| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely, if it is a good deal I am much more likely to take the risk.
|
09-13-12 03:58pm
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I always prefer natural, in every way. I've never really been a fan of makeup at all.
|
09-09-12 10:57pm
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with RustyJ. I think it is generally a very good value, aside from the occasional rip-off site, which PU certainly helps us avoid.
|
09-07-12 10:39pm
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Always, I usually unzip and delete the zips. I find it a nuisance to look at photosets inside of zips, and its not like it saves any space.
|
09-06-12 09:29pm
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
I'm with RA, I am drawn to the same body type as he is, and it is usually the first thing I notice. Second would be face.
|
09-04-12 11:20pm
|
Reply
206
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Capn,
I agree it is somewhat of a heartcore site, but I think the best example of that genre would be X-Art, at least in my opinion. This site still has some typical euro porn elements, but I would still clasify it as heartcore, just not the prototypical heartcore site.
Either way, I don't think it is a site you would enjoy, being well aware of what you are looking for in a site.
|
09-03-12 12:03am
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't really mind it, it is what it is, and it seems to me like the women in censored vids are typically more attractive (although I am by no means a japanese porn aficianado).
|
08-30-12 12:06am
|
Reply
208
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Yes, Khan, you are correct. I was going to link to it but got distracted by my nutball dog. Thanks for your assistance.
|
08-29-12 11:50pm
|
Reply
209
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I agree, hopefully they will stay around a while, and hopefully they don't devolve into more gonzo style crap.
|
08-28-12 10:59pm
|
Reply
210
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
There was a forum thread a couple of years ago on what to include in a good review, I usually just follow that as a guideline. I'll try and search for it and bump it to the top of the forum posts. It has been very helpful for me. From my perspective on this site, I find it more important to be subjective rather than objective. I don't pretend to be a good reviewer, thus all I can voice is my opinions (along with some useful facts).
|
08-28-12 10:38pm
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
I don't really like the subtext of the statement "talent can talk?", but I have no problems joining sites that speak different languages. Lovely ladies live all over the world.
|
08-28-12 10:35pm
|
Reply
212
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Nice review elephant, agree with all your points. I also think this an excellent site. I agree with others points that the models are quite common, but somehow I always think they look better here for some reason. There are a few that I didn't even realize were the same models I already had gotten elsewhere until I looked on EBI.
|
08-27-12 10:56pm
|
Reply
213
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Well, that's still more than me, I only have about 3TB of total space, and at least 1TB is taken up with music, movies, and TV shows. I also much prefer the smaller videos, 1 or 2 GB is just too much of a hassle, even if the quality is better.
|
08-27-12 10:49pm
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Zips are pretty much required for me, I don't have the time to go through it all otherwise, and I have found most of the image grabbing plugins pretty hit-and-miss.
|
08-26-12 12:36am
|
Reply
215
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nastyboy7's Comment
I totally agree with you, I really enjoy Wicked content, although the site itself (navigation, etc) wasn't all that great the last time I was there, and their preview blows. But still, one of the few sites I join yearly.
|
08-26-12 12:32am
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I very much avoid sites with payment processors I have never heard of.
|
08-26-12 12:18am
|
Reply
217
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
There are a few anal scenes on X-Art, but they tend to get a lot of people complaining about them in the comments, so I don't know that they will do many. The only ones I have are with Caprice and Kristen, but there may be more. It is sort of difficult to search for these types of niches there.
|
08-21-12 12:15am
|
Reply
218
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I'm sure perfomance of your machine can make a difference, although I was merely just joking since you said 200-300 GB (gigabytes) for a video, which is freaking HUGE! Sorry if my attempt at humor in pointing out your typo was not so obvious - I just thought it was funny for some reason. 200-300 MB for a 10 minute or so HD video can be pretty good if the encoding is well done. I wish more sites did this, as I absolutely hate downloading videos that are like 2 GB, it is just such a nuisance. Even though space is cheap these days, I'd still much prefer to get more on less.
|
08-21-12 12:02am
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
I'm with RustyJ, I have no idea, not something I usually talk about with people - although I'm sure many of my friends are.
|
08-20-12 12:56am
|
Reply
220
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review Denner, not sure why I have never joined this site, it seems to always slip by. Good to know there are still some good sites left to see!
|
08-19-12 10:51pm
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Oh, I didn't realize they were dishwasher safe, this will save me a lot of trouble ;)
|
08-19-12 10:48pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I'm with RustyJ, how it is shot is all that matters to me, if it some crazy super-close up I don't really like either, but framed well, particularly with their entire bodies and not closeups, I like both just fine.
|
08-16-12 11:53pm
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with Rusty, I have never been one to demand my money back for anything entertainment related regardless of how crappy it is, PU has definitely been helpful in avoiding this crap.
|
08-15-12 12:37am
|
Reply
224
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the info, exotics. That bitrate is sort of low, even for h.264 for full HD, but I'll trust your opinion if you say it is crisp. I still don't understand why sites brag about native resolution, as it doesn't really matter - it is the bitrate that matters.
I certainly hope the file sizes aren't 200 GB with that bitrate ;) or something funny is going on. I do agree it is a shame that the sites that try to be more 'erotic' tend to have very short videos. Not really sure why that is, and I guess in this case didn't do so well on the erotic side of things either way.
|
08-15-12 12:36am
|
Reply
225
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I know you guys all have raid arrays and crazy hard drive space, but 200-300 GB certainly isn't small to me (I know its a typo).
X-Art and orgasms.xxx both also have relatively small files, although the full HD ones are typically 400-600 depending on length. Are they crisp, what bitrate and codec are they using?
|
08-13-12 10:08pm
|
