Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ The sister site of the almost as impressive Slave Mouth.
+ As good of unscripted porn as I have seen.
+ Leans heavily on dom/sub scenes.
+ One of the few sites I download each video from.
+ Scenes are filmed outdoors.
+ Attractive subs and believable.
Cons:
- I could see a site like this being grouped with every other BDSM site, but definitely should not be.
- It is a small site in quantity but the quality makes up for me.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed Slave Mouth several months ago and was blown-away by the authenticity and realness of the content. I decided to try Dom The Nation and I am happy to say, I like it even better. The obvious reason is I like the less focus on oral.
Dom the Nation looks like a tour of debauchery. I did not list it in cons because I think people know what they are getting into with a site like this one. Some of the scenes and actions might be seen as lewd and that's okay, none of the actresses seem to mind. It is one of the strongest pros of the site. The females appear as legitimate submissives looking for their dominant male. It adds an authenticity most BDSM sites lack. There is never the feeling of these women are doing these actions just for a paycheck. It feels natural and though rough and maybe lewd and rude, if it's what the woman likes and desires, I have no problem with it and even believe in celebrating it.
While BDSM and bondage content is often viewed as restraining, it's anything but to a submissive who finally finds the dom she can trust and give herself to.
The size of the site will be a downside to those used to mega networks with heavily scripted and nearly all scenes seeming identical. Slave the Nation only has 60 videos right now, but all 60 are an adventure and vert different from each other.
Every video is worth downloading or watching just to see what is going to happen. There is a freedom the subs experience that can be felt and even shared with by the viewer.
The scenes are all filmed outside. I do believe that's a bonus for the subs and incites their exhibitionist side. The video quality is excellent especially considering the outside scenery, natural light changing and even sounds.
The subs range from cute to pretty. I am not familiar with any of them from other porn sites and assume they are all amateurs. The content also delivers that feeling. These are subs finally experiencing what they have always wanted and maybe even needed. I do not know if everyone who views these scenes will have as strong of a positive feeling as I have, but I do know I feel more watching these scenes than I do watching hundreds of everyday porn. I do like Dom the Nation a little more than Slave Mouth, but give both my highest recommendation.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Creative, innovative site
- Beautiful models
- Extreme BDSM
- Outdoor settings
- 25 scenes and growing
- Updates with at least one scene per month
- ‘Clips’ and photos too
- Downloads and streaming
- Multiple resolutions for downloads
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Slower than average download speeds
- 4K files cost extra
Bottom Line:
Dom the Nation (DtN) is a relatively new site by the creative minds behind Assylum and Slave Mouth. If you aren’t familiar with either of those older sites, I recommend checking them out and reading the reviews. Those sites are two of the most unique and creative BDSM sites I’ve ever seen. In terms of creativity, I’ve not seen anyone else come close. DtN is every bit as good as it’s sister sites but adds creativity.
What differentiates DtN is the setting for the scenes. Where both Assylum and Slave Mouth are shot indoors, DtN scenes are shot outdoors. Some of the elements that the two original sites are known for, namely bondage, extreme S&M, rough anal sex (there is no vaginal penetration here at all), face-fucking, watersports, degradation, humiliation and general depravity are all present here, but in outdoor settings. For me, shooting scenes outdoors adds a whole new element to these already-unique scenes. It adds an element of risk that, for me, heightens the allure.
Instead of using creative devices to bind and restrain the models, in most instances they are bound on bare ground including dirt, gravel and even jagged rocks. Sometimes softer surfaces such as grass are used.
Most of the scenes have been shot in the US though the crew recently did go to Italy and some of the scenes shot there are now making their way onto the site. Unlike the sister site, there is no unifying premise here. Here, it simply bondage and sadism for the sake of that alone. The site labels itself as having BDSM “documentaries” and that is an apt description.
This site began in earnest in early 2020, just before the pandemic hit. Lockdowns hindered site growth but they are back to shooting and uploading. There are currently 25 scenes uploaded. Here, a scene is called a movie and tends to be 40 minutes on average. There are also currently eight “clips.” These are shorter, more focused videos where there may just be oral sex or some specific act or bondage. Blended in among all of these are seven photo sets.
The site has made the unusual decision to not have any means to separate the videos, clips or photos. There are simply six thumbnails per screen and a description below that outlines what the file is. I suspect that not being able to filter for just videos, for example, is a creative choice because it is obvious that the site is trying to create a flow. While there isn’t necessarily a story behind these videos and clips, they do tend to flow together. And, even if you don’t want to view the photos, they are very easily skipped over.
The models who appear on the site are generally mainstream, though models who also are known for some extreme acts. Models such as Charlotte Sartre, Lydia Black and Rebel Rhyder all have scenes here. But there are also models that I don’t normally associate with BDSM who have scenes here. Those would include Rory Knox, Brooke Johnson and Claire Roos. Regardless of the model, they all give over-the-top BDSM performances. Many of the scenes feature multiple models in the same shoot. In some cases, all of the models are being subjected to BDSM and in other cases one of the subs is assisting the Dom.
For the basic subscription price you get access to stream or download files at 480p, 720p, and 1080p. 4K videos are available but require a premium membership. A note if you are streaming: the scenes default to the trailer so make sure to select the full scene.
An ongoing minor complaint that I have had with the two older sister-sites is that download speeds are much slower than I’m used to seeing on other sites. Unfortunately, that continues here. I suspect that since all these sites are related that they are all run off the same servers. This is simply a minor concern, however, because while the speeds are slower, I’ve never had a problem with the downloads timing out or crashing.
One other minor negative for me, though it may not be an issue for everyone, is that many of the scenes are shot over several hours and some extend into the night. While the lighting can make up for some of that, my preference would be for scenes shot entirely in the daylight.
DtN is certainly not a site for the faint of heart. Make no mistake, this is not a playful, vanilla BDSM site. This is a site where the BDSM is degrading and, in many cases, likely quite painful. If, however, you like what Assylum or Slave Mouth offers, then I strongly encourage you to look at DtN. Moving the scenes into a less controlled outdoor environment really adds an illicit element to them. If you do like extreme BDSM, you owe it to yourself to take a look at the trailers here. But, as with my conclusions regarding the sister-sites, DtN is class-leading but most definitely not mainstream porn.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
I just saw where this is a new listing from Adult Prime and thought I would try it since I like BDSM.
There are 116 scenes, but it doesn’t look like it’s updating. The last update was in October 2021, and they were updating weekly up until then.
This is likely true BDSM/bondage.
The videos can be downloaded in HD, no 4K.
One of the dom women is really pretty and sexy.
Cons:
This is not my first time reviewing a BDSM site from this network and I have the same feeling with this one. It’s not for everyone. It’s only for people that truly are into real BDSM/Bondage.
