Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
All of these models have appeared on one or more of the Met Art sites. So you can be sure that they are extremely beautiful.
You get all the benefits you would expect from any other site in the MA network. Technical support via email is excellent. I also have not needed a lot of tech support either. I’ve never had an issue with their billing. Navigation is identical to the main Met Art site, as are comments, tags, etc.
I simply adore the pic of Eddison that is usually displayed on the site’s home page.
Cons:
Some of these might qualify as “barely hairy” – so if you’re into a really full bush you won’t find a lot of that here. Even a small tuft of unshaven hair is enough to get added to this site. Most of the women have trimmed pubic hair, and a small percent have armpit hair.
Updates are infrequent and irregular. For January 2025 they came on Jan 2, Jan 3, Jan 5, Jan 7, Jan 22, and Jan 25. Next month it was Feb 2, Feb 5, Feb 9, Feb 12, Feb 26. The oldest photo set on the site is dated 5/4/2001, although this site didn’t appear as a stand-alone site until well after that.
The standard price for Love Hairy used to be quite reasonable, but now it matches any other MA site most of the time. At the time of this posting, the PU “discount” is $29.99 – I would never pay that much for this site. So wait for a holiday discount.
Bottom Line:
Love Hairy is one of the sites in the Met Art network. I don’t believe any of the content is exclusive to Love Hairy – in fact you can usually tell from the cover photo where it appeared originally on one of the other MA sites. The set is identical to the one posted on the originating site – exactly the same number of pics, same photo size options, same everything.
Even before joining, you can do a good amount of reconnaissance on the site. On the Models page, you can sort by Top Rated, Newest, Alphabetical, Most Viewed, Most Favorited, or Most Appearances. And if you click on the model herself, it will take you to a page where you can see which movies and which photo sets she appears in. Then you can get a page of thumbnails or usually a short clip of the video.
Old timers like me generally prefer the natural (unshaved) look for a grown woman. This site gives us the chance to see all the lovelies that appear on the MA network with their pubes intact, all in one place. If you’ve already joined multiple MA sites, you’re going to see very little new content here. But it is a convenient option when you really miss the good old days.
The best time to join is almost always on a holiday – most Met Art sites will offer discounts where it costs between $5 and $10 for a month. I got in at $7.99 for a month, and I think at that price this is an excellent value.
I doubt anybody would take out a long term membership to this site. But if’s definitely worth joining if you appreciate the natural look and can get it at a discounted price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Possibly the most polarizing “hairy” site I have ever been a member of
Is owned and operated by my favourite hairy model – Nikki Silver
New update every 3 days
Includes access to their Only Fans account
Over 1000 videos and all are downloadable with some even having 4K resolution so you are sure not to miss a single hair
Women of all sizes and ages; topped only by the variations of hairiness from facial, arms, legs, armpits and bushes
Cons:
Monthly download limit does severely limit how much content you get to keep.
I called it polarizing because even for a fan of hairy and natural women, some of the hairy examples on the site are just too much for even me.
Bottom Line:
A lot of natural and hairy sites are out there and most are just minor escapades into the world of hirsute femininity. I have joined some hairy or natural sites that are only showing hairy pubic areas. Naughty Natural goes all the way left with their hairiness.
Nikki Silver, sometimes spelled as Nikkie, is the featured model and owns the site. If you have not heard of Nikki, there is a good chance, this site may be too hairy for you. Nikki is one of the top hairy models across the world. She does have hair in places we do not usually associate with femininity. This includes her armpits, pubic area and inner thighs. I do believe she is in the top 1% of attractive hairy models and believe you could judge your own tolerance towards hairy models by looking up some of Nikki’s content and seeing if you are attracted or off put.
One of my favourite parts of hirsute porn is the inclusion of hair in often taboo (by mainstream standards) areas of the female body, means heavy, overweight, large breasted women fit right into the site and niche. Much like their slimmer, ultra hairy peers, the larger women can fit in by matching the taboo hairy parts.
We should talk about the download limit. The download limit will limit you to downloading 10-15 videos per month! I am willing to admit, I am such a fan of Nikki, I almost exclusively just download her scenes. See con #2 for a sort of explanation for why I focus on Nikki’s videos. While I am a fan of hairy models, there is a line for me and Nikki is that line. She is nowhere near as extreme on the hairiness of some of the other models. I do find an appeal to all the content and it probably has something to do with not being normal or status quo. I enjoy seeing different body types, varying body hair locations and everything that is similar to how regular, everyday life is. I know when I was single and dating, I remember the feeling of excitement, maybe a little fear, arousal, when a new woman in my life first took her clothes off in front of me. Naughty Natural offers that kind of experience just by scanning from one model to the next. If you ever are in a porn rut of thinking every model looks alike or feel like you are watching models modeled after one specific look, a site like Naughty Natural can give you a breath of fresh air and new interest even.
The site works and navigates well. I consider it important in this genre. I only knew a handful of the models by name. Nikki really stands out for me with natural, very curvy body and pretty face, the hair only highlights her pluses, including her beautiful complexion. The other models are all attractive in their own way and the scenes – if curious, are focused more on the beauty and attractiveness of the female form than on hardcore sex. You might want to make a note about that. If you are looking for hardcore sex you will not find it on here. There are some strap on lesbian scenes and even all-girl group scenes.
The download limit does put a limit on the ceiling or how high I can score the site. Maybe if they just lifted the limit to 25-30 downloads per month, one per day – minimally, to be fully acceptable, to me. I often find myself making a text list of the scenes and rating them to know which ones I should use by limited downloads on. That is, at least for me, a fairly big con and negative. I am not for sure what the site would score with more downloads or even unlimited downloads, but I have to believe a 92 even with a severe download limit, has to be considered very good and it is. My only other question is if the site just had Nikki Silver content would the score be the same? It is very possible, but I do like having the other models and variations of hairiness. Great site for all, and a must join for fans of hairy models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
An excellent network covering all major niches in glamour and softcore porn
6 ATK sites are included
Each site focuses on a niche
Thousands of teen to mid-twenties models
You can download videos and zipped photos
There are new updates
Cons:
The different sites feature different navigation and can be difficult
Favourites are stored, but it’s not easy to find them.
Bottom Line:
Coming into joining this network, I had experience with three of the ATK sites, Natural and Hairy, Galleria and Premium. All three of those come with this network package and you also have access to ATK’s Exotics, Petites, Archives and Girlfriends.
ATK at its most basic level is a softcore, natural site. There are models ranging from 18-30 and most of the scenes (videos) are softcore, masturbation and teasing. The models are almost exclusively European though a few Americans and more exotic locales show up once you look at ATK Exotics. It is very traditional porn in the sense someone is going to get naked. Someone likely will masturbate. There are some hardcore scenes, but those are few are far between. The pictures are just as important as the videos.
One possible con is the inclusion of ATK Girlfriends. When I joined the network it included Girlfriends, but I have noticed the join screen no longer advertises including Girlfriends. ATK Girlfriends is one of the best all-around sites on the network and does make a difference in the network package.
Once you are beyond ATK Girlfriends, it becomes a hodgepodge of sites with varying interest from the viewer based on their preferences. Luckily for me, I like all the niches covered. I could do without ATK Archives, but only because I am so familiar with the ATK content.
One of the cons is also responsible for exposing another problem. The sites are all signed into separately. This is unlike most networks where you sign in the network and then click from site to site to visit the different available sites. This does show the different navigation featured on each site. I do believe that is something that could be fixed, but would probably be a massive undertaking of resources.
I try to approach this network with a simple mindset of there will be thousands of pretty models and that works.
The downloads are unlimited and quality is very good to great. There are older sets and videos mixed in so the quality can drop off, but overall, the quality is good.
I do believe the network may be overwhelming for anyone not familiar with the ATK sites.
That problem could be alleviated with a more uniform navigational style on all the sites.
To my surprise, I would rank the 6 sites in this order: ATK Petites, ATK Galleria, ATK Exotics, ATK Natural and Hairy, ATK Premium and ATK Archives. Which may very well be the true strength of this network. Joining these sites one by one does limit the differences you’re going to see, but joining as a network, gives you a full spectrum of different types of models and niches. ATK Petites may well be my new favorite site and I had not joined it before joining the network.
You do receive a lot of content by joining the network, but I do believe it may be more efficient to join each site. The different navigation plays a role in that thinking.
It’s a network that gives you access to at least 5 great sites, but sorting through 6 sites can present a problem. I would recommend joining the network especially for those not familiar with ATK. It gives a great, albeit difficult to navigate view of each ATK site.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hairy fetishists have found paradise
If you’re a hairy fetishist, this may be the only site you ever need
Great quality videos and unlimited downloads
The pictures are super nice and can be downloaded, too
Less than 1,500 models, but over 10,000 scenes
One of the best model indexes I have used
The price reduction to $14.95 is awesome!
Cons:
I fancy myself a hairy fetishist, but even I have limits. There are many more hairy parts than pubic including legs and armpits
It's possible there won’t be enough variety in the scenes for the fans who like variety
Bottom Line:
Even though my screenname tells I’m a Hairy fan, it’s just not as extreme as a lot of hairy fetishists. My main fetish with hairy pubes is seeing them in panties. I like seeing a few stragglers peeking out from under the panties. I like seeing through panties to see a full, dark bush.
Hairy arms, hairy legs, hairy armpits are just not for me, but those are on the site and I know there is a market for that type of hairy content. For my money, this site is the end all of Hairy sites. I have often believed I complicated my own porn interests. My interest can and has started and stopped at just seeing a bush under panties.
That is the biggest reason I love this site. The first and second, maybe third focuses are on the hairy parts. I do accept and understand that may not be enough for others and that is the downside of We Are Hairy. The content really pushes and focuses on the Hairy aspect. You’re not going to see a lot of hardcore or extreme or deeply kinky scenes or photos. It is more about the beauty and showing off of the Hairy parts.
