| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto, that. I may want to chat her up as well, but that's about it. Now if she wants to engage in something deeper...that's another story.
I recently ran into a porn star in a Target store in Woodland Hills CA (just south of Chatsworth) and just said "I really enjoy your work." She said thanks and that was it. BTW, she was modestly dressed with her nice mammaries packaged properly and looked like a sweet but gorgeous babe. She turned a lot of heads.
A while back I was in an Orthopedic doctor's waiting room when Randy West came in looking like the total stud. Tempted as I was I left him totally alone, as did everyone else. I still wonder why I never said anything to him.
|
05-23-10 01:13pm
|
Reply
527
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Let's face it. The majority of us Porndogs are into porn because we love to check out the body parts of gorgeous ladies. While the preferred activities may vary among us pornoficionadoes, it's the babes we enjoy.
I personally like solo, no toys; solo,toys; two girls, "lez lite"; two girls, "hard lez; AND anything girls only, so an "all of the above" option would be my choice.
And I agree with Denner. The one important element is the quality of the camera operations; good lighting, good angles, good focus and full shots, not just shots that let you count the hairs on the babe's pussy.
|
04-17-10 07:57am
|
Reply
528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
larss's Reply
Ditto. But for me it's not a big deal because I'm more a video fan. Back about 10 years ago when web porn was in its infancy, I grabbed all the pics I could find because the video stuff was just plain garbage.
But today with all the photoshopping and with the superb quality and quantity of HD videos, I use the photos more for preview purposes than for collecting.
|
04-01-10 08:09am
|
Reply
529
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Ditto that. In fact Netflix is going the online route. I anticipate that most entertainment will be delivered that way in the near future.
I still have my "last century" technology (unused) and really don't need to spend any more money on that stuff.
|
03-20-10 09:22am
|
Reply
530
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I have no idea what the attraction could possibly be to a handjob video. What's to like about watching some anonymous dude getting jacked?
The only socially redeeming value that would make me watch a handjob video is if the babe doing the work is gorgeous and shows off her body parts in the process.
Almost the same for BJ's except that there are the occasional sensual BJ's undertaken by a babe who does the weenie slurping with a special artistic touch.
|
03-18-10 08:05am
|
Reply
531
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I chose "other" because I reeeally don't like the night club scenes where there is no structure or organization. One babe is getting boinked whilst another is giving a blow job to some other dude and the camera man is bouncing from one action to another.
I love looking at a really gorgeous babe from head to toe going from the foreplay through to the splat shot at the end.
As for the settings listed in the poll, I'm good with any setting where the lighting is good and the cameraman is a dedicated horndog who knows what we porn fans really like.
When the lighting is right and the cameraman knows how to compensate for white balance and sun glare I tend to like outdoors scenes just because it seems more real. But what is really bad is where the cameraman is oblivious to the light balancing problems that occur when he shoots into the sun.
|
03-14-10 11:20am
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Ditto.
By and large it's difficult to imagine that a babe can have a real orgasm under the circumstances with the heavy lighting and all the camera men, directors, "grips" and so on all around her as the stunt cock is being told to adjust position for better camera angles and so forth.
Orgasms are a product of several factors occurring at the same time and usually when the couple is into the act in an intimate and non-distracting environment, which is just not very likely whilst "performing" on command in front of an audience.
That said, I've seen some scenes where the babe is rather convincing that she's achieving an orgasm, which, after all, is what the fantasy requires. I'm good with a babe who can give a realistic and convincing orgasmic performance
|
03-06-10 10:16am
|
Reply
533
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I like 'em all.
But my all time favorite, Jennifer Avalon, was into rather hard core lezzie stuff with a lot of strap ons involved and also did some BJ's but I never saw her doing BG hardcore. And I like it that way.
Then there's Danielle from FTV who has established a no BG standard since Rob made her a feature on FTV, then created her own site where there's also no BG.
But she did some BG stuff before Rob made her rich that was ho-hum stuff compared to her erotic solo and GG.
Then there's Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy, aka Yana) who currently does hard core lezzie as well, including in group scenes. She works on the babes while others are working on guys, but I've never seen her boinking guys at all.)
So my answer is yes, if they move toward BG hardcore, I'd prefer gradual. But the fantasy is better for me if they stay away from BG.
But once a babe succumbs to BG, then I want them to go for it all, like Jessica Moore, who will do anything at all no matter how perverted.
|
02-28-10 10:24am
|
Reply
534
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Just saw an ad for a 4 Terabyte external hard drive for $398.00. That's about 10 cents per GIG and 1 tenth of a cent for one meg. External drives were about $1 a gig just 4 years ago.
At this rate of deflation, I'll be in the market for a 10 Tb hard drive for $100 in the next two years. That would just about cover my total stash right now and would free up all my current external drives.
|
02-27-10 09:31am
|
Reply
535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Thanks a million RB.
I use the clunky windows WMV editor. (Or, rather, I once used it but stopped.) The editor was very clumsy and error-prone and the quality of the end product was reduced. So my stash is loaded with great scenes that have a whole lot of crap that I'd like to edit out just as I used to do back in the old VCR videotape days.
I'm doing as Denner is, downloading the trial to make sure it's Monahan-proof.
|
02-22-10 08:37am
|
Reply
536
|
N/A
|
Reply of
redrum's Reply
Ditto redrum's comment completely.
Porn, to me, is about beautiful women doing erotic things to themselves, to men and to other women whilst exposing their delicious body parts in all their glory.
The eroticism is enhanced by the fantasy that lets me think I'm a vicarious participant rather than just a voyeur.
|
02-20-10 11:13am
|
Reply
537
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Agree with the comments so far.
