| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Regular, standard monitor. What's with all this high-tech craze?
|
07-05-11 06:00pm
|
Reply
1227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Where I live, people are supposed to pick up after their dogs poop. But that rule seems to be ignored quite often. Like most rules, I suppose, the rules are meant for "other" people. Lol.
|
07-02-11 04:36pm
|
Reply
1228
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Sandy Summers is a cute girl. Been around for years. So maybe I should call her a cute woman instead. Lol.
|
07-02-11 09:41am
|
Reply
1229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
One major problem with letting cats outside is they often get into fights with other cats. And until you take your cat to a vet, you don't realize how expensive a vet can be. I was spending more on vet bills than I was spending on myself for doctor visits. $100 to see a vet because my cat got some scratches. Why that cat loved to fight so much I'll never know, because he never seemed to win.
And he hated going to the vet. Hated the car ride, didn't like the vet's office.
|
07-02-11 09:30am
|
Reply
1230
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pets need looking after.
|
07-01-11 01:08am
|
Reply
1231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm mainly concerned with what the model herself looks like. But a nice set of panties (and bra) can set the model off nicely. And a little bit of strip by the model can add to a video.
|
06-30-11 04:03pm
|
Reply
1232
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Impressive. I'm nominating you for Detective First Class of the PU Patrol. No detail too small will escape our scans! Lol.
(Joke, mild praise. Some people think my humor is criticism, but that is not usually intended on my part.)
|
06-30-11 12:14pm
|
Reply
1233
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
What preview pages indicate that there is a high definition download option?
I look at a few preview pages for HD videos, and the ones I see have download choices of high and low, and streaming choices of HD, high, low.
So from what I can see, you can stream in HD (which I assume is "High Definition", but you can't download in HD.
The most recently posted videos are:
posted 2011-06-30
http://www.devilsfilm.com/en/This-Isnt-T...y-Scene-3/film/30841
posted 2011-06-29
http://www.devilsfilm.com/en/This-Isnt-T...y-Scene-2/film/30840
posted 2011-06-28
http://www.devilsfilm.com/en/This-Isnt-T...y-Scene-1/film/30839
|
06-30-11 06:40am
|
Reply
1234
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
This site (and the bonus sites) has a number of attractive models. Which is why I joined. But poor navigation and other flaws make the membership less of a value. Zips would be nice, search would be nice, a model listing would be nice, etc.
|
06-27-11 02:15pm
|
Reply
1235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. I don't find male bodybuilders attractive. Female bodybuilders are even less attractive.
|
06-27-11 02:30am
|
Reply
1236
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think I have a Wifi connection. I know that some libraries and coffee shops are supposed to have free Wifi, but I've never used those. I have a laptop, but am not really sure if I could use Wifi, or if I need to buy some add-on to use Wifi.
|
06-25-11 12:33am
|
Reply
1237
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
I don't like tattoos. Given how common they are for the models, it shouldn't be a factor, but I just don't like them. So I have no problem if this site (or whoever supplies the photosets) uses a bit of photoshopping to remove tattoos.
I know that different sites use photoshopping to remove birth marks (small colored markings) on some of their models. I think that photoshopping is more common than most people realize.
|
06-24-11 11:00pm
|
Reply
1238
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
The Collector's Review
Very impressive review. A lot of nice opinions and details that give a clear picture of the site. Welcome to PU.
|
06-24-11 11:50am
|
Reply
1239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
"What I find most useful though is an alphabetical model list."
Can be a great feature. Especially with a nice, large-sized thumbnail to show what the model looks like. Plus hot links to the videos and photosets of that model.
|
06-23-11 04:17pm
|
Reply
1240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Somewhat important. It makes navigation/using the site easier. The importance of navigation depends somewhat on the size of the site. The larger the site, the more site contents, the more important it is to be able to search the site contents.