As my pros told, there has been a price reduction that sees the site only costing $14.95 a month. I was used to paying $35 a month for it. The videos may not be as exciting or hardcore as you’re used to, but those videos do a stellar job of showcasing the hairy models. The picture sets are arguably better than the videos. If you’re a Hairy fetishist, you understand that and appreciate it. To make their picture sets even better, you can download a custom zip file you choose the pictures for.
The videos do not have a 4K option, but those are still very clear. The pictures are large quality resolution. I can see not recommending this site despite my high score. This is not for everyone, but I think everyone who tries it will be very impressed and happy with their content.
The model index is the best I have used and the site itself runs and loads quickly and smoothly. There are tags and you should never have trouble finding what you’re looking for.
If I was going to recommend any changes it would be to have more lesbian scenes, but not hardcore (man and woman) scenes. This is a genre that is softcore by nature and it needs to stay that way.
The site is as near to perfect as I have been on. It reminds me that technical quality does not outweigh the biasedness towards a favorite fetish. You also know what you’re getting with the site. That does have the downside of possibly being repetitive, but if you love the fetish, repetitiveness is welcomed.
It's well worth joining for fetishists and maybe non-fetishists could take a look at some of the preview content. There’s almost nothing wrong with this site and I could see it being appreciated by nearly all porn fans.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that is too big for its own good and too good for how big it is. See bottom line.
- I receive 7 sites with this network including ATK Girlfriends, which is not officially listed as part of it. Sites will be listed in the bottom line.
- Very high quality, amateur-level models, even though many either went on the pro careers or are better known than the typical amateur.
- Photography is excellent and zips are included. You just have to keep in mind these scenes and sets are filmed and photographed as amateur models walking in the studio. You’re not going to get a lot of glam.
- Videos are good and of good technical quality but the videos on most of the sites are not as good as the photosets. Those are downloadable videos.
- Download speeds are good (80% on my max).
- Price varies. I join this network once every year. Price can be as high as $99.95 and I have seen it as low as $49.95 and that’s for 7 sites that still sell as standalone sites at $19 - $29 each.
Cons:
- The content feels outdated. Porn has evolved and changed with time. It could be a pro or con. This is more like internet porn was in 2005-08. I like it but it may not immediately appeal to newer porn fans.
- Consistency would be good. Their content is consistent. The different prices, the videos on one site being great (ATK Girlfriends) while the other sites lag behind. It would be a huge site if they combined all these sites but if it brought consistency, it would be worth it.
Bottom Line:
I have been joining the ATK sites since 2006. The sites I receive with a membership are: ATK Galleria, ATK Girlfriends, ATK Premium, ATK Exotics, ATK Petites, ATK Natural and Hairy and ATK Archives. I’m not kidding when I say I used to join ATK Galleria, Premium and Petites for $24.95 each per month. These sites were considered close to the top of the Euro boom in porn from 2005-2010. I never understood what took the Euro porn of the spotlight but we are left with sites still trying to find the magic from 12-15 years ago.
Each of these sites other than Premium and Archives, are still worth joining … on their own. Premium used to be one of my favorite sites but it has had lapses in video updates that last a year or more. It has just dropped off a lot and it no longer has that premium feel to it. It used to be like a greatest hits site. You could find your favorite model and they would have 4-5 of that model’s best scenes and photosets. Archives is just what it says. It’s mostly older content that is still worth looking at if you’re newer to ATK. If you’ve been to these sites, the archive doesn’t really offer that much. I don’t really like Natural and Hairy site. That is natural and hairy in the UK, Europe, France and it includes hairy legs, hairy arms, hairy armpits, hairy faces even. If people think that’s wrong of me to dislike that then people haven’t figured out subjectiveness. I’m not into it. I like prissy, pretty women. I consider body hair (besides pubic) to be masculine.
The other sites: ATK Galleria is a buffet of the best teen amateur models ATK has. The only set niche they are playing to is age. The models are all young looking. Race, ethnicity, body hair, none of that matters. Look at it like an art gallery. You will see all kinds of niches explored. They will all be young. ATK Exotics is one that I should completely understand. I have loved exotic women all the way back to a high school girlfriend. I have a different definition and opinion of what constitutes exotic. Exotic to me is different than what women I saw in the 90s. I also see exotic as Asian, shadowy, darker complexion with blue or green eyes. I believe that would also include women from India. I think Exotics is a geographic word as well. If you knew girls from Hawaii, they didn’t seem exotic but on the other hand, there are the “plain” women that can be exotic based on they are mysterious to you. Their eyes draw you in. That is exotic to me. On ATK Exotics it’s mostly non-white women. I’m not going to tell them that’s wrong. I believe it’s subjective and can be based on the area you are from. The one choice I was not happy with was when ATK Exotic started classifying hairy women as exotic. That is the one negative to the site for me. What’s next? Overweight women? They’re different too. I do believe ATK Exotics tries hard to find Exotic models. It shows how a label can help and hurt a site. We all have opinions about what is exotic and what isn’t.
ATK Girlfriends is the real star of these sites for me. I have scored the site very high in the past and as a standalone site, I would score it over a 95. It’s POV, interviews, dinner/date, sex. My wife loves to see me watch the Girlfriends videos with her watching. It’s fun porn. The models seem so relaxed and off script. So many sites push the unscripted scenes. ATK Girlfriends does it better than any.
All of these sites have years of content. A decade or longer for several of the sites. It is the closest real negative I think you can run into. A month isn’t long enough. Even if you get the $49.95 price, which is the lowest I have seen it, that’s still a lot to pay every month. It’s why the consistency matters. I am going to score it higher than I did the last time but it’s because I know how to use the network now. There’s so much high quality here but if you only see a small portion of it, it’s going to waste. If I knew a quick fix answer, I would share it, but I don’t. Maybe offer long-term memberships with lower prices? It’s hard to complain about any of the content. Recommended but know what you’re getting into.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
An opportunity to explore a rarity in porn, naturally hairy women.
An exceptionally large library of high quality videos and photosets.
Supports download managers.
Several updates per day.
The site is well laid out and easy to use.
Cons:
4K videos are not an option, but there are multiple download options.
Uses tags, but there are not enough of them.
The site says about 90 per cent are amateurs. This can also be a plus for some members.
Some of the women have too much body hair. Also, some of the models are not attractive in my opinion.
There is no discount. This is a premium niche site with a premium price tag.
Not part of a network. It is part of the Gamma family of sites, but a membership does not give you access to any other site.
Bottom Line:
Although there are some sex scenes, both lesbian and boy/girl, We Are Hairy is primarily devoted to solo masturbation by women who are not professional porn stars. Some scenes are interviews and others feature stripping and putting on a sexy show. This is a contrast with most photography sites that have videos. On those, the videos are generally very artistic rather than erotic in their basic nature. We Are Hairy also has excellent photo sets, but the major theme here is women enjoying being seen as hot exhibitionists. You can see the women getting into the action and in many scenes the women visibly get moist. These are mostly non professionals who see this as a chance to fulfill the fantasy of being seen as sexy. I like the interviews as well as the solo shows as the models are as much into it as any viewer.
Another theme that takes center stage here is masturbation. Sometimes the models use fingers, toys, and at other times they use household objects, such as vegetables or brushes. The orgasms seem to be quite genuine. Between squirting and the looks on their faces, I enjoyed what I saw. The models are rather diverse as there are women here of many different ages and body types. Most of the models are Russian. The older models seem to get the most pleasure from doing the scenes. In some scenes the models get into giving the viewer jerkoff instruction, JOI, but that is not universal or even as much as I would prefer.
Some models probably don’t speak English and that detracts from the chance to get to know them better. I did feel that the more ordinary looking, the chubby and especially the older models tried a lot harder in their scenes. I had the impression that they appreciated the opportunity to be seen as sex objects. There is not much here that you would find on a site that uses an approach of making the models look glamorous. I saw little use of makeup, the women have imperfections and in general appear to be women who you would not expect to be on any porn site.
The choice of ordinary homes as the set is remarkable. Combined with the fact that most of the women wear ordinary clothing makes them seem all the more accessible and relatable as well. The layout is very easy to use even if this is your first time on a pornsite. You can easily find the new videos and photo sets that are added on a daily basis.
You can search for other scenes by the same model, or even by the same director. There are tags that enable you to find blondes, brunettes or those with red hair or dyed other colors. You can search by breast size, by video resolution, by the type of clothing or by the size of the photos or the degree that they are hairy. I must mention though that I would prefer a way to find the videos that were sexy shows as they were in the minority. You can find masturbation videos quite easily, but there should be a tag for non masturbation ones.
You have the ability to rate and leave comments on the models, can vote yes or no to adding new ones and can preview new updates as they post a schedule. There are three quality options for the latest videos. There is lacking a 4K option as the best is 1920x1080p, Full High Definition. You have the option to create a custom zip file for just the photos you select. I liked the progression from clothed to nude to explicit. There are about 8100 HD videos and photo sets. The site adds two videos and two photosets per day. Downloads were fast and easy. The files are small as the videos are generally under fifteen minutes. I found no download limits.
An obvious negative is that the site may not have broad appeal. Many porn fans prefer models that are shaved or at least trimmed. On We Are Hairy, many of the models are not just hairy down there, but have body hair as well. In some cases, more hair does not equal more attractive. If you enjoy seeing unglamorous women showing their exhibitionist side, this site has a lot to offer. This is a very large premium site in an uncommon niche and commands a premium price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Love Hairy is part of the Metart network. So you can expect the fine technical features of the Metart sites: Logical site structure, with easy navigation.
-Photosets have 3 main definitions: small, medium, large, with a zip file for each definition.
-The membership is inexpensive: $7.99/month, or $60/year. I don't know if this is a PU discounted price, or the regular price.
