| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Balibalo:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Indeed, I don't watch porn to see tons of cocks ;)
|
03-01-11 09:13pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tangub:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Actually my wife has complained of being sore after a few days of rigorous activity. I answered too big....i'm not trying to suggest i'm bigger than average just that my wife is a very petite 4 ft 11 ins filipino so its big for her.
|
12-29-10 08:32am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Ahhh .. you are right, there should have been an option for, "No, nothing has changed."
|
12-17-10 06:18am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from slategrey:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
you can use the sister site thebestporn.com to check most sites to see if it is a full trail.
|
11-30-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Sevrin:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Thanks for the link. I liked the Eve's Spell one a lot. Looks like there's a fair bit there to hold my interest. :)
|
08-29-10 07:54am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Sevrin:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I really wish there was a decent hypnosis/mind control site. I agree that the stories are usually much better than anything that's currently on adult sites.
Back when Usenet was all that, I used to spend a lot of time on ASSM (Alt.Sex.Stories.Moderated) and RAE (Rec.Arts.Erotica). Some of the stuff was of the nasty CP variety, but there was a lot of quality, too. The best stuff is archived on the web, so I still visit assm.asstr.org occasionally.
Writing decent erotic stories is a lot harder than it looks. Back when I was a know-nothing, no-money teen, my primary source of porn was stuff I wrote myself involving my more attractive classmates, and it was the beginning of my fascination with girl/girl sex. I still, uh, enjoy, creating scenarios in my head involving my favourite models.
I don't go out of my way to read much anymore, though. These days, what I really like are porn scenes and photo sets that have a little story behind them. Viv Thomas is an example of a studio that strikes a good balance by not only having hot action, but establishing a relationship between the characters.
|
08-29-10 06:40am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
That is my answer, too, but with a slight variation.
I still d/l pictures in a few cases where the babe is especially gorgeous and the pix are high quality. I used to grab some screenshots of especially memorable scenes using VLC but now with most sites providing high quality pictures along with their videos, I stopped with the screenshots.
|
08-23-10 08:24am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Ditto. 2 'puters; one for serious and one for fun plus several external hard drives.
|
08-15-10 10:38pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Many thanks for the blog examples, nadiencendia. I think you have to be a real fan of these models if you are going to follow/read these blogs. I think the models are pretty, but the blogs simply don't appeal to me. I understand the idea is to help their fans feel a connection to the models, and to increase the fan interest and loyalty, but the blogs just don't connect to me.
On the other hand, I bought a DVD of Rabid, a movie that Marilyn Chambers was in back in the 1970s, from Marilyn Chambers at a convention, and was happy to get it, because I had seen the movie when it played originally in the theaters when it was first released in 1977. Marilyn Chambers was a famous porn star back in the 1970s, when porn movies were first gaining acceptance and starting to make big money. Rabid was a non-porn zombie movie by David Cronenberg back when he was still doing small movies, and he since went on to become a big-time director. I was happy to get the DVD. But I haven't even opened the case or played the DVD (partly because she signed the outer plastic cover with a cute message). But I still remember pretty much what the movie was about, even after all this time. It was just a low-budget zombie movie, but I thought it was well done and enjoyed the movie at the time, so the DVD still brings back memories. :)
And Marilyn Chambers seemed like a really nice and friendly person when I met her. Very down to earth.
|
08-13-10 08:51am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from turboshaft:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Doesn't the rest of the world get pissed when we Americans use the term football for what's played at the Super Bowl and soccer for what everyone else calls football?
: )
|
02-12-10 05:38pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I also used the internet in hotel rooms, but that's not "while traveling" I guess.
|
12-26-09 06:07am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Monahan:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
If a PU review is lousy, that's the ballgame. I will not sign up for any site that PU members is unhappy with. Ever.
I also will not join a site that has not been reviewed by anyone on PU even if my libido is activated by the preview site.
Life is too short and there are so many superb sites out there it makes no sense to gamble even a few bucks on a site no one here has visited.
|
11-23-09 05:32pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from MargulisAZ:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I very much agree with this. I don't even pay attention to the guy on screen unless he's really fat or really old and it just makes everything look disgusting. Then I just feel sorry for the model more than anything.
|
03-01-08 11:53am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Pinche Kankun:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Man, it's about time somone said something about the looks!
|
01-10-08 10:17pm
|
Reply
15
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from rearadmiral:
Informative review! I have to admit that this is one of the few popular sites here that I haven't joined. Their confusing pricing scheme kept me away at first, but that's fixed now. So after reading positive reviews like your I think it might be time that I finally join.
|
09-03-12 05:05pm
|
Reply
16
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from Monahan:
I have no argument at all with nadiencendia's review. However users need to be aware of the site's less than honest business practices.
I signed on to 21sextury on August 28, 2010 through its Zoliboy.com site. The deal back then was that the longer one stayed, the more sites were accessible until a subscriber was permitted access to all sites.
I got what I was promised until sometime in January, 2012 when the network split into two networks; 21sextury and 21sextreme. Because I was originally signed up through Zoliboy, I lost access to 21sextury because Zoliboy was now part of the new 21sextreme network.
