adultlabs seems to be an interesting site. First time I've seen it, I
think. The quality of the photos seems to be better than what the same photos are, when posted at the Royal Cash network sites. And the prices to license the photosets and videos seems reasonable. If I was tempted to start up an adult site, this is one of the places I would have to check out for source material. :)
As far as model names, it seems a tradition for Internet porn sites to randomly assign names to their models. In a single network, the same model can have a different name at some of their sites. And
sometimes the same model can have several different names at the same
site (Met-art does this sometimes). And of course, a single site can
use the same name for several different models, like JustTeenSite,
because all these girls are interchangeable anyway, as far as the site
is concerned. :)
Thanks for the encouragement, TheSquirrel. I know exactly how you feel about waiting for years to join a site. There are many sites I've looked at for years, but still haven't joined. But on this site/network, I was actually a member 8 months ago, but was too lazy to write a review on any of the sites. There are currently over 30 sites in the network, and joining any site in the network gives you access to most, but not all, of the network sites. This is a teen network site, mainly gonzo style. Not really my style, so I don't know why I rejoined the network, other than I was looking for something new, and ended up here instead. There are times when I definitely don't understand my own actions. :)
Thanks for the kind words. But Nubiles is a different site, not connected to the network that contains Nubile Girls HD. There are so many porn sites that the ones with similar names can get confusing. If you join this site because you think you will be getting Nubiles, you will almost certainly be disappointed.
Nubiles is a very popular teen site. Nubile Girls HD is a tiny site that is part of the Royal Cash network.
Hope this helps.
Many site reviews don't mention prices, because you can find/see the membership prices when you click on the site hot link for PU or TPB, and the membership price (with any discount for using the PU/TBP link) will be prominently listed.
My first thought is that some Japanese porn is censored with the mosaic effect. And if you're into Japanese porn, that's something you have to accept. I skip sites from the US or Europe that use censored photos or vids in the preview.
The model should definitely be showing some kind of emotion or enjoyment or arousal. I don't want a lot of fake moans and groans, but I don't want the female to be a slab of meat who is just lying there getting pounded on.
My theory is that by splitting the contents into 30+ sites, it makes the contents appear much bigger than if the contents were split into 1 or 2 or 3 sites. So it's basically a marketing decision, I think. Also, with the contents spread into many small sites, they can offer access to the sites through each separate site, and through a group offer which is through teenmegaworld, which is not a single site but a mixture of most of the separate sites in the network. Somebody might be drawn/interested in a solo teen site, a boy-girl site, an old-young site, etc. etc. And they could offer a loyalty program that includes more sites in the membership the more months a person stays a member.
So it's basically a marketing strategy, I think.
But the site layout and design for each site is basically the same, from the sites I've seen, as far as navigation and having a video with an accompaning photoset, and the different options for downloading are the same from site to site.
I was a member of teenmegaworld before, and Denner's review is accurate. The navigation has not improved at all: it's very basic, and the search is very poor as well. I agree with Denner's review, except my score is much lower, because my taste in videos is different, and I have a slow ISP download speed (about 160 Kb/s), which makes downloading a single video take about 2 hours (in high quality), and I can't play the videos in flash mode, because my ISP speed isn't fast enough (the flash video stutters and stops, instead of playing). I mentioned the cons in my review, which is why I gave the site a lower score than Denner, who gave it a 90.
If you are into gonzo teen sex, then the network has a lot to offer. I personally want something with a "prettier", more glamorous look, where the models are attractive (they do have attractive young girls, but they are not shown to advantage), and there is more than just a meat factory fuck-suck sex. I would like some tenderness, or some slight story behind the sex to give it some meaning, or where the girls are really excited and enjoying the sex. The girls and the guys could be shovelling snow or mud for all the excitement and heat and enjoyment they are showing in many of the sex clips. I mean, the guys look like the sex is a chore, like they are working for a paycheck, instead of actually enjoying sex with some really cute girls.