-The model listing can be sorted by alphabet or ratings (ratings by the members). The model listing is oversized thumbnails that give you a very good look at the model's face.
-Support is 24/7. This is email support. I don't believe Love Hairy support has live chat or a phone service.
-Excellent search engine.
-Lots of tags to explain/support the content(photosets and videos). Can use them to search for items of interest. But I prefer to use the model index, myself.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Nice photo player for streaming photosets.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Metart support watches the PU site, and often responds to reviews and comments about the Metart network with helpful suggestions and information.
CONS(START OF):
-Site content is not exclusive. All or most of the content has previously been posted at other sites in the Metart network.
-There are 172 videos, but the overwhelming amount of content is photos. You have 1,253 photosets. So the site is more for photo lovers than video lovers.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They advertise daily updates, but the real update rate is very irregular. Probably because of the covid epidemic.
Bottom Line:
The site is a depository of models who have pubic hair.
The modern trend is for models to have no hair on their pubic area.
Except that some people prefer the older style where women did not shave their pussies clean.
Call it a fetish to prefer women with pubic hair. Or call it the natural look. Except even when it was normal for softcore porn to have women with pubic hair, the pubic hair was normally groomed or manicured.
A few models might have armpit hair, or hair on their legs, but those would be a definite minority. The site focuses on women with pubic hair.
Most men seem to prefer the clean-shaven pubic area on women, from the comments I've read at the Metart sites I visit.
Unless a women has a forest growing down between her legs, I think pubic hair can look attractive.
And the models at Love Hairy are definitely worth viewing. They are among some of the most beautiful women in the world. The Metart sites have, for over 20 years, been showcasing attractive teens and slightly older women.
The Love Hairy is more focused on photosets than videos, but you get both.
1,253 photosets. 172 videos. 490 models. 151 contributing photographers.
With a large number of photographers, you get to sample their different styles, although the basic approach is glamour photography.
If you're familiar with Metart.com, the main site in the Metart network, you will have seen most of the models at Love Hairy. The models at Love Hairy range from attractive to gorgeous.
You have hundreds of the loveliest women in the world featured here.
Go to the public pages of Love Hairy, and page through the model listing, and I believe you will agree with me. The thumbnails are mostly headshots, but many of these women could have been finalists in any major beauty contest in the world. They are that attractive.
This is psychological. And maybe it only applies to me. But the main Metart site, Metart.com, is too big. It has too much content. I get bored looking through their model listing, in spite of the lovely models. The physical beauty of the models loses its impact.
Although Love Hairy has fewer models (490 models at Love Hairy, versus 3,821 at Metart), and most of the models at Love Hairy also appear at MetArt, I can appreciate the models at Love Hairy more easily.
This is complicated.
Partially, it's because the brain gets overloaded with the huge amount of Metart content: too much of a good thing, and your appreciation starts to dwindle.
Partially, it's because I had a couple of bad experiences at Metart. I used to love the Metart site, even paid for a lifetime membership. But then I made a couple of comments at the site, and got flammed. This is foolish on my part, but I no longer love the site. I thought the Metart membership was supposed to support each other, but it turns out the Metart membership is composed of regular humans, who can be real dickheads at times.
I'm being foolish, and I'm aware of it, but I no longer respect the Metart membership.
I visit the site, since I paid for it, but I no longer look at the site with rose-colored glasses. Metart is a fine site with a lot of great models and great photography, but I no longer love the site.
And I'm reluctant to support any Metart sites with a paid subscription.
End of story.
Bottom line: Love Hairy is a fine site.
You have hundreds of lovely young women.
You have some of the best glamour photographers contributing their work.
You have a low membership price: both monthly, and yearly.
I don't think many PU members would go for a yearly membership, because of the slow update rate. WeAreHairy is a competing site in the hairy niche. It's far more expensive than Love Hairy, and the models are less attractive. But it updates faster, the videos and photosets are exclusive, and PU members seem to prefer it over Love Hairy for satisfying the hairy niche.
The main negative for We Are Hairy is the price: $34.95/month, or $79.95 for 3 months. Which is very expensive.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- An opportunity to explore a rarity in porn, naturally hairy women.
- Very large site
- Great production values
- Many amateurs (which can be a negative too)
- Broad range of models – age, ethnicity, body type
- Solos/ girl/girl and boy/girl scenes
- Rare niche
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Many download options
- Two video and two photo set updates per day
- The site is well laid out and easy to use
- Great for photo collectors too
Cons:
- No 4K option, for those who prefer that
- Very few known pornstars, mostly amateurs (this is subjective)
- Yes this is strange for me to say, but some of the women have too much body hair
- No TBP/PU discount
- Expensive
- Stand-alone site – no bonus sites
Bottom Line:
Full disclosure – this membership was a real stretch for me. I prefer models who have an intimate relationship with their razor but recently I’ve been pushing my own boundaries.
Obviously, based on the name of the site alone, it’s primary niche is unshaved women. I think a better description is that the women here are natural. The level of hairiness ranges from a thin layer to a curly mound that spreads down the thighs. Also, the hairiness doesn’t have to stop with the pubic area – we’re treated to other ‘natural’ areas on the female body too. You’ll find some hairy ‘pits and legs here too.
The site primarily offers solo scenes, some with masturbation and some with just posing. It isn’t hard to find lesbian and boy/girl sex scenes either.
I think it’s fair to say that the site can also be seen as an amateur site. A vast majority of the models are amateurs though I will confess that I have limited experience in this niche so some of them may appear on other sites too. But, it’s fair to say that you’re not apt to see your favourite A-list models here.
The scenes themselves aren’t scripted and usually follow a flow from clothed to nude. Some of the scenes end at teasing and posing while other go on to masturbation with fingers, toys and household objects. I like that most of the models aren’t heavily made up and wearing ‘porn clothes.’ Most start in clothes that you’d expect any woman to have. The ‘sets’ are usually just in someone’s home.
One other thing that the site does well is that the orgasms seem genuine. I’m not naïve; I think that in most hardcore scenes the woman’s orgasm is faked. Here, I don’t think they are.
One thing that I noted and really liked is that regardless of age or body type, the models here were genuinely into their scenes. It appears that these are ‘regular’ women who are really turned on by offering themselves to be seen as a sex object. That alone held a lot of allure for me. All women are sexy!
The site also offers something akin to BTS scenes as on other sites. Here, they are conducted as interviews. I’m a fan of BTS stuff and I liked the interviews here too. I liked hearing these women talk about themselves. For me, it made the scenes more intimate.
Speaking of the models here, and this is likely the case on most amateur sites, there is a much broader range of model than you’d find on a more mainstream site. Here you’ll find a range of ages, ethnicities and body types. I say this in other reviews but it really is applicable here: there is something here for everyone – with the proviso, of course, that this is a site that features women with natural body hair.
The site is large – huge even. There are currently around 7600 videos available and two more are added each day. It’s hard to argue against the value of the site with numbers like this.
The scenes are downloadable in three resolutions, 1080p, 480p and 360p. Bitrates on the 1080p are 6000 kb/s and are 30 fps. My preference would be to bridge the gap with 720p but that’s subjective. Also, most of the scenes are around 15 minutes long so the file sizes aren’t really an issue anyway. Some may wish for a 4K option, but I think that given that these are mostly amateur models it’s probably too much to hope that they or the director would have a 4K camera available.
The site is a rarity in that it offers as much value for photo collectors as it does for those who collect videos. There are currently 9100 photo sets with two more being added daily. The photo sets are downloadable as zips and the site even offers a feature that allows the user to customize the photo set. I’m not a photo guy so I confess that I didn’t use this feature and can’t really comment on how well it works. Three resolutions are available: 1024, 1600 and 3000 pixels.
The site itself is logical and easy to use. It relies on tags to assist in sorting the scenes, which is essential in a site this size. Some of the tags are unique to this niche – you can even choose to sort by the level of ‘hairiness.’ Given the range of scenes here, I think the site would do a service by added the ability to sort for stripping versus masturbation and others like that.
I found download speeds to be the same as I’d find on other mainstream sites. I had no issues with downloads and didn’t encounter any limits.
The cost of the membership is relatively high and there is no TBP/PU discount offered. But, given the size of the site and it being a rare niche I think it still offers good value for the money.
The bottom line is that while this isn’t my kind of porn, it’s well done for people who are into this niche. The site is easy to use and offers a lot for the money. If you like this niche you really should check out We Are Hairy. I don’t have much experience in this niche but it’s hard to think that there could be any better out there.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
ATK sites has a wide range of models that range in body shape. There are not much sites that does this most sites features the typical thin to average model. To some people that is there thing and that's no problem. For me I like variety and I lean towards curvy. For the sites that cater to chubby chases like myself they do not have the pic gallery that ATK does.
Second Pro: ATK has a HUGE selection of models on top of the variety so there is no shortage of models to choose from.
Third Pro: I really love there search feature. This is a bit double sided, however ill discus that in the cons. The advanced search criteria has various ways you can search for models. You can search by body type, height, hair color. You can search by photographer, by model, etc.
Cons:
First con: Various features are broken. One of the things I loved about ATK was the custom zip selection. This made it easy to choose your favorite photos without having to download the photos you would normally skip over. This feature is now inoperable and has been for quite some time.
Second Third Con: The video downloads are not working for me at the time. There is nothing more frustrating than seeing your download nearing completion and then come to a dead stop.
Third Con: Don't even bother contacting customer service they are worthless and could give two shits about the site being broken. I reached out and was basically told, "Well use the other option" they never even addressed the video downloads.
Forth Con: The search feature results do not always cover everything you searched for. For instance, In my case I tend to like the bigger models. The results do not include good amount of what I searched for thus I have to go through the alphabet section to find them all.
Bottom Line:
If you like variety in models and a large amount to choose from ATK is a great place. With that being said there a lot of features that are not working for this site and by the attitude of customer service its not likely that this site will be fully operational again. Proceed with caution!!!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- ATK's Hairy and Natural site, not my favorite niche but even I like some of this content.
