Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Straightforward navigation and clean site design, also mobile device-friendly (but see cons).
Search works across scene titles, model names and categories/tags.
Scene index thumbnails have a badge to indicate whether the scene is a favourite.
Model index with links to scenes and is sortable by name, update date or popularity.
Can save scenes as favourites and leave comments.
Favourite scenes listed in order that they were favourited.
Downloaded scene videos are very reasonable file size.
No restrictions on downloads and supports download managers.
Responsive support via email.
Vendo billing.
PU discount.
Cons:
Some features such as comments, liking a scene and flagging an issue with a scene don't work.
Inconsistent/poor download performance for many scenes, varies from less than 2Mbps up to 8Mbps.
No model bio, just list of scenes.
Some scenes have streaming thumbnails for an entirely different scene.
Too many scenes lack any scene length info.
Tags/categories link to videos from all networks rather than just the current one.
Downloads button doesn't do file download, you need to right-click and choose "Save link as" or whatever your browser provides.
Maximum video size is 1080p full HD - no 4K.
Older content is 720p rather than 1080p.
Comments and favourites functionalty is scene detail page is is very unresponsive and slow.
Odd behaviour of favourites badge on mobile devices.
Bottom Line:
The site name might lead you to think it's Italian porn but it's actually German, with lots of hot slutty girls, some young but many older/MILF, hot and sexy with many in stockings.
Content includes lesbian, threesome, interracial, solo and anal. There are also scenes featuring the girl fucked by a dildo machine. The action is hardcore and the girls are hard-fucked with generous cum-load endings.
The site functionality is straighforward and effective, with paged scene listings and scene detail pages from where you can stream the scene, download it, like it, add it to your favourites, add comments, flag/raise issues with the scene for support purposes.
You can filter the scene listings by category (anal, DP, etc) but only by one category, which isn't necessarily a big deal.
A nice touch is that scene thumbnails indicate whether the scene is in your favourites list.
Very usefully, the scenes in the favourites page are in the order the scene was favourited and so easy to keep track of - I've come across a number of large sites where there are unofficial limits on numbers of favourites and so favourited scenes end up quietly dropping off the cliff.
As someone who generally watches porn on a mobile, favourites scenes and then downloads them when on my PC or laptop, I appreciated the otherwise good mobile functionality.
There are a number of negative aspects of the site:
- clicking on the download link just loads the scene in a new browser window, forcing you to use the "Save link as" option provided by your browser to actually download the scene.
- submitting comments is very unresponsive - from hitting the comment it takes up to 30 seconds for your comment to appear and sometimes it doesn't.
- clicking the "Add to Favourites" button results in nothing happening until after between several seconds and thirty seconds.
- the links to actors is by actor name rather than a unique id, so a scene starring say Angelina, will link to a list of scenes starring an actor named Angelina and not necessarily the same actor from the scene you clicked from.
- on phone or tablet, the "favourite" badge on a scene thumbnail doesn't appear with the device in portrait mode, only if landscape mode.
I downloaded a lot of the content from this site - many of the girls, both young and old are extremely hot and sexy, particularly as most are wearing stockings. Highly recommended, especially with the inclusion of many other quality sites from the Gasm network.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
My all-time favorite site and it hasn’t dropped off that much
Basically it’s a DVD site that has scenes from British DVDs
The star pro of pros, very few of the models are or were active in the USA. It’s like a site full of amateurs!
While the video resolution could be better, it’s not terrible and is high definition
Good picture sets you can download
The model list is stacked with gorgeous British women
Cons:
From the best I can tell it is no longer updating, but the site is very large and high quality
The highest video download resolution is 1280x720
Bottom Line:
My first ever visit to Porn Users was around 2009 and the most recent review was Killergram. I immediately joined it and never looked back. It is a basic DVD site. These sites were very popular in the pre-2010 internet porn years. Killergram was separated from the pack of DVD sites by offering full picture sets you could download and those are still a major feature of the site.
Most of the scenes are nearing generic and the same as the previous scene, but that’s the best part about Killergram. Their top models really are head and shoulders above their average models. These models are easy to find as well. Killergram has dozens of scenes of each of their top models. A few of my favorites are Lyka Lopez and Anya Leon. The two have a combined 78 scenes on Killergram!
