| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
She's a new one to me but worth keeping a close eye on.
Another fox is Nicole Vaidisova. However she seems like she's slipping in her determination.
|
10-31-08 07:07pm
|
Reply
1352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
TENNIS!
Especially women's tennis.
You see it's this way. Those cute little tennis outfits with the flying skirts coupled with the tops that show the hard, erect nipples makes me a big women's tennis fan.
I know, call me a "prevert," but the women's game is also better than the slam bam men's game because there's a lot more strategy involved and the talent is awesome.
My favorite tennis babes for looks are Ana Ivanovic, Martina Hingis (now retired), Dominika Cibulkova and, of course, Maria Sharapova.
|
10-31-08 01:14pm
|
Reply
1353
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Reply
"For future reviews... maybe curtail my personal preferences a tad."
Don't do that. References to your personal interests are what make a review useful and provides context to your ratings.
|
10-29-08 07:19am
|
Reply
1354
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Review
Just a comment.
As I see it the review was in conformity with the normal expectations of we Porn Users and was well written. I re-read the review and don't think that obsessedoverit ever suggested a bait and switch occurred with Nubiles. He simply said he likes ebony and flashing and that it wasn't available on Nubiles.
While I'm OK with ebony and flashing, it's not something I look for so that observation has no impact on my interest in the site.
I guess the only issue I have with the review is that P. U. offers the same discount as paysitesdiscount.com and he didn't mention that.
His review reinforces my interest in the site because his "pro's" are what I want and his "con's" are of no significant concern to me.
In fact, his credibility is really established by his comment that the site's focus is "not his niche" which explains his score. The site is definitely my "niche" because it has some hardcore and does a far better job of editing than FTV Girls.
obsessedoverit's review was very well done, in my opinion.
|
10-28-08 07:45pm
|
Reply
1355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Alright. I answered PU because I'm responding to a PU poll...
Here's what really happens.
When I'm on holiday I always have my laptop with me and I check my email at least twice a day; once in the morning and once at bedtime. Sometimes if nothing else is going on, I'll check during the day.
I also check all of my financial accounts every morning, in particular my checking and credit card accounts, to see what bad shit may be going on. (Last fall, when on a week stay in Kauai, I did my usual check of my checking account and found that a bogus check for $5,000 had just been processed. Thank goodness I checked because that check was followed by two more and would have wiped out my checking account and the overdraft backup securities account. I called the bank's 800 number immediately and found out that the first check was processed two hours before I called so they were able to do a trackback instantly. Skip the details...but the shithead processed two more checks that were in the system. The best part, he tried a fourth check, but with a bank that contacted my bank to verify the funds were available while he was standing there. Bingo. They nabbed the guy in the act.)
Back to the subject. Then, after I check my financial accounts and email, I check Porn Users to see what's new on the site reviews, then the PU forums, and any replies to my reviews and comments.
Then I check VideoBox for the latest updates on that site and then any other sites I'm on.
That means that there's no need to "catch up" when I get home because I'm doing that daily.
|
10-28-08 07:26pm
|
Reply
1356
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Review
Unless their customer service has been reestablished (it virtually vanished a year or so ago) I suggest keeping your money.
Content is, as obsessedoverit says, good and plenty, but when something goes wrong, as it does very frequently, the customer can be shit outta luck.
No replies to emails and no answers on their 800 number.
With Danni.com, it's a case of caveat emptor. Let the buyer beware.
This site would be one of the top sites if someone with a decent interest in the customer took charge.
|
10-26-08 11:03am
|
Reply
1357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Concept makes no real sense. The concept of porn is the notion that real copulation is occurring and that the watcher is stimulated by the fantasy that he/she is participating.
I would like to see technology permit olfactory transmission and/or user directed multiple camera angles.
|
10-26-08 10:55am
|
Reply
1358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Agree completely with Pink Panther's list and ranking.
Chatter by the stuntcock or the director is not an issue with me because I am into the action. If I don't like the noise, I just turn off the sound.
|
10-25-08 08:55am
|
Reply
1359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
Me too (Toshiba 17" Laptop).
|
10-22-08 02:57pm
|
Reply
1360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Poll
Frankly, for me, I don't worry about it at all.
