good to you! So start saving them now for your old age! :-)
|
01-30-12 10:23am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
You caught on much faster than I did. Congratulations.
It took me too long and I threw away lots of money and time chasing women before I learned the formula. I'd like to have just a fraction of the money back that I threw away chasing so many women back in the day (it included two divorces and lots of heartache). You're much smarter than I am. I'm very happy now, but it took too long to get here.
|
01-26-12 07:50am
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(Monahan's Reply)
I've visited Solvang in California - and fled. When out of home, that was too much...Danish, ho,ho..
And about the other items: never meant it to be too general....
But bottom line, great input and take care, Monahan.
|
01-19-12 08:25am
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from elephant:
(Monahan's Reply)
Ditto that, its one huge task though so finding it hard to be bothered, gonna take days.
|
01-02-12 01:54am
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Capn:
(Monahan's Reply)
Well, I was asking about a 'favourite' site.
Based on your reply, perhaps go for the 3-6 month option?
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 09:54am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Cybertoad:
(Monahan's Reply)
Well since Uncle Sam is screwing you no doubt, nice
to see a few screws before you get screwed.
that was a screwy response. LOL
|
10-17-11 09:32am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from turboshaft:
(Monahan's Reply)
Can you blame her? It gets hot there, or maybe those were her work clothes.
I guess the tax rates are a sort of in-the-vicinity-of-porn add-on for living in CA. Nothing in life is free--not even spotting porn stars at your local supermarket (though it probably makes shopping a lot of fun). :-(
|
08-18-11 09:35pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from turboshaft:
(Monahan's Reply)
But what about the social conservatives you don't know? Didn't Bush II go a lot further than just trying to stop child porn with his Obscenity Prosecution Task Force?
I'd like to think that most anti-porn efforts are superficial--just window dressing to win over self-proclaimed moralist voters--but when they are actually dragging porn producers into court I think there's a problem. I find it ironic that the U.S., with arguably the most legally protected freedoms in the industrialized world, still seems to have a lot of problems with making hardcore porn.
And in terms of the web, since the president supposedly has a "kill switch" to it, will there be limits and laws on who can use what kind of domains? ".mil" and ".gov" are already restricted (though for pretty obvious reasons), would this be extended to our particular pursuit of happiness as well?
|
08-15-11 02:21pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from otoh:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yep, it seems to work - although because I'm at the desk more often than not, with the 22" screen, I opted for a 13" - I find 17" very unwieldy! (Insert random penis size gag here...)
Oh, and re Cap'n's comment about desktops being more powerful... true, but gladly nowadays, for most folk (serious gamers and the like aside) pretty much any computer you buy is easily enough for whatever you want to do with it.
|
07-25-11 12:28am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
A huge part of the problem I have with anime, at least in regards to Hentai, is the way they draw their female characters. There must be something about the Japanese psyche that makes them want to draw most of their female characters as very young looking with baby doll faces and inhumaly large eyes who often sport either huge breast or child like breast. I'm tempted tp call it pedophilic in nature but that might be too harsh. of course there are those dowmn tentacles.
What's that about?
|
07-19-11 08:47am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jberryl69:
(Monahan's Reply)
lol - well I've heard guys talking from behind the glory hole wall - lol and the wall moves like it's cardboard or thin ply-board.
Oh, but I love bj's in my porn - in fact it's all I love about porn pretty much - especially deepthroating. So it's not the bj but the glory hole that gives me the creeps.
|
02-10-11 09:55am
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from williamj:
(Monahan's Reply)
I saw Cat dance nude once been a huge fan
|
01-21-11 04:46am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from yote78:
(Monahan's Reply)
In response to Monahan, et. al., regarding the appeal of what seems generally to be held as a very disgusting practice, I would say the appeal is not touch or smell/taste (Jeezus, god help you if that's why you do it!), but more an element of sheer "kinkiness." That is, the idea of doing something at least a little off the charts of what most people would call normal. Remember that at one time oral sex of any kind was considered depraved, if not illegal.
Again, as I said in my original post, I'm not recommending or condemning it. But, as the old adage goes, "If two consenting adults want to try it..."
|
01-16-11 11:25am
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from tangub:
(Monahan's Reply)
I was struggling to remember but your reply jogged my memory that my first experience of porn could well have been the Russ Meyer film Beneath the Valley of the Ultra Vixens in the local cinema around 1980, if it wasn't that then its likely to have been one of the Emmanuelle films
|
11-07-10 03:34pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I actually saw "I, a Woman" back around 1966, which was considered an extremely erotic movie. The Mr. Teas series was erotic comedy, I think, but I'm not an expert on these classificatons. Depends on your definition, I guess, because the novel "Ulysses" by James Joyce was banned as porn for many years after it was written, but I studied that novel in college in the 1960s because it was then considered a classic. But in the 1960s movies (unless they were real porn) did not show actual penetration or pussy shots. But just watching a guy stick his hand under a woman's skirt and feel her crotch (without actually seeing the hand or the crotch) was considered massively erotic. That's about all I remember (or think I remember) from "I, a Woman". There was also the idea that an unmarried woman was having sex, and with more than one man!
This was before VHS tapes (and DVDs), so I saw it in a theater, but I don't remember if it was a mainstream theater or what.
Even then, I did not consider "I, a Woman" as porn, but as an extremely erotic movie. Today's audience, especially the PU members, would not consider it porn. Today's younger PU audience would laugh at the idea that "Ulysses" was considered porn.
|
11-07-10 11:08am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(Monahan's Reply)
It might have saved the girl's life that you didn't associate her nudity with sex. Fortunately you chose reality over fantasy (whether good or bad fantasy).
|
09-26-10 01:07pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
My life experiences agree with you completely, and the "bumpkin" response is the only way to survive. You are so smart. I had to get burned a few times before I caught on to the "bumpkin" reply.
The only thing worse than a neighbor and mayor being pissed at you is a woman next door feeling "scorned"..."Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."
|
09-06-10 05:41am
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan, you were born around 1952. So you were around 10 years old in the early 1960s. So what happened: instead of hiring a baby sitter, your parents dropped you off at a burlesque theater with strippers? No wonder you grew up addicted to porn? Lol.
|
08-28-10 05:32pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from turboshaft:
(Monahan's Reply)
That's a great interpretation of the law--I'm sure many lawyers would be proud! : - )
|
08-28-10 11:42am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from RagingBuddhist:
(Monahan's Reply)
I don't know of any video editting/file trimming programs that don't re-encode the original file. Re-encoding instantly means at least *some* degradation of quality in the final product. But, as always, I'm a big fan of Tmpgenc Xpress 4.0. It has a simple slider/timeline to set your start and stop points. It also allows you to specify what bitrate you want to output to. If you choose something equal to or better than the original, it seems to minimize the quality loss. Not cheap software - $99.95USD, but I love it!
|
07-11-10 02:23pm
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from RagingBuddhist:
(Monahan's Reply)
I wasn't referring to Young Busty.
|
06-14-10 12:19am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Denner:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan - I think that 'interesting method' is mildly/freindly put.
Was at the site little over half a year ago. Ok, things could have happened since then. But it was not even worth a review - then - and according to the latest preview not much is speaking for the site, so...
But you're at it now, so look forward to a review - if you think it'll be worth it....
Cheers!
|
06-13-10 11:38am
|