A couple of the models even have near 100 or more than 100 scenes!
Even though the site is not updating, it still has over 4,200 scenes and you can download all you want. Their numbers allude to their preference of their favorite models. There are only 358 models making up those 4,200 scenes.
My positivity and optimism should be balanced by the reader’s common sense. This is clearly my favorite site I have joined and while I don’t consider myself biased; I am sure there are people who won’t be as excited about some of these scenes as I am. I like that the models are not well-known in the USA. It really feels like I’ve found an A plus amateur site.
The scenes are generally hardcore. There are some lesbian scenes, but the hardcore scenes is the calling card of Killergram. I compare the hardcore level to that of a site like Evil Angel.
This DVD site does promote itself as a network and based on popular vocabulary usage, it is a network. The different sites on this network are just based on the title of the DVDs the scenes come from. Some of those include: Cum Into My Office, Brown Sugar Rush and Urban Perversions, just to name 3 of the sites included.
I’m sure for some, the no longer updating, would be the deathblow, but if you’re not familiar with this content it is well worth joining and becoming familiar with the content. The models stand out more than on American sites and you do see the British influence in the accents and even the weird humor.
A really great site that always makes me happy. Go find your favorite model and see how many scenes she has. I would have scored it higher, but I am punishing them a little for no more updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- this looks like a network I should know better than to join.
- I probably should have listened to the side telling me not to join, but by joining, I was able to find some of the best porn I have seen.
- The Porn Nerd Network comes with 22 sites that follow no rhyme or reason to why they are on the same network.
- You also get Aggressive Pass which is a network TBP doesn’t do business with anymore. It adds about 1,000 videos to the whole package.
- As this review goes on, you will get to see just how important one model or site can be to how much a person likes a network.
- Download speeds are good (80% my max), there is a reported download limit, but I haven’t hit it.
- CCBill is the payment processor and was the biggest reason I was willing to take a risk on this network.
Cons:
- The truth is the majority of this network is bargain-bin quality, but not all and there’s some hidden treasures on here. Oh give me time to get to what sold me on it.
- No photoset downloads. I had to break out the dusty but trusty image downloader extension for my browser and downloaded some photos.
- If you’re not sold on this network by the same way I was, you probably won’t like the network.
Bottom Line:
a lot of talk without any resolve. I will get the guilty site out of the way to begin this review. It’s Chubby Blondy. Go ahead, go look, chubby in 2011 looked a lot different than it does in 2023. That’s an all-natural, gorgeous, nerdy, sexy Italian woman and Chubby Blondy is her site.
I can’t believe how much views have changed. She looks normal size for 2023. Her site has around 100 videos and I downloaded all of them. I also downloaded the 50ish or so photosets they had using a browser extension. Those videos and photos were more enough to justify the one month purchase of this network. If you’re attracted to Chubby Blondy, you won’t be disappointed with her videos.
The rest of the network was hit or miss with me. Sites that I at least checked out and even downloaded some videos from include Voyeur of Paris, it’s good, and it’s what the name says. That’s a rarely touched upon niche. There’s The Art of Handjobs and it’s good enough for an often overlooked genre in porn.
Every site had at least a handful of scenes worth downloading. I still will have doubts about recommending it. That is unless you are as attracted to Chubby Blondy as I am.
The big picture makes this all clearer. The quality is not that good, even though some of the sites have 1080p downloads. There are no photo zips on any of the sites. A lot of the sites look like someone took 4-5 DVDs and ripped the scenes to their website and called it a website. There is an unconfirmed download limit and just an honest opinion, I have not downloaded anything from the Aggressive Pass.
I feel like I’m so experienced in pornsites that I’m looking over some major flaws just because I really like one model on the network. I will add this to put that in perspective.
If I was reviewing just Curvy Blondy, it would be an 84. Most of the content on it is from 2011. I think 84 is generous for a site that has multiple problems on it. The network, without Curvy Blondy, would score a 72-75. That too would be generous. I’m going with an 80 overall. I’m not for sure how long Curvy Blondy will keep my attention, but I currently see her content as some of the hottest I have.
This is me telling you not to join this network unless you have the same attraction to Curvy Blondy. None of the other sites are good enough to warrant joining a network for.
