| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
High average-superior would be my guess. Good poll graymane. I think you're right in that the quality of reviews and contributions means there's a high IQ present here. Strange but true given the subject matter of the forum. However go to a forum on some of the porn networks and you will see porn fans aren't necessarily intelligent. This is the way PU has evolved.
|
11-01-12 05:09pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't like it at all. I agree with messmer in that it is also present in comments accompanying a picture set. It's the same for forums. Given some of the comments by porn fans on sites like VideoBox it's the same stuff. Some love it, I hate it. Maybe it's harmless, maybe not. It does worry me a bit.
|
10-27-12 10:55am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, they and the Wittyguy forum awards, were two of the PU highlights.
|
10-20-12 05:05pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Nearly all of the above.
|
10-14-12 06:20am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Either not worth the effort or they're a scam, so I went for they're a scam.
|
10-07-12 06:20am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Like Rusty I went for "never too much" because there wasn't a "not too much" option.
|
10-05-12 12:47pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
It's over 50%, so I put answer one. This is mainly because I store on external drives.
|
10-03-12 08:46am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Somewhere between always and usually. Occasionally you see a good(ish) pair, but even then, when I realise they're fake, it's like the model in question has had a mastectomy. To me, post op, they are no longer objects of sexual interest or desire. Instant turn off, just like a plastic doll.
|
09-17-12 10:46am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes somewhat, it depeneds on the site or network. If there are a number high on my list, those with a discount go to the top.
|
09-14-12 09:42am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not since they killed Steve Irwin.
|
09-11-12 07:55am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, without a doubt, exceptional value.
|
09-07-12 06:17am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Absolutely not, horrible value for money, and you don't even get to keep the video. A rip off for the uninformed
|
09-01-12 06:21am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
The better the site the more accurate the preview and tour, for obvious reasons. I went for the don't tell all box. Most of the sites I have joined, have exremely accurate previews, but that's because I don't go for the shady rip off merchant sites.
I wont touch those that have lousy previews. If you think your material is so good you have to censor it or not show much of a preview to protect your copyright material - WRONG. You lose me as a customer straight away. I always go for a PU/TBP review first, to determine if it's a reputable network or site, then decide if I want a tour or preview. If it's a lousy preview I'm gone.
This may not go down too well, but I consider some of the best previews to be on free download forums. That has got a company my money quite a few times.
|
03-25-12 08:56am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
Power off. I may be ocd but I can't stand the thought of things being on when I'm not around. However due to CT's reply, I am now considering leaving on standby in the daytime, and only turning off at night.
|
03-16-12 07:24pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The first results show how out of tune I am with the majority of PU members. It also shows how in tune the TBP staff are with PU members. I voted 5 days, but for people who are here every day, it is almost certainly better to have 2 or 3 day polls, as it continually engages them with a new topic.
|
03-07-12 05:58am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Plenty of times. 100 per cent so far for the first option.
|
03-05-12 09:13am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes I factor it in all the time, even though it is for me, one of the minor considerations.
|
03-02-12 07:51am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Oops - never knew it existed until the poll, but will use from now on. I saw it but presumed it was for sites only.
|
02-27-12 04:23pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I'm probably not going to be popular with the majority (come to think of it I never have been!), but I voted for getting better.
Yes I hate the fake breasts, the slapping, the lousy camerawork, the tats, the usual stuff, but...
I don't want to go back to those old movies. I know some of you like them, but really, 80 minutes of movie with 10 minutes of action. Fine if you're that sort of coinnoisseur. I'm not. 70 minutes of talk, and the sex scenes were cut in, so all you saw was two anonymous groins in action. Cut in so they could sell the softcore version in places like the UK.
One month of 21 Sextury, or even my hated VideoBox is better than that. Girls in porn now are amazingly beautiful, and plentiful. Yes there is all the stuff we hate, but there's a huge amount of quality for very little money.
Maybe compared to two or three years ago you could say it is not as good, but even there I'm not sure. I consider this the golden age of porn. Maybe we are too spoilt for choice.
|
02-26-12 06:40pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
The answer is no to either gay guy or lesbian porn. However it has been great to see some gay reviews, with gay members finally establishing themsleves here. PU needed that, to be an all round site representing everyone.
|
02-22-12 09:21am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the reply, exotics. I did think Oye Loca looked quite good. It's sometimes hard to tell from a few snapshots what a site is really like, but that is why PU is so useful. Think I'll make a small investment in this one, it sounds like the sort of site I'd like. There don't have to be gigabytes of material, just enough quality material to make it worthwhile. Thanks for the heads up. Good to see you around again.
|
02-17-12 06:28pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Graymane Messmer and Drooler sum it up in posts 12 15 and 16. A sexy guy can quite often be someone who treats women like crap, but as Heather suggests, for some women that magnetism may wear thin after a while.
However the question is what defines a sexy guy and that very often means on the superficial first impression level. I too have been on the consoling shoulder end. Unfortunately my tongue has rather a sharp edge to it. I can't resist saying that if you choose a tosser with a lousy track record, what do you expect?
Thankfully being a nice person (I think!) I ended up with a nice partner. Both of us have an edge, which sometimes makes us dangerous, if someone pisses us off. Apart from that I think we qualify as people who have honour, honesty, and decency.
Quite often thoroughly decent men end up with horrible horrible women and vice versa, nice women often end up with complete bastards for men.
|
02-17-12 06:21pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Agree with Rusty. Rich, famous, and successful are tops. Despite what women say, it's what is on the outside plus image, that counts, at least as far as first attraction is concerned.
As for the available choices on what defines a sexy guy, I go for well dressed and stylish.
|
02-16-12 06:06am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Think I'll try out Team Skeet myself. Wouldn't touch some of the others because of their tricks department, but you are well known for your discerning taste - so Team Skeet will be my next port of call.
|
02-15-12 11:52am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
21 Sextury gets my vote as the best network.
|
02-15-12 11:28am
|
