Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Older women need to be loved and admired too!
Owned by the Score group, meaning large breasts are in abundance
Good user features and simple to use site
Videos, in number over 1,000, can be downloaded with newer ones offering 4K resolution
Pictures can also be downloaded and are exceptional, magazine-quality
Still updates and there are over 750 models total
Cons:
Probably the biggest con is the age of the models and the large breasts. Those are also two of the biggest strengths. It’s all in the palm of the beholder
The magazine-style may be lost on younger members
Bottom Line:
40 Something Mag aims to bring viewers the sexiest and bustiest 40+ year old models in the world. It is mostly a hit, but there are some notable misses. You will have a hard time finding faults with the site itself. The navigation works great and the download options, both on videos and photos, are robust and are at the top of porn standards.
The first potential miss is the nature of the content. There are hardcore scenes and your typical, 2023-flavored gonzo porn, but the real nature of this content is softcore and solo. It is where this content excels. The models, age possibly hurting them, are conditioned to be pretty, to pose and many of them have been doing it for 20+ years. The flip side of that is the models that are doing hardcore scenes, have likely been doing hardcore scenes for 20+ years and there’s nothing new to see in those.
Pictures are at a premium here. Most of the photos hearken back to the days of newsstand porn magazines. That is a major plus if you like that style of photography, but could see it as a downfall if you’re more used to the digital style photography. You can download the photos in multiple sizes of zip files.
Videos are as prominently featured on the site as photos, but I do believe the videos take a backseat. As mentioned, the hardcore scenes are nothing outrageous and have likely been seen many times before. They do offer 4K downloads and unlimited downloads. If you really are new to this style of porn, you may think this site is the greatest site ever made.
The navigation uses a model list, tags and you can filter nearly all search results. This was my 8th time being a member in 5 years and even for me, things are starting to feel a little redundant. I will say sites from Score group, tend to mash up together and can cause the feeling of redundancy. The sites are all good sites, but is it possible the love of large breasts has declined to the point that we are no longer that impressed by a set of majestic mammaries?
The site is still a good join in my eyes and I’m not even a large breasts fan. I just like breasts in general. This site, in my opinion, showcases a body type of females that does go back to the classic age of statuesque feminine bodies. That is my biggest appreciation of the site and is why I like to join it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nostalgia is my biggest reason for joining Scoreland
You really could just type the word “boobs” over and over and it would describe the site well
There is a combined 10,000 photo sets and videos you can download
A lot of the videos are now available in 4K downloads
Nearly 1,500 busty models
Promo prices are easy to find including on Porn Users
Cons:
The Score Group has over 60 sites and the majority of those are standalone sites that you must pay a separate membership for. They are in desperate need of a super network with all their sites included
Big boobs, as a boob-fan knows, often includes chubby and even BBW women.
Bottom Line:
As I near my 40s, I finally can say that boobs are no longer my top interest of the female anatomy. Go back 10 years ago and I almost always had a subscription to this site. Despite its age, it is over 25 years old, the navigation, the looks, the search tools, have all been updated to a more modern website. Boobs are greatly glorified and represented by the Score Group. Jiggling, bouncing, heaving, it’s all here and the women are often very pretty, too.
It is for lack of better word, a glamourous site, meaning: the women are usually a little over “made up”. Makeup is flowing by the gallon. The outfits are typically low-cut tops and tight tops. I really don’t agree with the style of dress. Women that are this endowed, do not need clothing to make them look busty. I am going to go even further by saying, I would be happier with this site if the women started out in more clothes.
It is interesting to notice the difference in number of photo sets and videos. There are right at twice as many photo sets and videos, and logic and common sense answers that: The older content was more picture focused due to the internet of that time period being dialup.
Every video, not most or almost all, every single video is in at least HD download resolution. Nearly a third of the videos have the 4K download option.
On the negatives: Score has over 60 sites, but only a few of their sites come with multi-site access. You can tell the site is old with their section called “friends”. That was a popular feature around 20 years ago. I can say after being a member of at least 50 times,, the content feels less inspired than if you just discovered it. There could be and should be improvements that show the models evolving. Instead, you really could look at a video from 2003 and not be able to tell it’s 20 years older than the newest scenes. It's the style of dress. The “look” of the models, their makeup and their hairstyles.
The site does have a high appeal factor. These type of women are the women I grew up wanting to marry, even the BBW ones. If you like women that are chubby or BBW, you’ll find a lot to like on this site.
The navigation is excellent. The site has steadily improved and updated the user functions and features. Thee is a chance new members won’t even notice those changes, but I definitely see the changes. It is still a very good site and value, but for me, the site needs more variety.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Specific niche
- Outstanding preview
- No download limits that I encountered
- Photos and videos available in multiple resolutions
- User friendly site
Cons:
- Photos and videos in multiple resolutions, but it's not always clear what you're clicking on
- Silly write ups
- Personal opinion, but probably shouldn't be its own site.
Bottom Line:
Do you like large women? This is the site for you. If you're shopping for this niche you already know what to expect. BBW, where the girls are big and not always beautiful, but most are passable and a few are genuinely attractive in the zeftig sense. There's ample content (ha, get it?), videos and photos, and download options for most stuff, although the older material will be more limited, of course.
I appreciate sites that offer fairly substantial preview capabilities, and Score needs to be commended for this. You can click through and see the pages upon pages of material, and clicking on individual models will pull up that content and what to expect. Well done, Score. This is refreshing in this day of "main page, scroll down, click on anything and you go to the signup/purchase page" style of websites.
It's my understanding that there were download limits in the past, but I didn't encounter any, and my speeds were good. I had to log back in every day or two, but I appreciate the overall user-friendliness of the site. Similar to the popular approach to main-pages mentioned above, I've spent too much time on websites that log you out after an hour or two and make you go through captchas to get back in to the place that YOU didn't leave. Well done, Score. Make things better for your users and the users will be more likely to spend money on the other sites.
Which brings us to another point, and one that I am on the fence about. You can click on an actress' name and it will pull up her content. Scroll on down and you'll also see other content on other Score sites, and it always sort of irritated me that I'd need to join two or three other sites to get the Score content of one Score model. Pornmegaload is their big semi-network site and priced accordingly, and it sort of seems like the Score sites could all be part of that expensive network.