- Updates similar to the other ATK sites, 2-3 photo sets per day, 1 video per day except Sunday.
- Over 27,000 photo sets and over 10,250 videos. All are downloadable and there are no limits.
- Very few 4K videos, but 1080p goes back more than 10 years.
- I hate throwing a subjective opinion in the pros but a lot of the models are very attractive, there's just one group that goes beyond too hairy for me.
- I almost always prefer pictures on ATK sites but this one is one I prefer the videos.
Cons:
- Underarm and leg hair is going too far for me.
- The navigation like on other ATK sites is a mess unless you know who you're looking for. This problem showed more than on other ATK sites for me since I don't know a lot of hairy models by name.
Bottom Line:
Going through these ATK sites as individual sites since I don't think the average user is going to join the ATK Network until the price comes down.
The feeling here is similar to Galleria. There are many attractive models, the photo sets are high quality and downloadable. The videos could use a few more download options but they are good enough. I can't explain why I prefer the videos on this site over the pictures but I do.
You're going to see women here that are what ATK calls "scary hairy" and they can keep them. Before I face a lecture, I have aversions to body hair, including mine. I don't mind some pubic hair on women. I just see some of it as unkempt and dirty looking.
The photo sets are large (100+ photos) and the high download option is 2000x3000. The videos have 1080p, 480p and mobile options.
I do think the updates have been reduced but they are still much bigger than many sites with 2-3 photo sets per day and a video per day. They have a note on all their sites that they no longer are updating on Sundays.
I can appreciate their photo sets here just like the other ATK sites. They keep the model in her clothes for at least 20 photos which to me is a mistake a lot of sites make these days. It's nice to see what the model looks like in her clothes before she gets naked.
The advanced search engine on this site is a little different than it is on the other ATK sites unless they've changed it in the last few days. This one has 15+ boxes you can mark to search for (freckles, armpits, etc) then you can select to apply those filters to models, videos, pictures. That's a big improvement and hopefully they will do it on all the ATK sites.
I don't know where this ranks for a hairy site. I liked it well enough and I don't usually join hairy sites. I found a lot of teen models with just pubic hair, shaved legs, shaved armpits. Some of these models appear on the other ATK sites too and that's how I recognized them. It's another good offering from ATK and keeps filling their network out with a good variety of nearly every possible type of teen models. An added note here, there's quite a bit of pissing scenes (128 videos) for those into that.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that I think needs a review as the name is misleading and it has a lot of collectible content on it.
- Nearly 46,000 photo sets and 6,000 videos.
- Photo sets can be downloaded as can videos with no download limits.
- Nearly 4,500 models including some big name models before they were famous, many with 20+ photo sets.
- Good download speeds at 80% of my max.
Cons:
- Have always said this site is misleading, it is still updating but the majority of content looks to be at least 10 years old. As a member of the other ATK sites, it looks like they would just move old sets to this site and call them updates.
- Quality is all over the place as some sets are as old as 2002.
- Model search is still a problem like on other ATK sites. It gives you the letters to choose from and you're on your own after that.
Bottom Line:
There's not been any recent PU reviews on this site and I see it as a very good site in some ways and a not so good site in other ways. If you're a collector, it's a pretty good site. Just because alphabetical order is helping me out here, Aaliyah Love has 33 photo sets and 5 videos on here. A longtime favorite, Eve Angel, just known as Eva here has 44 photo sets and 20 videos. Looking at the Eve Angel sets there looks to be a couple I haven't seen before, some look like sets I've seen on ATK Galleria in the past, a few look like ATK Premium sets and there is a rare blowjob photo set. Eve did only a handful of hardcore scenes and photos of those are even more rare.
The amount of content is enough to keep you busy for weeks, maybe months, especially since you're going to spend a lot of time going through pages of models you've never seen. There's also the downside to older Euro porn where you had many models with the same name. I'll use Eve as example.
There are 26 models listed as Eva. No last name. I can tell you that even as a longtime collector of Euro porn, I only recognize maybe 20% of these models. If you're into amateurs, not often seen models, that adds a lot more value to this site.
The videos can range from 240p to 1080p and there's no set standard. Meaning, some of the newer released videos can have only lower quality options. The newest video released just 2 days ago has a max download resolution of 480p, while one released 5 days ago has a 1080p option.
A positive on the downloading of videos is you don't have to click on the video then download it. The download options are on the screens you usually have to click on to get to the download options.
Is it possible for a site to be both overwhelming and underwhelming? That's how I feel about ATK Archive, there's a huge amount of content but a lot of is poorer quality or is content I've seen on the other ATK sites. I think if you join the ATK Network ($79.95), it's a good bonus site but I just don't see it being a strong standalone site unless you're a serious collector that knows exactly what you're looking for.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Every girl is freakishly hairy in the absolute extreme (this is a good thing)
- Many girls seem to be exclusive to the site
- Frequent updates of around 3 new videos per week
- Updates are all dated so you know how often the site is updated too
- Many videos; 629 at the time of reviewing
- Multiple download types of each video titled High, low and medium quality.
- The girl/girl videos are some of the hottest G/G videos I have ever seen anywhere. They really get into it.
- Very rare niche and one of the best offering this
Cons:
- No search feature, they is no easy way to find a video type you want than just going through page after page
- No customer scoring of the videos so you can see which are the best ones to watch first
- Most videos seem to be solo girls and are just caressing themsevles. It would be better if they had a Hitachi Magic Wand in the solo videos and also maybe chatted with screen for the video.
- Not enough Girl/Girl or Boy/Girl videos and no easy way to find them mixed in with all the solo vidoes.
- Some navigation errors such as sometimes you click a link to a video and it brings up photoshoot pages with no videos on them.
Bottom Line:
This site is the extreme hairy lovers paradise. I first got into this fetish after accidentally signing up for ATK Hairy by mistake many years ago. Then realizing I actually much preferred girls with hair on them as opposed to the totally shaven girls you see everywhere else. By the end of my times with ATK i just kept looking for the "scary hairy" girls and they were few and far between and getting annoyed that they often classed hairy girls as ones with just a landing strip and nothing else.
This is a site based entirely of those 'scary hairy' type of girls and nothing else. With Hairy legs and arms even a yeti would be shocked at. And it is sexy as hell for it. The girl/girl scenes on this site are some of the best I have ever seen anywhere, but there are so few of them. And they are hard to find mixed in with the solo girl videos. If this site could concentrate on girl/girl scenes this would be one of the best porn sites you could get.
If you are into hairy girls this is probably the best site there is. But I just wish it could be better given it easily can be. More girl/girl, or have the solo videos be interviews with magic wands as opposed to the sensual caressing stuff with no talking whatsoever (maybe in those intervies the girl explaining why she has went down the extreme hairy route and when she started this and what any boyfriends think of her having hairy legs etc).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site with 469 "hairy" models
More explicit than other sites in this genre, masturbation, girl/girl scenes and fully spread photos.
1,142 photo sets and 169 videos, all are downloadable.
Tagging system that can help you find models with similar traits as the one you're looking at, I even noticed a tag for "painted nails".
The majority of the hairiness on this site is in the pubic area. Some other hairy sites include hairy legs and hairy underarms, I haven't noticed any of those.
Cons:
The site is newer, but some of the content is 19 years old. The layout is a modern layout, but those older photo sets feel like I'm looking at vintage porn.
While there are videos they are not that common and there's no set update schedule. They had 4 in October and November 2019, combined. Before that they only had 3 in the previous 9 months.
Small in quantity photo sets, some have as few as 20 photos in them.
Bottom Line:
I find myself on the fence when it comes to hairy content. I think the biggest reason is too much pubic hair makes it hard to see the action (if there is any) that's going on in the pussy area. This site focuses more on women with hairy pubic areas than full, complete bushes. The content is mostly softcore, but there are usually 3-5 explicit photos in each set. The videos don't really feel like the belong on the site and I'm guessing they don't. Some of them credit Viv Thomas as the producer and look like content from 2006-2012. The videos are more explicit and even include lesbian scenes.
I like this site for including more explicit shots. I've joined several of these artsy sites over the last few months and I needed one to show me it was still pornography and not just women standing around naked. The explicit poses on here are even very good, done in what I would called "sexually provocative" ways.
I notice some big name models mixed in here that I think are now retired. The life of this site makes it seem like there should be more content. Maybe it was down or dormant for years?
The models are attractive and some are top-level in looks. I don't think "hairy fans" will think the content is hairy enough. A lot of these models have trimmed pubic areas.
The 1,142 photo sets can be downloaded as zips and will be the main focus of most members memberships. A better, more frequent and consistent video update schedule would help. It's a good, but not quite great site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Adult Time is probably the best porn deal on the internet. It is a huge network of 200 channels, 50,100 videos.
-No download limits
-Excellent search engine using tags
-The archive has 442 videos
Cons:
-Almost zero ethnic diversity
-Prechecked cross sell on sign up page
-Biller is Fame Support, not a big name biller
-Only 21 of 442 videos are in HD
-Almost an archive site. Only two updates in 2019 and zero for 2018.
-Non exclusive content.
Bottom Line:
With a membership to Bushy Bushy I got Adult Time access as well. There are presently 164 channels. Some are parts of websites, andsome are networks like 21Sextury. Adult Time is just huge and has several updates per day across the network, as well as an archive of over 50, 000 videos.
One of the sites within Fame Digital is Bushy Bushy, Fame Digital used to be a network with scenes from DVDs with a separate join price. Now it is part of Adult Time.