I’ve talked myself into saying don’t join it unless you are as attracted to Curvy Blondy as I am.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with three other sites in the Sensual Girl Network
Exceptionally beautiful and glamorously presented models
Every video is High Definition 720p
Absolutely one of the best glamour sex websites I have ever been a member of
There are 80 very erotic scenes
There is no mention of a download limit and I did not have a problem with one
Nice cumshots, but ordinary sized penises
Cons:
There is no mention of the dates when the videos were posted
Not updating. The TBP review in 2013 showed more updates than there are now with 88
Bottom Line:
This site promises real swallows and kisses, the fantasy you deserve. This made me expect some site that thinks they know what kind of porn women like. The women are presented as glamorous, made up nicely to look their best. This is what I have seen others call glamcore, maybe even couples porn. I think that the site works well if that is what you are looking for. Everything about this site shouts hot sex that is not extreme, not for those who are looking for a site that has a hard edge.
The models don’t talk, a sign that they might be Eastern European. As such, a great number of them are blondes, mostly genuine ones that are not from the pharmacy. There are a few moans or grunts, but that is not common. What you do get in the background is some distracting elevator music that made me turn the sound off. Although I would not be comfortable doing this, if I were sharing a man with a friend, I know there would be some verbal interaction between us. I am not talking about anything profound, but us girls can be verbal. Even during sex, we react and share our thoughts.
My best guess is that these young ladies are pros, not amateurs, and are from 18 to maybe 22 or slightly older. The guys are a little older, say 35 to 45. They don’t take advantage of the age difference in the scenes, but I can’t imagine why not. For the most part, the scenes just happen spontaneously as a result of playful interactions. In one scene with a black man, he is watering the shrubbery. Two young women in bikinis tease him and he squirts them with the hose. Soon the bikinis come off and they are all laughing and the real hosing begins. Something missing is that I did not see any model’s names. Mostly the women are very slim, but range from petite to tall. The guys had pretty much average for porn sized cocks and the cumshots were mostly, maybe even all, external and fun to watch. I even saw a few black male models, a rarity in Eastern European porn.
Besides the attractiveness of the models, I also congratulate the site for making the sets so attractive. Many of the scenes are outdoors, using boats, beaches, pools and house decks to give a feeling of classy elegance. The feeling I had was one of a scene that was so beyond the ordinary that it helped to increase the fantasy. Most other porn sites just put two or more models in a room.
The sex itself is mostly oral done on the men, but you can also find vaginal and anal. Rimming is not uncommon and mostly done with the other woman also going down on him. Sometimes one woman has sex with the man while the other helps, as what they call on the site an assistant. Sometimes it is both women oral on the lucky guy. Sometimes he takes turns with sex with each one. I like that the models seemed to be having some fun and there were times I felt that there was some genuine chemistry going on. The best video quality is HD 720p, but very sharp except for a few older scenes.
I think the site is no longer updating as the TBP review in 2013 has 88 scenes listed and today there are 80. The scenes are undated. If I paid for just this site alone, I would feel that the quality of the scenes were worth the price to join. However, you also get three other high quality sites in the Sensual Girl Network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
01-17-2005:59am (Update History) Reason: New vital information in the cons area
Pros:
1. Awesome content
2. Top shelf talent
Cons:
1. No model index
2. Severely restrictive (unmentioned) 30GB daily download limit.
3. Latest videos by date looks like entire network is updated with maybe one video a month.
4. Navigation is a pain, pretty much have to go site by site and then scene by scene.
5. If data limit is hit then you have to wait 24hrs and submit a account reset form and be given a new user name and password
6. Time does not reset at a given time, if you download 29.5gb at 7:20am then you have to wait until 7:30am the next day to download again.
Bottom Line:
This site has some pretty awesome content but is in serious need of an overhaul. There is no model index at all. A previous review said you could open a scene and click on a models name to bring up her scenes, I found this to be untrue. Going by site by site they have their scenes listed with no model name, after you click on the scene it then will give her name.