The write-ups for the scenes are often goofy "Dear Penthouse, you'll never believe..." types of things. Did you know that this model's favorite thing is ALSO getting tit-fucked?
The video quality of the newer clips is good, although the lighting and camera angles can be sub-par. I can never tell much of a difference between the 720 and 1080 clips, but I appreciate having options up to and including 4k. One thing I like a lot is that the video clips aren't outrageous in size. There are lots of sites that will have HD clips that are 3GB+, and this site (and I assume their others) seems to know how to keep them around 1-2GB. Again, well done, Score.
Some of the photo and video download links were unclear on what resolution you were downloading and you'd need to look at the browser info while you hovered over the link to see if it was a higher or lower resolution. No big deal overall, but something that I encountered that might trip some people up if they want the highest resolution available.
A few nitpicks here and there, but recommended overall if this is something that appeals to you.
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some.
Bottom Line:
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Deep sleeper site that comes from the Score Group.
Their speciality is pictures in a magazine-style layout.
Videos are not as common, but newer ones are 4K.
Pictures are downloadable. Most have a 3000x2000 download resolution.
Models range from amateur to pro-amateur.
Almost 5,000 models
Cons:
Bonus sites are not even worth looking at. All three sites included as bonus sites stopped updating in 2014 or earlier and the three combined do not offer large collections.
Videos could stand more production and direction. The videos seem more like a bonus to the photo sets.
Picture sets outnumber videos 4 to 1.
Bottom Line:
As a breast-aficionado, the Score Group, has been a longtime destination for my porn money to go to. Naughty Mag does not follow the Score Group’s love of only large-breasted models. I am sure the models being amateur to pro-amateur plays a part in the decision not to focus just on large breasts, but I didn’t even notice. Naughty Mag is the perfect name for this site. Every memory you have of opening a porn magazine as a teenager will flood back into your mind when you look at all these sexy models. Most if not all breasts are all-natural, but some are very small up to medium-large.
The site includes 3 bonus sites. Those are Bored At Home, Porn Loser and Naughty Tugs. They should not even mention these as bonus sites. Two have not been updated in over a decade. The collections are not very large and these scenes and photo s would be just as well-served as Naughty Mag releases. The other issue is with the amount of videos and if the videos are even worth downloading. I will say yes, but the videos are not the focus and should be viewed that way. Any other expectations will bring a letdown.
You should join it with the knowledge and understanding of you’re here for the pictures. The pictures are not only high quality, but feature some of the best lighting you will find in porn pictures. The models, while mostly amateur, are excellent at posing and the photographer gets the best angles. I would even suggest the pictures on Naughty Mag are close to the same league as the Met-Art sites.
There is hardcore content and that may surprise some. The site is promoted more as softcore, and it is, but there’s some hardcore and it at least confirms the videos go beyond posing or teasing. Even so, you’re still better off looking at the pictures.
For me,the make or break point for this site, s centered around your attraction to the models. I find their models to be the prettiest collection of amateur models, and that greatly benefits the site. If anyone knows of a prettier collection of amateur models, I would like to know what site so I can join it. There may be some nostalgic bias based on me loving old pin-up and “girly magazines” but I am sure no one would be disappointed with this content as long as they understand the difference between quantity of photos to videos.
It is one of my favorite sites and is the only amateur site (not on a network) that I join.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
A lot of sites dedicated to gilf seem to hire whoever wants to work for them. That's not a bad thing, actually it's good to know that there's place for everybody. But that means also that a lot of hardcore sites dedicated to gilfs (Mature.nl, Lusty grandmas, Aged love, Grand mams) often are not exactly the best place to find super hot mature women.
On the other hand 60 plus milfs has the best looking models of this age in the industry. Cara Reid, Katia, Seka Black, Rita Daniels, Chery Leigh, Georgette Parks, Julia Butt, Gina Milano, Cammille Austin, Lady Sextasy, Leah L'amour and many others make this site hands down the best choice if one is into sexy older ladies.
A lot of great scenes (the ones with young men are without a doubt my favorites, check out the ones with Ivan, or those with Matt Sloan, Archie Stone, John Long or James), the interviews are fun, and the fact that they do anal scenes is really appreciated.
Cons:
The recent lack of very young guys in recent times is my biggest complain. I've always thought that their main potential was in scenes where it's possible to see a hot woman like Rita Daniels fucking with a real nineteen or twenty year old guy like Archie or Ivan. Lately they're hiring often men in their thirties or even older, which is a big disappointment.
Also the bad camera work is frankly always been quite bad: no camera movement, lack of good angles (faces are the most erotic thing, and they seems to try to avoid the face of the male performer constantly, and sometimes even of the woman), too much close ups.
And the lenght of 20, 25 minutes for scene is just too short. I don't have anything against a good instroduction with teasing and dialogues, but with scenes that short this means lack of positions or positions seen for just few seconds and with very few angles. I think that scenes of 35-45 minutes could be much better.
Bottom Line:
As said,if you're into hardcore sites with good looking sixty-something ladies this is the best one. And they do anal!
Sadly the full potential of the site is partially ruined by the fact that the scenes with young guys especially recently are very few, and the bad camera work and the fact that the scenes are too short are things to consider.
But in this particular niche this is the site I always eagerly look for the new updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hot models in a hot niche (young, petite teens)
- Good mix of models
- Many A-list models
- Good production values
- Three classes of videos
- Updates (if a bit sporadically)
- Videos available in streaming and downloads
- Download option
- Huge photo archive
- Supports download managers
- TBP discount
Cons:
- Video resolutions/bitrates not up to snuff in 2019
- The site, and what it offers is stuck in a bit of a time warp
Bottom Line:
I recently rejoined this site and hadn’t intended to write a new review since what I wrote almost four years ago is still mostly accurate. I was planning to just write an update as a comment and leave it at that. But as I started to write and did a deeper dive into the site it occurred to me that the fact that it really hasn’t changed much actually warrants a new review.
