Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.

Visit Site Woodman Casting X Type: Pay Site NICHES COMPANY COST 1. Reality Porn 2. Hardcore Sex 3. Amateur Girls Karak LTD 2 Sites Listed Partner: Woodman Casting X Partners Monthly: €29.90 / $31.58 (recurring - no pics) Monthly: €34.90 / $36.86 (recurring - vids + pics) Monthly: €44.90 / $47.43 (recurring - vids + pics + bonus site) Multi-Mo: €149.90 / $158.34 (6 months, recurring) Multi-Mo: €214.90 / $226.99 (6 months, recurring - vids + pics + bonus site) View all Woodman Casting X Site Facts at TBP.

N/A Feedback History  (28) Active Reviews 0 Newbie Reviews 12 Active Ratings 0 Newbie Ratings 0 Comments 16 Review by TheBestPorn: 85.0 TBP Review Date: 04-12-22 Type: 2.0 Will +  Access 30 Years of Authentic Porn Auditions +  Watch 100s of Ultra HD Casting Sessions -  Use of VPNs is Prohibited User Reviews (9)  User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts. Expired 88* HairyPotter (0) 11-07-22  05:33pm No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply) Expired 87* elephant (0) 07-11-17  03:30am                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies) Expired 92* pat362 (0) 03-06-17  06:44pm              TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies) Expired 77* bibo (Suspended) 02-13-17  10:02am        TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies) Expired 80* rearadmiral (0) 02-22-16  04:01pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (5 Replies) Expired 90* texasporn1 (0) 03-25-13  03:12pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies) Expired 79* dracken (0) 07-08-12  05:47pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (6 Replies) Expired 82* slutty (0) 10-07-10  09:03pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies) Expired 78* mrpss (0) 07-27-09  07:53pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies) *Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews. User Comments (16)  Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc. Shown : 1-10 of 16 Next Page > Patrik4 (0) 12-17-19  01:35pm No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) woodmancastingx uses condoms On Woodmancastingx with the model AngelRush with the video published on 2017-01-18 around 1:21:31 in the video the upper part of the skin is shiny, and the lower part of the skin is matt. My conclusion is that condoms are being used. (content made September 2016) With the model OrnellaCyan looking at the video published 20171204 at 49:37 the skin is too shiny, and I think condoms are used. (content made March 2017) With the model JennyGlam on the video published 2014-08-31 at 36:13 you have a visible condom (not hidden with computer software), and in the same video at 51:02 you have a small horizontal lighter part (maybe a condom masked with computer software) that indicates a condom is being used. (content made April 2014) With model JennyGlam in the video published 2015-03-08 at 16:30 and also at 17:22, the upper part is shiny and the lower part is matt, this suggests that condoms are used (possibly making it less visible with computer software). With model ViolaBailey in the video published 2017-01-10 at 1:07:29 condoms are used. (content made March 2014) With model EmilyCutie in the video published 2019-05-14 at 46:38 condoms are used and at 51:48 the upper part is shiny, and the lower part is matt. Condoms are used. If you look at 1:01:29, then the range of colours suggests that condoms are used, and masked by using computer software. At 1:01:38 you see the shiny aspect of the condoms again. (content made May 2019) With model Ivana Wilde in the video published 2019-04-10 at 35:14 the top part is shiny, and the colours are different between the upper part of the balls and the part above that. Condoms are used and being masked with computer software. (content from April 2019) Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply YoMamma (0) 08-13-18  12:19am No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Credit Card Declined Tried both my credit cards at woodmanfilms.com -- both were declined. They work everywhere else, including other porn sites. Wanted to contact customer suupport -- and the site wouldn't even load. Too bad. Woodman has some of the best vintage films around. Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply Harland (0) 02-05-17  06:00am No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Video Angles Of all the pornsites, I have found Woodman Castings to be the best site. The content and videos are unique and different to other sites. The only minor thing I find with the videos is the angles are limited and the videos especially on the site ''WAKEUP N F**K'' are zoomed in too much. I find this especially when the girls are doing doggy style, the video is zoomed in too much and you cannot see the whole video or the girl. The doggy style scenes are too short along with the zoomed in angle of the video. The scenes with doggy style need to be longer and with more angles than just a zoomed in angle. Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply Jay G (Disabled) 03-05-15  11:45pm              TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Bate & Switch Going to the homepage of this site one sees many great items, but when one goes to join he finds out that access to all of the items on the homepage really costs 49.90 Euros, not 29.90. For 29.90 a user gets access to only a fraction of the items found on the homepage. In my circle that's called bate & switch. Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! poi2005 (0) 05-21-14  11:20pm No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) No access after unsubscribed before expiry date. My subscription was supposed to end at 23/05/2014 according to "My Account" status. It even stated if I am unsubscribe before 23/05/2014, I will still have access until 23/05/2014. Therefore I proceed to unsubscribe on 21/05/2014, but then on 22/05/2014, I have no longer access to the member areas. This is basically giving false information to me. To be honest, quite disappointed with such thing. Paid for a full month access but not even able to use it until the expiry date if unsubscribe before the next charging date. Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! bibo (Suspended) 01-03-13  08:41am        TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Pricing and unable to subscribe First off, the stated prices are not correct. The price for a 1 month subscription is €34,90. I tried to reactivate my old account today and got stuck in the subscription process, while the CC processor was trying to query my bank. It's *very* annoying to see a processor (aloopass in that case) being unable to conenct to anything! Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply interdiver (Suspended) 08-22-12  11:48am No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Beware of this site! The website does not grant you access. The ticket merchant, GTBill is happy to take payment but then no access is given. No emails to support are answered, (either by the webmaster for the site, or the ticket merchant) The password reset function on the site does not work. A real shame as a previous subscriber to the site, the content is top notch, but now it just appears to be a con. Beware. :( Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! PornoMickey (0) 07-31-12  03:07am No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) The original I love Pierre's content, and also the fact that every girl gets nailed very hard in the ass! (how does that happen though that EVERY girl does anal?) It just feels as if there is too much recycling of content though. Maybe it's just me. Also, the site is extremely slow for me too! Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply dracken (0) 10-23-11  06:04pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) 1 year Update on my review I joined the site again after quite a long absence and while I don't feel that a new review is necessary there are some things that haven't improved with the site (and a few that have) and I figure I might as well share my experience. There are now close to 1500 casting scenes and only around 500 hardcore scenes. This is really disappointing, especially considering a lot of the content is old or can be found on other places (Videobox for one or pornstarnetwork) There are some great new scenes that have been added (Aspen's casting is great) but overall I am not sure that this network is worth the very high price, especially since Wakeupnfuck is not included. Nonetheless, the most disturbing thing for me was a change in Pierre's attitude. He seems really, really concerned about piracy, to the point where he is making it harder to download videos in his member area. I used to be able to download a bunch of stuff overnight, but now the site logs you out after a while. When I mentioned this on the forum Pierre said that he wanted to make it harder for pirates to download his stuff... while I understand his concern, I was a paying member who never stole his stuff and he was making it harder for me to download the scenes I wanted. Not sure if anyone else had similar log-out issues, but it kinda left me disappointed. Other than this new log-out the site is pretty much unchanged from last year and everything I said before applies... without the optimistic tone that I had in my previous bottom line, I doubt anything will change for the better here. Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply lk2fireone (0) 09-30-11  10:03pm                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) The Woodman watermark is way too large. The logo "Woodman Casting X dot com" is very large and annoying, placed at the bottom of the video screen. I'm surprised more people don't complain about it. You don't need a very large watermark on the videos (or photos) to identify your company. A smaller, discrete logo will do just fine, or no logo at all. Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply Shown : 1-10 of 16 Next Page > Visit Woodman Casting X Company Sites Top sites from this company.       Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP 1. Woodman Casting X (0) N/A 85.0 2. Wake Up N Fuck (0) N/A N/A View All: Company Sites (2) Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.08 seconds.