Now for my biggest con. There is a ridiculously restrictive daily download limit of 30GB. This is not mentioned anywhere. When you offer 4k quality videos this is a crazy small amount. the 4k videos are upwards of 10-12 gb in size so only 3 videos a day! Plus if you hit this limit you have to request a account reset to continue to download. This is unacceptable. Why doesn't it reset after 24 hours like every other site with a limit?! Look, I get the bootleg concerns but this is punishing the people who choose to be a customer and actually pay for your content and I am a firm believer in supporting my favorite studios/producers by buying dvd's/blurays and memberships. I collect scenes of my favorite models and download three sizes: 720, 1080, and if available the 2160. Yes I am a 4k snob, I download the 720 for my tablet. So today I think I hit the limit at just TWO VIDEOS! I don't know if they ban people for multiple infractions but I will update this review if this is the case. It's sad because this site has just fantastic, amazing, outstanding content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very big network dedicated to fetishes - 52 different sites.
The site works well. Probably better if you know what niche/fetish you are looking for.
Some mainstream fetishes like feet, hose and BDSM. Some fetishes that I believe are rare these days, including 3 sites with models that are smoking cigarettes, some bondage that makes Kink look tame and some like Brutal Castings, that are hard to even watch.
They do feature series videos that are interesting, both in story and how the scenes play out. There's not enough of those.
Quite possibly the corniest fetish -- hypnotized models. Those are entertaining to watch.
Cons:
I know this shouldn't be a con since it is a fetish network, but some of the content is extremely hardcore, maybe the most hardcore I've seen.
Navigation isn't very good, there's no model list, but you can click a model's name in a scene and see all of her scenes.
Can't tell if it's updating and number count looks lower than the last TBP review.
Bottom Line:
This is the definition of a hit or miss network. About 20 of the sites are interesting to me, with 10 getting most of my attention. The other 20 are ones I'm not interested in at all.
I am into foot fetish and hose. They have over 500 scenes pertaining to foot fetish and/or hose. That's my money worth.
These series which they list as sites have some very good, interesting scenes with stories: Waitress POV, Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Hostel XXX, Operation Escort, Internet Creeper, and Strap-On Squad. They just don't have enough of those. Five of those sites have 20 or less scenes on them. Three have 10 or less.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The older scenes are not as consistent. Some don't list what the download's resolution is and there is only one option to download "high".
The quality is overall very good.
I think the site Pantyhose Creep is maybe the most interesting one for me, but it only has 44 scenes on it.
I counted around 3,500 scenes, it's not exactly easy to count these as they list all 52 sites one page with a number out from it. I'm not going to sit here and punch 52 numbers into a calculator. I went over the numbers in my head and came up about 600 short of the last TBP review. It's possible I'm missing something or not counting something, but that shows the problem with the navigation as well.
It's a good, somewhat confusing network if you are into fetishes. I think those that like foot/hose would be as pleased with the network as I am. If you're into the really rough sex you would probably like some of the sites on here. Those into bondage, they have 10 different sites with bondage as the main theme.
I don't think it's updating. I accidentally forgot to cancel it and am on the second month of my membership. I haven't noticed any new scenes and there's not a tab for "updates". They have a good and different network here, but they do need to put a little work into making it more functional and easier to find what you're looking for.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Nice high quality camera work
2. Large selection of movie types
3. Large number of movies available
4. Movies are a good length
Cons:
1. Very low down load limit per day. 3 to 15 HD movies per day.
2. Hard to unsubscribe from. (Seriously why make dead unsubscribe pages, you're just driving people away)
3. They try to add on expensive services when you sign up.
4. They sell your contact information without asking. (Possibly they ask in their privacy statement)
5. Movies get repetitive very quickly due to lack of original ideas
Bottom Line:
Why do some sites treat their customers like this? These are people willing to pay you money for your site!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Young attractive models.
Newer sites seem to have found a niche.
Newer video quality is good.
Site layout is pretty good.
Navigation is pretty good.
Videos are user scored on a 5 point scale.
Updates are dated.
Download speeds are OK.
Current sites are 1080p.
A few videos are 4k.
Cons:
Many older sites no longer update.
The newer sites are not BDSM sites, they are "Simulated Peril" sites. (Can we coin that phrase, maybe?)
Only 1 update a week across all sites.
HUGE video blocking watermarks on every video
Infuriating page load delays until you scroll down to view the next sections.
Images but NO ZIP FILES!