Back in 2015 when I first reviewed the site I had several criticisms of it with the main one being video quality. At the time the best video resolution available was 1280x720 with a relatively low bitrate of 3500kb/s. In the elapsed time between the 2015 review and now we’ve seen some big advances in video quality. I’m sure that many people see 1080p as the new standard and there are many sites that now offer everything in 4K. But not 18Eighteen… they seem to be stuck in a time warp since the best resolution that they now offer, four years after I said that what they had then was barely up to industry standard is, wait for it… 1280x720 with a bitrate of 3500kb/s. Keep in mind that this is the BEST resolution that they offer. The technical side of the site simply hasn’t kept up with the rest of the industry. In my last review I chuckled a bit that in 2015 this site was still offering each scene as a series of small clips for download. You know, for those of us still on dial up. I posed the question as to whether, in 2015, anyone still downloaded small clips. But guess what? Here we are in the waning days of 2019 and they STILL offer small clips. Maybe, just maybe, this site has the market cornered on people who still only have dial-up. Maybe there are some porn shops around that still rent VHS tapes too.
So here’s why I think this is important and why it merited a new deep dive: 18Eighteen is an AMAZING site for those of us who like this niche. If you’re looking for the freshest, tiniest teens on the ‘net this place has to be on your list. The models are a great mix of A-list pornstars, lesser known semi-pros (up-‘n-cummers?) and some relatively unknown Russian/Eastern European models. The site is, however, more skewed to American models.
While the models are all in the same category (young and petite) the site itself offers videos and photos in three broad classes: B/G, G/G and solo. So there might be something for everyone (with a caveat). There are currently 308 solo scenes, 373 B/G scenes and just 10 G/G scenes. This isn’t a big deal for me as I don’t usually collect G/G scenes but it seems to me that this is a niche that the site could be doing a much better job at serving.
The videos are available for download in the above-mentioned 720p as well as in 854x480 (1500) and 640x360 (800). They are also available in WMV at 640x360 (2500). I didn’t know WMV still existed. Streaming is an option too.
Two big advantages that this site has are that it is as much a draw for photo collectors as it is for video fans and, since the site grew out of a magazine that started in 1992 they have a fairly decent catalogue of photos. Currently there are 2646 photo sets. But, like the videos the resolution of even the new sets is low – it’s currently 2000x3000. Not bad, but not great either.
The site is definitely still updating though the schedule is a bit unpredictable. There are times when a new scene or photoset is uploaded every two days but then there are stretches with nothing for almost a week. But there are updates.
I had no issues using a download manager to queue scenes for download and I found that download speeds were up to par with what I get at other sites. Given the small size of the files (due to resolution and bitrate) I downloaded a lot in my first evening and didn’t hit a limit.
The bonus sites that were available last time (there were two of them) no longer seem to be bundled with the membership. My recollection of them, and the fact that I have kept nothing from them, tells me this isn’t a big loss.
My biggest takeaway from my current membership here is that it’s a squandered opportunity. This is a site that has some of the hottest offerings in one of the hottest segments in the porn business and their technology is letting them down. The models are stunning, the scenes are well shot and edited and the site layout is reasonably logical. But the site simply hasn’t kept up with the rest of the business in offering better resolutions. In my opinion, they’re selling themselves short.
So would I recommend this site? I would. If you like this niche then this is a site you have to visit even if you, like me, would prefer higher resolutions. With a TBP discount the site is still a good value but go in knowing you won’t see hot teens in glorious 1080p or 4K.
To reflect that the site hasn’t kept up I’ve dropped my score accordingly. It’s still a great site but I’d really love to see them modernize the technology.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Big, often beautiful women
- Lots of focus on big breasts
- Large site
- Videos and photos available
- Download managers work
Cons:
- Sometimes more big than beautiful
- Lots of fake tits
- Downloads fail just before finishing fairly often
- Flash/java heavy = often unresponsive site design
Bottom Line:
Scoreland is a site that offers a large amount of content containing mostly larger women. It’s not always larger women, though. Sometimes it’s average sized women with large breasts. To my eyes more often than not those women have huge fake tits, but occasionally some of those will even have natural breasts.
The good:
There are often only photos for the older material, which is fine considering how long Score has been in business. On the bottom of the website they note that they’ve been in business for 25 years, and I’d guess that there are still a lot of offerings on their website that span that length of time. And that’s a good thing.
The newer offerings are usually available in multiple formats and even five minute clips of those multiple formats, and I commend the website for taking this approach. 720p is the highest resolution available for download as of September 2018. They look fine, but topping out at 720 is noticeable in this modern day and age of ultra high definition and virtual reality offerings. There are none of the latter that I saw, by the way.
There are often photos and videos available for the newer shoots, but occasionally you’ll find only one or the other.
The not so good:
Download managers work, but it’s not unusual to try to download a video and see it fail right before it finishes and yield a “server error” message. And my “right before” I mean the last 10% of the download. I never could determine that it corresponded with a particular time of day or file size. Sometimes the file would finish and sometimes it wouldn’t. It’s irritating and could certainly influence one’s view of the site.
The site seems to be based heavily on java script. So much so that it won’t show you anything if you’re running a blocker. I also noticed sluggish responses and images that wouldn’t always load unless you scrolled the page down. That would somehow trigger the images that should’ve loaded when the page was initially visited. Not a huge deal but definitely another annoyance.
Bottom line:
A good site with a lot of attractive larger ladies. There are some minor irritations here and there, but I would join again.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Rocketpay. However never got an acknowledgement email.
-Excellent PU discount
-Many ads for other score sites, but no popup sand not in your face and annoying.
-Did not encounter any broken links or slow downloads
-Updates are at least one new video and photo set per day
-Huge site. 969 models, 4200 videos and 5980 photo sets.
-Well done effective search engine using 69 different tags.
-Nice mix of ages and ethnicities.
Cons:
-Some videos are dull interviews. In nearly every one of these videos they say they are sex addicts. I find that hard to believe. A few could be, but I doubt that all are.
-Some videos are set in a foreign travel spot. Not hot as basic posing similar to glamour photo sets.
-Fairly standard glamour style sex.
-Site layout is not too bad, but it could be better. Can move forward or back at most two pages at a time.
-Some models are a bit too BBW for my taste, too many tattoos, and some are silicone enhanced and not natural. In spite of this, there is so much of everything on this site that you can ignore these models and still find a lot to like.
