| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Oriental Orgy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
This site doesn't even seem to have sets with two-on-two. Mostly simple one-on-one average sex.
|
05-23-11 05:17am
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Drooler:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
You'll note the tentativeness of what I said. It was all in question form. You're probably right. Silicon tits will remain as common as the silicon chips used to find and delete them.
If we complain about boob jobs, I think that would make us optimistic as well. And what would be the use of complaining if we're really sure that it's hopeless?
|
05-21-11 01:07am
|
Reply
203
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I think you expressed the idea very well in your review of Teen Mega World:
"For some members, the thin girls will be an absolute plus, so I admit this is all about personal taste...Add 10 points to the score if you like thin young models but subtract 15 if you don't."
Personal taste is a huge factor in how much you enjoy a site. But patience and other factors also count: are you willing to wade through the junk you don't like to try to find what you might enjoy, or will the junk turn you off before you can find any material to your liking?
I know that I have paid for sites I barely looked through because the material I first saw was boring or disappointing. There might have been videos or photos I would have liked, but it just wasn't worth the effort. So psychology plays an important part in how much we enjoy a site, in different ways.
There is very little material at Teen Mega World network that I find really outstanding. But I think the network deserves a high score, not because of my personal satisfaction or dis-satisfaction, but because there is a large amount of content that is "good" quality and the price is low.
But the network could be improved a huge amount. By better material, easier navigation, etc.
|
05-10-11 10:58am
|
Reply
204
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from Stas RC:
Thanks for your review!
|
05-07-11 02:37am
|
Reply
205
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from graymane:
I gotta say, squirrel, although I don't get around to checking out many reviews, this is about the best one I've had the pleasure of reading. If you missed any essentials at all, then it never was there in the first place.
All you left out, Pal, was the kitchen sink.
Congratulations.
|
05-06-11 11:58pm
|
Reply
206
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slutty:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Good review man, luckily for me I like them with a little less baby fat. I very much agree with your points though.
Hadn't downloaded any pictures from there the last time I was a member, a shame to hear they are just scree caps.
|
05-06-11 09:34pm
|
Reply
207
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review.
Skinny white girl is the gold standard for teen porn models. Very few US or European sites deviate from this.
There is a large number of very attractive girls at this network. But the videos (and the poor photos) do little to show off the girls to their best advantage.
|
05-06-11 06:54pm
|
Reply
208
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I'm not surprised to hear that there is no customer service. I suspect that the site is just so big now that customer service just isn't on the menu any longer. I don't think I've ever had to contact them for anything so I have no experience with the customer service.
I can't say I've experienced the speed and distortion problems that you report. I use Free Download Manager to allow we to queue up a bunch of scenes and then leave it to run on its own and my normal DL speed is 1880KB/sec.
I realize that it is a personal preference, but give some thought to trying them again. Customer service probably remains as bad, but the other issuse may have been fixed.
|
05-06-11 04:26pm
|
Reply
209
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from John1:
You mentioned that this was not your favorite spanking site. What other sites with more severe spanking would you recommend? Thanks for the great review!
|
04-14-11 05:03pm
|
Reply
210
|
Teen Bitch Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RustyJ:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
At least it used to be like that. I guess now you get the bonus sites immediately.
|
04-13-11 09:35am
|
Reply
211
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I'm not a fan of the gynecological shots either. One of the things I should have mentioned in my earlier reply, I also reviewed both Pix and Video and Club Sandy in the low 90s in 2007 on here. So they've consistently been high scorers for me. Those two sites in particular were standalone sites in 2007, but I used to join with the two combined for $45 a month because those two have a nice blend of glam/softcore/midcore/hardcore. I really think those three teen sites they have add a lot. I'm usually not into the teenish models, since I like the mid-20s to mid-30s, more elegant looking models, but the three teen sites, Cuties Galore, Anal Teen Angels and Lez Cuties are very similar to say Nubiles. I will post on Cap'n's thread in the forum about networks with a few other strengths this network has.
|
04-01-11 10:50pm
|
Reply
212
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
That's the good thing with this network. Pix and Video, Club Sandy and Footsie Babes are more softcore than hardcore. I think one way to see how highly I've thought of these sites is to look at the old individual reviews I did of them. Pix and Video a 92 in July 2009 and Club Sandy a 94 in July 2010. Those are just 2 of the 37 sites. Even looking at the PU average scores on the sites by themselves gives a good view.
Asshole Fever 87.2
Lez Cuties 85.2
Nude Fight Club 80.6
Anal Teen Angels 88.7
Gapeland 91.5
Footsie Babes 84.5
DP Fanatics 96.0
Cuties Galore 83.0
The Pix and Video PU score suffers from being reviewed during the time period when they were having their server issues. I was even surprised by the TBP review since TBP only scores the network an 89, but also scores Pix and Video, by itself, an 88.5. That's why I think a network like this one is hard to review since it's hard to determine how to balance all these sites and scores out. To me, having 10 sites that I would rate 85 or up all included in one package is the most I could ask for.