A con I don’t like posting, most of the women are average at best in looks and some are well-below average.
The dom male/rope master, whatever he is called, is also unattractive.
Cameras flashing throughout the scenes
Bottom Line:
This is near a “yikes” for me. I understand that BDSM is a real fetish and bondage is as well. I understand that there is a concept of power and control being explored in BDSM. I understand that many subs can get to or even achieve orgasm from being tied up. These scenes are elaborate with the contraptions. Women that look in the weight range of 150-175, suspending from the ceiling, spinning in the air, but this is one time I have to remind myself and the director, this is porn.
The closest I see to porn is the sub is naked. Most of these women are on the heavier side. Suspending them from the air is just asking gravity to work against their bodies. I am not making fun of them. I am, however, saying this is maybe sexually gratifying for the model or the dom, but it doesn’t give much visual stimulation to the viewer.
The part I noticed most is there is a tall, redheaded, dom female that – just being honest – is hotter than any of the models, but she keeps her clothes on. I know that I talked about this in my last review of one of this studios BDSM sites – there is no sex. None. The videos are 12-20 minutes of a dom tying a nude, chubby woman up, raising her on pulleys to swing from the ceiling, spinning her around, then the closest I have seen to sex it is flicking of the nipples.
That is a weakness of this genre. I believe when sites show the bondage, but it leads into sex, the traditionalists that are into the fetish are going to be disappointed about the fetish stopping for the sex. If you just stick to it like they are now, the people wanting sex are going to be disappointed. If the women were more attractive. You can almost always see their boobs. You can almost always see their butts. Their pubic hair. There is very little explicit.
When you post a review like this one, you except a bunch of fetishists to show up and be angry. This, to me, does not qualify as porn. I wanted to be as sure of what I was saying before saying it. Porn is defined as something made to create sexual excitement. My feeling when watching these scenes is I hope the woman doesn’t fall. I do not see sexual feelings coming from watching this. I am sure there are, no I’m not, I’m going to leave that to show I was trying to talk myself into someone will see this as sexual. I can’t. It looks more like demonstrations of how to create bondage and make it work with a naked woman as the test dummy. Nothing makes me want to touch myself. The dom, especially the male, he looks like he is studying the ropes. He doesn’t touch the women. You may a scene or two that does. I watched 12-13 and it was all I was wasting my time on. This just looks so obscure and very narrow-reaching niche type content that 1% of people will find sexual. Maybe that’s why the updates have stopped. I just happened to notice it was just listed on Porn Users and The Best Porn. It is not for me. I’m not going give it that low of a score because it comes with very good Adult Prime network. If you have a membership, take a look at this site and you’re welcome to tell me it’s very sexual to you. I would like to know that makes this sexual.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Updates every two weeks, excellent for a specialized niche site
Extremely high level of creativity
Has links with discounts for its sister BDSM sites, Assylum and Slavemouth
Not only a fetish site for BDSM, it works as an older/younger site and a rarity for porn, every scene is outdoors in a rural, natural setting
Uses tags like painal, whipping, and impact play.These are specific to BDSM scenes
Cons:
Less than 40 updates and six are only a few photos
The videos and photo sets are not separated
Bottom Line:
Some sites are easy to compare to their competitors as they have a lot in common. Very few sites can be truly called unique or original. But then again I occasionally run across the rare site that is so different that it can truly be called out of the norm, in a way that you can only hope that others will imitate. You may well ask, what is so different? Two people or more take off their clothes and do the deed, so how is this site worthy of singling out for praise?
Porn is about fantasy and many times the porn you see is not truly how it is done offscreen by regular people like you and me. A great example is that most lesbian porn is a fantasy for men and real lesbians have told me that they don’t like a lot of it. This site is a work of love by real life Dom Neil, who found much of the BDSM porn made today does not appeal to him.
He is also quite a camera artist and loves the freedom and beauty of nature. If the idea of seeing scenes shot outdoors day and night, with all levels of lighting appeals to you, this is your site. If you love seeing rented farmland, or mountains, streams and models having fun appeals to you, this just may be your site. The same is true for camerawork that should be studied and imitated on how to get the essence of the model’s personality. Or maybe you just like unrehearsed, never overplanned and never boring BDSM with great models who enjoy their work.
In some of the first few updates, you get journal entries and playful scenes more than the sex scenes. The site started off a bit slowly as they started filming in 2019, but delayed the launch until February of 2021. As a result the site does not have a ton of content. The planning that went into filming the site gives it a lot of potential moving forward. The models wear custom made audio collars that work well in order to pick up sounds outdoors. Every scene is shot with the panorama of nature a second focus to the models and the action.
The video specs can be confusing. The main thing to note is the films are presented in 2.39:1 (very widescreen) cinema format, using film with some anamorphic lenses, and when you desqueeze the image from the lenses, this is the size you get. It's great for capturing the beauty and presence of the landscapes. The movies on the site are filmed in cinemascope and the actual videos specs are a bit different from regular 16:9 video specs due to the cinemascope format.
All of the sexual content revolves around very hard BDSM. If you find a site like this to be appealing, you will find a lot to like such as difficult positions, bondage, anal, rimming, forceful oral and peeing. In every case, he makes sure the models act out fantasies they have and gets the maximum pleasure from them captured on film. There is also playful content that helps you see a real, very accessible side to the models too. An example of one of the playful scenes has Rory Knox using a blow dryer on the Dom’s underwear as an example of another kind of blowjob. Another scene that I enjoyed was the same Rory Knox giving Dom Neil a foot job. She licked every toe and took his foot into her mouth as acts of worship like I have never seen before.
In another with a high level of male fantasy, Audrey Holliday who was beaten and anally abused while, hold on, playing football. I can imagine a guy grabbing a beer and watching this scene in a loop during halftime. My absolute favorite scene was any of the three that Rebel Rhyder was in. The one where she was cosub with Brooke Johnson was amazing as they both obeyed Dom Neil in a scene worthy of an award. The interactions between them, as well as with Dom Neil, were enough to make me love the site.
The site was easy to use, except for the fact that the videos and the photo sets were mixed together. The site lists updates in chronological order, not by type. Additions currently are every two weeks, but the archive is still small with less than 40 and that includes photo updates. I liked the site and can confidently predict a great future for it as it has a great concept and does what it does very well.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- email alerts for when your favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to over 34 sites each with its own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites' content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Over 500 videos each video about an hour long.