Bottom Line:
Scoreland has been around on the net for decades. They were a magazine for years before that. I am not sure when they opened this site, but the oldest videos and photos are from the late 1990s. The site says it is now their 25th anniversary of being in business. Their specialty is having a treasure trove of large breasted women. Within this particular specialty, Score is an iconic web site. It seems incredible to me that the site has had so few reviews in recent years.
Many of these women are of large overall body size, BBW. Many are not as they are normally proportioned women who have huge breasts. Most of them are all natural, but a much smaller number are silicone enhanced. The models are a mix of known porn stars and some that are not. Not all models do sex, as some are nude only. There is a nice mix of Americans as well as Europeans, Japanese and even models from Latin America. The mix of ages and ethnicities is excellent. For example there are 56 HD Asian videos, 63 of Latinas, and 102 Black women, not all of whom are Americans.
Overall there are 4200 videos of which 3300 are HD. For a site that has been around as long as this has, this is quite good. The HD videos are currently 1280x720, 3900kbps. There is better HD at 1920x1080 and also 4K to be had on other sites, so the site is behind the times on the latest and best quality. On the other hand, they play very nicely on my computer monitor. Maybe on a bigger screen you might have a complaint.
The latest photo sets are 2000x3000, also not the greatest. The photos are not what you get on sites that specializes in them, such as Metart. Mostly the latest photo sets are the same as the videos of the same name, but are not screenshots. Scoreland needs to up their game, but what they do they do well.
The videos come in a few types. XXX is sex videos. This is by far the biggest video category. The sex here is fairly glamorous in style. There is little anal. The sex is not forceful or even very hard. Given all this, the scenes still work well.
The models are mostly quite beautiful, as well as having huge breasts. Many were photo models taking the next step. Most speak in sexy way before and during the videos. There is a large number of videos with jacking, which I have seen described on other sites as JOE, jerk off encouragement. The videos start slowly with tease and buildup. Not blabby, the beginning is stripping and/or verbal sexy talk. The models at least go through the motions, which is better than the usual gonzo that has no buildup at all. This adds a touch of fantasy.
With a focus on breasts, the camerawork adds a nice touch. There is a lot of whole body usage, breast play, fondling, as well as breast sex in most videos. I prefer extreme sites, but I found that here they know how to create sexy, hot videos out of fairly standard sex. It helps a lot when you start with models that really catch your eye. I could see this being a site for couples.
The solo videos are mostly masturbation, but some are sexy stripping. Some are hot, but not all. The girl girl videos are not all lesbian scenes. I found these somewhat dull and uninspired. Some other videos that I did not care for were the ones set in somewhat of a travel location, such as the Caribbean or some city. These remind me too much of photo set glamour photography.
There are also some videos of the models being interviewed. Mostly these were dull, the same as they are on so many other sites. I found it very hard to believe that every model is a confirmed sex addict. This sounds far too scripted.
For me, this is a site that I was very glad that I joined. In spite of it not being a fetish or otherwise extreme site, I truly enjoyed this. It is so big that I could see it taking more than a month for anyone to get their fill.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I thought I'd be getting less plumpers and more REALLY FINE women but "that might be on me"-the fact that that's my only "PRO" tells you what I think of the site.
Cons:
Terrible, unwieldy interface that lists many galleries and movies contained in their other sites. Be wary of canceling as they don't send emails when you start and end your subscription. They are their own billing service, but at least they provide you with a toll free number (that provided static and unintelligible words the first two times I called).
Bottom Line:
The plumpers were too plump for my my tastes and their handling of my subscription was beyond shady. Because I canceled within thirty minutes of calling ScoreGroup the lady said my cancellation wasn't in the system. She eventually canceled it for me and sent me a handmade email-How long have these guys been in business????
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Offers content that is sorely under represented.
+ The models age varies from the 40's all the way to late 60's.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in the MP4 format. Resolution varies depending on production year but it's common to see 1280 x 720 on most of the videos.
+You can download the picture sets as a single file.
+You get a set of stills from each video that help you decide it it's worth watching or downloading.
Cons:
-False advertising when it comes to the models that actually do anal.
-None of the content is exclusive. You can find all of these videos if you join other Score sites.
-The date on the videos is not the production date so it should only to be used as a reference point.
-They only have 64 videos and if Rabbits review is accurate than they actually lost 1 video since his Nov 25 2016 review. It may be even more if you consider that there were supposedly 4 videos added in December so the most recent count should be 69 and not 64.
-The videos are about 20-25 minutes long with usually only the last 8-10 minutes dedicated to anal.
-You supposedly get access to 15 other sites but in you could have simply had two or three sites that break down as anal only, interracial only videos and one that covers the rest.
-No search engine to help you find the content.
Bottom Line:
*I can't help but feel that this is a pure cash grab by the Score group and that's too bad because it's not going to endear them to other people who might have joined one of their sites but may now think twice because if they can screw you here than why can't they do it elsewhere. I know because I'm the one who got conned into joining this site but if others avoid it than it was worth it.
*I should have realised that it was too good to be true the minute I visited the site and saw the names of so many women who had never done anal before that they were using the old bait and switch trick to fool visitors into thinking that you could finally see something that you hadn't before.
*If they at least had all of the anal scenes available from all the Score Group of sites than it would be worth it but as it is they only have a portion and I can't help but feel that they aren't ever going to add a lot more to this site.
*If anal starring more mature women is your thing than simply join some of the other Score sites that are sure to have a lot more content and will likely be cheaper than 30$.
**I try never to use pricing in my score and I won't this time but charging 30$ for these sites feels a lot like highway robbery and the owners should be ashamed**
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Great collection of huge breasted & thick women!
Cons:
The Price!/Poor Video quality!/THE PRICE!!
This site is a waste of $$$ for the simple fact that they are charging $50 a month for a video only site that doesnt even have real quality HD videos!!! Hell Naughtyamerica.com only charges at the most 24.95 a month but at least you are getting 4K HD videos!!! I use to LOVE the old ScoreHD.com site I think they even had better quality videos but now it isn't worth $10 a month!!!
