Thanks for the suggestion. I usually do re-size my screen fonts. Like they are currently. But that makes for another problem, because now the complete page does not fit inside the monitor. I have a small section of the URL page that is outside the monitor, that I don't see unless I use the "whatever" bar at the bottom of the page, to move the page slightly so I can now see/read whatever is on that small section of the URL page that I don't see.
But it's better for me to re-size the fonts, because I only sometimes want/need to see the section of the URL page that is not shown to me.
The price seems attractive. But I read in another comment a lot of the content is duplicated at Teen Mega World, 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn. I'm currently a member of the two latter sites, and will probably rejoin Teen Mega World soon.
There's just so much porn out there, and not enough time to search through it all. Lol.
I don't really have a problem reading a message that is in all caps. Actually, since I don't usually use my reading glasses when looking at the computer monitor, it's easier to read the words when they are in caps (bigger letters).
I put money as the number one problem. Religion, social disapproval, trying to become and stay popular: those can be serious issues. But with the current economic downturn, I keep reading stories about how porn is making less and less money and porn stars are finding it harder to get work, and they are not making anywhere near the money they used to make. So that would be the biggest problem they are facing, in my opinion.
Quality of content, amount of content, model selection and updates are important to me. I pay little attention to live shows.
If I were efficient, I would join a site for one month and then return much later (6 months, a year) for the updates.
But I'm lazy. So I sometimes join a site or network for 3 months, or even a year, if the site or network is worth it, and you get a good discount for a longer term membership.
So I voted "other", even though that is not technically correct. The only option I have little interest in is the live shows, which I have found to be boring. And I refuse to pay for the private shows, which are extremely expensive.
Thanks for the update and the very complete explanation.
But if you can't get full network access, in spite of the fact you might have downloaded material from Young Legal Porn, you are entitled to a full refund of your $30.
You should get the refund from CCBill, if you explain the problem.
Or you can get the refund from your credit card company if you signed up with a credit card.
Either company should give you a full refund, since you did not get the full network access you paid for.
Reputable companies don't quibble about minor details, such as you might have downloaded some content from a single site. You are entitled to full network access, which you are not getting.
But the best solution would be if you were given full network access. And maybe the Diesel network support (if they are part of Diesel, and not just some outside third party), might give you a free extra week in your membership to make up for the problem.
If you use either the PU or the TBP link to go to the Young Legal Porn site, and then go to the signup page, you see a choice of two memberships:
$19.99/month for access to Young Legal Porn.
$29.99/month All DieselAccess Network sites.
Since you chose to pay the $29.99/month, you are entitled to access all the sites in the Diesel Access network.
In a sense, this is a separate issue from the PU/TBP discount. Because you are signing up with Diesel through CCBill. (PU/TBP almost certainly gets some payment if you use the PU/TBP link, but you are signing up to Diesel through CCBill.)
And the signup page clearly tells you what you will be charged, and what you will get for that payment.
So contact CCBill and explain you are not getting what you paid for. You should have a choice of a full refund, or access to the complete Diesel network.
Or you can contact the Diesel support, and explain.
But there's no question you are entitled to full network access. It says so clearly on the signup page.
If you didn't use the PU/TBP link to go to the Young Legal Porn page, then the signup page would show different prices:
$29.99/month access to Young Legal Porn site only.
$39.99/month access to 13 sites in the Diesel Access network. (But even though it states 13 sites, you should get access to all 14 sites. This signup page needs to be updated.)
And there are a couple of other membership options.
But like I said, if you used the PU/TBP link to go to the Young Legal Porn site, you should have used the signup page where the prices were $19.99 and $29.99
Sorry to be so long-winded. But you said you used the PU/TBP link, and you were quoted $29.99 for complete network access. So that is what you were entitled to. Whether CCBill or Young Legal Porn will give you better satisfaction, I don't know. But you should definitely get complete access to all the sites in the network. It said so on your sign-up page.
Maybe CCBill can help. They have been helpful to me in the past.
