| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1826
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler, have they been using more photoshop or a similar process at metart? I don't mind some photoshop at metart, but lately it seems to be used over-much and the photosets, even of attractive models, are less appealing. The coloring and appearance of the model seems fake instead of real.
|
12-11-09 06:11pm
|
Reply
1827
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I think it's easier to find good quality softcore pics than hardcore material (pics and vids).
But most softcore vids don't really appeal to me that much.
I don't know why softcore pix are so much better than softcore vids. In general, it's easier to produce pix than vids, so that's part of the reason why softcore pix are much higher in quality than softcore vids.
Most hardcore pix that I've seen are much lower in quality than the softcore pix that are available.
But even given that quality pix are easier to make than vids, I don't understand why most softcore vids have very little value for me.
Except that with vids, there are so many more factors that can detract from the enjoyment of the vid compared to a picture. A lovely girl opens her mouth, and her voice or what she says in a vid destroys the illusion of beauty, grace, attractiveness, etc. The lighting and focus and other elements in a vid are much harder to control than for a picture. It's much more expensive shooting a video than a photoset. The detail/definition of a picture can be much higher than what is found in most videos. Etc., etc., etc. High quality softcore pix are found at many sites.
There are not a lot of high-quality softcore vids that appeal to me. There are few high-quality hardcore pix that appeal to me. There are high-quality hardcore vids, but they are much harder to find and collect than high-quality softcore photosets. Sorry if I was rambling, but the ideas I stated are the ones I believe.
|
12-10-09 12:19am
|
Reply
1828
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
pinkerton "The conclusion of porn sex back then in the early 80s was the guy cumming on the girl's body rather than in her mouth/face, usually on her chest or ass."
I think it's a lot classier cumming on the girl's body than on her face. It's degrading to cum on her face, but that's what today's audience seems to expect.
|
12-06-09 11:52am
|
Reply
1829
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm thinking it was my first time, but I wasn't really watching myself that closely. I was paying more attention to the girl I was with.
|
12-06-09 09:09am
|
Reply
1830
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Eufrat is a lovely model, a long-time favorite of mine. She has my vote (but I've never been a member of this site).
|
12-05-09 09:20am
|
Reply
1831
|
Ladyboy Flix
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
A lot of porn sites are run by people who speak/write very little English, so that might be part of the reason the responses from the web sites to questions can be poor.
Another reason for the poor quality of responses to questions can be a lack of interest on the part of the site personnel to answering questions.
Some sites have a positive attitude about customer service and try to provide a quality experience, or at least spend the time and effort to answer questions helpfully. But there are a lot of porn sites where the help section is apparently asleep or on vacation. I've found some sites that advertise 24/7 help for problems don't even bother answering requests for help.
|
12-04-09 10:07pm
|
Reply
1832
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
RagingBuddhist stated 2 of my main grips with porn clips:
2a. Cameramen with diarrhea of the mouth
2b. Women overplaying the sex
I have a lot of other gripes about porn videos, but the two above would be a good start on how to improve many clips.
|
12-04-09 01:35pm
|
Reply
1833
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I like lesbian porn, as long as the models are attractive. Toys can be used, but I would like to see a "real" or "natural" approach where the actors have some regard or feeling for each other, instead of a lot of fake moaning and groaning that starts off with the toy or hand or mouth or whatever still a foot or more away from the woman's body. Are we supposed to believe these actors/models are so excited that they are ready to orgasm just by looking at each other, without any physical stimulation?
|
12-04-09 01:04pm
|
Reply
1834
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I was a member of the network about 4 months ago, and found a lot of very nice videos at some of the sites. There is a wide range of material, most of which I was not really interested in, but there are a good number of attractive models in a large number of videos that are nicely shot. One factor I appreciate is that the fake moaning and groaning in a lot of these videos is much less than the average porn clip. The network is certainly not perfect, but it's one of the better ones out there, as far as content and price.