Bottom Line:
Bottom line if you feel like wasting $50 a month on a site that has poor quality videos then go right a head but it honestly is not worth it hell just for the price alone it's not!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautiful teen models
- Mix of solo, lesbian and hardcore
- Great for both photo and video fans
- 452 videos
- 2356 photo sets
- Site updates regularly
- Supports download managers
- TBP Discount
Cons:
- Video resolutions and bitrates are lower than average
- Bonus sites aren't worth considering in your decision to join
- Photos are lower resolution than many comparable sites
Bottom Line:
I went into this membership with high hopes because the models look to be exactly what I like: young and petite. The site isn't perfect, but it has a narrow focus and it sure does that one thing well: youll see some of the freshest porn models here. What I think bugs me most about this site is that it is so good that if the few flaws fixed on a go-forward basis this would be one of the best teen-themed sites on the net.
I think the best thing this site has are the models. There is a mix of up-and-coming porn stars and girls who just dabbled a bit in porn once or twice. There is also a mix of American and Eastern European / Russian models, but the majority are American. The common theme in the models is that they are all petite, just over 18 and, in my opinion, exceptionally hot. I realize that this is entirely subjective, but these are the exact kind of models I prefer. If you share this interest then a membership here is definitely worth considering.
The site has been around since 2007 and has amassed 450+ videos and 2350+ photo sets. The site updates with two photo sets and one video being added per week. Occasionally there will be two videos per week. The videos are a mix of solo, girl/girl and hardcore. This is just a guess, but it seems that for the last few years at least the split is somewhere around 45% solo, 45% hardcore and 10% girl/girl.
The videos dont follow any specific theme except the setup is intended to showcase the age and freshness of the models. The newer videos are offered with some choice: 1280x720, 640x360, 854x480 in MP4 and 640x360 in WMV. Bitrates are crucial to a video looking good but there isn't any consistency here. Even on the highest resolutions the bitrates can vary quite a bit. I have some scenes with bitrates as low as 1500kb/s. It does appear that the site is now fairly consistent in having bitrates around 3500kb/s. Older videos are WMV only and come in 640x480. Anything older than early 2011 and you will have to be satisfied with lower resolutions and bitrates. It is even later before 1280x720 is offered consistently.
The video quality is obviously the sites biggest flaw. While 720p videos are my choice as a balance between size and look I realize that others want the highest resolution possible. Maybe 4K wont happen, but it seems odd in 2015 to not offer 1280p. An immediate improvement could be made by using better bitrates. All isn't lost though, as the newer videos are encoded in a way to take full advantage of their less-than-stellar specs.
Another odd choice that seems to harken back to a decade ago is that the scenes are offered as five-minute clips. Some readers may disagree, but in my opinion the video offerings are outdated. Having 1280x720 as the top download is below what most people expect these days. Offering five-minute clips seems like its from a different internet era. Are there people buying porn memberships that still download this way?
Photos are a key part of the site too. This is one of the rare sites where photo collectors and video collectors could both feel the site offers good value. The photos do suffer from the same drawbacks as the videos in that they arent very high resolution. The newest photos come in 400x600, 800x1200 and 2000x3000. Older photos are available in a maximum of 768x1200.
The videos are offered in streaming too, and there is an in-browser photo slideshow available.
There are a few minor concerns. The biggest of these is that the search function really doesnt work well. I did a search for anal scenes and got some scenes that had no anal. To make matters worse, I couldnt sort those results to get only videos.
Some minor positives are that the site offers a TBP discount and allows download managers. The TBP page says that managers aren't supported but I had no problem using IDM to queue-up scenes. It may be that multiple simultaneous downloads are blocked. I didnt run into any download limits.
The site offers two bonus sites (Picking Up Pussy and T&A Tryouts) but both of these sites are small and offer what look to be old scenes with new release dates added. You may like the bonus sites, but I wouldnt use factor them in on a decision to join the main site.
I would definitely recommend this site to anyone looking for videos and/or photos of some of the freshest porn models on the net. With the TBP discount this site offers a great value. The older material is definitely not up to par by 2015/2016 standards, but thats to be expected. Some minor improvements to the current videos and photos would take this site over the top. Ill be adding this to my list of sites to join regularly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
10-07-1403:23pm (Update History) Reason: issue with cancellation was a major technical issue and seems to be fixed for everyone
Pros:
+There are currently nearly 1560 scenes to choose from.
+All the content is dated and they update with 1-4 new videos each day.
+You can download all the videos in 4 different resolution:320x240, 640x360, 854x480 and 1280x720 but some of the newer ones can also be downloaded in true HD 1920x1080.
+They offer a huge variety of models from teens to older milfs and with body types from petite all the way to BBW.
+There is no third party advertising on the site and advertising for it`s other sites isn`t too intense either.
Cons:
-They borrow/steal content from many of their other Score sites so it`s very important for past members to make sure they don`t already have those scenes.
-They offer the ability to search by keywords but the scenes don't have actual keywords tagged to them so the results you get aren`t all the ones you should if it worked properly.
-There is no way of knowing which videos are in WMV and which ones are in MP4. You would think that all the recent ones would be in MP4 but they are not.
-I don't normally use cost as a con but the join price for this site is 50$ which is more than twice the cost of any of their other sites and since the content is mostly all from SCoreHD than why make it so much more expensive?
-There is no kissing between the men and women but there is in the g/g stuff.
Bottom Line:
*This is basically the same site as ScoreHD but with some content taken from their other sites that was not offered when it was called ScoreHD. I think it's basically stuff from Score 50 plus that has been added. That's a plus for some people because that was one of my complaints but you aren't getting much of Score50 content and you are paying twice as much as you did for any of their other Score sites
*I notice that TBP's review list 1749 videos but I only counted 1555 while TBP says there are 1749 so what happened to those 200 scenes that I did not see? I counted using the latest scene icon so maybe there are really 1749 videos if you use another option.
*The videos are all top notch with some very good camera angles, excellent lighting and a nice flow to the scenes. The downside is that there's no kissing between the men and women which removes a lot of the chemistry that would be there with some kissing. The strange thing is that there is kissing in the g/g stuff.
*Scene breakdown is: 662 solo only scenes, 18 are g/g only and the rest are hardcore b/g. There are 328 scenes starring BBW and 159 starring MILFs.