Bushy Bushy is DVD scenes only. It looks to be the scenes that feature hairy women.The DVDs are for example include My Hairy Cream Pie, Real Bushy Beavers, I Wanna Cum Inside Your Mom, I Wanna Cum Inside Your Grandma, My Hairy POV, Big Hairy Clits, My Grandmas a Lesbian, White Chocolate Creampie, Hot Horny and Hairy, Hairy Mothers and Daughters, So Hairy its Scary, We Wanna Gangbang Your Mom, Hairy Teen Pussy, Black King Dong, Real Raunchy Redheads, Kinky Lesbians, Pubic Hair For Sale, Nursing Home Nymphos, I love Chubby Chicks, My Hairy Gangbang, 50 Hairy Creampies, 25 Fucking Grandmas, 40 Fucking Milfs, Grandma, Mome and Me Anal Ecstacy, Dirty Hairy Hippie Chicks, My Hairy Gangbang, 456 Hardcore Sluts, Cum Farting Cream Pies, Play with My Hairy Asshole, I Wanna Butt Fuck your Grandma, Hairy Black Pussy, Real Bushy Beavers, My Hairy Pregnant Wife, Your Dads Cock is Huge, and Super Dicks.
The only thing I am seeing in common is that the women are hairy. The sex is practically free range and without any theme.
The sex ranges from dull and by the numbers to just ok. There is never any premise or story, so I would say it is ordinary unimpressive gonzo.
I did not recognize a single pornstar, which is rare for me. There is close to zero ethnic diversity, but at least there are many older models as well as younger ones, as you would expect.
I have two major problems with this site. Only 21 of the 442 videos are HD. I would not bother with SD in 2019.
The other major con is that it is almost an archive site. In 2019 there have been only two updates, In 2018 there were none. In 2017 there were four, In 2016 only four times were any new scenes added. It was actively updating from 2011 to 2015 and then neglected.
The navigation is easy. There are fast downloads and no download limits. The biller is proprietary, Fame Support. They are not one of the big name trusted billers, such as Epoch or CCBill, but I have used them before and cancellation was not a problem.
Although I would not recommend joining for this site alone, Adult Time alone has so much content on it that it would take much more than a one month membership to get full value from it.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+pretty girls
+low price
+good quality sets in high resolution
+fast downloads
Cons:
-small site
-some girls are barely hairy at all (just a trimmed bush)
-infrequent updates
-member's area is half covered with ads for cam girls
-not very explicit
Bottom Line:
I'm a big fan of seeing pubic hair on models, so naturally when MetArt began an archive site collecting sets of their hairy models, I joined. MetArt is known for erotic photography done by some of the best photographers around, but a lot of their material is not very explicit and their movies, well, boring.
Love Hairy is a disappointment. There isn't enough content to keep a serious hairy girl fetishist satisfied. Updates come every few days. They aren't bad quality, but in lower resolution than MetArt's typical sets. Worse, they're boring. Part of the attraction of hairy porn is lots of explicit shots of an open, hairy bush. Love Hairy is typically devoid of such shots.
The main site is clean and well-organized, but half the main page is taken up by ads for cam girls, so I feel like I'm only getting half a site. And despite being on a hairy site, I'm not even sure if any of the cam girls have pubic hair. Bad form.
Downloads are fast, and the quality of the videos and pictures is generally good. Some of the models are absolute stunners. Most have only a hairy bush, but a few have hairy legs or underarms (very few).
CONCLUSION
When I joined Love Hairy, I wasn't expecting much, and that's exactly what I got. There's a variety of hairy models, but the sets lack the explicitness of either ATK Hairy or We Are Hairy, which is half the draw for me. Add very infrequent updates, and it's good that Love Hairy is so inexpensive otherwise it would be a ripoff. As it is, it is a disappointing entry in the hairy porn genre.
I normally like to do longer, more in-depth reviews, but this site really didn't inspire me. It's decent, and nice to have all the MetArt hairy content in one place, but I just wish that it was more exciting in all respects.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has discount
-Top notch Euro stars
-Photos for almost every video, but small and low quality
-Support link on every page
-Offers discounts to join 27 other porn sites
Cons:
-Many download failures
-prechecked cross sells
-Vendo is the biller
-Captcha log in sometimes
-Must log in to other DDF network sites individually
-Modestly sized archive with 84 pornstars, 199 videos and 9893 photos
-Not updating. The last update was May 28, 2015
-No way to search for anything, no use of any tag system
Bottom Line:
The DDF Network describes itself as the “Ultimate European porn videos hub with exclusive 5K VR, 4K and full HD XXX videos for 2019.” It’s headquarters are in the Czech Republic, but the models are from many different countries in Europe. There are fourteen individual sites and 17,394 videos in total. As a network I would give it a 95. The network is discounted by PU, so you get quantity, quality and a nice price.
Hairy Twatter is one of the sites in the network and has never had a review here on Pornusers. It features somewhat hairy models, but not any extremely hairy ones that you find on some sites in the niche.
The scenes range from masturbation, sybian riding, and lesbian to heterosexual hardcore. What you see here is standard, predictable mainstream porn.
Of the 199 scenes, 32 involve shaving. Maybe it is just me, but I don’t find that of any interest at all. If I joined to see women with hair down there, why would I want to see them removing it? The act of shaving is not erotic and there are plenty of sites with women who are already shaved.
The site is no longer updating, with the last new video added in May of 2015. The site members’ pages are very bare bones and there is no way to search. Ouch.
If you are a fan of hairy women, this is not a good example of the genre. The videos are all in HD, but not very unusual or exciting. I would give this site a 60 or 65.
If you see this site as an extra in a network that is quite excellent, the few hot videos are a bonus to what you already paid for. In that case the site rates a 75.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that is going to be very hard to review as a whole, massive network of young, teen, hairy, shaven and some just beautiful models.
- You get access to ATK Galleria, Premium, Exotics, Natural and Hairy, Petites and Archive. If you like them all you better set aside some time.
- I try to join sites through PU's links but I had a promo for ATK Network for $49. That's my max that I would pay for a site/network.
- This will be explained further, I am counting 10+ updates per day across the network.
- Download speeds are very good (between 80-90% of max)
- Navigation is not terrible, if you have been an ATK member before it will make the navigation better for you.
- ATK's photos are the focus for me. Their videos are okay to good but the photos are better.
- They have most mainstream niches covered on the network.
- Signup through CCBill
- Could be a lot better with some fixes. Even 15 or more points better!
Cons:
- I don't mean to offend anyone that likes hairy models but that hairy site is a waste for me.
- No access to Aunt Judy's or ATK Girlfriends. Maybe Aunt Judy's is understandable but why no ATK Girlfriends?
- Patience is a good thing. Time is too. You're going to need both to bounce back and forth between websites.
- The regular price $99.95 is way too much, $49.95 is better but I don't know that I will join again at that promo price either. I would say $34.95.
Bottom Line:
Maybe the most frustrating review I have posted ever. There's no way I was going to join ATK's network for $79 or $99. I had a promo they sent me about 6 months ago for $49. Since I hadn't joined Exotics, Premium, Petites or Galleria in nearly a year, I decided it would be worth joining the network to catch up on the content I've missed.
I considered Archives to be a site I wouldn't need to check since I have a lot of the older ATK content. I knew I wouldn't be downloading anything from Natural & Hairy. The first thing you will notice about the network is it's not a network. You are buying a membership to the six sites. You have to sign in on each. ATK is a massive site/network. Some of these sites have been around for as long as I've been buying internet porn.
I decided to look for a specific Eve Angel scene from ATK Premium. I first opened the "movies" tab. It shows Premium only having movies back to 2014. The Eve scene I was looking for was probably 2009. I clicked on the models list and there's Eve (Eva on here). There are 16 pages of her content. No dates. Two videos, two photosets per page. That's a lot of clicking. I bounced around from site to site having to sign in on each. I thought I would check Archives out, it says the current content in the archive is from 2001-2006. Then it shows newest updates in the Archive as 2019.
Stop it. This is not funny. This is a regularly priced $99 per month network!
I can fix it. Put all the content on one site. Call it Amateur Teen Kingdom! If you find a model you like, this is what you will have to do to find all of her content:
Find her on Galleria, download her content, login to Petites, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Archives, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Exotics, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Premium,find her in the model list, download her content. Yes, I know that's repetitive and redundant but when you do that for 10 models, you start to feel repetitive and redundant.
Put it all on one site and go with a $34.95 price. This reminds me very much of when the "All Only" network launched years ago with 5-6 premium sites in it for $34.95.
The content is good but trying to dig through 6 sites in 30 days? I would rather join one and have 30 days to go through it.
I don't think I realized that until halfway through my membership. I have downloaded all the Exotics content that I wanted/has been added since my last membership. I will be lucky to finish another site before the membership expires.
The ATK sites offer something rather unique these days. It's a professionally filmed amateur site. No, they're not all amateurs but when you see the models you will think it's from their amateur days. There's little to no glam here. Makeup is at a minimum. Premium, to the best of my knowledge, is the only site that offers "no implants". These sets will make your most favorite glamorous porn star look like the cute girl that just moved in next door to you. It's a major selling point. Their photos are much better than their videos. Premium has some good videos but overall, the ATK photos stand out.
The amount of updates is impressive. I'm just estimating at 10+ per day, across the network. Exotics alone has 3 to 4 updates per day as does Petites. And I get the part about Archives "updating" as they add old content but where is that old content? Is it being removed from the regular sites? If so, it shouldn't be an "update".
The video resolution on the newer scenes goes up to 4K. Photos are very good quality and downloadable.
I looked around for content from Fred the Photographer but don't see any new content filmed by him. He was always one of my favorites.
This is another thought about improving not just the ATK sites but any site that specializes in photos. Has there ever been a thought about combining all of a model's photosets into 1 zip? There are models on here with dozens of photosets at 10 - 50 MB. It takes 1 second to download those sets.
The frustration comes from knowing I would have been happier and it wouldn't have cost much more to join each site on a monthly membership. As it looks right now, I might get two of the sites caught up on my downloading. Those sites could have been joined for $17.95 each.
