| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
BrighamXart's Reply
Thanks for the reply
Your comment about daily updates is simply wrong. There have been many days with missing updates or old material reposted recently - although I notice that since my comment you added a very late update on that date.
My comment about Aubrey not being able to do the anal is simply based on Colette's introduction to the scene. They had to shoot it without anal because she wasn't able to do it. We should be thankful you have her the choice.
The artistic merit of the material on the site has slipped a lot, it is now indistinguishable from regular mainstream hard porn. The blog section recently commented that you were making a film, as though is was something you rarely do, and you are now just referred to as "x-art co-founder" which seems a bit of a relegation to me.
As you say, you can't please everyone. Your site has gone from something that was very important in our lives to something that just seems ugly and slapdash now. That's a shame but we can live with it.
|
04-13-15 05:46am
|
Reply
2
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Reply
Both these look possible - I knew about EroticaX, but my concern is that the main target of the producers is HardX which is a site I wouldn't go near, EroticaX just looks like something they're not really interested in.
I hadn't heard of Lust Cinema - from the review it looks like it doesn't allow downloads. Is this the case?
|
02-14-15 11:20am
|
Reply
3
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Does anyone know whether the $10 trial is fully functional?
X-art these days is a long way from the kind of site I'd want to be on, it seems to have become slightly glossy gonzo rather than the beautiful erotica they claim. But I think there are maybe 10 or 12 films from the last year that I would like to download. I'd like to give them as little money as possible given their godawful business practices, they're really not the sort of people I want to pay money to. It would be cool if a $10 trial would allow me to download the few films I'd like to watch.
|
12-13-14 02:41am
|
Reply
4
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi RA - with regards to darkness, I was referring to both, not necessarily in the same film. There have been largely negative comments from members on the site about some of the recent material (and lots of positive comments from the staff who know where their next paycheck is coming from). Interestingly, quite a few are from female members saying that they don't like it but are OK with it being there if other members do like it.
I saw an interview with Colette from X-Art in GQ a couple of years ago, where she said that although they were aiming at females & couples, they were aware that the majority of their members were male porn users - and they are coming from years of watching much more extreme material. I think that, in the end, this is why the glamcore sites go downhill. It's a commercial decision, and I don't blame them for it. Unfortunately it means there isn't anywhere for people like us.
|
12-12-14 03:31am
|
Reply
5
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Reply
No she didn't write anything grrrrr!
I've just had a look. They've deleted all the negative comments and added a big gushing interview with one of the performers where she goes on about how anyone who doesn't like anal has a closed mind and all that shit. Real stupid straw man arguments.
It's exactly what x-art did a couple of years ago. Bigging up all the anal scenes, censoring negative comments, insulting those who don't like anal.
Funny really. It even the same down to this - a month ago the guy who runs the site said they wouldn't do anal - when they were making this film at the time. Once Colette at x-art said they had one anal scene in th can and wouldn't do any more, and two weeks later released a dp scene! They're the same right down to the lying about it!
|
12-02-14 12:52pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I know some people in the kink/fetish scene. They despise most BDSM porn. That say's it all, really. BDSM is about giving and taking control, and pleasure. Most BDSM porn is about hatred and violence.
|
11-18-14 10:35pm
|
Reply
7
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
They're running scared after what happened to Cameron Bay.
If you set a mob of 50 drunken psychos on a girl, with permission to do pretty much what they want to her, something is going to go wrong. This site had untested members of the public slapping, beating, scratching, and even sticking their hands roughly into the girls. They were lucky with Bay in that she had a lurid personal life so they were able to cloud the issue and claim she could have been infected before. If it had happened to another performer, Kink could have been wiped out.
Kink always claim to be very big on consent, although the scenes themselves appear anything but consensual. In these PD scenes the girls have no idea what is going on, and who is touching them - Bay said she was just trying to survive it and it was only when she saw the finished scene that she realised what was happening to her.
They are trying to become a center for the BDSM community, but they have found that they are an embarrassment to it. Most of their material is about violence, hate & rape rather than consensual BDSM, and their audience is misogynists and hate-filled creeps who would never get near a woman let alone negotiate consensual BDSM with her. That's why they are cleaning up their act.
|
11-06-14 09:42pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Not only do they not enjoy it, they really hate it.
By the time they've not eaten for hours, given themselves an enema and thoroughly cleaned (no-one wants to see a scat movie), then the whole area is even more sensitive than normal. Even using anaesthetic cream doesn't stop it entirely - I've even heard of girls resorting to injecting local anaesthetics to get through anal scenes. I mean, how could anyone think that a girl could take half a dozen outsized cocks up her ass for 2 or 3 hours and be in anything other than searing pain?
|
10-02-14 11:19pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most porn these days is based on hate & misogyny, the verbal abuse is merely one part of that.
|
10-02-14 11:13pm
|
Reply
10
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm with Pat. Hateful sites like this cause trouble for everyone. Girls are discouraged from doing porn, and lawmakers are encouraged to step in which causes problems for the decent sites.
|
09-01-14 11:36pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The good thing is that porn is incredibly cheap now.