I have amended my review by removing anything to do with the difficulty in cancelling because I truly believe that it was never intentional on their part to make it next to impossible to cancel. I received what I consider to be the best support anybody could hope to get and I am very impressed with Score. I have also increased my score as a large part of the low score was about cancellation issues.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Christy Marks - Fantastic mammaries and a fun loving attitude
High quality content professionally done
All videos are high def (1280)
Updates once a week or so
Imaginative solo scenes
Christy's an incredible contortionist. Example - she could fuck herself with her nipples. When she squeezes her mams between her legs it sends me off. Her patented "frog" position is unique.
NO INK. A major plus for me.
No broken links.
Cons:
No interaction with members
A total of 60 videos* and associated pix
Only two non-Christy videos - both Merilyn Sakova, with tits equal to Christy's
All of Christy's material is 5+ years old and is remastered (very well, by the way).
Some material is also available on one or more of Score's other websites and some is unique to this site.
Hard core material is all SSDG - Same sex different guy. Little imagination in the hard stuff.
The g/g/b and g/g stuff isn't particularly good. (Exception - her scene with Terry Nova with two guys was outstanding)
Slowish downloads
* One scene was taken down before I had a chance to download it. No idea why it was removed.
Bottom Line:
The site is $19.95 with the PU/TBP discount and, for horndogs like me who really enjoy watching Christy enjoying her great tits. I was able to drain the entire site in four sessions.
The total amount of video content as of 7/1/14 is just a tad more than 15 Gb.
Thus site is not included as an add on (free or otherwise) with any other Score site so it must be considered a "hot property" by management.
I decided on a point score of 76. It would be higher if the site had more content and included all, not just some, material from other Score sites. It would be lower except they have done a good job of upgrading their catalog to HD.
Bottom line, I recommend the site to huge tit aficionados who like young, seemingly carefree models. It comes to about 33 cents per video scene which, if you enjoy world class huge natural boobs bouncing (flopping) all over the screen, is a great value.
Set aside a few hours a day for four or five days if you plan to download everything on the site.
I plan to cancel about a week before my first month is used up and may, but probably won't, rejoin a year or so from now.
I can't comment on customer service because I had no need to use it during my brief stay.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.
Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.
The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.
That's about it for the "Pros" list.
Cons:
Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.
No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.
Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.
It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it.
Bottom Line:
This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.
If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.
The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.
The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.
The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They offer content that is rare to see on the net and even more so when you consider that it stars North American women.
+The sex is surprisingly good considering the age of the performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to still be updating.
+Many of the performers look good for their age and seem to still be all natural. Not too mention that they appear to be mostly unknowns.
+You can see the age of each performer in the photo section of the site.
+You can download the photosets of each video as a single zip file and resolution is minimum 1200x800(but many of the pics are 1600x1063).
+You also get access to 50plus milfs.
Cons:
-This site like it's sister site 50plus does not allow members to download videos that are older than 6 weeks.
-The site is quite tiny with only 72 videos and they don't update regularly or with any kind of schedule so that number does not grow by much each year.
-Many of their performers have more than one video on this site and on 50 plus so you are getting some similar content.
-Since these women are in their 60's then they don't look like women under 40 or let alone under 30.
Bottom Line:
*I debated whether I should do a seperate review of this site or simply add the info on my 50plus review since the transition from both site is seemless to members but I decided to do a seperate one just in case Score decides to split the sites. This way each site will have it's own review and that is important because this site is so much smaller than the olther one.
*The thing to know about this site is that it's women in their 60's having hardcore sex with men that are definetely half their age or younger and don't let the gray ins ome of their hair fool you because they can give as good as they take. Sadly the site also doesn't have any kissing between the performers which is too bad because that would add a lot more passion and heat to the scenes.
*They don't allow downloads other than those released in the last six weeks but because they don't update as often as their 50plus site then you actually get less for your money.
**Bottom line is that there are almost no sites that cater to this type of fetish so even though it's mostly a streaming only site then it could be worth joining at least once to see what it offers and since you get access to 50plus milfs then that's not a bad deal. Of course if they seperate both sites then it will probably take years before they have enough content to make a visit worth it. that is unless more 60 years old start doing porn.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They offer content from a niche that is rare to find on the net.
+They offer all exclusif content.
+They have a surprisingly wide selection of models who for the most part look natural.
+These women handle some pretty huge dicks and a fair amount of them even do anal with said dicks.
+The sex is often quite good but(see con).
+There are 133 videos that can be streamed online with a resolution of 480p and 720p.
+All the videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is at least 1200x800.
+They are still updating and it appears that it's anything from two to four updates per month.
+All content is dated.
+Many of the performers are unknowns so this is probably the only place you'll see them do this kind of stuff.
+You also get access to 60plus milfs.
Cons:
-The biggest con against this site is that it's for all intense and purposes a streaming only site. You can only download videos released in the last six weeks.
-The sex is hardcore and quite good but there is no kissing at all which I found disapointing.
-The navigation could be improved with the addition of keywords but then again the site is so small that this isn't such a problem.
-The load time for streaming is inconsistent so that it will sometime load quickly and stream well and other times it takes a while for the video to load and you can forget skipping ahead or suffer slow load time.
-The same performer will sometime have more than one scene so that may or may not be a problem for some.
-These women are in their 50's and although they don't always look their age. They also don't look like young women anymore.
-Videos can only be downloaded in one resolution which is 640x360.
Bottom Line:
*This site offers content that is badly underrepresented and therefore it is nice that it exist. It would be a lot nicer if all the videos were made available for download. They have their reason why they aren't but I've never really understood them.
*The important thing to know about this site is that you are watching women in their 50's have hardcore sex with men that are often half their ages and who plow into them like there is no tomorrow. This is not vanilla porn so if that is what you want then you'll want to stear clear because hard pounding vaginal and often anal sex is on the menu on this site. A significant amount of the male performers are Latino and African American so if interracial isn't your thing then you'll also want to stay away.
*The one thing that I wanted to see and which is lacking is kissing before and during the scene and strangely there isn't a single instance where you see this. Kissing would go a long way in increasing the heat factor and since there isn't any then that's make the scene less appealng than it could be.
**Of course making videos available for download would be nice and they lose points because they don't but not as many as some other sites might because their content is too rare to excessively penalize them for a business decision.** They probably already lose customers due to their no download policy anyway.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week.