File resolutions and sizes not listed.
Video file naming could be better.
Repetitive nature of themes is unfortunate.
Very limited set and male actor variety.
OH. Cancellation process is worst on Internet!
Cancel fine print says you have to cancel at least 30 DAYS prior to next billing. That's nuts!
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying that my review is primarily about the dedicated, updating micro-sites in this "network".
When it comes to BDSM material, I think the gold standard is probably the Kink network. That network provides a lot of really raw, tie-the-girl-down-and-make-her-come-a-million-times true BDSM that is consensual but incredibly intense. Some of it is a bit too brutal for me, though, although it is clearly all consensual.
In the middle, I don't know, several sites where a model/actress is tied down and you can't quite tell if she is acting or not when the guy puts a vibrator to her clit. BBB comes to mind, but there is a moderate amount of acting there.
Then there are these "simulated peril" sites. The girl is tied up loosely or only has her hands tied together during sex, with a backstory that implies peril. Sites in this category include the main micro-sites here and those on the sister site punishteens.com. These sites may have popular models and porn stars, but the scenes are nowhere near as intense as scenes found on true BDSM sites. (The best of this simulated type that I ever saw was on the Hustler site. Guy breaks in and attacks the girl, girl gets a gun, girl makes guy seriously fuck her, then at the end the girl points the gun at him and after fade-to-black, shoots him. Awesome Karma!) Sorry, I digress, but it was best-of-genre and memorable.
All that said, there are 7 micro-sites here that I consider current and not a purchased collection.
They are: (scenes in p
Teen Creeper (8 )
Teens in the Woods (12)
Helpless Teens (42)
Brutal Casings (56)
Brutal Pickups (12. last update: 5/16) Sexual Disgrace (130. last update 8/16)
Strap-on Squad (60. last update 9/16)
Sexual Disgrace is a pretty good traditional dungeon-style BDSM site with a lot of content. Strap-on Squad is an all girl dungeon-style site. Both of these seem to be no longer be updating.
Note that there is 1, one, one, ONE primary male actor on all of the sites listed above, except Teen Creeper, and he is also often found on punishteens as well. He is a very, very busy guy.
There are also 11 "collection" sites that do not update, many of which are so old (i.e. 2011) as to be all medium to standard def. There are a total of about 1,130 videos in these collections. There is some true BDSM here and some good images.
Just in case you can't guess, here are the themes:
Teen Creeper: Break-in and forced sex. 1 or 2 girls. A few of these scenes are pretty good but all are nearly identical in format. This site uses a different male actor who is a good creeper.
Teens in the Woods: Girl(s) in the woods find their way to a house where a forest ranger serial rapist lives.
Helpless Teens: Stranded girls who need a ride do stuff in the front and the back of a van for that ride. Many get dragged back to a dungeon-like bed for additional sex.
Brutal Castings: Exactly as it sounds. Starts out nice, then the guy goes ape-shit on the girl, ties her hands and screws her.
Brutal pick-ups: Girl on a street gets pulled into an alley, hands tied and screwed.
They all sound pretty good, don't they? Well, although the first one of each of these that you watch will be entertaining (Ava Taylor in Brutal Castings, for example, or Gina Valentina in the first few minutes of Teen Creeper), they are all so similar that they quickly get boring. Add that the girls are usually not really tied up and are clearly just doing their usual porn acting stuff, complete with the usual porn sequences from blow job to money shot, and the whole thing goes pretty limp. Honestly, the best part of each scene is the moment when the guy "grabs" the girl and you can't quite tell if the initial reaction from the girl is acting or not. (That sounds really creepy, but, hey, that's why I joined!) The limited themes and settings, the repetition and the occasional re-use of an actress on different micro-sites, detracts from the overall entertainment value.
Overall, the sets are well done and well lit. The guy does a pretty good job of acting and the girls' acting varies. Video quality on these is good,although the actual video size is not consistent across all the sets. You don't know if "HD Hi" is 2K or 4K until you start the download and file sizes are not listed.
The newer sites have a frustrating "feature". When viewing the 4-8 sets on a page, the section of the page that is not visible does not load until you scroll down. So you spend a truly stupid amount of time waiting for the page to load as you scroll. This is unnervingly slow during peak internet hours. 4 to 8 sets per page? Why should I have to wait?
