I suppose it's all a matter of taste, but I am stunned by the number of high 90's scores I see given to Brazzers, Reality Kings, and Bangbros, so this well below the norm sort of score is a welcome balance.
Personally I don't agree with 50, or the reason given, as they don't claim to be a teen site (Try 21 Sextury or Teen Mega World), but given some of the stuff that has been written by PU members about the negatives of these companies over the years, I don't mind seeing them getting a 50.
Virtually every company claims to be the "best" or "world's best." Each and every one of them, except for one, is lying. That's porn.
I hope you stick around and let us know what you think of the teen sites.
I think most of the regulars read the regulars' reviews, but don't leave replies, so I would imagine quite a few will have read your review, and will have appreciated it, even though they don't comment. I read tons of great reviews, and have to admit I often don't leave a positive reply, when I should.
For me the most annoying thing about doing reviews is taking the trouble to do one, then ten minutes later seeing it replaced on the "front page" by one about ten lines long that took all of five minutes to throw together. No, it shouldn't bother me, and yes I know how PU works, but it does.
Yeah I occasionally now do the Ctrl V thing. It's when I don't that something usually goes wrong. For reviews I simply open a file and over the period of membership, jot down any pros, cons, and bottom lines, whenever I think of one, then begin to put it all together after a few weeks.
Cheers graymane, it's obvious you take the trouble to put together a really good review (which applies to most of the regulars here).
I have to admit to mostly reading reviews by regulars. Some newbies take to it like a duck to water, others take time to get used to it, but the best reviews for me are the ones with the required facts along with a unique slant that only that particular taste and personality can bring.
I have more than once had an hour's plus hard work wiped out by pressing the wrong button (NOOOO!!!) or my computer having a mind of its own. That can't happen with pen and paper - unles you do a Richard Pryor while writing.
Excellent, well written and informative review. I shall take note of your warnings. Some may be expecting more, given the name behind the site, but it looks like one to avoid.
Yes I nearly asked for my money back. It must have merely been a blip, but to have that happen first night, with what appears to be a dying network looked very bad. I am pleased I persevered with it, as there is some worthwhile material.
There are some familiar girls on this network, but as Pat pointed out elsehwere, they have different names than on other sites. I prefer newer faces and bodies though. and there are some girls I haven't seen much before.
I didn't have to search much to find material worth downloading, but for yourself and many PU members you would probably only find this material just okay because of the quality. I am willing to put up with a little less in spec quality of pics and vids for quality of material.
Thanks toad, much appreciated! I figure this network is very much a matter of taste and opinion and depends on what you value most. Those who like lots of high spec updates wont like it, but I do.
There was no room to lay out the sequence of events for my first 24 hours of membership. Above is an abbreviated version. Here is the long unedited one. Incidentally since that first day, I have had no trouble accessing material.
First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible. I mailed customer services and unsurprisingly, given their record as documented on here, received no reply. I mailed Epoch who said to try a different browser. I had already tried that, however the next day the sites were functioning properly.
One download later and I received a message that I had been banned for logging in too many times. I mailed them to say that's because I tried to log in at a number of sites several times to see if any were working. I was supposed to apply to them to reset my password, but given their lack of any customer support, thought this would be impossible. I complained to Epoch, who said it wasn't their concern. I said it was their concern as they were supposed to be a reputable billing agent dealing with reputable websites. After a while with me talking about complaining to my credit card company, the Epoch person said they may refund me if I didn't hear in 24 hours from the network. Unbelievably, it was easy to reset my password as it appeared to be automated. Just as well, as no one seems to be in customer service at 1 Pass For All Sites. They should be renamed No Customer Support For Any Site.
The next day I finally heard from them saying they had temporary hosting problems, but now everything was fixed, and that if I wanted my money back to contact Epoch and they would refund. They also sent me a new password. My reply was "Customer support on your network seems awful, but the material although for the most part not updating, seems very good. As long as the network continues to function I am satisfied enough not to ask for my money back. The network happened to go down the very first night I was a member, and there is no customer support, so that is not a good impression if the site isn't merely laying down and dying, and scraping out a few last memberships - which is what it gives the impression of doing."
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
No DRM, pre checked cross selling, regional discrimination, or download limits.
Mostly exclusive material, with attractive girls.
Less gynaecological close ups than some other sites.
Not too many tats, or fake breasts, and not too much choking, slapping and abuse of models, that many of us here hate.
High quality spec vids and pics on newer updates, and professionally shot.
Epoch as billing agent.
$24.31 membership available through Amour Babes instead of $34.95.
Cons:
Poor customer service.
Not great membership home pages, with all of them looking the same. Once again, if you want to see what's good to download, the trailer advertising pages that are open to everyone, are far better that the membership home pages.
Only a few sites on the network updating.
Obviously with the majority of sites now defunct, the quality on those sites is below what is expected of modern standard.
Annoying navigation at times.
Irritating advertising links at top of membership pages.
Little build up or stripping in photos.
Another network with very little age, ethnic, or weight, diverstiy. The models are mainly young, white, and slim.
Most of the newer updates now have mp4, but no wmv downloads.
Bottom Line:
First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible. I mailed customer services and unsurprisingly, given their record as documented on here, received no reply. Next day the sites were functioning normally
One download later and I received a message that I had been banned for logging in too many times. I mailed them to say that's because I tried to log in at a number of sites several times to see if any were working. I was told by an automated message to apply to them to reset my password. Unbelievably, it was easy to reset my password as it appeared to be automated. Just as well, as no one seems to be in customer service at 1 Pass For All Sites. They should be renamed No Support For Any Site.
The next day I finally heard from them, saying they had temporary hosting problems, but now everything was fixed.