You do get a one less bonus site when you join with the PU/TBP discount. But I did not think it was worth the extra $10.00 to join without the discount.
Joining with the bonus thru teenmegaworld I got:
$19.95/30 days membership
17 "exclusive" sites
16 non-exclusive sites
Checking the join page, non-bonus teenmegaworld, it states:
$29.95/30 days membership
18 "exclusive" sites
16 non-exclusive sites
And like I said, it is difficult to tell exactly what sites you get access to before you sign up. Once your membership is activated, and you enter one of the sites, you can then tell which sites you have access to.
So I was a little disappointed to find I did not get access to fuckstudies. I joined through the teenmegaworld site. Possibly, if I had joined through the teenstarsonly site, I might have gotten access to fuckstudies. Their bonus system is a mystery, and even the webmaster apparently has to check with somebody to be able to know exactly which sites you get access to with each site membership. And that is probably not taking into account the reduction in sites from the PU/TBP membership discount.
So is it worth it to email the webmaster asking for the specific information? When there are so many combinations?
Why can't they just make it easy on the customer, and give all the sites with any membership? Would it really cost them anything, after considering the added good will on the part of the customers, who won't be angry or disappointed because their membership did not include some network site they wanted as part of the membership?
Apparently, they give access to most of the sites in the network with any subscription. So why not give access to all the sites?
Maybe, in the back of their minds, they are considering a bonus loyalty program, where they will add a few more sites to your membership if you stay a member longer than 1 or 2 months. But I don't think they actually have that program in place at this time.
Oops. I just realized that I became interested in fuckstudies because I read your review on the site. So I guess I don't need to tell you about that site. Lol. :)
As you know, there are a number of different sites in the network. And they slice and dice the sites that you get access to, depending on which site you join through, and when you join.
I joined through teenmegaworld a few weeks ago.
I do not have access to 18firstsex.com.
I was hoping to get access to fuckstudies as part of my membership, because I saw some clips from that site that seemed nice. But I did not get access to fuckstudies either.
I've been a member of the network before. But it will a good while before I rejoin, after this membership runs out.
Sorry I can't give you any information on either of those sites (fuckstudies or 18firstsex).
I mentioned elsewhere that it's irritating that you don't know exactly which sites you will get access to before you join. They really should give you access to all the sites in the network. The way it currently works is a little stupid and irritating, because you always want what you don't get (if you know the sites that are available). Just human nature. :)
Thanks for the kind words. This site (and you get many other sites in the network with a membership) has some really attractive teen girls. The videos are all hardcore. But they leave me cold. I wish it was otherwise, because there are some lovely girls, but they are not attractive in the videos, and in the pictures they are even less attractive. That is me. I know there are PU members who find these videos hot, but I find them boring: hardcore fuck and suck, without any erotic or arousing quality. A real shame, considering some of the girls are really attractive.
You discovered my secret shame.
But in spite of my glowing review of Met-art with its high score, and my other posts telling what a great site it is, I've never gotten a free pass to Met-art, or even a thank you from that site.
I like to see the entire female model, with all her body parts. And in videos, I even want to hear her voice, as long as it's not really stupid words coming out of her mouth, or really fake moans and groans. I don't really appreciate photos that cut off the model's head to focus on some other specific part of her body, or because the photographer/video cameraman is an incompetent.
Nice, comprehensive review. I'm still searching for those sites where I could write: "great videos, great pics, great girls, what more can you ask, 100."
The closest I could find was Met-art, which was my first review, and that got a 97 score. No other site ever reached that high a rating. Lol.
The agony and the ecstasy. What a great title for someone bitten by the porn bug. Instead of watching movies about vampires and werewolves, why can't we see movies that explore real human activity, such as people watching porn? There have been academy award winning movies about drunks and drug addicts and other perverts. So why not about porn watchers? Don't we deserve a little respect?
I will sometimes use email to report a problem to technical support. But I don't think I've written to a site webmaster to praise or complain. The response to emails from technical support can be hit or miss. Maybe you get an answer, maybe it's helpful.