|
12-04-09 12:53pm
|
Reply
1835
|
Couples Seduce Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
maki's Review
Because of the problems you had with this site, I would have given the site a lower score than the 88 that you gave it. An 88 score for a site usually means a very good site with only minor problems.
|
11-30-09 05:13pm
|
Reply
1836
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
I read the site reviews and comments to get an idea of whether a site is worth joining. I also like reading some of the threads.
|
11-30-09 04:40pm
|
Reply
1837
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Maybe Twistys was trying to give you a subtle hint with their emails they are sorry to see you gone. I feel kinda lonesome myself, because I hardly ever get emails from my porn sites saying that I've been missed. I do get a ton of spam emails, some of which are supposedly sent from my own email address (a type of spoofing).
|
11-30-09 04:32pm
|
Reply
1838
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
exotics4me, you talked me into buying the Iomega Prestige 1 TB at Amazon. I placed my order today. If I have any problems with the hard drive, I'm shipping it to you for my refund.
|
11-30-09 04:24pm
|
Reply
1839
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I try to keep breathing. That's the secret to a longer life.
|
11-30-09 04:19pm
|
Reply
1840
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Content quality is the main consideration. But if the sites have poor navigation, that can make it difficult to find the good content.
|
11-18-09 08:49am
|
Reply
1841
|
Fuckslut License Test
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Moaning in german sounds better than in english? You might scream and yell louder in german than in english, but this is the first time I've heard that german moans sound better. Is that because the germans do a lot of moaning and whining?
|
11-16-09 09:51am
|
Reply
1842
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm guessing that's a legal requirement. So anyone not posting that 18+ warning is asking for trouble.
|
11-14-09 02:13am
|
Reply
1843
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Are you raising piranha in your fish tank? Maybe you should drop some of the Brazzers folk into the tank to see who eats who?
|
11-13-09 07:45am
|
Reply
1844
|
Girls In Nature.org
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
The navigation for the preview section (and probably the member area of the site) seems extremely cumbersome. The site really needs a programmer to make the site easier to use, to show what models are available, and their photosets and videos. A simple site design like Met-art or MPL Studios would be a big improvement.
But the $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) seems attractive. I've been seeing more monthly memberships in the $15-20 range lately, maybe as a result of the recession.
The $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) is what is listed at PU/TBP. When I go to the site itself, using the PU/TBP link, the monthly price (recurring) I see listed is $16.95.
|
11-11-09 05:38pm
|
Reply
1845
|
I Love Pop Whore
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
PU/TBP removed the monthly membership option today, and now shows only the 90-day membership option for $70.
PU/TBP does not give any note explaining why the 30-day membership option was deleted from the PU/TBP listings.
|
11-11-09 10:06am
|
Reply
1846
|
I Love Pop Whore
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
$70 US is much cheaper than €70. Maybe you guys should consider moving to the US? The prices they charge Europeans seem very unfair.
|
11-11-09 04:30am
|
Reply
1847
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I agree pretty much with everything that's been said so far. The simplest answer is dracken's, where he says, "Hmm...sounds like an addiction at that point". I hope I never let it get that bad.
|
11-10-09 06:46pm
|
Reply
1848
|
I Love Pop Whore
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
According to PU, there is supposed to be a monthly membership option. But like you, when I go to the sign-up page, the only membership option I see is $70 for 90 days.
Maybe PU/TBP can send them an email requesting membership prices and options, or for them to fix the signup page to show the monthly membership.
|
11-10-09 06:41pm
|
Reply
1849
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Review
The network has a nice preview section where you can see sample pix of the models and very short sample clips.
|
11-08-09 02:24am
|
Reply
1850
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
A typical scene for a bj should take no more than 1/5 of 1 second. Then the porn scene can move on to something that's more interesting, more erotic, whatever.
Most bj scenes are crap. There are some good bj scenes, but they are rare.
|
11-08-09 02:07am
|