I think it's amazing so many people look at movies and TV on handheld devices. I prefer a full sized computer monitor, or my laptop monitor. The bigger the better.
Most of the videos I watch and most of the models I see photo sets for are from Eastern Europe.
Japan has a lot of gorgeous women. I just don't like the mosaic.
I see very little from England, France, Germany, Italy, or other European countries. I know they are making porn, but I just don't subscribe to sites that carry porn from those countries.
I live in the U.S., but don't care for most of the U.S. videos I've seen. Sites like Nubiles and Teen Mega World are inexpensive, and offer a huge selection of good quality videos. And they are mainly Eastern Europe, as far as I can tell. MetArt and MPL Studios and Femjoy are also heavily Eastern European, I think.
I think the theory is that the watermark is supposed to be a sign of ownership. So the watermark is supposed to discourage piracy. As well as being a form of advertising.
But like I said, and I'm sure a lot of PU members will agree, there's no need for large watermarks. They are just ugly and distracting, and can actually hide part of what you want to see in a video or photo.
Lazy like me, too. I sometimes (too often) let subscriptions run out without ever visiting the sites after my first visits, where I try to cherry pick the best models. Lol.
Gloria is not one of my favorite models. But I think you will kick yourself if you don't visit the site. The videos are crystal clear. Some of them might appeal to you.
So were you able to get into the Skinny Super Girl site?
According to the members blog, as you pointed out, you should have access to all the sites in the Diesel Access network.
I think it's a nice feature you can choose to stream or download these bonus "advertising" sets.
For example, the video with Kasey Chase from Nubiles titled Smack My Butt has a runtime of 22 minutes 12 seconds, and can be downloaded in 4 choices:
HD 720p (WMV file, 578 MB)
HD 720p (h.264 file, 533 MB)
SD 480p (255 MB)
LD 360p (175 MB)
I normally choose the highest definition, largest file size, because I figure that's going to give the best, clearest picture to watch.
But I should really test the other file sizes, to see if there's a real difference in picture quality, that I can see.
It would save a lot of hard drive space if I downloaded these files choosing a smaller size.
I look at the videos and photos on a computer monitor, not a large TV screen.
And I've noticed that, for myself, at least, I can't really tell any difference in most small-sized, lower quality photos than a huge-sized, high quality photo. That's assuming we're talking about a recent photo set from MetArt or one of the other high-quality photo sites.
And I just bought a new 3 TB hard drive two days ago, because I keep running out of disk space.
The prices on new, larger hard drives keeps dropping, which is wonderful, but how many hard drives do I really need? It's like an addiction.
Yes, these clips they post as advertising (from other pay sites) are inside the member area.
It's actually a form of advertising, because they clearly state from which pay site the clip comes from. They even have a hot link to that outside web site. And this is something I haven't seen before (not a link to another web site, but actually posting a full video clip from some other pay site inside their own web site).
I assume that most of the content at the Diesel Access network (including Young Legal Porn) is exclusive to that network.
Pat362 is far more expert than I am about knowing what content is leased or not. But I don't recall, off hand, seeing any material at Diesel Access network sites on other networks (except for the "advertising" clips).
I have seen many of the models at Diesel Access at other sites, but in different material- photo sets or videos.
There used to be some sharing of videos and photo sets between Young Legal Porn and 18 Only Girls (two sites in the Diesel Access network). I don't know if that has happened recently. My guess is probably not.
(This is part of same reply, but line limits break this reply into 2 parts.)
Most of the site are small, don't update, and are worth very little.
The main sites with value are 18 Only Girls
Young Legal Porn
But the newest site, Skinny Super Girl, is nice and updates.
Beata Porn is also a good site.
You can join a single site, or join the network. Joining the network is usually more expensive.
The first time you join, it's probably better to join the network. That should give you access to the entire network of sites. You will quickly see the small sites that don't update, and have little value, and drop them from your list of sites to revisit.
Do not join through Super Skinny Girl for $29.99. That would only give you access to that one site, and not the network.
Instead, use the PU/TBP link to go to the Young Legal Porn site.