Given all the publicity about disease and all the "morning after solutions" to unintended impregnation, it's impossible to imagine a porn actress who isn't well prepared before the fuck scene.
As for the guys, if they aren't prepared, then they are subject to the Darwin effect. (Stupid people will die off faster).
Now, speaking from the User/Viewer/Wanker's point of view, I don't give a shit if rubbers are used or not because I am into the female body. I don't care for anal sex, for example, except when she's getting fucked in a reverse cowgirl position so I can see everything I enjoy seeing.
If a condom is used, fine. Show me the PTA.
If a condom isn't used, fine. Show me the PTA.
By the way, I have an associated question. I've seen scenes where the sperm jockey uses a condom, ejaculates his load in the rumbber, then the babe drinks it down. Can anyone explain why protection was used except perhaps the after-action is it's own fetish niche.
[PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass.]
|
10-20-08 11:27am
|
Reply
1361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
As is elephant, I'm mostly video these days. But if I decide to check out the photos of some babe, I'll check a shot or two near the end to see how far the set goes, then I'll D/L the zip. That way I can do the slide show at super fast speed on my photo program which almost makes the photoset an animated video, albeit a bit jerky.
|
10-18-08 10:46am
|
Reply
1362
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
Frankly, these guys are really missing the boat. If they stayed at $29.95, I bet they would be making a ton more from a lot more subscriptions at the nominally top price in the web porn biz of $29.95.
Consider the fact that the only real variable cost these guys have is the small amount of additional bandwidth needed to accommodate the new customer.
The proof of this is when you consider how many sites offer a "stick around" price when you cancel a membership.
(I am paying $5.95 a month for a site that I started at $29.95 after trying to cancel. It notched down from $29.95 to $19.95 to $14.95 to $9.95 to $5.95 as zi tried each attempt. They are getting $5.95 a month from me just because they have some content once in a while that I like. I don't want to cancel because, for the price of a Big Mac meal deal at McDonalds I can get access to a good porn site - without gaining weight even.)
I'd sign up for DDF Busty in a New York minute if they priced it at $24.95, and would put it in my A list at $29.95.
|
10-17-08 10:18am
|
Reply
1363
|
AV9898
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Wow, you guys are fast!
|
10-16-08 09:51am
|
Reply
1364
|
AV9898
(0)
|
Reply of
deadelvis's Comment
This is what appears in the TBP review:
Monthly: $9.95 (recurs at $29.95/mo.)
1 Year: $99.50 (non-recurring
|
10-16-08 07:02am
|
Reply
1365
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
BINGO!
There are three things that FTV needs but does not have.
1. The search function that you want. (I'd give my left nut [well, not really] for FTV to have a search function like Twistys and Babelicious where you can get as specific as labia size in addition to the usual stuff.)
2. A full length download option instead of several segments.
3. Reduce the length of time devoted to just one activity. (7 minutes of a babe diddling her pussy with a dildo where the scene is identical at minute 1 as it is at minute 7 is boring as hell.)
I'd also like an archive that contains all samplers for all content, not just the recent additions
|
10-15-08 10:24pm
|
Reply
1366
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
gamblinman's Comment
Candidly, I lost interest in BangBros when they pulled a price bait & switch, but mine was a promised discount listed on PU that billed at the full rate. Their response to my email complaining about it simply said that the discount wasn't authorized and that they had no idea who Porn Users is.
I had been a member for a few months a few years ago and was OK but was not motivated to continue my membership. They've got some babes in exclusive videos that, at the phantom discount, would have kept me on as a member for several months.
I really don't understand the logic in a site being belligerent with its customers. It's rare, fortunately.
|
10-15-08 10:15pm
|
Reply
1367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
None. I'm with Drooler on this one.
|
10-14-08 06:59am
|
Reply
1368
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
laxattack34's Review
Another issue is that their search function, while it functions well, is inaccurate. A babe who appears in one scene, Victoria Vonn, is featured in many of their ads on other sites but cannot be found anywhere unless you just happen to know that she's in their Babys with Boobs site and page through the chronological listing.
And they choose not to reply to email communications suggesting that they make the correction.