- Videos 1280X720 approx 5 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour
- great production value. As part of the kink.com family, there's never a time when you don't see good action. Camera work and direction are tip-top
- Allows download managers
- Casting seems to be top line professional. But if you look in the background (and sometime in the main shoot) there are what I assume to be local members of the kink community. I find that very hot
- Billing by rocketpay
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like
Cons:
- pix available as .zip files
- Some of my favorites (and it was hard to pick) were:Lauren Philips (they say redheads can handle more pain - she seems to be an example!), Aidan Starr is one of the main doms and she is hot as hell, Dee Williams (I love the MILFs), Penny Pax (red head and MILF). In short the talent is always good and the scenes are always hot. It's unusual to find a bad shoot)
CONS:
- zips are available for pix but they are small sets. Typically less than 50
- download limit but it doesn't say what it is
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Expensive (but high quality)
- Occasionally I feel like the camera is panning too much - but I'm really being nit-picky here.
- Last update was June 2020 I'm willing to bet that's covid related. To pull a shoot like these off with Covid protocols must be a mess. I'm sure this site will be back in time
Bottom Line:
I love this site. Shooting gangbangs is really hard (well or so I imagine anyway). This site and the ameature CathyCreampie.com I think do it the best of anyone. I seldom feel like I'm missing out on good action when the camera moves on.
I don't think there's a better BDSM site than kink.com and I think the upper floor is one of the top 5 sites on the network.
Action centers on a sub or two need to be challenged and prove herself. It's always hot seeing the dynamic play out. There's normally side activities that can just have hot as the main attraction
I thought about throwing down a 100 because when it comes to gangbang BDSM I think no one does it better (even with the competition within the network I think this site does it best because they make it hot without making it over the line - for me - a very subjective call to be sure.)
In the end, I decided that the lack of new updates and the historic inconsistent updates kept them from a top score. But the whole kink team should be proud of this site. It is truly top-notch.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking. There's a good mix of partner action and multiple partners. Most scenes have a interesting set up everything from revenge to naughty maids.
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates once/week
- Close to 700 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. There's also more diversity of ethnicity/body type/pregnant etc. than any other network I can think of.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
Cons:
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10 minute post interview were the model explains the good time she had
Bottom Line:
***April 22, 2017***** After reviewing some wise comments from the community I decide to back away from the 100 point score I previously entered. I hate the notion that "you can't score a 100", but they are correct this is not the site to exemplify that notion. THANK YOU for taking the time to critique me.
I know some people will challenge my rating of 100. Please read this before killing me in the comments. I rate a site based on what it reports to be. And S & S does exactly what it says. They deliver hardcore kinky BDSM content with flawless production values. You can see and hear all the action. The camera doesn't jerk around wildly and there are interesting "plots". I could knock them down to a 98 or 99 because "no one is perfect" but to me it's not about an arbitrary measure of perfect; it's how close did you come to delivering what you promised. Sex and Submission hits the mark.
Kink is a huge player and I view Sex and Submission as their flag ship site. It is one of the more frequently updates; gets the bigger talent, and has the broadest appeal. That said: Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here.
Although it is pricy I think everyone should check out kink.com; and S&S in particular. They allow 5 previews a day and the previews give a good taste of what's inside. Along with Brazzers, Reality Kings,and Naughty AmericaI I view kink.com as something you owe it to yourself to at least get a months membership once.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I consider Sex and Submission to be the flagship site of the Kink Network. It's one of the more "accessible" sites to Kink first-time members and the amount of content is impressive.
- Lots of different BDSM action. There's bondage, there's clothespins, there's pinching tongue chains, gag balls, latex, dominating and sometimes, it's all in one scene.
- The average porn user will find more mainstream porn models on this Kink site than most of the other Kink sites, which often have a set, rotating cast of regulars.
- Comes with the entire Kink Network.
- Stays within the mainstream cast formula (b/g, b/g/g, nothing too extreme like on some of the other Kink sites).
- The quality is high. Videos are in 720p. The amount is hard to believe, nearly 650 videos, averaging 45-55 minutes each. Dating back to 2005.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- This is one of the Kink sites that doesn't have the pictures added back.
- It's repetitive. All porn of all genres becomes repetitive, but BDSM seems to become repetitive faster for me than any other genre.
- Despite it being one of the more accessible Kink sites, it still at times will be too rough for some viewers.
Bottom Line:
Sex and Submission has been around for 12+ years. The content is what you would expect. The actions are also fairly predictable. You'll see women having their nipples clamped, clothespins popped onto them, hair pulled, choked, suction pumps used on their clits during sex, arms tied behind their backs, over their heads and just all-around being dominated. You rarely will see a scene where the female dominates the man. You'll need to check out Kink's site Divine Bitches to see that.
I think if this site has lost any of its appeal its because the general mainstream porn video has become more rough and aggressive. This site started in a period when porn was mostly softer, scenes had themes, then this site came along and said "the theme is women being dominated" and it doesn't change from scene to scene. I am not a huge fan of women being dominated. And it's not because of politically correct reasons. I just have trouble triggering my fantasy brain by saying, "That big man is going to dominate that little woman". My realistic brain knows that wouldn't be a surprise or something worthy of a fantasy.
But ... if you're into females being dominated, you'll be hard-pressed to find a site that does it better than Sex and Submission. I think this site benefits more from Kink becoming a network than any of their other big sites. It seems once the BDSM becomes boring or repetitive, however you like to look at that situation, it stays boring and repetitive for awhile. I only joined Sex and Submission, twice by itself, before the Kink Network came along. Where as I joined multiple other Kink sites, 5 or more times each, before the Kink Network came along. Having the network allows you to move on past the repetitiveness of it to another genre/niche.
As with the other Kink sites, you're not going to get 1080p videos. The videos focus on story/theme and most scenes end up being upwards of an hour each. Anything bigger than 720p would cause the scenes to be in the 5-7 GB range. Their videos are very clear for 720p and look just as good as most 1080p videos.
Their oldest videos date back to 2005. With nearly 650 scenes and weekly updates, there's a lot to download or stream.
Another thing that could appeal to those who are new to Kink is the basic mainstream porn formula used on Sex and Submission. It's often just a male and female. You'll then see some male with 2 females scenes, but it won't go much further than that. Unlike other Kink scenes where there are sometimes multiple men with one woman. On the other hand, I do think, at least for me, the BDSM hurts some of the scenes. They'll have a really pretty model with big natural boobs then slap 10 clothespins on her nipples. That fantasy just isn't realistic for me.
Something I don't think is stressed enough with the Kink sites is the believable acting and enjoyment from the performers. I would still put this in the top 5 sites, on the Kink network, for first-time Kink members to check out. Along with Kink University, its content is just similar to what you're going to see in most porn these days. To make that simpler, there's not much here that's going to make you think, "That's disgusting" or "Why in the hell did they do that?"