The bad thing is that this really is the only good thing about it.
|
09-01-14 11:33pm
|
Reply
12
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
I don't know anything about your site at all. I have no idea what the niche is, what the content is like, or anything. Having read this, I do know I would never ever join it, if it was the last site on earth.
What an unpleasant little man.
|
08-26-14 12:09pm
|
Reply
13
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
Abbey Winters occupies a niche which isn't of interest to me, so I have no dog in this argument. However, I do find the comments on photography interesting. I have noticed that a few other sites are trying to get away from the lights up full, f/16 or f/22 everything in focus simplistic photography, and bringing in a more intimate feel with shallow depth of field, more natural light etc (for example 21st sextury). I assume it's an attempt to differentiate themselves from the mass produced herd. To me it's a great improvement. Sadly, it seems that a significant number of consumers don't get it, and just think it's out of focus or underexposed.
|
08-15-14 12:14pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I travel abroad a lot, and I've occasionally fallen foul of security when logging on to a site from two different countries on the same day. X-art was a pain for this - I used to have to go through the full password reset process. I eventually worked out that you have to wait until the next day PCT.
|
08-13-14 10:56am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Every image should move the "narrative" along. Endless almost identical images shot in burst mode are just tedious, however good they are individually.
|
08-10-14 08:07am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's all so cheap ....
|
06-26-14 04:31am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Not at all my cup of tea.
However, I did see an interview with a couple of performers where they said how easy it was compared to other extreme porn. Compared to the brutal and very painful anal type stuff which they have to go through for most scenes, bukkake is nothing. If you're used to getting sperm on your face, bukkake is just more of it. There may be a lot of humiliation involved, but it isn't painful or dangerous. You can do one scene in the morning, and another in the afternoon. With most extreme porn, you can't work for days afterwards while you recover.
|
06-01-14 12:01am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I put D, but to be honest they're all good!
|
05-21-14 10:21am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've used hotels a few times, don't really like doing it but I'm on the road a lot and have had problems keeping up with the updates on some sites. I'm quite happy to access PU, it doesn't seem like porn!
|
05-04-14 04:35am
|
Reply
20
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
Sooner or later all these sites give up on the quality and beauty - it's just too much hard work when the majority of porn consumers only want to see brutality. Fortunately SexArt hasn't dropped its standards yet. I hope you like it!
|
02-22-14 04:27am
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If it looks good, it's HD-enough
|
02-02-14 08:45am
|
Reply
22
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well I'm afraid the self-justification simply raises a hollow laugh. I only have one experience of this site - when X-Art hired James Deen several members complained because of his violent material, so I downloaded a film to see for myself. I had no idea such repulsive violence existed. In addition to the slapping and spitting which I kind of expected, the girl was beaten repeatedly with a pool cue, swung around by her hair, punched, kicked in the face, they stamped on the back of her neck so hard I'm surprised they didn't break it, and half drowned. She ended up semi conscious. Sure, they chucked a bucket of water over her and she sat there blankly saying how wonderful it was afterwards - again, that's a legal loophole, that's all. Anyone who isn't provoked to a towering rage by such material is beyond me, and the very idea that someone could find it sexually arousing is utterly sickening. This was nothing to do with sex, it was just violence, brutality and hatred.
I guess we just have different views on the ways one human being should treat another.
|
01-15-14 01:20pm
|
Reply
23
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
The material on this site really is the worst of the worst. The little "interviews" are used by Kink to circumvent our already minimal restrictions on violence in porn and protections for the female performers. They are all that prevent the producers and male performers from being where they should be - behind bars. Viewers may rationalise (ie lie) to themselves that the interviews show that Kink are good guys but the reality is that they are taking advantage of the state of the porn business and paying the girls a minimal amount (what was paid 10 years ago for a single easy straight B/G scene) and making them agree to the most appalling abuse in order to scratch a living.
Anyone who isn't utterly repelled by this material really needs to take a long hard look into their soul. Sure, the r@pe part of it may be (just) a fantasy, but the violence, brutality, abuse, and shattering pain which the girls are suffering for your viewing pleasure are unfortunately very, very real.
|
01-12-14 08:48pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
There are obvious advantages to the sites - they can pretend that the girl is new, if they change nationality then they might get a few members from that country if people think there are local girls on the site, they can try to maintain an air of exclusivity by having almost all unique names, and they can try to separate themselves from the girls' escort names. Given that so many european porn perfomers are really escorts who just do porn as a loss leader, I am surprised they put up wth it.
I really can't see any advantage to the girl in using a different name on some sites - they don't use their real names anyway.
|
01-06-14 07:08am
|
Reply
25
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Joymii's Reply
As of today, 3 out of the last 5 scenes are anal. You've made you choice, I've made mine.
Next year you'll be on here defending DP scenes, or double anal, or something similar. Of course, the girls love it, you treat them wonderfully - typical apologist BS. Glad to be gone, I'm afraid.
|
12-30-13 12:48pm
|