Initially I was promised continued access to 21sextury but every month when the membership renewed, I was bounced off the 21sextury site and had to submit a trouble ticket for reinstatement. Then I was told that my original "lifetime" deal expired and that I would need to sign up separately with a new subscription to regain access to 21sextury.
Be warned. 21sextury is, indeed, a superb site for great content and production values, but if they decide to split the network again, all bets will be off and all promises will "expire."
I agree with the 93 score for content but give it the lowest permitted score of 50 for its business practices.
|
09-02-12 07:50pm
|
Reply
17
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Great review. I agree with you, both about the pros and the cons, and for me, this place is one of the best.
|
09-02-12 04:49pm
|
Reply
18
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from RustyJ:
They've managed to hook me with their very reasonably priced full loyalty price bonus. Now I do not dare to break my subscription with their new subscription system and all, at least until I can figure it all out...
|
03-03-11 09:47am
|
Reply
19
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from RustyJ:
I noted the same. Could it be just another clone content site from another subscription package?
|
02-02-11 07:37am
|
Reply
20
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Sandstone:
Heya Nadiencendia,
You have keen eyes to notice that :) It is, unfortunately, a minor bug caused by our constant upgrade work. Thanks to you we noticed it and we are working on to repair it.
Really sorry for the misleading issue. :)
|
02-02-11 07:03am
|
Reply
21
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Yep, that's happened to me quite frequently as well. I was about to download a new update but got nothing but a picture. Sadly, I can't reconsider my membership because I took it out long term some time ago and now will have to wait until my membership expires. I gave this net a good score in my review but it sure does have its occasional hiccups.
And you're right support is not very responsive.
|
01-04-11 09:17am
|
Reply
22
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tom22:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Yeah, and I always thought the huge majority would be those that prefer full body length shots. That's not to say there is never a time for a close-up, but geeezs you can't just part the camera at her butt-hole, which is what most sites do.
And they love shots from the floor looking up at almost a 90 degree angle of the girl. What's up with that? I wouldn't complain about it except that its so common. It's a lousy angle, but they love it and do it constantly.
Many of these sites that love this ultra close up crap would have 500% better camera work if they just put the camera on a tripod and never touched it throughout the entire scene. Honestly, I'd much prefer that to the constant and unnecessary movements, swatting of the camera, and too close-up all the time.
But if you want to see some good camera work, (not great, could still use some improvement) but some "good" camera work, checkout the Teen Mega World sites. The Russians have got the right idea on camera work. Good for them !!!
|
12-31-10 11:10am
|
Reply
23
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Tom22:
You are exactly correct Nadiencendia. 21Sextury has slipped back into the old porn paradigm of a constant TOO-CLOSE camera. Marketers of porn have pretended that POV (so called Point-of-View) camera work is something new. It's not, its been one of the curses on porn from day-one.
Thankfully some porn sites are finally learning to keep the camera back so you can see the overall action. The Russian sites are leading the way and they are kicking-butt on all the old style American and Euro sites.
Shooting a porn scene is not rocket science, its just 1) get adequate lighting, 2) keep the camera steady 3) get proper focus and DISTANCE and angle so you can see the overall action. It's that simple, but they still manage to mess it up by trying to keep the camera stuck up the girl's butt.
Yes, a close-up is good sometimes, but it shouldn't be ALL the time. And they zoom the camera too fast, and constantly make unnecessary camera movements and generally swat the camera around like its a tennis racket. I don't know what they are thinking.
Hey, it took the porn industry 40 years to lean to turn the lights on. Honestly, go look at some old 'classic" porn and notice that about 90% of the scenes don't have adequate lighting. I guess it will take them another 40 years to figure out we would like to see the ENTIRE girl... not JUST her tits, not JUST her butt, not JUST her face.... LET ME SEE ALL OF HER PLEASE !!
Well, maybe they will figure it out someday, but my hopes are dimming, especially seeing 21Sextury fall back into the same old trap.
|
12-30-10 11:59am
|
Reply
24
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
nadiencendia, this has been annoying me too - for a long time...so it's good you bring it up again - and thanks to your comment, I could not resist to make a new thread - see that, if you like....
BTW: agree somewhat about Viv Thomas - except that what I've seen the vid quality lacks a lot - in general...
|
12-10-10 07:55am
|
Reply
25
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Denner:
I think nadiencendia here says what a lot of us/PUs feel - and not only for this site/network - but for quite a few others:
Instead of being so fond - photographers/video-ditto - of a vast amout/looooong minutes of close-ups - let's get much more full body views...including the face, the legs, the high heels...
Close-ups are part of the deal and it's ok - BUT not 2/3 or even 3/4 of a set/video...
We have been around this many times, so the producers/Webmasters must have an idea what the paying users are looking for - it's still a mystery, that they obviously do not listen...don't you guys care - not to loose the dough from users?
Anyway - thanks for bringing it up again!
|
12-10-10 07:02am
|