My preferred order of the ATK sites: Petites, Exotics, Premium, Galleria, Archive, Natural and Hairy.
Still don't get why Girlfriends isn't included as this is the ATK network and it's an ATK site. Seems like a missed opportunity to get ATK fans hooked on another site.
My score is leaving major room for improvement. Petites and Exotics could easily score 90 on their own. Maybe I will review one of those as a standalone and show how my frustration goes away when away from the six site package.
I would recommend any of the ATK sites if you're into the niche they cover. I just can't recommend this high-priced package of sites.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Low price for specialized interests
- High quality images of beautiful women
- Download managers work
Cons:
- Ads inside the paywall. Not so much ads, but camgirl stuff. Which are still ads.
Nitpicking:
- Overall size of the website?
- Not every single image set is enormous with amazing resolution?
Bottom Line:
Love Hairy is a sort of “best of” compilation site of Metart, Errotica, and other sites under the Metart umbrella that give collectors with specialized interests access to their particular flavor of beautiful women. And it’s great.
The site offers pages and pages of beautiful young women who are groomed but not shaven. I didn’t see any scary legs or bizarre hairy nipples. I only saw one or two models that would probably be considered “dyke”-ish. The majority of the models, and sets, are of women who just happen to look like actual grown women down there.
There aren’t many with underarm hair or stubble, but every so often you’ll happen upon one. Interestingly, the women are often so attractive that it’s not all that disturbing even if you don’t generally care for that sort of thing. Seriously, click through and find one and ask yourself if you’d shun her advances, refuse to sleep with her, or consider it a deal breaker in real life in any meaningful way.
Most sets offer multiple sizes of .zip files to download, with some of the more recent sets’ largest option being absolutely huge. There are occasional videos as well, but the photos are where the site really shines.
The online viewing of photos isn't my favorite, but I guess old-fashioned pages full of fast loading thumbnails you click to go to another page where the image can be viewed is, well, old-fashioned. Still, I would much rather have the option of choosing it over a site with thumbnails that you click and some sort of script puts the image in front of the open page of thumbnails until you close it. I know that's the direction everything has gone recently, but I don't care much about an "experience" when looking at nekkid pictures. The means of viewing them should be intuitive, fast, transparent, and un-annoying, and the modern flash/java/whatever approach often isn't.
My other gripe is the cam girl advertisements. They're at a point on the screen where you'll often drag your pointer across them and THEY'LL pop out to cover the content you actually want to see. A minor gripe but still one that should be mentioned.
Regardless, it's well worth the $8 if you have any interest in photos of beautiful women who don’t shave everything completely bald.
WEBMASTER:
May I suggest some similar sites for tanlines? How about freckles and redheads? I bet the tanlines one would be a decent draw, and I would suspect you have a thousand or more sets that would apply when you think that even the slightest bikini line would equal content. I’d definitely pay my $8 for it. Heck, I’d pay $10 for it. :)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The latest videos are at best 1920x1080, 6000 kbps, very sharp, but not 4K.
-Recently updates are 4 or 5 a day.
-808 models, 6912 videos, 7492 photosets. Each has over 100 photos in each.
-Excellent preview tour. You can check everything out, but can’t download.
-For the most part the models are very natural. Few tattoos, implants, piercings or even makeup.
-Nice variety of ethnicities, ages and body types..
-Easy navigation using a logical site layout.
-No advertising on the members pages.
-No download limits.
-Excellent search engine using a tag system.
-Active forum as well as the ability to leave comments on individual videos.
-Free live cam shows. Also available as downloads.
Cons:
-Alphabet soup site generated user name and password’
-Proprietary biller. Not a big name. However, cancellation was simple by using a link under customer support.
-Standalone site with no extras of any kind.
-A bit pricey at $35 a month.
Bottom Line:
I remember a few years back, this site was new and well received by many at PU. I wrote a complimentary review, but had as a con that the new site was still very small. It has grown a great deal since then with 808 models, 6912 videos, and 7492 photo sets. The webmaster was quite active on PU and I remember Basil quite well. If you read this, your helpfulness was and would be very much appreciated here. Please come back. You have a wonderful site.
I recognized a few porn stars such as Chloe Camilla, Lola Gatsby, Laurie Vargas, Max Mikita, Nina Devon, Selma Sins and Sasha Yung. However the the site says that the models are 90% amateurs. Most models are in their twenties, but many are in their thirties and even a few in their forties. Body shapes vary. Many are very thin, but there are some that are a little more full figured. Some have imperfections and they are shown exactly how they are. There is no attempt to glam them or use photo shop. There is little to no makeup and they appear to mostly be natural girl next door types. Few have tattoos, piercing, implants or even bleached fake blond hair. They are very real women that you might someday meet, unlike the too perfect clones that can become a turnoff in a glam model site. Many are beautiful by anyone's standards and some are more appealing in a different way. Many can only be called an acquired taste. Some of the most ordinary looking put on the most sexy performances.
For the most part the Eastern European models don’t say anything and as a result you don’t get to know them. The US and UK models personalities are more accessible. Some are quite excellent at making the art of the verbal being as hot as the visual. What they have to say as they strip or masturbate can be quite erotic.
The best videos strike a good balance between full body eroticism and close ups. Too much of either can kill an otherwise great scene. Most start off in either ordinary, but attractive street clothes, or in a few cases in costumes. One features a harem girl, another in a police woman uniform. The strip scenes have their own tag “striptease” and many are quite hot. Most scenes feature masturbation, mostly with fingers or dildos. The scenes that I liked the best were of the models putting on a show, however. With a site as huge as this one, there were many, even if they were not as plentiful as the masturbation videos. A small number of scenes had either lesbian or heterosexual sex.
Photo sets are mostly indoors, which I prefer over outdoors. The lighting just works out better indoors. Each set has over 100 photos and is zip downloadable. You can even customize which photos to download. Most are not photos from the videos, they are instead unique shoots. Most of the photos are portraits, not landscapes as portraits showcase the models bodies better. By the way, you get mostly landscapes when photos are taken from videos. Most sites take the easy way out and the photos are not as hot as a portrait taken by a high quality camera would have been. The details are 2000x3000 pixels and 72 dpi. This is excellent, but perhaps not as detailed and sharp as in some other photo sites.
Some of the photographers have done work for other sites, so their style here looks familiar. I am a big fan of both Toby and R Williams, whose updates show a true sense of how to get the models to be erotic performers. Even the sexiest models need direction to do their best.
The only reason to deduct any points is that it could be a bit cheaper. This site is crying out for a PU discount. Be that
as it may but it is very true that you get what you pay for. With multiple updates every day for the last several years, this site is well worth the premium price. If you like hairy women, this is the best site in its niche.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+over 7000 picture sets and 5000 movies and counting
+daily updates (usually two picture sets and two movies)
+frequent live shows
+mix of hairy women (all have hairy pussies, some have underarm or leg hair)
+some ethnic models
+good mix of photographers
+user options allows you to see only the content you want (38 categories)
+nice search feature (search by category, keyword, date, format, or photographer)
+no dead links or missing content
+active subscriber base
+bonus photo sets from other sites (AllOver30 and GirlsOutWest usually)
+vote on prospective models
+previews of the next week's upcoming sets
+forum and active users feedback
+customized photo sets
Cons:
-mostly young Eastern European models
-expensive at $35/mo or $80/3 mos
-repetitive sets and costumes
-no 4K content
-only MP4/mobile video download formats
Bottom Line:
Their banner reads "WeAreHairy.com – Natural Hairy Pussy the way you like it!" and they provide a great selection, good photography, and some stunning girls--just the way I like it. Of course, this is a hairy site, so ymmv, but if you like hairy models, this is one of the best sites out there.
WeAreHairy updates with at least two picture sets and two movie sets every day. The content is usually a girl undressing, showing her body, and masturbating. There is occasional hardcore, mostly some B/G action, some rare G/G action, but most of the content is solo models showing her hairy goods in all their glory.
The models themselves vary in hairy splendor. Some have just hairy pussies, some have hairy underarms or hairy legs. The content is clearly tagged into 38 categories (blondes, hairy arms, meaty pussy, puffy nipples, etc.). You can select on the user page what content you want shown, so if live shows or hairy pits or hairy legs aren't your style you can avoid seeing that content.
There is a good mix of photographers at WeAreHairy, many who do sets for other sites (including a few former ATKHairy photographers). Most of the models are slim Eastern European girls
but there are some American girls. Most are younger, but there are some MILFs, and a few chubby girls too. Some ethnic girls, but not a lot considering the size of the site.
CONCLUSION WeAreHairy has overtaken and surpassed ATK Hairy as the best site for lots of hairy women porn. With thousands of sets, easy navigation, and suggested models on every page, you will easily find hairy models to suit you. OF course, if you like shaven pussies, skip this site. Otherwise, well worth the price to check out.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
An up-close, well imaged exploration of middle to older aged women's vaginas.
Excellently lit with close-up detail in high quality (1280 x 720, 5000Kbps, about 600-700Mb for 16mins average scene).
We see facial expressions whilst they are opened up.
Middle to older aged models have natural curves and real-world body shapes
Forum for interaction with creators.
Epoch/PayPal billing and no pre-checked boxes for easy signup.
Decent preview shot of every scene (but not the video).
Cons:
No anal attention or pissing. Likewise breasts receive little attention.
No story/script.
East European so no dialogue.
No sex with the male but that's more of an obsevation than a criticism as this is somewhat voyeuristic.
Some models will be too old for most tastes.
Bottom Line:
I think this is a little gem of a site. Not huge (73 scenes at last count), but high quality and inexpensive. If you've ever wondered what a middle or older aged women's cunt looked like, look no further. These East European ladies show us everything, and mostly they look pretty good. Depending on your age, some may look like your mother or even grandmother, this is a niche not all will like all of and some may like not like any of. Scenes gernerally progress to masturbatory orgasm. Whilst some ladies are frankly a bit too old/worse for wear, many others look great, and like real women not pornstars. Stretchmarks and fat, not silicone. And something younger viewers may not remember called pubic hair.
