| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
hiker's Review
Hey Hiker, glad to see a new face here at PU. Like a lot of us, we started posting after feeling that we got ripped off by a site. I'll just echo the comments from the previous reply, in that while you're experience may not have been good we always like more info so that others can make a fully informed decision.
|
10-12-11 01:52pm
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
DOESN'T IT MEAN THAT THEY'RE REALLY COOL LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!!!
|
10-12-11 01:50pm
|
Reply
178
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I would say that it's less than 90%, probably only about 60%. However, in my past experience they usually have the scenes first before the content starts to filter out to other websites as the months go by.
As an aside, the reviewers at TheBestPorn aren't collectors like us so they mainly rely on a websites description of "exclusive content" when they post their facts. Other PU reviewers may miss that as well. However, I don't usually have a beef when the majority of the content is exclusive like Karups.
|
10-12-11 01:49pm
|
Reply
179
|
Teen Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
Agreed, I just browsed through the preview pages and saw lots of content from teenmegaworld. Still, if you haven't belonged to that site this does seem like a pretty good deal. I might try it for the "sex for grades" site they have.
|
10-09-11 02:32pm
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Money, money, money. That's why most get into it. Most can't make a living doing it. Money is also why you see some former stars suddenly come back. I'm still looking for definitive proof that is does make the world go 'round.
|
10-09-11 02:27pm
|
Reply
181
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Thanks for doing a detailed review on this one. I've been thinking about it and it looks like I'll hang to my bucks for a while before signing up.
|
10-04-11 05:38pm
|
Reply
182
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I know, now. Just after I posted this comment I looked back at the TBP page on this site and saw the disclaimer as a limited trial. Sorry, just didn't read ... or least my brain refused to comprehend. You can scrap my original comment and these replies if you want.
|
10-04-11 12:22pm
|
Comment
183
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
|
10-04-11 12:14pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
Cause I'm so full of shit that it overflowed into my screen name.
|
10-03-11 09:35pm
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Another thing that I've never understood. I mean, what ... is the guy too lazy to walk over to the bathroom? Is some chick flowing free just testing the strength of her feminine sanitary products? Then someone has to clean up after it all. If someone really wants the full effect why not get a job at a farm or a zoo and just stand around a horse or an elephant? Whatever.
|
10-03-11 09:33pm
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
If there was no porn think of all the bandwidth that would become available and all that former porn money waiting to be gobbled up. I'm all in on cow tipping, the next internet sensation and international sport. Don't forget about the bikini girl cow tipping leagues either.
|
10-03-11 01:36pm
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Uh, the countries with the hottest babes doing the hottest things for the lowest subscription cost. So much for nationalism, when it comes to porn I'm all about the dollar ... no wait, the peso, euro, zimbabwe dollar?!?!?!!? Nevermind.
|
10-02-11 10:47pm
|
Reply
188
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Let's be real for a minute. 5 new reviews, all in the 90', in one day. The site itself is plain. According to TheBestPorn it has 7 videos and about 200 photo sets. The webmaster is defending himself left and right after never having appeared on this site before. Did I mention that the people posting the highly regarded reviews here have never posted reviews before? This is nothing but a con game so let's leave it at that and move on to more important stuff like how long it's been since I've cleaned my belly button lint.
|
10-02-11 10:33pm
|
Comment
189
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
09-19-11 02:03pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
190
|
Naughty America
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
++ 30+ sites, 1700 models and 4100 scenes to keep you busy
++ Very good tags and cross site search functions
++ Lots of video options, especially the new stuff, and goes up 1080p
+ Cool function on the new videos where you hold your mouse over the play back bar and it shows what is happening during that section of the movie
+ Lots of social media and site interaction if you're into that stuff
+ Good monthly price through TBP
+ Others have said that the "live" section was gone in earlier reviews but it appears to be back, at least in recorded form.
+ Lots of American girls
+ Professional lighting and production value
+ Lots of options available for customer support and I got a prompt reply to my one issue.
+ All the content besides the live shows is hardcore |
| Cons: |
-- Not enough pictures and they're low quality (don't join for the pics)
-- Problems with downloads using Mozilla and with older scenes
-- Slow site at times (they need more servers)
- Cross sales on signup
- Stupid social networking keeps popping up |
| Bottom Line: |
I sort of joined this site at a bad time given I didn't have a lot of time to use it during my month and I'm sort of in a porn burnout phase. Nonetheless, I had mostly good experience but there wasn't enough to give it a top notch score that with a little effort this place could achieve.
PICS: Don't join for the pics. All scenes have pics but even the newest scenes max out at about 60 pics with a size of about 900x600. Too few and too low quality that could easily be solved. This site will never cross 90 for a score in my book so long as this continues. Also, when clicking a photo to bring it up to full size, you automatically go into slideshow mode even if you try to turn it off. All pic sets have zips but generally the pics on the network need help.
VIDS: The newest vids are great. You have mobile and "normal" download options. Sizes go up 1080p on the new stuff, older vids generally max out at about720 or 480. All vids have full scene or partial scene D/L options. All vids have stream options although even with a broad band connection the streaming was jumpy when trying to view it above 480 resolution. Download speeds were OK at 400 to 500 kbs. With older vids I sometimes had problems getting them to DL in the .wmv format (the only option available) because the screen taking you to the download page wouldn't download ... how's that for irony. As noted, the newer streaming vids let you mouse along the playback bar to reveal what action is taking place in that part of the scene. There are no screen caps though.
OTHER: Search is great. Scenes seem well tagged and the search engine is very good and comprehensive. There is no real model info though beyond the name. Navigation needs some work (a fair amount of clicking sometimes).
There are a fair number of boob jobs and the chicks, while most are US born and bred, are mostly average caliber porn stars. Not much anal but the site is mostly hardcore. Lots of niches with 30+ sites but the theme is pretty constant throughout the network. All high production value except the pics.
The social networking aspects are probably the best I've seen including a wiki (just a link ofr now) and a forum and user feedback galore if you're into that sort of stuff. The damn social networking needs to just go away though (pops up every new screen).
The site can be slow at times and I didn't like the fact that when viewing a specific models portfolio (many have multiple pages) that when navigating you always have to go back to page 1 even if you last on page 6.
So, there is lots to see and get involved with. For me, the pictures are a big negative along with some slow navigation and downloading issues. Overall, it was worth the money but I'd like to see some changes before I go back again. |
|
07-11-11 03:42pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Isn't this poll question basically preaching to the choir? Most of us wouldn't be here if we didn't think porn was a great thing to throw a couple of bucks at.
|
07-11-11 11:47am
|
Reply
192
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If you have to wear goggles and still see barely recognizable 3-D there's no point. I doubt that anyone can even download a 3-D movie that plays back decently in 3-D in a commonly used viewing format (WMP, VLC, etc). Right now it's just a gimmick until the technology makes it look good. Even then, it won't have much of an impact on me because you'll need to play it back on a big old monitor / tv to get the full effect which I don't do.
|
06-09-11 10:54am
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
Not really sure how this would work. As an old school dude, I wouldn't use social networking to access PU. However, for the younger crowd who actually thinks surfing for porn on your phone or ipad is cool then maybe it'd work. Not really sure what TBP or PU would tweet or post though - read up on Khan zapping a crappy review or forum spammer, Duke just tweeted that he got a woody from looking at new porn site. I'm not really sure I'd want my newest reviews or forum posts spread even further around the web (they're bad enough as they are).
A better idea would be Groupon take, where if x number of PUers sign up, you can get a great deal on a website.
|
05-02-11 12:54pm
|
Review
194
|
18 Stream
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
++ $1, 1 day full access trial (bills thru Segpay)
++ Big pictures (up to 4300 pixels, but most sets are still in the 2500 pixel range) with zips
++ Exclusive content (for me anyways, other reviewers have said different but I don't know and haven't seen it elsewhere)
+ Good sized vids (720x540 on most, a few are bigger) and d/l options (wmv, mpeg and quicktime as well as flash streaming)
+ Movies have screen caps to see what you're getting
+ No DRM
+ No cross sales on signup
+ About 680 vids and 300 pic sets |
| Cons: |
-- Pretty amateur in terms of quality and performances
- Picture sets don't offer a lot
- Slowish download speeds (1 gig = 1 hour of download time on my highspeed connection)
- Search and navigation need work
- No scene downloads, all or nothing
- Cannot jump around within the scene while using the streaming video option
- Camera work could be better (too often the guy seems glued to one spot or has a few focus issues)
- Page often has to refresh when going back and forth from it.
- No model info, just the name
- A couple of video updates a week, pics don't update anymore |
| Bottom Line: |
I checked this one out on the el cheapo trial to see some exclusive Eastern Euro puntang. That's what I got but it didn't exactly leave me with that "Charlie Sheen drinking tiger blood with the goddesses winning" feeling. This site is focused on hardcore younger girl porn and that's what most of the scenes are. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: All pics have zips and they are pretty big. The problem is that there isn't much content. At most a couple of positions and because the photographer won't move it isn't uncommon to get no view of the old "in and out". When your getting almost 200 pics per set and only a handful are good, that ain't good. The newest stuff can be slow download (can you say a half hour for one zip set) because of the large files. Some pics were out of focus too. Lighting and quality varies a lot. If you're into pics, this place won't satisfy you.
VIDS: All the vids were good sized and I didn't have any sections that were garbled from the download like some other reviewers did. The quality, angles (again, sometimes you just see bodies rubbing with no visible action) and lighting varies a lot from scene to scene. While the girls are exclusive they are also pretty amateur and it shows in the performance, not much excitement from most of them. Yes, it beats gonzo screamers but this is pushing it towards the other extreme. You do get screen caps and you'll need them because the stream option can only run from beginning to end, no jumping. Download times, as mentioned, need some help.