Overall, by itself, it's a good site, but would be lucky to finish in my top 10 of Kink sites. I thought reviewing it would give newcomers an idea about the depth of this network. I have at least 9 sites on Kink that I prefer over this one and this one is still an 86. I would be more recommending of this site, by itself, to new Kink members than to former Kink members, but would recommend the site and network as a whole to anyone.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great orgy scenes. A lot of times I can't follow the action. Upper Floor doesn't jerk around like some other sites so you can see what's happening.
- About 550 scenes
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Lighting and sound are well done. I give them a lot of credit that especially hard when there's so much action going on.
- Lots of guy on girl and girl on girl action. Almost always multiple partners.
- zip downloads are back.
- more model diversity here than many other places. Mostly in ethnicity somewhat in body shape.
- Lots of big name talent. If you favorite porn star shoot fetish content she's probably worked for Kink - and UF in particular.
- Updates about 3 times per month
- scene length is usually over an hour I think one of the longest I saw was almost and hour and a half.
Cons:
- While I'm happy to see picture access is back. I'm still frustrated with the user interface. It is deviling to find more of what you're looking for. There are keywords available but they are both very broad and not ever shoot is tagged correctly.
- Cross sells inside the member side. It frustrating to see search results come up for another site offering for you to buy more- especially because Kink.com is not a cheap membership
- Expensive (but high quality)
- Occasionally I feel like the camera is panning too much - but I'm really being nit picky here.
Bottom Line:
The theme of most shoots a "slave" is proving herself to the community and finishing a final ordeal of submission/service. It is certainly hot. Many of my favorites were ones that deviated from this worn route.
Competition is often used - blow job, who can go without coming longer, that sort of thing. It made the site a lot more fun than it might otherwise be.
I give this site a solid buy. The action is hot. There's a lot of it. Updates keep coming. There's plenty of variety. I think kink should keep this site going.
While I have a couple of complaints they really are small. I'm unaware of any better orgy BDSM site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A somewhat hectic, completely perverse site that I've yet to figure out, which at least means it's unique.
- Update schedule is erratic, but they still have a fair amount of updates. So far in September there's only been two updates, in August there were 3 updates and July had 5, so there's no strict schedule, but there's still updates.
- Is part of the Kink Network and stands out for being not nearly as genre-specific as the other Kink sites.
- I would think this appeals to fans of BDSM, role-playing, bondage and voyeurism.
- Fast download speeds, around 90% of my max.
- More amateur interaction than any site I've seen. Will explain below.
- There's a story in most of the scenes and some of the models return to continue their previous stories. It's really not that great, but at least they're trying.
- Navigation is iffy, but once inside The Upper Floor site and away from the network, it's a lot easier to use.
Cons:
- I want to put this first because most of the TBP reviews list these sites, including this one, as having picture sets for downloads. There's no picture sets whatsoever. Not for browsing or downloading.
- These Kink sites are easy to nitpick since they usually are repetitive (by nature of staying true to their genre), but The Upper Floor is different. It's like a mixture of Sex and Submission with the live aspect they've used on several of their sites which includes a live audience, mixed with a renaissance fair that provides sexual stimulants to their guests. It's in the cons because I don't get it. Maybe it's just too far-reaching for me? It's not a big negative, but when you become used to things being perfectly clear then you get a site that you can't even figure out the basis for it becomes a con.
Bottom Line:
The Upper Floor is my least-liked site on the Kink network (boy/girl content).
One of its biggest strengths is most of the people in the scenes are in costumes or if you want to say, non-typical everyday clothes. It's a strength since I either can't tell the amateurs in the audience from the pros in the action. This creates the closest I've seen to a believable public orgy. I could see a bunch of hippies in San Francisco dressing up like miscast medieval characters, getting tipsy, then getting naked and having an orgy. There are believable crowd interactions in the scenes. Many of the women that end up touching a female model or even fingering the model look like regular, everyday receptionists. I'll continue to tap into my imagination and believe their boring daily lives are repressing them sexually. They go see one of these live sex shows on The Upper Floor and lose all their inhibitions.
That's also the problem with the site. I like structure, order and discipline. Hectic is a four-letter word to me. It's kind of like watching a television series by starting with season 4, episode 7 and trying to figure out why you're seeing what you're seeing. You'll also see this with the update schedule. There's no pattern, no "X amount of updates per month/week/day".
The action on this site is mostly good, pretty normal for a Kink site.
And this is my take on what the site is about. If I'm wrong, it's okay, it's my take on it. The males are supposed to be these powerful, rich men who the females want to be slaves to. They have these various competitions like "who cums first loses". The loser then faces some kind of punishment. These scenes are usually shot in a room with 10-15 people. But then there will be scenes of one man and one woman in a closed bedroom.
There's lots of anal sex, quite a bit of throat-gagging and as said in the opening of the pros, perversions. The one big plus for me in the action is when those amateur-looking girls step in and start getting involved in the action. The rest of it comes off as typical hardcore porn in 2016 with an extra dose of bondage/clothespins. Maybe it is like a combination of multiple Kink sites into one?
Either way, I don't think it's enough reason to join Kink's network, but the other sites included with the network make it a good join. With The Upper Floor being a fun diversion from their usual sites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
For the spanking niche this is a great (and greatly improved)site. Almost since the internet was first available I have been a member off & on, but not so often in the last several years.
It has lots of what I like when I feel like watching real spanking: red asses, pretty girls, and (sometimes) tears. I am also partial to spanking girls clothed in blue jeans and there seems more of it here now than ever before.
It has greatly improved in having far less verbal nonsense ("shame on you, you will have to be spanked"). I, personally see spanking as a sexy part of pain/pleasure and don't care for the false notion of it as punishment, especially when the spanker talks way too much (as is found a lot at Firm Hand Spanking).
They have put in wonderful new features since I was here last including model indexes, a favorites (scenes & models) section and an updates calendar going back to 2001. The calendar links with the videos & pictures, making finding things more interesting.
Cons:
Limited to punishment spanking only with a variety of implements.
I find little sexual material here. A girl might seem to be masturbating (horrors!), but it is not hard-core.
Bottom Line:
I was delightfully surprised by the great improvements in quality on this site at a very reasonable price (about $22/mo).
Definitely a wonderful site for those who find the sexy red asses of pretty girls being spanked a turn-on.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Kink.com family of sites
- 480+ scenes
- Updates weekly
- Standard-setting production values
- Many viewing / downloading options
- Many A-list models
- Rare niche (bondage AND sex)
- Supports download managers
- Clear model consent
- Excellent value
- Photos available as singles and zips
Cons:
- None
Bottom Line:
For those who know Kink.coms sites, Sex and Submission needs no introduction. S+S is one of their older sites and dates back nine years. All Kinks sites focus on consensual BDSM play with each site adding a twist. Here the twist is sex. That may seem self-evident, but many of Kinks sites dont have a lot of actual sex and when they do it is secondary to the specific niche. Here the sex is front and center. The sex isnt plain vanilla though, as there is always an element of D/s play and sex while in bondage or restraint. Kink.com is, in my opinion, the best BDSM company operating today.