Oh, and there is no easy way to cancel.
Uh oh. Ran out of space. I would recommend this site to those who really like the simulated BDSM style, or for anyone looking for a bargain in older true BDSM. I downloaded what I wanted and will probably not be back
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
First lets cover some basic Pro's
1) There are around 4143 Video's
2) There are around 46 sites
3) They hire some top notch talent
4) They have a large selection of amateur porn
5) They have a large variety of Fetish porn
6) There is no download limit
7) Their content goes back over a decade
8 Their new content is 1080p
9) Most of their content has Photo set's
10) They have the best selection of Fantasy Rape Porn of any site on the web!
Cons:
Now lets cover some basic Con's
1) Out of their 4143 Videos less than 20% are in Full 1080p.
2) Most of the 46 sites no longer update and are years old.
3) Their search function could use a lot of work, it is hard to find the newest scenes.
4) Their streaming encounters a lot of errors.
5) Their older movies could use better descriptions
6) They seem to buy content in patches about twice a year so there are long content droughts
7) Several of their scenes are missing, poorly encoded, missing sound or are not downloadable at all
8 Some people have trouble cancelling their membership but I did not have this problem.
Bottom Line:
So now that we have covered some basic pros and con's let's get down to the real review. The Fetish Network has been on my radar for years. But I never took a chance on them before which is a shame. This holiday season they offered a 10$ membership and I jumped at the chance at a 66% savings over what TBP offered. But even at TBP price of $30 this is it 100% worth a 1 month membership!
If you have a fetish this site probably has something that caters to it. I like harder content like Facial Abuse, Kink, Elite Pain and Assylum. Sites that specialize in humiliation and taking the actresses to their very limits.
If you are a fan of Rape Fantasy (Like you see in a lot of Japanese Porn) then The Fetish Network is without a doubt the #1 porn site on the internet for this niche Fetish. They devote multiple sites to this Rape Fantasy Fetish: Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Brutal Castings and Brutal Pickups. It is debatable if other sites fill this role but in my opinion these are their premium Rape Fantasy Sites. The scenes have a great sexual tension and build up, they follow a well planned plot progression and finish well.
There has been a lot said about violence against women and I 100% agree. Women should be respected and going past a safe word is always wrong. If that is your fear then you need not worry you wont find James Deen here. Instead they use Bruno Dickemz and some people do not like him but personally I think he does a excellent job. They do a lot of before and after interviews so you can see the actresses are well taken care of.
The Fetish Network is not without its con's which I outlined. But most of those con's are to be expected of such a large site with older content. In fact I subscribed to them using a CC just to see if they would cancel upon request. After two weeks they responded and canceled you just have to be patient. This is my personal experience with them however so if you want to be safe please feel free to use a disposable visa of some sort.
In conclusion The Fetish Network far exceeded my expectations. There is real value for money invested in them and it is my conclusion they are worth a 1 month membership. You will not find a better selection of Fantasy Rape Porn on the Internet period and this is coming from a reviewer who specializes in this niche. I gave this site a 90 because they offer "The Best FRP Content" on the internet today.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discount through PU.
-There are 10 sites. However, most of them are not updating or rarely do.
-The best video quality is 1920x1080, 5200 kbps. The balance are mostly 1080x720 2000 kbps, but are remasters of poor quality originals.
-Good mix of professional and amateur models.
-Nice variety of ethnicities, body shapes and ages.
-Many beautiful models as well as some that you might meet in your everyday life.
-Not heavily made up and not glam at all.
-Easy, intuitive navigation. Description and screenshot of the model for nearly all the videos.
Cons:
-No search engine of any kind.
-Daily download limit of 20GB for the network as a whole.
-Consistently slow downloads at about 1 MG.
-Many failed downloads that count towards the daily limit.
-Does not support download managers.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable screen shots at poor 350x350.
-Many videos do not also have photos.
-The scene descriptions often describe the models in a manner that is degrading and misogynistic.
-Far too many models with tats, hardware and breast implants. Even the male talent has tattoos.
-Dishonest cross sells.
Bottom Line:
Having been a member several years ago, I thought I knew what to expect. What I found was a network that was ruined by a combination of neglect and greed.