Almost all my porn emails/posts are done here at PU. But even after all this time, I'm not sure if PU has a webmaster. Does it? And is he visible to the PU members?
I assume that Rick is the site owner, and Khan is the head honcho for PU submissions/posts, but who is the webmaster? The guy that "runs" the site?
One definition of webmaster: a technician who designs or maintains a website.
A second definition of webmaster: a term used loosely to describe an individual assigned to administering a web site. Typical duties might include updating pages, correcting errors, fixing links or responding to technical inquiries.
Thanks for the confirmation, Sevrin, and also for the added information. I tried to show in an updated edit on my original comment that the met-art update page has been corrected, which is what I found on a later check of the page. The photosets that I checked now have the correct posting dates.
I use the updates page the same way you do, to see if there are any fresh photosets that I might be interested in.
I think Met-art is a very well-run site, that has very few technical glitches. And over time, as you indicate, they are working to improve the site even more.
As you can probably tell, met-art is one of my favorite sites. :)
I found it by looking up porn review sites. And at the time, I thought it was one of the better review sites, because the reviews were written by amateurs like myself, and many of the reviews were intelligent and informative, and sometimes amusing. Over time, I found that the reviews/comments were much more useful than the puff pieces found at many porn review sites. Also found that I enjoyed contributing/interacting with the PU community, which was friendly, polite, and mainly welcoming. The discounts offered thru PU were also helpful and appreciated. And the raffle is like a cherry on top (but not the virginal kind, I'm afraid).
Perhaps I need to clear my browser cache. But what I am seeing is still the mis-sorted/mis-dated thumbnail page. The page itself looks fine, as long as you don't care when the photosets were actually posted. But I usually like to check the daily updates, to see if there are any photosets I might be interested in.
And the page I am looking at has the wrong dates listed for the most recent photosets.
For example:
07.21.2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
07.21.2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
are the dates listed for the two photosets above, which were supposedly posted today, July 21, 2010.
But those photosets were actually posted:
July 15, 2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
July 04, 2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
Those are just a few of the photosets that are being posted with the wrong date.
If you use the Internet, you can find the actual date each photoset
was originally posted.
But it's not a major problem. I believe Met-art will fix it sometime soon.
But if your computer shows the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, then the problem is with my computer, which is still showing incorrect dates for many of the recent photosets.
If you are seeing the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Or if you are seeing the incorrect dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Because I am interested to know if I am seeing the current update page, or if I am seeing an older update page, and need to clear my browser cache, or try some other fix.
It would be very difficult to find any site where the videos are less erotic than Met-art videos. The main value of Met-art is in the massive collection (and massive updating) of their softcore teen photosets. MPL has very fine photosets, as well, but in much smaller numbers, than Met-art. I agree the MPL videos are slightly more erotic than the Met-art videos. But I have not really found any softcore teen site where I thought the videos were truly erotic. For me, it's much easier finding erotic softcore teen photosets, than to find erotic softcore teen videos. There are many fine sites that feature teen glamor photos. But I have not found any site that has, for me, outstandingly erotic softcore teen videos.
Edit01: But X-art, which has become more hardcore lately (not truly hardcore, but definitely not the softcore it used to be), has extremely fine quality videos. Lovely girls, fine lighting, professional camera-work.
Rearadmiral seems to sum it up nicely: If a site has enough good content, it's worth joining once. But without updates, as long as you are able to keep the downloaded material in your collection, there's no sense in joining a second time.
Thanks for the note. I did realize that there was a name change. I have seen a number of videos from the YoungPorn/YoungLegalPorn site, and thought the models were very attractive and the videos were very clear and nice quality. But I never got around to joining the site/network, because I am mainly into softcore photosets. But I am dabbling with video sites more now.
Today video clips can take 1 GB for a 20 minute runtime. So buying more external hard drives seems like the only solution. On some photosets, I've seen single photos that are 4 MB or more. It takes more and more space to store these images and videos.
So how much space does my porn collection take? Too much.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