Even though there are 28 individual sites, they have the same appearance, with a number of the same girls appearing on different sites, only with different outfits, different settings, and different situations. To be fair, that means it isn't any different to most of the other "networks." Names like Tricky Old Teacher, 18 Virgin Sex, Creampied Sweeties, Young Anal Tryouts, Horny In Hospital etc, gives you an idea what to expect from each. The material on updating sites is well produced, with good lighting and photography, and appeals to my taste, as it is slightly less gynaecological than some of the other networks. The girls are attractive, and there are enough of them, and enough decent material, to make the membership worthwhile.
Some of the older sites look untended and uncared for. They often have a photo and name for the girl by the video download, then next to that, on the plot synopsis, have a different name for the girl. Some of the pictures are clearly out of sequence in the set. Either no one has bothered to put them into a correct order, or no one has noticed. It leaves a very bad impression of a site about to go down the plughole, and trying to pick up a few last memberships.They have dated updates, and it seems above board, with no bringing in of old stuff and passing it off for new. If they devoted just a few minutes to tidying things up, it would leave a much better impression.
The newer photos are typical of current porn thinking. Eight or ten all looking the same, then a fast forward to the next batch, without much stripping, teasing, or attempt to set out a chronological sequence of pics. Apperance of the models is young and natural, photographed in a professional way, with little airbrushing or retouching that I could see.
It may be just me being awkward as usual, but the older defunct sites like Wild Young Honeys, and Young Models Casting have better photos as far as being in a chronological and natural order, and looking more like a genuine photo set to those of us older porn consumers. Instead of 8-10 pics all looking the same then fast forward to another bunch all with the same pose, they have more of a continual flow, than most of the modern ones. Unfortunately their specs are below average for modern porn. Why the Tatyana set on Wild Young Honeys should have a yellow/orange hue, is beyond me, but it's a shame because they were only taken six years ago, not eighty.
There is wmv or flv streaming in high or low segments, which stop at the end, and do not automatically move on to the next segment. Slide shows, and full or part downloads are also available. The slide shows disconcertingly move from right to left rather that stay still.
Download speeds are on the slow side of average, but not unacceptable, with an unstated limit of six simultaneous downloads. Picture and video quality is good on the sites that are still updating. Pictures are 1200x800 on the newer updates, 1023x680 and 960x640 on the older ones. Examples of wmv video quality are Tricky Old Teacher and I Fucked Her Finally, 1920x1088 at 8447 kbps, Young Anal Tryouts 1920x1088 at 8447 kbps and 1280x720 at 5030 kbps, Young Models Casting 832x468 at about 2000kbps, down to Wild Young Honeys and Young and Banged 520x416 at about 1450 kbps. However most of the updating sites are starting to use mp4 only, instead of wmv, for their downloading and streaming, so now you have no wmv option.
Despite all the faults I am renewing for another month. The older sites lack modern spec, but have an older porn look that appeals to me. It's a lack of gynaecological closeups, and irritating cameramen and male leads that I find refreshing. The new material is pretty good too.
This network appeals to me, but take a look at the TBP, and other PU reviews, before deciding. For me it's a nice little goldmine. They even have a "new site coming soon."
Promoted in PU Newsletter, but watch out for pre checked cross selling.
This site is now available through the Porn Users Newsletter at $9.95. Hooray! They are implementing pre-checked cross selling. Boo!
As one of the sites on the Team Skeet Network I'd have been willing to spend $29.95 to join, but how can you trust a site that tries to trick you? You can't. $29.95 with no trickery and they get my money, $9.95 with trickery and they don't.
Yes I can untick the box, but it's also the principle of the thing. Obviously it pays to try and trick customers, so that's why they do it. Some of us are not going to join because of that trickery, but they can obviously make more money from tricking customers out of their money than they will lose from those of us who refuse to join on principle.
Which brings me to TBP/PU. I don't think they should be promoting this type of site. I know they are in it to make money, but they have a certain goodwill not only from us minority who post and review, but from the silent majority who rely on them for promoting and linking to trustorthy sites.
Ban pre checked cross selling. It should be illegal, and hopefully one day it will be. Until then we need to avoid those shady enough to try and rip off customers.
Great review. Some of their material looks okay and this place would be on the list to join, but it's those fake breasts and tats that put me off. In fact I have been put off many sites I was thinking of joining, by seeing 7 out of 10 models on the preview either having fake breasts or tats.
Somewhere between always and usually. Occasionally you see a good(ish) pair, but even then, when I realise they're fake, it's like the model in question has had a mastectomy. To me, post op, they are no longer objects of sexual interest or desire. Instant turn off, just like a plastic doll.
Great review. Thanks for taking the time to explain clearly what this place is about. I have been considering joining this kind of site for a while. Now I hsve to decide which one.
I would say avoid any site with download limits to stop this sort of thing happening. If you don't pay your money they can't lock you out of the account.
No I agree with you. I far prefer those sites which have reputable billing agents. That doesn't mean those who do their own billing are bad, it's just there will be a few bad apples who will try to rip you off, and you jsut never know which ones that will be - until too late.
Agreed Capn. I am just as annoyed about regional pricing, and avoid any websites that use it, just as I do with pre checked cross stealing. My idea of some sort of badge of good trading, similar to other trades, didn't get any replies (apart from messmer), but it would be nice to see those who are customer oriented, be acknowledged in some sort of formal way, and therefore be rewarded.
I know I always seem to be griping and complaining, but it would be nice to find a way to be positive and support those who deserve it, and there are quite a few of those.
Yes, agreed GPL, this is what the forum is for. Hopefully it highlights the good ones and exposes the bad ones, and at the same earning itelf some money.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