1) That will offer you a sign-up price of $19.99 for that single site.
2) It will also offer you a sign-up price of $29.99 for complete network access, all 14 sites in the network.
In my opinion, it's worth spending the extra $10 for network access. Once you are a member, you can then decide whether you want to stay a second month as a network member, or change to a cheaper membership for a single site, or drop your membership completely and then return some time later if you think there will be enough updates to make it worthwhile.
Some people think the best choice would be to join a single site, either 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn, as those are the two sites with the most value, and it's slightly cheaper to join just a single site.
But I think it's worth the small premium to get network access, at least the first time you join. And slutty and Drooler, on re-joining, went for network access, as I did.
The network is called Diesel Access, or Diesel Media Online or Diesel Action. Not sure what the correct title is. I've seen the network listed in those three ways.
The network includes 14 sites: 18 Only Girls
Sasha Fucks Dasha
Ivana Fukalot
Vika Nymph
Young Legal Porn
Policeman
The Sperm Lover
Alice Wonder Bang
Beata Porn
Best 18 Girls
Lay The Kat
Natasha Shy
Sasha Blonde
Skinny Super Girl
You might try sending an email to support explaining that you are a member of the network, but that you do not have access to skinny, and that you have talked/communicated with other people who are members of the network that were given access to skinny.
As I mentioned, Drooler said, in response to your comment that you did not have access, that he also did not have access. But today, he said he does have access. And I'm almost positive he did not pay extra to get that access. He said he wouldn't pay extra for access when he was not able to enter that site.
I did not pay extra to get access to this site. It was just included in the network access.
So, if you send an email to tech support, you might get into skinny. It's a nice additional site, and it's worth the attempt to get it, because you already paid for a network membership.
But I certainly, like you, would not pay $30, or even $20, to gain access to skinny by itself.
Just make clear you are a member of the network, and not just a single site.
Never. I got a couple of massages when I was in a hospital for surgery. But they weren't erotic, or even enjoyable. More like painful. And it was a guy doing me, not a girl.
slutty, on September 8, 2011 (earlier this month) mentioned that he has a current long-term membership to the Diesel Access network, and that he was surprised that he was not getting access to this new site of theirs (Skinny Super Girl). Drooler replied to that comment that he also was not getting access to Skinny Super Girl.
But in a reply to my comment of today, that I just joined and did get access to Skinny Super Girl, Drooler replied today that he is now getting access to Skinny Super Girl (without paying anything extra, I'm sure).
So I would guess that slutty is also getting access to Skinny Super Girl as part of his network access.
I see the new discount for network access through PU/TBP for $29.99/month.
There was some discussion in the past on whether it was worth joining either Young Legal Porn or 18 Only Girls by themselves, or paying extra to get the entire network. Some people said it's not worth the extra money to get the entire network, since most of the network sites are small and don't update, and also because there was some duplication between the Young Legal Porn and 18 Only Girls sites, which are the two major sites of this network.
But when I joined before, I got the network access. And I got network access again this time. And slutty and Drooler also got network access. So I think it's worth getting network access, at least for the first time you join this network.
That's just my opinion.
This is not a mega-network like Teen Mega World, or a mega site like Nubiles or MetArt. But if you like white Eastern European teens, there are a number of lovely young girls here. The sex is more softcore than Teen Mega World. And there is a lot of solo and girl-girl at this network. But I think, based on what I like (teen girls), that it's worth joining at least once.
And some of us have obviously joined the network more than once. Lol.
I'm not sure of the date or even the year. I think it was sometime in the 1950s, but definitely by the 1960s.
The first "pornographic" images I saw were photos on the back of racy playing cards. They were topless models, definitely not frontal bottomless, but also had rear bottoms exposed (just the ass cheeks, not the vagina seen from the rear that is so common today).
Those weren't my playing cards. I'm not even sure whose cards they were.
Later I graduated to looking at my brother's Playboy magazines. Wow!
Many years later I got my own subscription to Playboy magazine.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.