Oh and yeah, I've been a member many times in the past, just not through the network. Some of my first reviews here on PU were of Club Sandy and Pix and Video, which were $30 a month each back then. With so many updates though, they keep me coming back.
|
03-31-11 10:25pm
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Drooler:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Yes, that's probably Reason #1 for me, too. It's what I call the "body pileup." I mean, it's not exactly the stuff of Shakespearean tragedy.
|
03-08-11 05:53pm
|
Reply
214
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Hi The Squirrel, I guess we shall see tomorrow if it was an honest mistake or a rip-off. I will give them the benefit of the doubt till then.
|
02-23-11 03:08pm
|
Reply
215
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review from Tree Rodent:
Yep Cap'n, same applies here, which probably makes us sort of weird. Being weird is something I came to accept, and eventually be proud of. Better that, than be mainstream sheep, being told what to watch, what to think, and what to consume.
As a final PS before the review gets buried, I think I had better add that if you go to the model directory or photos on 18 Eighteen, you will find a wealth of archive softcore photos. Finding hardcore is very rare, but the softcore picture archives go back ten years. I should have put that in the review, but being more a hardcore fan I virtually ignored it, and the navigation is not user friendly, so I gave up searching. There is also some hardcore in there which is not listed under hardcore.
|
02-04-11 06:08am
|
Reply
216
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Perhaps we are.
Speaking for myself though, surprisingly enough ;0) I have never been mainstream in pretty much anything I have taken an interest in.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-04-11 02:44am
|
Reply
217
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Quite agree on the gyno closeups.
Those I can really do without.
Much rather have a full body shot.
Fine review BTW!
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-03-11 01:33pm
|
Reply
218
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from graymane:
Damned fine review, treehopper. You hit a home run with this one, fellow ...and touched all the bases.
I'm especially impressed with your piece on closeups. That alone was enough to turn me off ... despite the sought-after youth factor.
|
02-02-11 03:45am
|
Reply
219
|
Sex Video Casting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Yes, there is real hardcore, but no, not a lot. My cynical mind says the two or three guys who are there for the audition shoot check out the babe to see how far she'll go without causing trouble. And we get to share those few cases where it actually happens.
|
01-30-11 05:28pm
|
Reply
220
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
TheSquirrel said: "... you have to go to The Best Porn and click on ..."
Technically, it'll work from any of the links for the site from either PU or TBP. Just so there's no confusion to anyone reading along. :)
|
01-14-11 02:10pm
|
Reply
221
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment from Tree Rodent:
Silly bugger - me that is. When I referred to the $10 discounted price through Porn Users, I of course meant TBP. I'm sure anyone who reads it will know what I mean. Just in case they don't - you have to go to The Best Porn and click on 18 Eighteen and follow the link to get the discounted sign up price.
Ik - yep I finally found a place that got me back on the straight and narrow, and downloading legit porn again.
|
01-14-11 01:41pm
|
Reply
222
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Glad you were able to find a site that meets your strict standards. Hopefully the sites you join will provide satisfaction for the price you pay. Looking forward to reading your review.
|
01-13-11 10:48pm
|
Reply
223
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks Squirrel, nice words there! And allow me to say: visa versa!
|
01-11-11 07:45am
|
Reply
224
|
Teenamite
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Fuck Studies is part of the TeenMegaWorld network, or maybe it's called the Royal Cash network, or the Royal Cash network.
That network is a solid teen network.
If you do sign up for that network, be sure to look for the pre-checked trial that will sign you for a 3-day trial to some other site. That trial turns into a high-priced subscription to the other site unless you cancel if you are accidentally hooked into a subscription. There's no reason to get the trial, so make sure you uncheck the box.
Only a few of the sites in the TeenMegaWorld network are currently updating. But there is plenty of hardcore teen content to look through.
The navigation is poor, the search is poor. But you can't have everything.
There are some very sharp (good clarity, good definition) videos at this network (TeenMegaWorld). The action is almost all gonzo: 2 or more teens banging away. But you have a lot of good-looking teen girls at this network.
The above is talking about the TeenMegaWorld network, not the TonyBucks network of my review.
|
11-09-10 09:42am
|
Reply
225
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
We're both in the same boat, squirrel. I, too, have looked for an alternative but after just having finished a long term subscription to VideosZ I can tell you with confidence they are no better. Porn.com angered me with some of the stunts they pulled re. updates plus the overly cautious sign-in procedure you have to go through, so what's left when it comes to DVD sites. Sure miss American Vice even though they, too, were offering mediocre material toward the end, most likely from lack of cash.
|
11-08-10 12:23pm
|
