| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Of course I do. I believe in the power of positive thinking. So my answer is "Yes".
Now, what am I guilty of?
|
09-30-12 03:35pm
|
Reply
227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I lurked the site for over a year before I actually joined. Not sure why I didn't join immediately, but I've joined so many different sites, and then hardly ever visited any of them. But PU was different. Like other PU members have said, the PU community is basically welcoming, friendly, helpful, the site has great information on porn sites along with the discounts, and the staff is friendly and helpful if you have any questions or problems.
So that's why I finally joined and stuck around.
But as RagingBuddhist points out, with 8,000 registered users, less than 10% are actively involved (that's different from being an active member: I believe PU counts all members who joined as active, unless they have deactivated their account or been delisted for some reason).
But as the poll question is stated, "How many new PU members stay for over one year?", I would guess the answer is less than 80%. Because once they have signed up, they are considered active, until they de-activate their account, or are delisted by PU staff. And most of the members don't bother to de-activate their account, even when they no longer contribute.
But it would be interesting if the staff would give some figures on how many members do de-activate their account.
But I don't know if they would do that, or if they considered that proprietary or confidential information.
|
09-29-12 11:38am
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Toadsith is the man. He's got my vote for PU President. But I think the position is non-paying.
|
09-27-12 08:41am
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer to pick my own, because it's easier to remember.
Also, some sites don't send a confirmation email when you sign up.
|
09-25-12 06:23pm
|
Reply
230
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
That's something I never thought of. Why don't we have more porn vomiting sites? Not that I would be joining anytime soon.
I recall that vomiting was sometimes done at Roman orgies (in the really olden days).
|
09-23-12 10:37am
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I don't watch it on the TV. But I just got a new PC, with a new, larger monitor. I think the monitor is 24".
|
09-21-12 12:17am
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What BadMrFrosty said.
|
09-19-12 12:43am
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
For the obviously oversized breasts, it's easy to tell. But sometimes a boob job can look natural.
|
09-18-12 06:53pm
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I look at the face, the eyes, the body, etc. Some makeup is usually good. But don't really go for the gothic look.
|
09-11-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
RustyJ said it right. Online porn is definitely much cheaper, and more available, today than DVDs or videotapes were from years ago.
|
09-11-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
236
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I rent DVDs from Redbox. But have never watched a BluRay film.
|
09-11-12 03:47pm
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
It's far easier to make excellent photos than to make an excellent video. There are fewer factors to control in a photo than in a video. That's the main reason, I believe, why wonderful or good photos far outnumber the number of excellent videos.
There are other reasons, as well. Photos cost less, in terms of time and money to produce.
And as a viewer/consumer, it's simpler and easier and less time-consuming to view photos than to view videos.
Photos and videos each have their own appeal.
|
09-05-12 04:23am
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I almost always unzip photosets. How else are you going to look at the photos? I don't have a special program to examine unzipped zip files.
On the other hand, there are lots of videos that I download, that I have never looked at.
|
09-05-12 02:05am
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
The face is the first thing I look at. But all the other factors, including the voice, can play a part as well.
|
09-04-12 03:13pm
|
Reply
240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
BadMrFrosty took the words right out of my mouth.
Can I sue for copyright infringement?
|
09-01-12 02:38am
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I really dislike it. Makes the videos far less appealing.
|
08-30-12 01:33am
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I am more comfortable with payment processors I've used before.
|
08-28-12 04:16pm
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
I dint knowed talent could talk. Maybe I should get new batteries fur my heering aid.
|
08-28-12 04:12pm
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
No idea.
|
08-21-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I think graymane speaks for at least some of us elder PU members.
|
08-18-12 09:48pm
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
Maybe I'm getting jaded, but fellatio and cunnilingus often appear boring.
|
08-16-12 03:38am
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I tried getting a refund on a pre-checked cross-sale site. But didn't get one.
|
08-14-12 03:18pm
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
What tangub said. It's a good thing I like skinny white chicks. Japanese models are some of the most beautiful in the world, but I don't like the mosaic blur.
|
08-10-12 05:52am
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mostly I go for the slender East European teen models. But normal-sized is good, too. Even the voluptuous. But I don't usually prefer models that are seriously overweight.
|
08-08-12 03:20pm
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't pay a lot of attention to the height of a model.
Maybe it would be more important if there was real-life interaction. But even then, unless the model was under 2 feet tall, or over 10 feet tall, I don't think height would matter very much.
|
08-06-12 07:20am
|