In addition, they lest several babes in their index that have only a brief bio and photo but no videos or photos.
I'll be writing a review soon but thought I'd toss this minor "con" in for consideration.
|
10-13-08 12:30pm
|
Reply
1369
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Ditto what messmer said. Thanks.
|
10-13-08 12:18pm
|
Reply
1370
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
As with CT, I like a bit of firmness too but well developed floppers are still a turn on for me. This babe's mam's are spectacular anyway and she knows how to play with them and other body parts to great effect. The public site's video samplers made little Willy excited until he became big Dick.
I've learned my lesson on single model sites, but at $30 for three months, and with the fact that the site seems very actively updating, I may just toss a few bucks in the bucket and go for it.
Questions for atrapat. You said, "Extras section is just a couple of videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova." Does that mean her site is a bonus site or just that there are a few videos in Christy's site? Also are there any bonus sites or other "girlfriends" material in this site?
|
10-13-08 08:17am
|
Reply
1371
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Review
I found this site today while tracking down all sites with Victoria Vonn content. (She's either out of the biz or is very selective because she's been around since mid 2007 but there isn't much.) Never heard of it until today, so I went to the PU listing and found your review.
I checked out a few of the trailers for some of the babes (Victoria Vonn is on page 18, +/- a page or two) and was very intrigued. (BTW, she also appears in the upper right masthead of the login page as well.) A few questions.
1. How long are the video sequences?
2. The quality of the trailers is quite good. Are the videos all equally good (or better)?
3. There seemed to be a decent front end tease segment in each trailer, but it's hard to tell. Is there a tease before the handjob where the babe shows off her assets in most, if not all, scenes?
4. The trailer sets all indicate the number of videos. Is that an accurate number as far as you know?
5. Is there any download limitation such as DRM or a maximum download limit?
|
10-12-08 04:16pm
|
Reply
1372
|
Rookie Slut Search
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Review
Now this is a quality review, loaded with information but economical with verbiage. And the explanation of the low score makes sense.
I'm signing up for the trial as troglodite did just to do a little "site-seeing" ;o) because the site's concept is intriguing and trog's comments make me want to.
|
10-12-08 10:28am
|
Reply
1373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
What Pat362 said, that's me...but I answered "Model Videos" because that's what I'm interested in. Adding to my inventory of videos of my babes list.
If the new site has reruns of old stuff that I already have I will still download it to compare quality and content (some vids have been edited down) and keep the best one.
Then I'll check out the inventory of babes to see if there are any that are new to me that catch my interest.
I used to be into photo heavy sites, I guess because I've been doing this since 2001 when videos were lousy and short. But the video quality and quantity has exploded so dramatically I've lost interest in stills.
{RECOMMENDATION} The new version (ver. 9.4) of the VLC alternative to WMP offers a neat snapshot feature that is instantaneous so anyone can make photos from a video that are as good in quality as the video itself.
VLC is free at VideoLAN. It's got some great features like the snapshots, a fast aspect ratio correction, and a better operating console. The one negative is that, unlike WMP, you cannot adjust color and/or contrast.
[I'm repeating this recommendation on the Forum, so if it seems familiar, that may be why.
|
10-12-08 10:14am
|
Reply
1374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree with pat362. The raffle is a bonus, not the objective. If it's handled fairly, then there should be no "affirmative action" added to the process.
This site has made me and, no doubt many others, more money through the great reviews by people like me that steer me away from sites that are not up to their hype.
|
10-11-08 09:53am
|
Reply
1375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
To save a few bucks, yesterday I tried to cancel two sites that I'm not that hot about. Surprise. Both came back with "stick around" offers that were good. I accepted one (a $29.95 site that offered a $19.95 price) and declined the other one. The second one came back with an even lower price (a $29.95 site that came in with a last offer at $5.95) so I OK'd that one too. In other words, I dropped a monthly $59.90 down to $24.90, a $35 save, and still have access to everything.
Bottom line, it could well be that porn budgets can all be tightened without losing any memberships just by trying to cancel a full price site. After all, if they accept the cancel without any deals, you can sign up later if you want and it costs nothing extra.
|
10-08-08 11:45am
|