This site is so far and away superior to any other review site there's no way I would be happy with any replacement. This site is well organized, permits open and candid discussion of all sites and a whole lot more and it has a great deal of variety.
Most of the sites to which I belong can thank TBP/PU for getting my business simply because the honest and open comments provided both by the members and by the staff.
I've said before and I'll say again, TBP/PU is the Consumers Reports of Porn; the go to place to check out new sites and to see what's happening on/to the older sites.
|
02-16-10 08:11am
|
Reply
538
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I said "Sometimes." The jizz biz is extremely careful about any possible taint of scandal and is very protective of the health of the talent.
Many babes do other things outside of porn, such as escort service and gentlemen's clubs, where they can be exposed to HIV, etc. so the producers will test the bejeebers out of the talent to make sure "shit don't happen."
Thus I voted "sometimes" not for the mainstream talent but for the young babes who just turned 18 and entered the biz and who seem to be so totally brain dead that they may not have any idea of the devastation HIV can cause...so they happily let some slimy scuzz in the local pick-up bar have at 'em in the dark corner.
|
02-08-10 09:32am
|
Reply
539
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto.
I really don't understand how anyone can have interest in a guy getting jerked off, especially by himself. But when a babe does it, it's usually because the dude went flaccidly limp during the scene and she's still into it.
Tug jobs don't make any sense while blow jobs can, occasionally, be damned erotic.
I just don't see any reason for any focus on a schlong in porn except when it is in business with a cunt or an asshole...or if it's a gay flick.
|
02-07-10 03:54pm
|
Reply
540
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Porn is fantasy and real life has no relevance to porn. Living in the San Fernando Valley, I've been involved in occasional cross-overs where I'll bump into a porn star in a store or restaurant.
One example is when I was sitting next to Herschel Savage in a restaurant about 4 years ago. He looked terrible, probably because of the variety of abuses his body had experienced over the years. I also see an occasional nameless but recognizable porn babe in a Target or WalMart. They also look worn out.
Onee exception was Randy West who I saw in, of all places, my orthopedic guy's office (I had shoulder surgery) who looked totally buff and the stud that he always was.
I deal with those encounters the same way I deal with porn. I look but I never engage.
|
02-04-10 08:39am
|
Reply
541
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Capn: "I like real world formal & smart casual outfits too."
Agree, especially if she's wearing real life "smart" high heels and not those silly platforms or other outrageous footwear.
Capn: "None of it is any good to me unless it starts fully clothed & ends with full nude!"
Agree, so long as the start is brief and the end is nice and long.
|
02-02-10 11:42am
|
Reply
542
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
For reasons I'm too lazy to analyze, a babe wearing a white blouse over a short plaid skirt just blows me away, especially if she's got nothing on underneath.
Must be why I enjoyed my strolls under the bleachers in high school even though I got neck strain by looking up.
|
02-02-10 08:37am
|
Reply
543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Cell phone? Nope.
The new Apple iPad? Probably.
|
01-31-10 10:28am
|
Reply
544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
WGAF? He cheats on his totally gorgeous wife. That makes no sense in the first place. Then he does what most pro athletes do with their snakes when they are out of town. Which is what makes it a "dog bites man" story.
Why, when John Edwards was running for Vice President and the open secret was out about his messing around outside his marriage, wasn't it even remotely an issue, but with Tiger it was front page news?
|
01-27-10 08:44am
|
Reply
545
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Ditto.
And the same for those who "retired" that still have new stuff getting posted.
There's a chance that her stuff will go poof forever and that would be something I would not be happy with.
No, nothing, other than me going blind or dying, would ever cause me to stop checking out what I have on my favorites.
|
01-21-10 03:44pm
|
Reply
546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Torn4do's Reply
Drinking cum is disgusting and does nothing for me at all. Same with pee.
I like internal creampies and watching a sweet babe take a pee, but there's nothing at all appealing about watching someone drink that stuff.
That said, it must have some appeal to some people because there is so much of it on the web, but I have no idea what the appeal could be other than that it is a form of humiliation. And some guys get off on wathching the humiliation of females. (Must have been mistreated by a woman during his life, I guess.)
|
01-19-10 09:58am
|
Reply
547
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The term "Gay" used to include lesbians, which are among my few "fetishes."
I don't dig B/B, but I'm OK with G/G and B/G. I've seen some B/B/G where the babe and a guy give head to the other guy. Doesn't do much for me but I'll watch if the babe is watchable.
I don't see any reason why B/B Gay stuff needs to be in a separate PU site, but if the folks who run PU think it's better, I'm OK with it. (I voted for option #2)
|
01-17-10 11:59am
|
Reply
548
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
That would be me as well.
My problem is that there are so many honeys getting into the business I sometimes feel overwhelmed and frustrated that I cannot keep up.
|
01-16-10 12:54pm
|
Reply
549
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Sweet babe.
Hope she doesn't get aftermarket boobs.
|
01-16-10 12:52pm
|
Reply
550
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Just thought I'd raise an interesting point or two.
An 18 year old babe in Chatsworth California can fuck on camera and drink a faceful of cum, but she has to wait three years before she's allowed to drink a glass of wine.
And a guy from Chatsworth can put his life on the line in the military at age 18 but isn't allowed to drink a beer until he's 21.
And most titty bars (oops, I mean Gentlemen's Clubs)in Chatsworth permit 18 year old babes to do their bare-assed thing sticking her twat in the face of any guy who throws money her way but they don't let any guys younger than 21 to enter, even those who spent 3 years fighting in Iraq.
|
01-14-10 07:04pm
|