For those unfamiliar with Kink, dont confuse them with Abuse sites. Those sites seem to revel in making the model miserable. Kink is the opposite: the models get to explore this facet of their sexuality in a controlled environment and it is clearly all about their pleasure. Its hard to explain, but this isnt misogynistic BDSM.
As with other Kink sites, this one goes out of its way to ensure that the model fully consents to the play. There is an interview in each one where the scene is discussed and the safe word is made known. I know there are some who reject this approach and think that the consent itself is forced, but there is no evidence to support that position. One factor that, in my opinion, speaks well for Kinks professionalism are the numbers of A-list stars who shoot scenes here, and many of them shoot multiple scenes. I suspect that if Kink coerced the models that no A-list star would work for them, let alone shoot multiple scenes. Adding to this position is the fact that many of the A-listers are definitely not fetish models.
The site currently has 480 scenes. Older scenes start with an interview and jump right into the action. Newer scenes are scenario-based which can add to the heat. There is bondage in several positions, with sex in most of them. If the model does anal, there is usually some anal. The scenes close with an interview which can be interesting to watch to see what the model liked about the shoot. The average length of the scenes is a little over an hour. The scenes cant be said to meet usual standards in that Kink.com sets those standards. Set creation and production values are the best there are. For scenes that strive have a dark feel about them, they succeed but they dont look actually dark. They are all well light, shot and edited.
The site updates with one new scene being added per week.
As with all Kink sites there are a lot of options to watch the scenes. (Obviously the older scenes have fewer options) There is streaming in four available resolutions. Downloads are available for portable devices, in WMV and MP4 formats. Each of those offers a choice of resolutions. I opt for the highest quality MP4s and those come in at 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. My experience with the next largest is that they are 960x540 at 1500kb/s. A few of the older scenes appear to have been remastered to a higher quality, but some havent. The highest resolution for some of the older scenes is 640x480 at 825 kb/s, but keep in mind that these were shot in 2005 so they were up to standard then..
Another difference exists between the oldest and newer scenes on the site. When Kink first started the scenes were relatively simple: ropes, chains, spreader bars, etc. were common implements. As Kink matured the scenes became a lot more innovative in the means to bind the models. Kink clearly has some creative minds at work. A majority of the scenes are innovative and very interesting.
Photos are available, though this is really a video site so those are secondary. I dont collect those so I have no information on them.
Download managers work for queuing scenes. I found the links timed out at about an hour, which is reasonable.
Kink.com isnt a network so each site requires a membership. The good news is that when youre a member to one site you get a discounted price for the others. I usually take advantage of this by joining the cheapest site I want at the full price and then get the discounted price on the others. Im on their mailing list but havent seen an offer in several years.
The bottom line on this site is simple: if you have any interest in this niche you should seriously consider joining. For the price, you get access to almost 500 scenes, regular updates and many big-name porn stars doing some interesting fetish work for the best company in the BDSM business. The scenes look great, the bondage gear is innovative and the models really seem to enjoy the play. This is an excellent value and I highly recommend it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Close to 400 scenes with video and photoset all the way from 2005 to this day
-Weekly update with a long scene
-720p HD from 2006 already. Most of the scenes are 720p
-These guys are the pioneers of sex in bondage kind of material. There is lots of variation and little bit for everyone as long as you like the subject
-Active community on site with forums and commenting
-Well known models as well as total amateurs
-Good download speeds, works well with DL manager, no timeout on login that I've noticed. Technical side works
-Kink.com membership is not tied to any subscription. You can stay and subscribe what and when you feel like it waiting for possible special price offers
Cons:
-Site could use some work. No relevant search or any kind of tagging to find scenes, instead of preview page you are thrown into streaming video when you click on a scene etc.
-Strongly subjective but I prefer European models which this site doesn't feature that often. I'd also prefer even more hardware and less ropes
-Acting too much (I guess it is acting). Screaming, shouting, stupid dirty talk about masters, asking for permission to cum, rolling eyes and making faces etc.
-Relatively pricey unless you wait for a discount either on Kink.com or on some other site
-Not really for photography freaks. Pictures look like non flash pics taken during action or even screenshots
-No 1080p although 720p in mp4 is very good
Bottom Line:
Without any doubt, this is the most significant sex in bondage site around with strong take on topic and no filler scenes in between. You can see the whole history of them tiptoeing around US legislation in 2005 and quite quickly starting to produce full action in bondage instead of the "catch and release" stuff they were probably forced to do for first few dozen scenes. There is probably no need telling that the site is part of the Kink.com which offers various sites in different fetish themes. However all sites must be individual subscribed to and there is no kind of network pass, only other option being buying overpriced on site currency one can use to unlock scenes.
The content of this site is simply put sex in bondage with various forms of light to semi hard SM with whips, electric prods and such, acting and role play included. There is always at least some kind of master/slave set up in place but occassionally the plots are more elaborate with scifi, medical or some other acting with props and all. The acting is the general porn quality and luckily the focus is still on the action. Sometimes I wish there was a little less of the "Yes master!" shouting as I find it awkward. These people have probably the best shooting locations and hardware for this kind of stuff available in their San Francisco Armory. Personally I think it's still a bit too rope heavy but of course they have a separate site for even more hardware bondage.
Models are the quality factor that varies a lot on this site and it too is of course all subjective. Many of them are American or big name international stars. The most glaring lack is my favorite group, East Europeans. The models aren't all that young or fit and some of them are total amateurs too which is actually cool. The strong American presence leads to lots of awkward dirty talking, shouting and screaming which I personally find a bit too much. There is one particularly frightening case called Chloe Camilla. She looks cute in photos and before the action starts but then it turns into one huge epileptic fit where she makes scary noises and rolls her eyes. Impossible to look for prolonged times.
Video quality is very good, especially if one is willing to download 720p mp4 which can end up in huge files way over three gigabytes. 1080p is a glaring omission by todays standards but I'm not sure if there'd be much to gain with it compared to already very good 720p. The only complaint is that most of the scenes are shot in quite dark conditions although lighting is good. Photo sets are available for every scene but they aren't anywhere near the offerings of sites with more focus on photography and appear to be non flash snapshots taken while filming the scene.
Technically the site itself leaves me little cold. Searching is not happening, there are no tagging on the scenes and the overall appearance is (probably intentionally) dark and minimalistic. The scene links lead directly to streaming scene so be aware of your speaker level. Personally I think they should change it to take user to the site preview.