Not much deviation from the theme here, the lady quickly strips and lets a younger clothed man help with the exploration of her cunt. He pulls her open with fingers, nice prolongued stretching here clearly filmed, leading to fingering/gaping. Dildo and speculum may well follow along with masturbation from either model or male.
This site is related to Exclusiveclub and Spermhospital etc so shares their older models. Discounts are often availiable via the forum www.exclusiveclub.com/forum
Overall, this site reminds us that sex does not stop at 30. Lack of English probably limits it a bit, I feel that with a story/script it could be taken to another level. The fact the males remain clothed throughout makes this site accidentally CMNF, but in the absence of any story this is not exploited. This is cavity exploration porn without partner penetration and whilst that may be a requirement imposed by some older/ more reticent (first-time?) models, it could equally become a CMNF reality storyline.
If college girls are all you want to see in porn, then pass this one by. But if you think 40-60 year olds still have beauty down there, check this site out
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure login page. (https)
-Secure member pages. (https)
This keep some information safer from hacking, and leaves less of a record for your ISP.
-Superior support: live chat is 24/7, fast to respond, with knowledgeable, helpful staff.
-You can also access support by toll-free telephone, or email.
-Membership in any one of the Fame Digital network sites gives you access to over 20 sites.
-There is a trailer for most videos, to give you a quick look at the action of the video.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading are included in the basic membership price.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is almost standard for any porn site.
-Sometimes will experience a poor connection. Yesterday, I could not stream videos (they stuttered and stopped), and downloading files was very slow. I checked my internet connection at a test site, was was getting about 102 to 110 Mbps, which should give smooth streaming and fast downloads, but my connection to the Devils Film network server was poor.
-They did a network update a few years ago, making the site and network harder to use: They dropped the easy-to-see-and-use dropdown menu for changing sites. And they changed the structure of the entire network, so that you are now forced to use a gateway site instead of actually entering the different sites you have access to--which makes exploring and accessing the contents of each site harder.
-Slow update rate. For the last year, 1 new video per month.
-The photosets are poor screencaps of the accompanying video.
CONS CONTINUE:
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-The software mechanism for viewing the photosets online is clumsy and poorly designed.
-The sound control of the videos can be poor: Sound can spike suddenly, making normal sounds into explosions.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
Site theme: For many years now, the bald pussy look has been the norm. HairyUndies is a niche site that features women with pubic hair.
The site is part of the Devils Film network.
-The most famous sites in this network include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD
Access to any one of the sites listed above would justify the membership price: Access to all 5 major sites, plus over 15 more sites, means you have access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price.
PU lists this site (HairyUndies.com) as a clone of the Devils Film site.
This is probably because all the videos and photosets (the photosets are screencaps of the video) carry the Devils Film watermark.
Also, the videos are listed as "from Devilsfilm" on the gateway site.
My interpretation: The Devils Film network uses a gateway system where you are logged in to a gateway site, and access the different sites from the gateway site, instead of actually entering each separate site completely.
This means it's easier for the network to maintain the network, since they don't have to work on each separate site, but only on the network gateway.
It makes it harder for the user to explore and access the content of each site.
And also it's more confusing about which videos belong to which site, since there's some question whether any particular video is part of one site, or just randomly thrown in from a different site.
And the watermark on the video is no help, since the sites labelled under the Devils Film section all carry the Devils Film logo. (Hairy Undies is labelled under the Devils Film section.)
Maybe a software engineer could explain it more simply: but I do not believe Hairy Undies is a clone, but a listing of a site that no longer exists as a separate site, but is a listing of videos and the accompanying photosets that formerly made up the Hairy Undies site.
Anyway, I'm giving the site and network a score of 82.
This is because you get access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price.
There are some real gems at the network, but you have to slog through a lot of junk to find them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Tour page claims 1,982 Models; 25,909 Photosets; 9,558 Videos; 3,949,495 Pictures (see bottom line below)
+daily updates (recently 5 pic sets and 2 videos a day)
+Supports multiple size downloads (pics in Standard, Medium and Hi Res; vidoes in SD MP4, HD MP4, and mobile formats)
+Customized picture downloads available
+Different model types and different photographers each with their own style (see bottom line below)
+Some ethnic models and MILFs
+Billed as the home for "100% NATURAL BREASTS AND UNSHAVED PUSSIES!" (see bottom line below)
+Some really stunning models and great photographers
+Clean layout--no extraneous ads, no upsells, easy navigation, and good search features
+few toys (most models pose in softcore solo sets sans toys; but some toy sets)
+some B/G and G/G content
+some excellent pussy spreading content
Cons:
-limited number of active photographers
-older content rotated out to ATK Archives
-most recent content is the same handful of models every day
-older content might not be in HiRes or HD
-some older videos sets broken into parts
-some bad lighting and out of focus photography
-repetitive sets
-some really unattractive models (YMMV)
Bottom Line:
ATK Hairy was once the preeminent site for people looking to see models with unshaven pussies. Unfortunately, it is now a shadow of its former self and coasts along with a small stable of photographers and a few models being shown over and over again.
The tour page looks great, hinting at the large number of models and sets available, but much of the tour content shows models that were introduced months or even years ago. There is a still considerable amount of good content at the site, but due to several issues ATK Hairy has had over the years (DNS attacks, a schizm in the fan base over just hairy pussies or all-over body hair, and evidently some defections of photographers to WeAreHairy) the site seems more like a collector's niche site to find older content than a vibrant, vital site.
There is nothing wrong with catering to people searching out their favorite models or photographers for older work. But ATK systematically moves older content (it varies but about six years old or older) to its sister site ATK Archives.
There are a lot of models of varying body types, hairiness, and attractiveness. Some are porn veterans, some amateurs, but all have hairy pussies. Some sets have models with hairy underarms and hairy legs (this was a controversial but largely user-supported refocus of the site). Most are softcore, with the model starting clothed and ending with some spread pussy shots.
Earlier in its history, ATK Hairy had many regular contributing photographers, each with a distinctive style. Sean R was a longtime fan favorite for his raunchy explicit sets. Sean R has not contributed to the site in months. The current stable of photographers is limited to two or three (GBP, JSP, and Foxy). Every set for months is the work of these three, but mostly GBP and JSP.
Content quality is good, but the content is thinning. There is a large amount of older content, but really old content is now at ATK Archives. Some photographers really relied on the same sets over and over, some sets had bad lighting, and there was the occasional out of focus shot. Some photographers talked to the models over the videos.
CONCLUSION
ATK Hairy's glory days are behind it. It doesn't have enough new models or contributing photographers to make its recent content the draw, but still retains a large amount of older content that could attract a fan of hairy porn. I would primarily recommend it to fans of hairy women who are looking for a variety of sets and styles to compliment their collection. Sadly though, if you're looking for lots of unique new content, ATK Hairy isn't for you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
-PART OF THE METART NETWORK. SO YOU CAN ASSUME THE PRODUCTION VALUES AND MODELS AND PHOTOGRAPHY/VIDEOGRAPHY ARE HIGH QUALITY.
-LOW MEMBERSHIP PRICE. $7.99/MONTH. $60/YEAR.
-SOMETIMES YOU CAN SIGN UP FOR A FREE 2-DAY FULL TRIAL THROUGH A METART NETWORK SITE. HOWEVER, AFTER THE 2 DAY TRIAL, THE MEMBERSHIP RENEWS AT $19.00/MONTH, UNLESS YOU CANCEL FIRST. SO IF YOU WANT AN EXTENDED MEMBERSHIP, CANCEL THE TRIAL AND JOIN THROUGH THE PU LINK FOR A MUCH LOWER PRICE.
-YOU GET A CONFIRMING EMAIL IF YOU TAKE THE 2-DAY FREE TRIAL. THIS IS NEEDED BECAUSE YOU ARE ASSIGNED A PASSWORD BY THE SYSTEM, INSTEAD OF CHOOSING YOUR OWN. SO TO USE THE TRIAL, YOU NEED THE PASSWORD.
-SUPPORT IS 24/7, AND IS EXCELLENT.
-PHOTOS ARE IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH RESOLUTION.
-ZIP FILES FOR EACH PHOTOSET IN LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH DEFINITION.
-VIDEOS ARE ALSO IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH RESOLUTION.
Cons:
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-THE CONFIRMING EMAIL GIVES YOU YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD. BUT IT DOES NOT SPELL OUT THE TERMS OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP. THAT WAS SHOWN ON THE INTRO PAGES FOR YOUR JOIN PAGES. ALL THE CONFIRMING EMAIL SHOWS IS YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD AND THE SITE YOU HAVE ACCESS TO: IT DOES NOT STATE HOW LONG THE TRIAL RUNS, THE MEMBERSHIP TRIAL PRICE, OR THAT THE TRIAL TURNS INTO A MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP AT $19.00 WHEN THE TRIAL ENDS UNLESS CANCELLED.
-THE TRIAL MEMBERSHIP USES ROCKETGATE BILLER. THE NORMAL BILLERS ARE CCBILL AND EPOCH, WHICH ARE BETTER KNOWN. I'VE HAD NO PROBLEMS WITH ROCKETGATE IN THE PAST, BUT CCBILL AND EPOCH ARE EASIER TO USE, MORE FAMILIAR.
-MUCH OF THE CONTENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED ON OTHER SITES IN THE METART NETWORK.
I'M GUESSING THAT MANY OF THE PHOTOSETS WERE PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED ON METART.COM, SINCE THAT IS THE LARGEST SITE IN THE NETWORK.