Cons:
-None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video.
Bottom Line:
*I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.
*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.
*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.
**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-) Updates with videos/photos multiple times a week
-) Large variety of models
-) Easy navigation, appealing design
-) Zipped photosets are downloadable (although not with a unique filename)
-) Video and photo quality of new sets is very good (720p and 1200x800 pixels) - i like the colors and contrast and detail in the photos. Makeup is used on the models
-) Plenty of content and variety
-) Download speed was decent for me
Cons:
-) Videos are downloadable ONLY for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you can watch it streaming only.
-) Zipped photosets for download have no unique filename.
-) old content (and that's a big part of the content) is not so great in quality - mostly low-resolution photos.
Bottom Line:
As always, this is a BBW-site and as such anybody looking for something else should go elsewhere.
But those who enjoy this kind of content (and you can preview the featured models as a non-member quite well), will definitely like the content inside. You'll find many models in great videos. Video quality of new videos is good (720p) and so is the photography. The overall styling of the model is stylish with makeup - so not as natural as some others might like. Content is exclusive as far as I could see.
However there is one MAJOR ISSUE with the site: Videos are only downloadable for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you'll have to be happy with streaming (so no viewing later on). To be frank, this sucks. All websites that restrict downloading of videos suck and this is the reason why I didn't give it a 90+ point rating. I'd be happy to pay a premium to download all videos as I please. Nothing during sign-up tells you about that restriction.
Site navigation is easy and straightforward, so is downloading of videos (if they are downloadable) and photos. One minor glitch with photoset downloading: the file naming is "Modelname.zip" so your photosets aren't named to matching videos - you'll have to rename (or auto-rename) the file during download so you don't overwrite existing zip-sets.
Important during signup: They try to screw you when signing up by offering a 19,90 one-month recurring option and a 29,90 one-month NON-recurring option. Be aware what you choose.
Verdict: The action and the models are excellent and I'd somewaht recommend the site. The downloading restriction is downright ugly, hence a big fine in rating-points.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good selection of milfs and gilfs.
Streaming video quality is good.
Cons:
Can only download recent scenes.
Only two updastes a month.
Bottom Line:
This site has a lot of potential but falls short. If you like the type of models they have, older sexy women, then the content is great. Many of those sexy seniors love to take cock. They perform hardcore sex inluding anal, facial, and creampies. The women looks great and are paired up with a younger man. The video quality is good. They are available in dvd quality 6630X380 in wmv and mp4 format. You can also rate the scenes and leave comment on them. There are some nice picture sets available for each scene and model too.
The really bad part about this site is the lack of downloadable content. They only offer the most recent two months to download the scenes. All the other past scenes are available but for streaming only. The other bad part is they only update twice a month so that leaves you with a total of four or five scenes to download from the start. There reason behind this is to stop online piracy of there scenes they stated. The problem with that is the site is run by the Score group and they have other grat sites that don't have this limitation on downloads.
In short with the lack of updates and downloads this site is not very good. You do get access to 60 plus milfs, which is basically the same but with slightly older women. If they updated at least twice a week on both sites and allowed all the content to be downloaded it would be a great site but until then its really not worth it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-- Large number of models.
-- Easier to naviagte and find content than Scoreland master site.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons:
-- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- For some reason, the DL speed and streaming was slower than at Scoreland.
-- Probably not enough updates to keep long-term subscribers used to large volume. Best for one-month subscriptions.
-- Should be part of Scoreland main subscription.
Bottom Line:
Background:
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.
--Navigatiuon and menus are a bit simplified from the information-overload present at Scoreland.
-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.
-- Streaming and DL speeds are not as quick as at the master site Scoreland.
-- The site will likely not keep long-term interest. Site should probably be included with a Scoreland subscription and not exist as a seperate pay-site.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Summary:
I added this site when signing up for a one-month subscription to Scoreland. The cost was $19.99 for one month, non-recurring.
BBW stands for Big Beautful Women.
The first two two terms here are relative. I have had an erotic interest in this genre over the years.. I have discovered that 'Big' can mean anything from slightly plump to to morbidly obese. The women shown at XL girls generally falls somewhere in the middle. One characteristic all the models have is that that they all sport large, natural-looking breasts. Most appear to be young, twenty-somethings, althought there are a few MILF models. Pretty faces are the norm.
Beauty is also in the eye of the beholder and this genre won't be for everyone. It is refreshing, however, to see more natural-looking women in this industry--the kind you are likely to encounter on the street. Also, in the photosets, the models will actually smile and don't look irritated or annoyed.
The photos at the site are much more profresinal-looking than most BBW images I have come accross in the past, The photographers could tone down the airburhsing a bit, however.
I guess this genre is defined by anything that does not fit the cookie cutter mold of what the average man would find appealing in terms of physcique. The women at XLGirls look like natural women on the plump side, all with motherly figures.Silicone appears to be used sparingly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conclusion:
This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of plump, rubenesque women one would find in classic paintings, albeit with large chests.
The site is a mix of photos and videos. There is not a large amount of XX action here and most videos are solo or girl-girl.
IMO, who would like this site:
Photo lovers and those with a fetish for plump, rubenesque, motherly women or those who have a breast fetish. Also, this site will appeal to those who enjoy a more classic, conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.
IMO, who won't like this site:
Those who are looking for the cookie-cutter, well-toned models who spend most of their days in the gym and count their calories. Also, those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades(obviously subjective):
Site Navgigation: B
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: C
Quantity: B
XXX Action: D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for improvement:
Addf this site to the standard Scoreland subscription.
More creativity in photos. Diversify the photosets to include more angles and perspectives. Photosets tend to stick to a classic script.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-- Huge amount of content.
-- Large variety of model types within the 'big-boob' genre.
-- Fairly decent DL speeds.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons:
-- Not the most user-friendly site when it comes to navigation or finding content.
-- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- A little pricey compared to competition.
--- Although the content amount is huge, it is easy to become a bit overwhelmed by it when trying to decide on selections.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- No HD Video Download Option--Only Streaming.
Bottom Line:
Background:
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pros and Cons:
-- The amount of content here is huge. I used to subscribe to Voluptuous and Score back in the 90's. The models represent the type of women I find attractive. You can find content dating back to the 90's on the site.