This site is quite slow updater by today's standards. One scene per week is all you get so prolonged membership might end up not being the most attractive choice. However almost 400 past scenes is certainly a lot and probably takes up to one terabyte of HD space if downloaded at the best 720p mp4 quality so there is a lot for your money. Also once you have made a Kink.com account, you can watch for special offers to join varying sites while leaving others behind. Still I wish they had some system in place where you'd gain credits while subscribing to any of theire sites that you'd be able to buy occassional scene from another one.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ pre/post interviews with the models
+ good quality
+ partial video downloads
+ fast download speeds
+ Mixture of girls
Cons:
- New videos are very large
- search functions
- no bells and whistles
- pricey(sometimes)
- No Streaming in hd
- DL manager timeout
Bottom Line:
This is the second time i joined a kink site. The first one i joined was fuckingmachines.com and i had a good experience with the site but after awhile of watching my interest faded. Thought that might be the case with sexandsubmission.com (i was Sooo wrong.) For the most part each scene that i viewed was different from the last. Some models were tied from the ceilings while others ball & chained to floor. There was a vast amount of positions newer and well known pornstars were bounded in.
Video quality/lighting and camera angles were superb to me. And non-gonzo scene stories were pretty decent. DL speed on this site was great. My DL speed is 1500kb/s and the site always maxed it out.
Newer hd videos are to large for my liking. The latest videos can be over a hour and are around 2.2gb per scene. Which could be great if you have the hard drive and the download speed for it. But if you dont have the hardware i still wouldn't count this as much of a con because of the excellent way they clip the scene into several smaller clips.
The partial videos are great!!! They are more like a short standalone scene and not just a clip that thrust you into the middle of a movie. It starts with fade in and fade out and seem like a complete 5-13 min scene. Also like the complete scene you have 4 options to download the partial videos. mp4 hd (highest quality), a step down from that WMV hd, high quality, and a portable version.
This site doesn't have a lot of the little things that other sites might have like a favorite section to archive the videos/models or an extensive search function.
The price is a little high for me at 29.99, but if you can hold out a little and sign up for their newsletters most of the time they have a 19.99 special which is very reasonable for the site. Needless to say the content on this site isn't for everyone. Sometime i was a little squeamish with some of the peeing and the hooks up the asses.
I would strongly suggest this to any and all bondage fans and all others without a weak stomach. There are some great gems among this site that one would like to keep forever.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive, mostly American, ladies
-unique and exclusive material
-no DRM
-Download managers work (I used DTA)
-Decent download speeds, maxed out my 10 Mbit connection using a download manager, not quite so good with the browser
-decent sized site, 343 scenes at time of review
-acceptable update schedule at one per week, I am sure this type of content prevents a more frequent update schedule
-excellent video quality on newer scenes, I preferred the 1280x720 5000 kbps mp4
-zip downloads of photosets, although most I saw were split into parts
-active user feedback to scenes and forum
Cons:
-price is a little high
-older videos not as good of quality, 640x480 1900 kbps wmv was the worst I saw
-scenes can be a bit long (I downloaded a few that were over 2 hours) and thus the file sizes can get quite big
-I found some of that material too rough for my tastes, although some might find this a pro
-navigation is not the best, click on a models name and it gives you all the scenes she is in on the kink network, although downloading from this index doesnt seem possible
-logins appear to timeout after an hour or so
-it would be nice if they provided access to other kink sites, although they do give discounts
Bottom Line:
Overall, I think this is a pretty good site for that that are into bondage that involves sex. Although be warned, some of the scenes are quite rough. I guess I am generally more a fan of lighter bondage, but felt like trying something new.
I think what the do well is get original content, many attractive (mostly American porn stars) to perform in their scenes. Some scenes tend to be a bit similar to others, but I am not sure exactly what they can do to change it.
The general setup is a brief interview where the guy talks to the girl about what kinks they like, usually followed by some lighter stuff, then sex, the a post scene interview.
As far as improvements, it would be nice if they included access to other sites, although I am sure this material is a bit more expensive to produce than a gonzo site, so I guess it might be cost prohibitive for them to do that. They could also do some work to fix the navigation and provide a functional model index. Personally I would have preferred more scenes that weren't quite as rough, I like the idea of tying a woman up, but I found some of the slapping and choking to be a bit excessive.
Overall I think this is a decent site, with attractive ladies doing some very interesting stuff. If you like bondage involving sex, it is certainly worth a look, althogh be warned it can get a bit rough here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Like "Big Brother" with naked women and sex, this sight offers a live-in atmosphere of sexy women in kinky servant positions serving men and women at a variety of sex parties.
2. Seems very real with participants talking and fondling, eating, drinking, and having sex in a way that seems very random and unplanned. This is both a positive and a negative feature.
3. Includes LIVE sex parties Wednesday nights that invite (but often ignore) member comments while several party participants go about fondling, eating, and drinking.
4. Includes the excellent and user-friendly Kink.com service where a member seldom needs to enter the password and can cancel membership very easily when it comes time. Of the hundreds of sites I've belonged to in the last decade, Kink.com seems to have the very best service.
More talk and social-party atmosphere with several naked ladies serving the party-goers, with fondling and ass-slapping, but fewer blowjobs and actual sexual intercourse than other party sites.
Bottom Line:
I took a long time before joining this sight, but find it an interesting one after having been a member of many more intensely sexual sights. Watching people at a party can be interesting.
While there are more performers per scene, there seems to be less actual intercourse per scene than most other sights.
If you enjoy watching lots of naked ladies walking around fancy parties being fondled and ass-slapped with some actual sex this would be your perfect sight.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I have joined the site again after more than a few memberships over the years. The beautiful models keep on enticing me back.
For those who love playful spanking, the great models at this site bare their beautiful butts in a huge quantity of scenes (over 1000 at this point).
Regular updates, good lighting, and crisp photography make this a great site for lovers of pure, friendly spanking.
Cons:
Not a site for those who are looking for tears or real pain. The models here are having fun and enjoy the butt-slapping. While a few butts turn cherry red, most butts get just warmly pink here.
No sex or even promises of sensuality in most of the scenes. This is just playful fun.
With so much content there are a great number of scenes for many of the models (like Allison Miller). This may be a plus or a minus depending on your enjoyment of individual models.
Very repetitive in format, like most spanking sites.
Bottom Line:
What can a guy who keeps coming back to this site say? The models are just terribly attractive and I enjoy watching the spanking.