BUT THERE IS ALSO SOME CONTENT FROM OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, SUCH AS THE LIFE EROTIC.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
WHENEVER A MODEL HAS UNSHAVEN PUBIC HAIR, HER CONTENT MIGHT APPEAR ON LOVE HAIRY AFTER FIRST APPEARING ON ONE OF THE METART NETWORK SISTER SITES.
I AM UNSURE IF ANY CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE TO THE LOVE HAIRY SITE.
THE ONLY WAY TO CHECK WOULD BE IF THE SITE ITSELF PUT OUT A NOTICE ON THE SITE'S CONTENT, BREAKING IT DOWN INTO EXCLUSIVE AND NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTENT, WHICH IS PROBABLY A NEGATIVE FACTOR TO ADVERTISE.
AT MANY PORN SITES, YOU CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT THEY ADVERTISE, BECAUSE THE CLAIMS ARE EITHER OUT-OF-DATE OR OUTRIGHT LIES.
THE METART NETWORK ENJOYS A HIGHER STATUS: YOU CAN TRUST WHAT THEY WRITE, WHAT THEY ADVERTISE.
LET ME MODIFY THAT: THE SITE USES HYPERBOLE IN DESCRIBING THEIR MODELS: THE METART MODELS ARE, IN THE WORDS OF THE METART STAFF, THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN THE WORLD. THE LEVEL OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE MODELS IS EXTREMELY HIGH, BUT TO THINK THEIR MODELS ARE THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN THE WORLD IS JUST OVERKILL.
THE METART STAFF SPEND A LOT OF TIME TRYING TO KEEP THE METART NETWORK RUNNING AS SMOOTHLY AS POSSIBLE.
RECENTLY, THERE HAVE BEEN SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES AT THE METART NETWORK SITES: PROBLEMS LOGGING IN TO THE SITES, PROBLEMS DISPLAYING OR DOWNLOADING THE CONTENTS, ETC. BUT OVER TIME, THE NETWORK HAS BEEN ONE OF THE BETTER NETWORKS TO JOIN.
-I DON'T LIKE THE SOFTWARE MECHANISM FOR VIEWING PHOTOS ONLINE. IT'S CLUNKY, SLOW TO LOAD INDIVIDUAL PHOTOS, SLOW TO MOVE TO THE NEXT PHOTO.
MUCH EASIER TO DOWNLOAD THE ZIP FILE AND VIEW WITH A PROGRAM FROM YOUR COMPUTER.
-IRREGULAR UPDATE RATE: NEW PHOTOSET ONCE A DAY, ONCE IN 2 DAYS, ONCE IN 4 DAYS, ONCE IN 7 DAYS, ONCE IN 14 DAYS. WHENEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IT.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
SITE THEME IS GIRLS WHO DON'T SHAVE THEIR VAGINAS COMPLETELY.
SOME PORN ADDICTS BELIEVE IN THE CURRENT STYLE OF CLEAN IS BETTER: HEALTHIER, MORE ATTRACTIVE.
OTHER PORN ADDICTS YEARN FOR THE GOLDEN DAYS, WHEN WOMEN HAD PUBIC HAIR.
IT'S A MATTER OF TASTE.
THIS IS ONE OF THE SMALLER SITES IN THE METART NETWORK.
APPARENTLY, IT STARTED IN 2017.
THE MODELS ARE MAINLY ATTRACTIVE TO VERY ATTRACTIVE.
IF YOU LIKE THE OLD-STYLE WHERE GIRLS SPORTED SOME HAIR DOWN BELOW, THEN THE SITE MIGHT BE WORTH VISITING.
SEVERAL REASONS:
-THE GIRLS ARE ATTRACTIVE TO VERY ATTRACTIVE.
-THE SITE CATERS TO AN APPRECIATION OF PUBIC HAIR.
-THE SITE STRUCTURE IS EASY TO USE. GOOD NAVIGATION, GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS.
-METART CUSTOMER SUPPORT IS ONE OF THE FINEST SUPPORT TEAMS OF ANY PORN SITE:
FAST RESPONSE, WITH AN ATTITUDE OF WANTING TO HELP THEIR CUSTOMERS.
-LOW MEMBERSHIP PRICE: $7.99/MONTH, $60/YEAR.
HOWEVER, IF YOU HAVE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE METART.COM SITE, OR SOME OF THE OTHER METART NETWORK SITES,
YOU WILL COME ACROSS CONTENT YOU'VE SEEN BEFORE. WHICH WOULD BE A NEGATIVE FOR SOME PEOPLE--THEY DON'T LIKE PAYING TWICE FOR THE SAME CONTENT.
ACTUALLY, IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT, THE BEST WAY TO USE LOVE HAIRY IS TO HAVE A SEPARATE MEMBERSHIPS TO METART.COM AND LOVEHAIRY.COM.
THEN, IF YOU FIND A MODEL YOU LIKE, YOU CAN PROBABLY FIND MUCH MORE OF HER CONTENT AT METART.COM.
THAT'S BECAUSE SEARCHING THROUGH THE VAST COLLECTION OF MODELS OR PHOTOSETS AT METART.COM CAN BE AN EXHAUSTING EXPERIENCE. I JUST DON'T HAVE THE ENERGY FOR IT ANY MORE.
GIVE ME THE GOOD STUFF, WITHOUT ALL THE FILLERS (CONTENT I DON'T APPRECIATE OR THINK IT'S A WASTE OF TIME).
BUT IF YOU HAVE THE TIME, YOU CAN DO THE SEARCHES AT METART: WHICH HAS A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF CONTENT FROM ABOUT 20 YEARS OF STEADY GROWTH OF PHOTOSETS AND VIDEOS.
THE METART STATISTICS (FOR THE METART.COM SITE): AS OF 2017-09-24
MODELS: 3,404
PHOTOSETS: 17,579
VIDEOS: 1,431
CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS: 277
THE AMOUNT OF CONTENT AT METART.COM, PLUS THE EASY NAVIGATION DESIGN, PLUS THE OUTSTANDING CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPPORT, PLUS THE OUTSTANDING ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE MODELS, MAKE THIS THE FINEST SOFTCORE NUDE SITE ON THE INTERNET. WHICH IS WHY I PAID FOR A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP TO THE SITE.
HOWEVER, THE AMOUNT OF CONTENT IS OVERWHELMING. METART.COM COULD BE SPLIT INTO 5 OR 6 SEPARATE PORN SITES, AND THEY WOULD ALL BE WORTH JOINING.
GETTING BACK TO LOVE HAIRY: IT HAS A SURPRISING AMOUNT OF CONTENT, CONSIDERING IT'S A NEW SITE THAT STARTED IN 2017. BUT THEY ARE BUILDING THE SITE WITH CONTENT FROM THE OTHER METART NETWORK SITES.
NUMBER OF PHOTOSETS: 355
NUMBER OF VIDEOS: 128
THIS IS MORE OF A PHOTO SITE THAN A VIDEO SITE.
HOWEVER, THE VIDEOS ARE OFTEN MORE EROTIC, MORE HARDCORE, THAN THE STANDARD METART.COM VIDEOS, BECAUSE THEY ARE TAKING THE VIDEOS FROM THE METART NETWORK SISTER SITES, WHICH FEATURE A HARDER APPROACH TO SEX AND EXPLICITNESS: IN MANY OF THESE VIDEOS, YOU MIGHT SEE ACTUAL MASTURBATION, LESBIAN LOVEMAKING, OR -- WHAT IS FORBIDDEN IN THE METART.COM SITE, A MAN APPEARING IN THE VIDEO HAVING SEX WITH A WOMAN. (MEN ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE METART.COM SITE).
BOTTOM LINE CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION:
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Billing through ccbill
- Lots of models
- Lots of different bodies, hair styles, colors, etc.
- Quite a few stars before they were big
Cons:
- Not entirely exclusive?
- That ATK underarm thing.
- No distinct names of downloads
- Ads inside
- Fairly frequent logouts
Bottom Line:
I thought it's a pretty good idea to have an "archive" site for content going back ten plus years. I'm not personally convinced it should be priced as high as it is considering the quality of the older stuff is often fairly low, but there is a large amount of overall content available.
I'm not sure it's exclusive material. I don't doubt it's likely exclusive to the ATK brand, but some of the sets looked like I've seen them before on the other ATK sites.
More of the ATK underarm fetish present. I've joined three of their sites now, and it's definitely not coincidence. It's not so bad to be offensive, but it's very noticeable if you're not into underarms.
As long as we're here, there are some hairy underarms in there as well. Again, not enough to be a deal-breaker even for those of us who aren't into it, but know you're going to see some when you're browsing. Or, if you're into hairy (or not) underarms, go buy an annual subscription right now because this is an excellent resource.
Numerous different studios taking the photos. I thought it was interesting to be able to pick out specific photographers/studios before even clicking the link to take you to the sets. It's neat how distinctive DDF (and others) methods and styles are, and also neat how you might not have noticed it until you see them lumped together with other studios'.
There are videos here and there, but it's very much a photo site. The quality of the sets I looked at varied from okay to good, but it's an archive site so that is forgivable. Even in the videos I'd guess the majority of the content is interview and/or masturbation with a bit of lesbian or BG hardcore here and there. Don't go into it for the videos. Accept them as added benefits of the models' sets that you liked.
It's fairly common to have 50+ images in a .zip file that is only 5-15MB in size. Don't expect zoomable MetArt shots. Again, everything is tempered by the fact that these are archives and you joined an archive site, so it's forgivable.
The files will often share a name, so if you download a hundred sets featuring "Jennifer," and there are a dozen models named Jennifer, you'll have no idea which Jennifer is which or what is happening in any of them until you go through each individually.
Bottom line: Not a bad site, and a lot of pleasant surprises finding models I'd forgotten about or didn't know about at all. Would I recommend? Sure, but. The "but" being if I found out all the sets were shared with another larger ATK site. It would be silly to not just join that site, wouldn't it?
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