NAV: No real navigation other than the pics and vids home pages. No tags, no search engine, no model info. It is more of an amateur site but it is getting a bit big to have non of this info and still be functional.
OTHER: They do have some social networking functionality within the site which I never bothered with. Overall, I wasn't all that impressed. The girls are mostly cute but many of them don't put much into their performances. All the scenes are in Russian so you don't know what they're saying when the vids start but I bet you can use your imagination to figure out where it's heading. The camera work needs help and kills most of the picture sets. The volume of content is what keeps it in the high 70's for my scoring system.
You also get access to Spunkybee and Rough18 but the same issues I had with this site follow to those as well.
I had no problem finding what I wanted with my 1 day membership even with the slow download speeds. Certainly not worth the full $35 a month. So, I guess it's a good diversion for a day but don't expect a ton of good stuff here. Be happy with what you can still get for a buck I guess. |
|
04-25-11 07:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
195
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MountainMan's Review
Good first review there MountainMan. Glad you've come down from your peak of to share your porn wisdom with the masses. A few more technical specs (vid sizes, etc.) would be useful but darn good for a first review. Hope to see more.
|
04-21-11 05:03pm
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
So, do I get a paycheck from Rick or what for bringing this up as poll question :) I've looked at it a few times but the only weakness I see in it is that join pages can easily change and they might quickly become outdated. Probably best used for sites off the beaten path.
|
04-14-11 12:04pm
|
Review
197
|
Gaping Angels
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ Good $3, 3 day full access trial through TBP
++ 17 site network
++ Exclusive Evil Angel content though some of it may be on other sites
+ No cross sales on signup
+ Some 720 sized HD vids
+ Fast download rates (about 1.5 mb/sec on a single download, about half that for 2-3 channels of simultaneous downloading)
+ Lots of anal and fetish vids for those into that
+ No DRM
+ A good number of recognizable porn stars
+ 100's of scenes / dvds spread across the network in a variety of niches
+ Several updates per week |
| Cons: |
-- Crappy search function and no cross site search
-- Photosets are worthless and no zip function
- HD streaming vids are pretty choppy even on my broadband connection
- A lot of sites have some overlapping content
- Video quality varies from great to crap
- Many scenes and DVDs lack model info and scene tags
- My computer crashed a few times during downloads (not if this is the site but this rarely happens to me)
- Limited number of HD movies on each site, older vids are pretty low in quality
- If you're from Canada, read the terms and conditions before signing up, it's sort of messed up for the up north folks.
- Some of the featured directors sites have actors and/or directors yammering on during the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Other than the prospect of a cheap full access trial I don't know why I really signed up this site and I guess it shows in my score. For the uninitiated, this site is part of a 17 Evil Angel site network. Evil Angel tends to lean to the harder side of hardcore so don't expect much gentle solo softcore/midcore and story line material in the hardcore. Here's the bottom line:
PICS: In the network, most sites have only a handful of pics for their scenes. Most pics are just pose shots before the action. No zips. Good sized but only 30 to 40 pics per set. Quality and cropping varies. Skip this place if you want pics.
VIDS: All the sites have some 720p vids that download as MP4 files. All offer a high and low bitrate wmv download as an option. Most come in at 640x480 for the "high" quality content (non HD). All scenes have low and high level streams and the HD ones also offer HD stream but that was choppy even on my high speed connection. Fast download speeds but streaming took about 5 seconds to buffer on the "high" setting for me each time I jumped within a scene. Most quality is average while the majority of scenes are professionally shot with good lighting.
NAV: Navigation needs work. No model directory and no cross site search. Many sites have scene tags but many don't and not all are correct. No model info for many scenes so you're stuck if you want to find out who some hottie is. On each site you can search by movie title but the listings don't include all the movies on the site. Basically, lots of hunting and clicking to find what you want.
Overall, I can't really recommend joining unless you're a bit Evil Angel fan (in which case you've probably seen most of this stuff) or you're a collector looking to find specific porn stars. A lot of these sites have DVD series but even most of the series are just random or incomplete. This whole network feels a bit like an after thought, which it may well be in comparison to the official EvilAngel website (never joined that one so I don't know for sure). Videobox and similar sites offer a lot more content for the money once you get beyond the 3 day trial period.
Once you get beyond the known pornstars, the girls are fairly average looking and the production quality can vary quite a bit. I didn't find a lot that personally appealled to me and even with the crappy navigation / search, it only took me a few hours to scan over the offerings in the areas I was interested in. Average be this place so average be the score. |
|
04-13-11 02:38pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Don't most of us get depressed if we don't get our daily dose of porn?
|
04-06-11 03:47pm
|
Comment
199
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
|
04-04-11 02:20pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Echoing BadMrFrosty, I use Firefox blocking along with Ad Block Plus and that kills most everything. I can't imagine anyone surfing without a pop up blocker; you'd spend a lifetime just killing the crap showing up on your screen.
|
03-17-11 12:03pm
|