Price is not a bargain, but still reasonable considering the tons of content. For those who love spanking, it's hard not to make this a site one of those to periodically join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Very good quality high definition Spanking video
+ Reasonalble variety of models and scenarios and implements .These naughty girls can expect hand spankings , strap and the cane applied over the knickers and on the bare bottom !
+ A couple of video options including download and streaming movie player .
+ Member forum .
+ I love miss Jessica !!
Cons:
- Updates usually only come in part movies or hq stills ( could be weeks before you see the full version of a new movie )
- Not enough content for the price .
Bottom Line:
Overall britspank is a solid 'spanking site' offering Hd quality spanking video , but feel they need to work harder on some of the basics .
My biggest gripe is the 'part' updates . When so may adult sites are now filling member areas with solid content i feel this site is holding something back . Maybe the webmaster here is struggling to fill all the site in his 'xerotics ' network with content .
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
it's a superb site.it has every thing that one needs.most of the girls are attractive and cute.it makes a feeling that i too want to fuck them.really they have some sort of magnetic effect.
Cons:
one of the major bad effect is that some of them very aged.there are not being such hit videos nowadays for them.its better for them to just stay out.
Bottom Line:
include more younger girls.include more blockbuster videos.make full use of the ass of the girls.make their boobs effectively.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- One of the all time stalwarts among spanking sights
- Long reliable track record.
- A huge number of girls. The large majority are very young and cute looking.
- Each girl is given an introductary spanking that is moderate and an accompanying interview - some never make it past this stage others move on to harsher and harsher spankings
- there are a variety of different themed shoots. The best are "school paddling" which is a realistic and I mean realistic reenactment of school paddling. These are GREAT and worth the price of admission.
- There is also a faces series which shows a lot of reaction shots that I like.
- Level of spanking is from moderate to severe. There is also a variety of implements used. Hand, small paddle, belt, graduating up to big paddle, lexon paddle, and canes.
- There are some cute new girls here as well as many legendary spankees. Kaylee a punky girl with a great butt and a perpetual smirk on her face was "discovered here".
-
Cons:
- they were not adding content as much in the last few years. I rejoin about once every 18 months.
- The biggest criticism is that sometimes it tends to get mechanical and one spanking looks like the next.
- Also they do two or three shoots a day and the girl starts out red at the beginning of the scene.
- They seem to cut the scene right as soon as the spanking is over. I like to see post spanking rubbing and there are only a few of these.
- Picture sets are fairly limited.
- A little too much chatter sometimes
Bottom Line:
This sight once dominated the spanking scene and is still among the top five or so. The girls are cute and the spanking pretty hard. There is a good mix in the type of girls, but most fit the 18-23 year old mold. One exception is the wife of Coach Daniels. She is a middle aged blonde women who both dishes out and takes some real hard ones.
There is a large network of related sights to this one and they usually run specials if you want to join more than one. They have individual girls sights for the lithe Brandi, the red headed step child Jessica and new recruit Bailey.
There is also a bulletin board where you can ask questions and make suggestions.
Navigation is good with a list of all the girls' pictures. When you click on their face, you get a list of all their videos with a brief preview.
You can also sort by different scenerio type - these include School paddlings, Naked school paddlings, school canings, Faces, cheerleaders, multiple girl scenes, and probably a half a dozen more.
Another way to sort is by implement - cane, paddle, lexon paddle, hairbrush etc.
I have joined this sight probably every 18 months for the past five years, plus grabbed freebees when I can. If you are a spanker, this is probably stil a top four or five sight.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- The models here are the best looking anywhere
- the spankings are in the moderate to hard category
- very good emphasis on the showing both front and back angles of scene
- videos are of excellent quality with short scenerios and set ups
- also have many continuing series like spanked stewardesses
- many of the girls are in progressively better videos beginning with soft spanking and moving up to harder ones
- some reality based scenes - school paddling in Texas take off. Some of these are very imaginative.
- some of the ladies are both tops and bottoms
- there are MF and FF scenes. About evenly split.
- This is one of the older sights on the web. There is a large archive of older stuff and movies from models
- Most models are nice and curvy on the rear. There are many videos featuring Amy Denson, Shannon Carson etc from the old days.
- Almost all models are either pretty or gorgeous.
- There are some bonus areas - spanking in movies, photo shoots only etc.
Cons:
- Spankings are from medium to hard, but not usually super hard like Dallas, RGE or Mood.
- Latley many of the models are recyled from other sights. Although Samantha Woodley is gorgeous she is featured in dozens of videos, many repetitive.
- The guys (spankers) on this sight are horrible. One guy in almost all the videos is super fat and talks in a boring monotone.
- I would like to see a little more post spanking rubbing etc.
- Picture sets are not always satisfying
Bottom Line:
This is one of the standard sights to join if you are a spanking fan. I come back about once a year and gobble up everything they have.
The women are slways beautiful. Samantha Woodley, AJ Rutherford, Michaela McGowen, N. Peachey are awesome have great butts and get spanked pretty hard. You can see that are in slight discomfort but not really in pain or crying like some other sights.
Also the clothing and scene set ups are great. The series where Samantha and McGowen dress like stewardesses is really hot and if you have traveled much by air lately you probably would like to spank an air hostess or two.
There are probably 30 good models and many movies to enjoy with a variety. I like several of the other models also. Two of my favorites are Natasha Edwards who is a pretty honey blonde with a nice body and snotty attitude and another petite blonde named Rachel Young whose rear always gets turned super red.
Overall, if you are a spanking fan this sight should be in your top 3 or 4 stops. It is a bit on the "glam" side rather than reality but is clearly an niche leader.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
There is a model index.
They have an updates calendar.
Most of the models are attractive girl next door types (or would be if the girl next door ever really looked like that).
A massive catalogue of material to choose from.
Old and experienced site with a good reputation, and reliable billing agents, so you shouldn't be risking your money.
They do have photos.
No DRM.
No download limit.
No regional discrimination for subscribers.
Very good value at $21.95.
The clips are quite often filmed in real time, without too many cuts or unnatural breaks.
There are usually 2 camera angles. One for the girl's ass, and one for the face.
Cons:
Poor and confusing navigation, although it has improved in the past year.
The videos are even at the highest 700 kb/sec rate, not great quality by today's standards. Some of the old clips are very poor quality.
No WMV, only a choice of Flash Player or Real Media.
The clips have watermarks that can sometimes be obtrusive and annoying.
The best spankers have disappeared. The more recent productions have been weak.
They went nearly 2 years without new material, relying mostly on what had already been shot, while they waited to move to a new studio.
Not that many models, few new ones recently. So you see the same faces, (or whatever) a lot of the time.
Far too many clothed spankings, especially in recent years.
Being American the cane is hardly ever used, and then only very lightly.
The photos are posed, and not from the actual spanking clip.
Too much talking.
