| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It depends - I've seen good banter between models and cameramen before, sometimes it brings out the best in models. But often it's just annoying.
|
10-07-14 03:04pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
One of my girlfriends looked like Sarah Peachez. Coincidentally her name was Sarah too. She was incredibly promiscuous, had a lot of fun with her in the few years that we were together :)
|
09-16-14 09:56pm
|
Reply
53
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
I suspect it is probably because sites glorifying 'abuse' are likely to get blocked in certain countries (eg, the UK).
|
09-01-14 01:42pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think so, yes, when you consider that your porno pound goes towards paying the models/talent gets their fair share, the webmaster(s) get their cut, any outfits and props, any studios they may need, the photography equipment, the web hosting and bandwidth plus probably a million other things I've forgotten.
|
09-01-14 12:52pm
|
Reply
55
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Roberto281's Comment
Wow, let us know the outcome for this. If it's true, it's yet another example of cynical, sneaky 'customer service' whereby they try and trick more money out of subscribers.
And these websites wonder why subscriptions are down. Yes, piracy and tube sites have a lot to answer for, but my list of sites that I will not join is getting longer and longer by the day and Brazzers is on the verge of being added too.
|
08-19-14 11:22pm
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most of the sites I join are solo sites, and honestly, most have a pretty lousy track-record of updating in that I have often joined just as they stop updating. The idea that this could happen when I commit to a 3-month membership really puts me off.
With the big network sites, I normally dip in-and-out membership-wise, so I'll join for a month, catch up with updates, then rejoin a few months later.
Also, I don't normally like to have more than one or two memberships at the same time, so I don't like to put all my eggs in one basket.
|
08-17-14 01:31am
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I really like it, so long as it's not a substitute for a real update. For me, a model's personality is really important and it's a big reason why I like models like Riley Reid.
|
08-15-14 09:31am
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Twice, and both times it was resolved. First time was with Chica's Place, and they sorted it pretty much immediately. The other time it was with Bryci's site which was sorted after quite a protracted discussion.
|
08-13-14 11:41pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I completely agree with Pat, I voted no too. It's not the same thing, plus 95% of the women who will take advantage of being able to go topless will probably be the ones we'd prefer not to.
|
08-09-14 06:12am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I said not important at all, but that isn't to say I don't mind scenes with a narrative to them.
|
08-06-14 12:43pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Probably 60% hardcore, and 40% solo.
|
08-02-14 01:08pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Videos, normally. If it's a network site, then by model videos.
|
07-28-14 12:58am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Some are, I guess. I like athletic figures (a lot of female sports stars/athletes for example) and fitness models like Zuzka. So long as they're still feminine, though.
|
07-10-14 03:01pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not really interested in its current form, but I wouldn't write it off completely, particularly if there's still an option for 2D. I voted for 'only slightly interested'
|
07-05-14 12:26am
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
1, but it's dead, so strictly speaking it's a doorstop.
|
06-19-14 11:43pm
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Surprised there's no 'none' option, so I've voted 'other'
|
06-08-14 02:31pm
|
Reply
67
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
ghosty's Comment
Good to know - regional pricing is pretty annoying, particularly with examples like this. Presumably you complained in response to their reply? If so, what was their response?
|
06-03-14 11:08pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I always try and organise as I download, but sometimes, where it isn't possible to right-click download to target, it will end up in my downloads folder, then I'll move into the appropriate place within a day-or-two.
|
06-01-14 12:33am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on the type of site. Daily to several times a week for a network, while weekly (several times a month) I'd say is frequent for a solo/amateur site.
|
05-28-14 03:02pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
C for me, although B is a close second. Honestly, I'm not generally too fussy at all - shape is the most important aspect to me (more than size).
|
05-20-14 12:56pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Cropped thumbnails are pretty annoying as they're always indiscriminately cropped, often meaning you have to guess what's what's missing.
|
05-14-14 03:21pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I'm with you. I've read and re-read and it makes no sense to me whatsoever.
|
05-12-14 11:12pm
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Same here, so long as they're obviously adverts they're absolutely fine. Anything that helps me discover new content I might otherwise have missed is a good thing in my opinion.
|
05-06-14 02:43pm
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't really notice the flaws, and when I do, I don't mind as it adds character.
|
04-30-14 10:54am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I voted no preference, but I guess ideally starting off with heels and ending up barefoot is the perfect scenario for me.
|
04-26-14 04:11am
|
