| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
176
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
|
01-10-13 06:49am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
177
|
She's New
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Great review as always Ik. I have recently joined this network due to them getting rid of pre checked cross sells. Overall I like the place. For once, this is a real network as each site has its own personality, therefore each site has its own pros and cons.
For me the downside and big negative of "She's New" is the lack of boy/girl hardcore but far too much oral/blowjobs and toys. A bit of a disappointment as I like the amateur/newcomer niche.
Will be doing a review in a couple of months, but hope they get some sign ups. I have found download speeds here in the UK are really good at most times of the day, and streaming is excellent quality.
|
01-09-13 10:15am
|
Reply
178
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I decided to put my money where my mouth is. I said I'd have joined ages ago if not for the pre checked cross selling so I signed up this evening. The network looks a good one. I hope they get rewarded for removing cross selling, and some people sign up.
|
01-06-13 05:15pm
|
Reply
179
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
marvin's Reply
YES! YES! Y E E E E S S S! A small step for porn users and a clean industry.
|
01-05-13 05:06pm
|
Reply
180
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
With Mofos operating both pre checked cross selling and regional discrimination, the only good thing you can say about them is they believe in some kimd of perverse equality - they expect us porn users to bend over and take it just like their models.
I agree that if TBP wants to keep any kind of reputation they need to be more careful who they promote.
|
01-05-13 06:07am
|
Reply
181
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
Oh and by the way - that's 35 GB pounds for us here in good old Blighty, which equates to around $60. FFS!
|
01-04-13 07:48pm
|
Comment
182
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
|
01-04-13 07:42pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
183
|
Anal Recruiters
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review as usual, admiral. I have never joined this network but one of the cons, for some of us, would be the use of condoms on many of their clips.
|
01-01-13 10:14am
|
Reply
184
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks Ik, best wishes and Happy New Year to you too.
I don't post in the forum much nowadays, but often look in to see what's happening. I am not at home as much as I used to be, which means I'm away from the computer too, so I don't watch as much porn as I used to. On the plus side, that stops me from getting jaded.
I was going to make a post about trying to find a porn site or network to join pre Christmas, listing all the ones I had to discount due to regional discrimination and cross selling, but I didn't find time to do it. I may find time in the next few weeks. At the last count I found 25 with cross selling and 9 with regional discrimination.
|
12-27-12 04:58pm
|
Reply
185
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
Very positive indeed. It's good to hear news about this sort of thing, so thanks for the observation, Marcus. They would go way up on my list of potential sits to join, but still have pre checked cross sales.
|
12-27-12 09:39am
|
Reply
186
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Another great review Ik2. This organisation would have had my money a long time ago but for pre checked cross selling. I simply cannot support a company that tries to trick its customers. On the contrary, we should be collectively boycotting those who try to trick us. A shame because their content looks good.
|
12-26-12 07:25pm
|
Reply
187
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Shame about the pre checked cross selling, otherwise I'd have joined ages ago. Can't trust any orgqnisation that tries to trick you out of your money.
|
12-10-12 09:00am
|
Reply
188
|
Casting Couch X
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yep, that's why I always give trials a misss. Same for sites with pre checked cross sells. If it looks like a site that is likely to try and trick you out of your money, it's best to give it a miss.
|
12-08-12 07:31pm
|
Reply
189
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Absolutely agree with you. It's a hideous name for a porn site. A real turn off.
|
12-08-12 07:25pm
|
Reply
190
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
tonguey's Review
That's two newbies with two 100 perfect scores in the last two reviews for this organisation. Hmm..
|
12-06-12 03:00pm
|
Reply
191
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes Capn, Epoch is number one with me for that reason alone. It appears CCBill doesn't exchange currencies at what I would consider to be a fair and reasonable basis. Sometimes they have outright regional discrimination. Either way it amounts to the same thing. I go with Epoch whenever I can. Probably the best customer support too.
|
11-28-12 10:31am
|
Reply
192
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
This sort of thing is a little worrying. DDF have a reasonable reputation, but are they resorting to desperate or dubious measures because of lean times? Seeing reports of customers being unable to cancel always sets off alarm bells with me. It may be a little unfair, but I'm not trusting them with my credit card. Using a prepaid card seems like a good idea on this one.
For me, seeing Epoch or CC BIll, as the sign up agent, goes a long way towards making me feel comfortable about handing over credit card details.
|
11-27-12 07:12pm
|
Reply
193
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Looks like they have both pre checked cross selling and regional discrimination in place. I wouldn't trust this lot with my credit card details. Looking at some of those free download places, DDF don't have bad stuff. They would have my money if they could be trusted, but I'm not touching them with a barge pole. Where's my money going next? Not to DDF.
|
11-27-12 06:30am
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Excellent observation which leaves me little too add.
I was expecting this to be a messmer poll.
I would say fully dressed, with a little teasing. I don't like too much talk, teasing, and oral. That is why I hate the 80's porn films. Twenty minutes of talk then ten minutes of oral, followed by four minutes of sex. Too much like reality.
|
11-14-12 09:41am
|
Reply
195
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Truly excellent review admiral. As a site contender I never had this in the rear view mirror, but it sounds better than I was expecting. Don't forget the pre-checked cross sales as a negative though.
|
11-06-12 08:44am
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Completely anal, but I still miss some.
|
11-04-12 10:17am
|
Reply
197
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
High average-superior would be my guess. Good poll graymane. I think you're right in that the quality of reviews and contributions means there's a high IQ present here. Strange but true given the subject matter of the forum. However go to a forum on some of the porn networks and you will see porn fans aren't necessarily intelligent. This is the way PU has evolved.
|
11-01-12 05:09pm
|
Reply
198
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Review
Welcome to PU. Good effort for your second review.
The one thing you don't mention in the cons, is the use of condoms in 90% of their clips. That isn't necessarily a con for some, but means it's a definite no goer for me. Even if it isn't a con I think it needs mentioning.
|
10-30-12 07:22am
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't like it at all. I agree with messmer in that it is also present in comments accompanying a picture set. It's the same for forums. Given some of the comments by porn fans on sites like VideoBox it's the same stuff. Some love it, I hate it. Maybe it's harmless, maybe not. It does worry me a bit.
|
10-27-12 10:55am
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, they and the Wittyguy forum awards, were two of the PU highlights.
|
10-20-12 05:05pm
|