There are some sites that don't bother to name the models. That makes collecting the videos/photosets a real mess.
|
06-23-11 03:20am
|
Reply
1241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Did I win yet? My gosh, why can't I have a sneak peak to see beforehand? Like, this is Tuesday, and I should have already known since last Tuesday who the next week's winners were. The suspense is killing me.
|
06-21-11 08:23am
|
Reply
1242
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I prefer women with pubic hair versus the shaved look found almost everywhere today. But almost all models from the 1970s and 1980s, when they started showing pubic hair legally in the US, had trimmed pubic hair.
Hairy legs and armpits does not make the model attractive to me. I want a lovely face and figure to be part of the package.
|
06-19-11 01:46pm
|
Reply
1243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. I'm mainly into softcore photography. But after getting into hardcore videos a few years back, my tastes are still mainly softcore with some hardcore. I don't go for extreme porn. I'm not really clear what extreme porn would be.
|
06-19-11 12:50pm
|
Reply
1244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
indybt30's Reply
Never heard of jelquing before. I guess I've led a sheltered life. Reading about jelquing on Wikipedia, I read that silicone has been injected into the penis and scrotum for penis enlargement. Ugh. Maybe silicone breast implants aren't so bad after all. Could that be a poll question: which would you prefer, having silicone injected into your breasts, or into your penis and scrotum? Possible answers would measure the intensity of your outraged screams. Lol.
|
06-18-11 05:10pm
|
Reply
1245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Ditto for other meaning no.
|
06-17-11 01:26am
|
Reply
1246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've used email in the past. The response is hit or miss. Most sites have never replied. A few have replied in a timely manner. But I don't try to contact customer support unless I'm having a major problem. And because I usually get such a lousy response, I don't have a lot of faith in customer support, which many sites advertise as 24/7.
|
06-15-11 07:33am
|
Reply
1247
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
slutty, in your review, you say there is no HD downloading yet. Was there any notice of when, or if, HD downloading would be available for the network sites?
On 04-21-11 (12:00pm) Veev (the webmaster for FameDigital) posted a reply to a comment at PU (the comment was by RustyJ posted 04-21-11 08:55am and titled "Any changes to HD downloading?").
RustyJ was asking if and when HD clips could be downloaded.
Veev (the webmaster) replied: I was told that it's on the 26th of April and it's gonna start in EvilAngel.com. If all goes well, it will be all over our other sites as well..all 44 of them :-).
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
I don't remember EvilAngel being available as part of the bonus sites when I was a member of DevilsFilm before.
Were you able to access EvilAngel. And if so, what site did you join through?
|
06-10-11 08:31pm
|
Reply
1248
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
What can I say in my defense of a foggy brain? Well, the network used to be called netFameSolutions. So because of the name change from netFameSolutions to famedigital, I didn't recognize that this was the network for DevilsFilm and RoccoSiffredi.
Edit: The company is still listed as netFameSolutions at TBP. It's confusing to me how to refer to some of these networks. What is the proper name to use? Why can't they make it simple?
I joined through DevilsFilm. That's why I think of this as the DevilsFilm network.
|
06-10-11 02:07am
|
Reply
1249
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Excellent review, as usual.
I've never been a member. I don't like most DVD sites because there's usually too much material to look through before I find something that I like (personal taste).
Your review makes that point very clear, that it's not easy searching the contents to find the good stuff. So in spite of the low price, I'm too lazy to join this site.
Oops. I just looked at the site. I've been a member of this network before. I've got a foggy brain. I've been a member before, and will almost certainly be again. I like a number of models at this site, and will return when I have the time.
I need a new brain. I didn't realize this is the Devil's Film network. Lol.
|
06-10-11 01:34am
|
Reply
1250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Did you see Creature from the Black Lagoon and House of Wax in the original runs back in the 1950s?
I dimly recall seeing Creature from the Black Lagoon at the movies back in the 1950s, but I didn't remember it was in 3D.
I think I only saw House of Wax on TV, so that wasn't in 3D when I saw it.
I remember 3D glasses back then were made of paper with plastic to see through. The glasses seemed different from today's 3D glasses. I don't remember any eye-strain effect back in the 1950s. They even had 3D comic books. I had a 3D comic book of the 3 Stooges back then.
|
06-09-11 09:36am
|