I signed up for the PU discounted price of 19.95. I was careful to read RearAdmiral’s review of four years ago as well as what PU has to say about the site. I saw no, I repeat no prechecked cross sells, so I was stunned to see that I was charged for trials to other sites by the same people. I immediately cancelled and called the biller Segpay. I got a refund, but only by being firm and insisting that I in no way agreed to these charges. Further, the trial got me access only to the preview page. If I had entered the sites that would have activated a monthly membership.
BEWARE! This network dishonestly treats its members like a cash cow.
The next problem is the daily download limit of 20GB for the entire network. To add insult to injury, there were many failed downloads and each and every one of them counts towards the limit. The downloads were excruciatingly slow at about 1MG and you cannot use download managers. If you stop a download, it will not restart, it fails and you have just added to your usage for the day. As a result of all this, downloading is extremely tedious and it takes weeks to get your money’s worth out of what is on offer.
The network has been neglected for years. Most of the ten sites have not updated since RA’s review of four years ago. In fact most of the network has not seen an update in at least six years.
This is the current state of affairs:
Amateur Throats 26 videos last update was six years ago
Anal Recruiters 33 videos last update was six and a half years ago Fuck Me POV 11 videos last update was nine years ago Her First Porn 27 videos no updates in nearly nine years Huge Rubber Dicks 20 videos last update was seven and a half years ago Latina Abuse now called Latina Throats 175 videos. The last update was yesterday, the previous one was five months ago Lesbians Love Sex 49 videos last update was two years ago Monster Cock Madness 22 videos last update over two years ago Sexy Suck Jobs 46 videos last update was nearly eight years ago Sperm Suckers 289 videos last update three months ago
What is up and available is mostly at 1920x1080, 5200 kbps. The balance are mostly 1080x720 2000 kbps, but are remasters of poor quality originals. Files at 1080 are a bit on the large side, so a daily limit of 20 GB is just not working. Complaining to customer service was like talking to the wall.
So you may ask at this point, is the available content worth bothering with?
It may not be what you like as it is most definitely hard, a lot harder than many at PU would like. It is usually misogynistic and messy with some scenes that can only be called over the top. It is a variation on BDSM, but not in a nice way. This aint the type of video you could find on Kink.
Several years ago they moved out of the US, specifically New Jersey. (Note: making porn is illegal in New Jersey) This change is only for legal purposes, as they use the same sets as always in the videos. I can only guess that they are trying to be one step ahead of the fate of sites that have been closed because of their content.
You will find many pornstars here and some even come back for a second time. The amateurs almost never do, as I agree with RA that the video style turns off the models. In fact there are often boasts that after doing a scene here, most will never want to do another porn scene.
Many models have tattoos, hardware and/or breast implants. Further, the male models are mostly heavily tattooed. Many of the women are quite attractive in a non glam kind of way. Since I believe that this network will hire any woman who wants to get a paycheck, many are also plain and ordinary. Any makeup is minimal and there is no effort to hide any defects, such as zits or razor burns.
In my opinion this network has not been improved over the years and is basically an archive of what was once cutting edge in technology and in hard content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discount through PU.
-Comes with a network of 10 sites. Most of them are not updating or rarely do.
-Several A list porn stars. I recognize Amber Rayne, Annie Cruz, Jackie Moore, Cassandra Cruz, Jaslin Diaz, Mika Tan, Max Mikita, Tabitha James, Tia Ling, Faith Leon and Daphne Rosen.
-The best video quality is 1920x1080, 5200 kbps for 22 of 33 videos. The balance are 1080x720 2000 kbps, but are distinctly remasters of poor quality originals.
Cons:
-Only 33 Videos and 32 models as Cassandra Cruz has two videos.
-Has not updated in over six years.
-Daily download limit of 20GB. The site has 18 GB of content however.
-Slow downloads at about 1 MG.
-Many failed downloads that count towards the daily limit.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable screen shots at poor 350x350.
-Dishonest cross sells.
Bottom Line:
This site is about as far away from heartcore as you can get. At the opposite end of the porn spectrum, what you get here are videos that start at direct and hard anal sex. There is no buildup or foreplay. They don’t even use any lube. