| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Nope. Not at all. When I see a gorgeous babe literally gagging on a guy's sausage, I wonder what, besides $$$, she is getting out of the experience.
And isn't the objective of having a big dick to pierce a pussy? I like a BJ but I like a straight fuck a whole lot more.
I dislike extended deep throat scenes intensely.
|
08-12-12 10:38am
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
On reflection another element that is worth considering is the vicarious experience of the fuck scene. I never liked the process of condum-interruptus where when Willy was at full attention and the love hole was juicy and ready for action. I also preferred the tactile experience of unhindered contact between my joystick and my partner's passion box.
That aspect would make me switch my vote to "I don't care for it"
|
07-29-12 12:12pm
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't mind it.
After all, the female body parts are what I enjoy, not whether a dong has a skin on it.
|
07-29-12 11:23am
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As a horndog interested in PTA*, I really prefer nice teenie weenie itsy bitsy polka dot bikinis, not coverups.
*PTA = Pussy, Tits & Ass
|
07-21-12 12:08am
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My preferred method is phone because if you get someone with half a brain you can resolve the issue(s) quickly and efficiently.
But my usual method is instant message. The combined IQ of the staffing of the phone banks can't be much more than Tiger Woods' golf score for a single round,
Besides using IM or Email provides a written record of the discussion if needed later.
|
07-15-12 10:14am
|
Reply
381
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
The state of the porn art in June of 2002 compared to today can be a guide.
In 2002 the major source of porn was magazines and VHS videotapes. Magazines were timidly entering the hard core business. Back then most of the major magazines were experimenting with mild insertions (dildoes, fingers, etc.) and men with woodies were showing up in some cases. The "good stuff" was available on VHS tapes available in rental stores and we horn dogs copied off the salient parts for our collections.The internet porn biz was just starting with what now are called low res photos and short, lousy quality videos.
Today the vast majority of porn is web based with most of the remaining video stores barely hanging on with copy protected DVD's and marginally popular non-mainstream stuff. Magazines are struggling for survival.
The delivery systems for porn in 2022 are most likely going to be exclusively web based with a very simple interfaces to large screen 3-D TV screens. Magazines will disappear as will many of the video stores.
While there have been some who have discussed the possibility of reality delivery to include olfactory elements (smell-o-vision) and even tactile capability (simulated touch capability).
I've heard ideas like virtual sex being available but my limited mental capacity can't imagine how that can be accomplished.
In any case it will be a fun ride to see how porn advances over the next decade.
|
06-29-12 10:42pm
|
Reply
382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Lousy Nav & Search functions can kill my willingness to stay a member of a site.
|
06-27-12 11:50pm
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
All of the above as well and I agree with the other comments.
Just one additional aspect that I really like is the participation of webmasters. That tells me they care what we customers think and their comments are very helpful in many cases.
I have dodged so many lousy sites and have found so many superior sites with the insights I've gotten from PU (with some help from TBP) that I haven't bothered with any other review sites for a good long time.
|
06-17-12 10:30am
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Exactly. My answer also is "all of the above."
|
06-13-12 09:08am
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Being a boob fan, there's nothing like strolling up and down Oxford St in London on a hot summer's day watching those braless British babes bouncing along. WOW!
|
06-12-12 11:45pm
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I organize by model name and simultaneously create a subdirectory for the source on my C drive. That makes it easy to find and move stuff to my various external hard drives later.
|
06-09-12 01:19pm
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. Too mainstream these days. And here in CA it's a major part of the local economy so, as bad as our economy is right now, taking out the porn industry would literally force LA city and county into instant bankruptcy.
|
06-05-12 10:10pm
|
Reply
388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Ditto...what Rusty said. I see it as a part of a multivaried approach to sex.
|
05-30-12 09:28am
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I, too, have Time Warner cable modem access. The problem is that when several users in my area are downloading, my speed drops drastically.
The fastest I recall seeing is about 1.2 Mbps but normal is between 400 and 500 Kbps.
|
05-24-12 08:51am
|
Reply
390
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
Man Ass: In my opinion there's nothing worse than a video of a guy's hairy ass blocking the view of a gorgeous lady's glorious snatch in action. And the lousy cameraman who fixates on that ass instead of the babe with extended shots of his backside.
Blabber: Blokes who blabber can be dealt with simply by turning off the sound.
Direction: The intrusive direction being captured actually conveys a bit of reality to the scene and demonstrates that the producers aren't spending much money on professional editing.
Condoms: WGAF? (Who Gives a Fuck?) After all I'm into the babes so if a babe or guy want the guy to wear protection, I'm OK with that.
Finishing: If a guy has to jerk himself off to finish a scene, then either he's got issues with his schlong or sexuality. But again,WGAF? I never quite understood why a money shot is so important in porn.
Other: My biggest turn-off after the hairy ass fixation is where the camera focuses on the guy's dick and not on the babe, especially when the babe has a spectacular body.
|
05-19-12 10:28am
|
Reply
391
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
I agree with Marcus. A solo model site with an update once or twice a week is fine, but most sites should post an update at least once a day (or 6 times a week) to boast having "frequent updates."
|
05-16-12 10:53pm
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I'm expecting that someday we'll have a means to search by photo rather than just by name so we can deal with all the aliases created out there in pornsite-land.
Unfortunately I doubt that will happen in my lifetime.
One approach I've played with is a master Excel index page with a thumbnail photo of my favorites, a list of aliases and a hyperlink to my collection.
Problem 1: Lots of work; not much time.
Problem 2: I fill up my external drives so need to offload stuff to new drives.
Problem 3: There's so much new stuff these days that saving old stuff reminds me of that box full of VHS tapes that I haven't touched in at least a decade but can't bring myself to toss out.
|
05-15-12 10:01am
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Model name with sub folders under each model by website. If there are two girls I save, I duplicate the download. When a site provides a posting date I include that in the title.
On rare occasion I'll also save by a specific aspect that caught my interest.
|
05-14-12 10:46pm
|
Reply
394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
I agree with Marcus...except in one aspect. Many ads are now disguised as part of a site's content so clicking on the link and expecting to see something created by the site instead gets you redirected to another site and a sales pitch. That's an intrusive pain in the ass that I don't need and, if it continues, would make me change my vote to "I hate them."
|
05-11-12 10:08am
|
Reply
395
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Rarely; just when a post by someone is confusing or seems out of touch. Can't recall the last time I checked.
|
05-02-12 09:46am
|
Reply
396
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Also very mixed. 21Sextury is very responsive, others are not. What annoys me most with support for other sites are the robotic responses that don't address the issue.
Some sites work properly right from the start so I have no interaction with the support functions.
|
04-20-12 10:06am
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A totally naked babe walking with high heels moves her entire body in an incredibly erotic way. Once the scene gets down and dirty, barefeet are the best...but I love heels in the tease part.
|
04-18-12 01:12am
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Like everyone else, it depends. I like to do random hits in my stash and see what comes up, so to speak. Sometimes I can spend two or three hours, but normally it's 30-45 minutes.
|
04-16-12 10:26am
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm always fining new talent and am amazed at how many girls I "discover" really have been around for a year or two or three. And it seems like there are more and more gorgeous (and natural) babes entering the bis.
I'm loving it.
|
04-14-12 09:55am
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The only fire arm I own is my third arm (between my legs) and it's notoriously unreliable, both in preparing to fire its load and its ability to shoot several loads in succession. It seems to peter out (so to speak) long before the job is done.
Sigh.
|
04-13-12 10:46am
|