-- Streaming and DL speeds seem to be up to par and there are no problems to report here, so far.
-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.
-- It can be a bit difficult at first to navigate around the huge of amount of content in the archives. More user-friendly options would be nice.
-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.
-- Subscription rates also seem to be a little bit higher in cost than the typical site.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conclusion:
This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of large-breasted women, especially of the voluptuous and/or curvy variety. Models can range from thin-and-stacked to soft and voluptuous.
The site is a mix of photos and videos. If viewing softcore images of chesty, well-endowed women is your thing, you won't be dissapointed. There is a fair amount of xxx video action to be found, but the majority of presentations, both photo and video, are softcore solo or girl-girl.
Update 1/24/12-- HD Video Downloading is NOT an option. One can only stream HD videos. I discovered this recently. One must subscribe to Score HD to download HD.
IMO, who would like this site:
Photo lovers and those with a breast fetish who enjoy a variety of body types and those who enjoy a more classic conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.
Who won't like this site:
Those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades(obviously subjective):
Site Navgigation: C-
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B+
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: A
Quantity: A+
XXX Action: C
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for improvement:
Improve the site navigation utility and add options to make the user experience a bit easier.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Decent selection of natural and enhanced models to choose from.
-Photosets can be dowloaded in 800 x 600 and 1600 x 1200 resolution.
-They are still updating.
-Content is dated.
-You can search by models name, body type hair color and type of shoot.
Cons:
-The bulk of the videos are streaming only.
-They only have 270 videos.
-They only have 150 photosets.
-They only have 13 magazines.
-There is a large logo on each pic.
-Their preview pages are serioulsy misleading.
-Their pages are clutered with offers from other sites.
Bottom Line:
-There must have been some serious changes at 40something since January of this year because TBP gave this site an 82 and claimed that videos were downloadable. In my book 10 downloadable videos out of 270 is not enough to claim that the site allows downloads.
-This is one of the worst case of half truth and lies that I've seen a site do in many years. I joined based on the TBP review and the sites own preview pages. First lie. They claim that you can get access to every 40something magazine ever printed. Yes, you do but you will have to buy them so not free. Second lie: They mention all the videos and pic sets that the model has and they do say x number of videos from other sites but if they aren't availbale on your site then why bring them up. The only conclusion I see is that they know that people like me will assume that these videos are available on their site but content can be also be found on those other sites.
This site belongs to the score group which owns a huge amount of other sites but because of this site I don't think I will ever join any of their otrher sites for fear that they are lying on that site as well.
***This site is to be avoided at all cost or you will regret wasting your 20$ like I am at this very moment.***
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
No DRM/DL limits.
A variety of download options with good download speed.
Sites still updating.
Lack of irritating things Porn Users hate like pulling hair, spitting, slapping, insulting the models, mucking about on camera etc.
Good customer service, and no pre checked cross sells.
No regional discrimination.
$10 discount for 18 Eighteen through TBP/PU.
Easy sign in procedure.
Good quality video and zipped pics.
Mostly no contraceptives.
Models are young, attractive, have girl next door looks, and there are mercifully few fake breasts.
Cons:
Navigation is difficult, not least because there are far too many links and adverts for trying to sell members material outside the membership.
Far too many tattoos and piercings.
To use a perfect Drooler phrase - "pussy fixated" sums up the photography and camerawork, which is a shame because they are professionally done, with both the videos and pics looking good. It's just there are far too many close up groin shots, and three quarter shots, especially in the videos, where you don't see the whole model.
Very little anal.
Suprisingly few videos compared to some sites, especially long serving ones. Less than half the material on 18 Eighteen is hardcore.
Bottom Line:
TNA Tryouts and Picking Up Pussy are included with membership. You get a 10 dollar discount through TPB/PU. I was more interested in TNA and PUP than 18 Eighteen as they specialise more in hardcore, but I joined through 18 because of the discount. Less than half of the 18 Eighteen material is hardcore.
Pics come in downloadable zips or you can watch them as slideshows. Videos can be streamed or downloaded. Specs are as follows-:
Pics 1600 high or 800 medium resolution. TNA only has around 16-30 in each set whereas PUP and 18 Eighteen have 50-80.
Full downloadable videos in HD wmv at 1280x720 and medium HD wmv at 854x480. Medium wmv at 640x360 and mp4 at 640x360. There are also 5 minute segments in wmv at 640x360 and 360x240, or mp4 at 640x360. Unfortunately 18 Eighteen does not have the high 1280x720 downloadable videos. They do have 720 HD streaming. Full videos or 5 minute clips are available for mobile devices.
The videos on TNA Tryouts take the form of a girl coming to the door and pretending to be a newcomer. She takes part in a short interview before doing a strip and having sex. On Picking Up Pussy the build up takes the form of a girl being picked up by a driver or on a street/in a park. On 18 Eighteen the sex starts a little quicker. You see the same girls on all three sites, so the build up is just a bit of acting to get the scene going. Camera work and pics are good quality, but once again there is far to too much groin/pussy oriented and three quarter close ups for my taste.
On TNA Tryouts and Picking Up Pussy the videos and photo sets are dated, so although they are kept separate you can match up the pics to the video. On 18 Eighteen it's horrible. Very little is dated so in most cases you have to find either the photo set or video, then go to the model directory to match up the videos and pics. In fact there are so many bits and pieces, which are usually not great quality, that trying to find anything is very time consuming and annoying, because it's all mixed up with the upsells. Some of the material comes with the membership, some of it doesn't, and it's really tedious trying to sort out which is which. In the end I spent most of my time on the two bonus sites.
As on all sites, the older material is poorer quality. Given how long 18 Eighteen has been going I was surprised at how little high spec material was available. There was not a lot of hardcore avavailable on 18 Eighteen, but the other two sites are purely hardcore. Today I have counted 15 videos and photo sets on TNA, with 5 of them being 2011 updates. On PUP there are 30 videos and photo sets, with 5 being 2011 updates.
On cancellation there was an offer to remain for five pounds. If navigation was not so hard I'd have probably taken the offer.
However, I consider the money well spent, and good value. This is another site that I find to be almost old fashioned, and better for it, because of the lack of those annoying cons that we all hate.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
