For me it's a no-brainer. I would give up my porn movie collection.
I have a large porn photo collection.
But my porn movie collection is small:
-mainly short clips.
-some clips that are longer, that might be called movies. They are certainly not movies in the sense of having a plot or characterization or anything; just a series of oral sex mixed with intercourse, both anal and vaginal.
I do have a large collection of "normal" movies, of many different genres/types. Most of them are far more interesting than the porno clips I have.
I enjoy my porn picture collection far more than most of the porn "movies" that I've seen.
But then again, I've never joined any of the porn video box sites, to watch those porn movies. And I've never rented any of the porn DVD movies.
I have watched "Emanuelle" and "The Story of O" and some other movies, that I thought were porn movies when I first saw them. But by today's standards, many if not most members of PU would probably not categorize those movies as porn, rather as "erotic" or sexy movies.
Those movies were enjoyable, and worth watching more than once.
That page does not load the images that it is supposed to show. Instead, I get a page that is mainly white-space. The titles and brief descriptions of many photosets are listed on the page, but there are no images loaded that are supposed to be a thumbnail for each photoset.
Clicking on one or more hot links for each photoset listing brings up a new browser page, that is supposed to be a larger image of that particular photoset. But again, there is no image of the photoset that is supposed to be shown on the new page.
Do you, or any member of PU (including staff), get any images when you visit the Intro page (http://www.amourangels.com/trial/) at amourangels?
Can you load or view the image for any of the photosets from the trial page?
Maybe my problem is that I need to clean out my cache, or do something else to bring up the images. Or maybe there is a problem at the amourangels site. That is what I am trying to find out. Is the problem of viewing the images due to my computer, or is it a site (server) problem?
exotics4me, Jay G:
Many thanks for the tube suggestions. I'll look into them.
As a side note, I think the PU site should adopt as it's theme music "Bad to the Bone" by George Thorogood and the Destroyers. You can hear it on YouTube at:
The video is a fan-made clip showing scenes from Terminator 2. The governator (Arnold Schwarzenegger) is shown in only part of his glory with nude upper chest and nude upper back (he is supposed to be totally nude, but that is not shown in the clip, only suggested). So the video does not qualify as free porn.
Flame wars don't accomplish much in helping anyone. They don't let off anger, they just raise it. Can't we try to be polite and/or helpful and open to one another's difference of opinion?
Khan, "I an [sic] sitting here thinking: What does this have to do with porn?"
Khan, thinking about porn too much makes me sick at times as well. So don't feel bad, hopefully you will soon get better.:)
As far as polls and threads, as Khan notes, we are now open to both porn and non-porn issues. The main focus of the site is obviously porn, but I think it's nice to be able to ramble on about other issues besides porn.
I am straight. But that does not mean I'm automatically anti-gay.
Gays and lesbians (I really think that gays should include lesbians) should have equal rights with non-gays. Discrimination should be illegal, whether based on color of skin (race) or religion or sexual orientation.
There is no reason gays and lesbians can't serve in the military. Contrary to what some people believe, being gay or lesbian is not a sin or a mental disease, and it's not supposed to be contagious.
Seems to be a lot of porn coming out of Eastern Europe. But I'm not really into videos, so I can't really compare how hot the porn is for US versus Eastern Europe.
"Not my thing", says it all, as far as bondage / BDSM in porn.
As for porn in the US Congress: AIG pays insiders $165 million in bonuses after taking over $170 billion in federal rescue money.
AIG reported this month that it lost $61.7 billion in the fourth quarter of last year, the largest corporate loss in history, and it has benefited from more than $170 billion in a federal rescue.
AIG would be bankrupt except for the federal monies being given to it. And the insiders (the top executives) running the company, instead of cutting their salaries, are giving themselves $165 million in bonuses. Is that pornographic, or merely greed?
Thanks for the Google search string.
It's simple, as long as you enter the correct search string.
Change the search string slightly, and the results are quite different, nowhere near as good.
I guess I should read a tutorial on using Google (too lazy until now).
"I did a quick Google search of cached user profiles and I realized that, if you leave one-timers aside, those 4 intervals should get around 25% each."
Would you tell me the specific search terms you used to do that Google search? I'd like to learn to use Google better, and when I try to get information about the cached user profiles at PU, I come up blank (except for a lot of useless hits that are not really related to what I was looking for).
First to vote, first to reply to poll. Where's my lollipop for being a good boy?
I don't think there's a whole heck of a lot of significance in avg Site Rating, unless it's maybe to point out extremes of high or low. Some PU members just give out high scores, some give out low scores. It's an individual choice, which is as it should be.
Definitely save your money by not joining this site.
In case you missed it, PU will not accept any reviews of this site for 30 days, because of the suspicious reviews.
I pasted below the comment by Khan announcing that no reviews will be accepted:
..................
..................
Khan - PU Staff 03-12-09 06:52pm
Talk Back TRUST USER? YES (1), NO (0)
OFFICIAL NOTICE !!
Due to the sudden and unexplainable number of new users submitting unusually high scores this past week ... at least a few shown to be shill activity, we are temporarily suspending Reviews for this site.
We'll revisit this decision after 30 days. But until then, any and all Reviews submitted for this site will be summarily declined.
We're sorry for any inconvenience this may cause but feel this action is warranted to curb the high score reviews that contain little or no substance.
Save your change. The opinion of most of the PU members that commented on the recent glowing reviews of this site is that the reviews were not trustworthy. The older PU members think this is just a scam, hyping the site to get new members to join.
I really like the design of the site that allows you to preview:
-what the models look like.
-the quality of the model pix (quality of the pix is poor to OK, definitely not high quality).
-the quality of the videos. Good quality videos: sharp, crisp focus, good flesh colors, good lighting.
In a PU poll a few days ago, the question was asked: "In a porn shoot, how important do you think the setting and decor is?"
This is supposed to be a "reality site", where no effort is made to dress up the models or the action in the videos. The setting and decor are two steps below Hamburger Helper.
I'm not looking to join this site anytime soon. My personal taste is more for glamor pix.
But your review is nice: short, yet covers the essential points.
"We see people wearing funny sexual shirts all the time. This girl was buying some gas, when I noticed her bumper sticker, 'My other car is a Sybian'".
That would be considered an inside joke. I believe very few people would have any idea what a Sybian is. Obviously some kind of foreign car, Korean or what not.
Interesting review of Sapphic Erotica. I've never been a member of the site, and that might be partly why I have trouble understanding your ideas. You appear to write in clear, precise English, at first glance, but trying to understand what you actually mean is difficult for me.
I'm not trying to make fun of your English. I've always had a poor ability to learn any foreign language. So you are accomplishing something which I would not be able to do: writing a review in a foreign language.
But I think it would be better for you to write your review first in your native language, and then translate that review into English.
I would guess that you wrote this review in English, not your native language (which is German, I assume).
One simple example of what I mean when I write that I do not understand the meaning of what you write.
You write:
"I have been a regular subscriber to the site for the last, say, 4 years. Since then I was a member for about 10-12 times at least."
If you have been a regular subscriber to the site for the last 4 years, that implies that for the last 4 years you have been a regular subscriber.
So how can you have been a member for 10-12 times since then? You are writing that you have been a member for the last 4 years, which means that you are a member now, and have been, for the last 4 years. So, to count that as 1 continuous membership, and then to count separately 10-12 memberships since then, does not make sense. There was no time for you to be a member 10-12 times since the current time.
And when the 10-12 memberships did take place, is also slightly confusing.
Possibly you meant to write that over the last 4 years you have been been a member 10-12 times.
Sorry if I appear to be picky. Feel free to ignore me. Your review is interesting, almost like poetry, where you sense meaning in the words, but the ideas are something you have to clarify and puzzle out.
I hope to see more reviews from you, and hope they have as many or even more of your ideas and opinions.
I really like the "Nope, I like anonymity" choice. In fact, I'm considering changing my name to Anonymous Smith. Or maybe Anonymous Jones might be better. America should stand up and salute the Anonymous among us, and maybe nuke everyone else. I saw Watchmen yesterday, and if they can wipe out Los Angeles, then I should be able to retaliate in turn.
Setting and decor either add to or detract from the value of the shoot. You focus on the models and the action, but the setting and decor are definite factors in how you react to what is taking place. There are many factors that go into the "value" of a shoot.
Many times the guy seems to be half limp while he is having intercourse or getting jacked off by the girl. The guy does a better job of getting stiff when he jerks himself off. Kind of takes away from the illusion that the girl is the one the guy is interested in.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