Some of the clips are cut up into ridiculously short segments, sometimes straight down the middle of the action.
Bottom Line:
Bottom line - very appropriate given the niche.
I was last a member of this site about a year ago. I rejoined because my computer got a virus and all my files were wiped out. I wouldn't have joined for the more modern clips. The best spankers Lady D left long ago, and Mr M is not to be seen, most of the time.
The recent clips I find far too light and usually with the model partially or fully clothed. I find this boring. The old clips are by far the best, but the drawback is the quality is quite poor on a lot of these. They are redoing some of them in a new bit rate of 700kb/sec.
The picture quality and sound has improved over the years as the content quality has decreased IMO.
Here is roughly the bit rate over the years.
2001 - 75kb/sec
2002 - 150 kb/sec. Some clips redone in 750kb/sec or 350 kb/sec from here onwards.
2003 - 225 or 450kb/sec.
2004 - 225 or 450kb/sec.
2005 - 225 or 450kb/sec
2006 - 350/700 kb/sec mostly from here.
Despite all the negatives I would still recommend this site as the No.1 choice for anyone who is interested in spanking but has never joined a spanking website. Some other sites deliver harder spankings, but here they are usually around moderate severity, which is reasonably safe, and almost old fashioned, for those who have an interest in this sort of thing. It is not my favourite spanking site because of all the negatives, but I still find it good value. It is almost the Video Box of the spanking world. It is like finding a 3 story warehouse of spanking clips. If you are looking for a clip in particular, it is quite hard to find. At least they have a reasonable model directory and calendar of updates. Last year I would have said this site has the worst navigation in the known universe, with the one exception of my girlfriend's map reading, but things have improved a little. The site now looks like something from the 21st century. A lot of faults, but is worth a look given the price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I won't repeat all the stats that others have done so eloquently here. So, I will keep it brief and relevant.
In terms of quality, it is excellent. The newer movies are top notch with good editing.
The women are well known but the slant on their presentation makes for a refreshing change. I have seen Trinity Post a gazillion times but not the way she is portayed on this site. The same goes for all the 'known' babes.
I like this site because it is not just focused on the S&M action but includes sex which, for me, is crucial.
The guys certainly know their thing and it always makes for a smoother experience.
Great 'feel'.
Sensible layout with multiple download options for movies and pics.
Cons:
Not much content.
Old films are grainy.
Older films are grainy and almost invisible. I believe a gnat would have a better change of ascertaining the action within.
Misleading star search. I searched for Adriana Nicole and found many links for her but the way the links were presented they lead the user to believe the star is on the sexandsubmissive site. However, you are led to another Kink.com site whereby you have to sell an organ or two to join. This form of clever external linking is a new trend that is both annoying and underhand. Spreading content by the same star across sites under the same umbrella that require further subs is not something I like.
Could do with some different scenery and situations.
Could do with some fresh faces that we have not come across.
I need more ethnic babes, more fukin' stockings and classy outfits and maybe some bush would be a refreshing change.
Bottom Line:
Refreshing and fucking sexy even if you are not into the S&M type of content, which I am not.
Great quality on the newer films and it's about time others followed suit.
Needs more content and more updates.
Needs an all-in umbrella membership so we can get all the babes under one roof. Hell, I'd pay the difference in price.
One of my favourite sites and very cleverly thought out to grab the middle market of dudes like me who like lovely babes getting a tad roughed but not bludgeoned beyond recognition.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Spankings quite severe and real
- Attractive, young girls
- Most girl have pubic hair.
- Good navigation
- Pics & vids each set.
- Sets not just in isolation: set within context of aims of the 'Real Spanking Institute', which gives shoots greater focus.
- Range of implements used: paddles, canes, straps, broad perspex plastic canes (real brutes of things. At least one really good scene with this)
Cons:
- School uniform seems to dictate that standard shool underwear is but, white, baggy things which come out of grandma's wardrobe. Would have greater appeal of far more girls were caught wearing 'non-regulation' underwear.
- Not enough nudity.
- Use of hands for spanking. Get real! A hand spanking really does "hurt me more than it's going to hurt you." With all the wonderful implements available, why use hands?
Bottom Line:
This is a convincing site. The introductory information presents the site within the context of how prison was not working for young female inmates, so the Government set up the Real Spanking Insitute as an experiment to bring these troubled young women back onto the straight and narrow. (Good to know the US Governent has some sensible policies. Someone should have a word in the ear of our man in Australia, Kevin Rudd, about this policy!)
The spankings vary in severity, according to the girl's misdemeanors, scenarios framed according to how much punishment and nudity the model has opted for.
On this point, the pay for the girls varies according to the severity of the spanking, and the amount of nudity they show.
I'm surprised at how little full nudity there is - If their butts are going to be beaten to a pulp, (which many of the girls obviously opt for) I can't understand why they don't go fully nude and get paid more.
There are, however, some really good scenes - and at least a few full nude scenes where the girls get a fairly severe buttock padding.
overall a good site, if you like this sort of thing.
One of the models featured is Jessica, whio also has her own site: Spanking Teen Jessica.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Many very attractive pornstars.
-Multiple scenes from Eva Angelina, Bobbi Star, and Jada Fire. Jada's best workever.
-Ethnic mix of white, black, Latina and Asian models.
--No DRM or download limits.
-Archive of 205 videos, going back to May 2005.
-Newest videos are about an hour long.
-Supports download managers with excellent download speeds. Mine was 2500kb.
-Videos available as excellent DVD quality MP4 or as WMV 1280x720,7158kbps. Older videos are lower quality.
-Videos can be streamed. Downloads come as clips, while whole videos can be zipdownloaded, and in a few cases can be downloaded as whole videos as well as in clips.
-Photosets for every video. Can be zipdownloaded. They are screenshots that are 1200x675 and very sharp.
-Exclusive material. Mostly known pornstars.
-Mostly the girls seem to be really into the action. They don't come across as acting. The site claims the girls are told not to pretend, but to have genuine reactions.
-Updates at least once a wk
Cons:
-Too many pornstar looking typical bleach blondes.
-All videos shot in the same location. A little variety would be better.
Bottom Line:
This is a light BDSM site, so it is not for everybody. This is my second membership in this site. It has gotten better and better over the last two years since I was last a member. This is the highest that I have ever rated any site, regardless of niche. There is a lot of great sex along with the BDSM, and can be VERY hot. The only site in this niche that comes even close is fuckedandbound.com, but this is much better both in the sex and in the dominance. I am much more into the sex than in the BDSM aspects and can tell you that the sex is amazing. If you like the niche, you cannot do better than to join this site. It has a very large archive of high entertainment value videos and great quality that can be compared to the best videos available on the net.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
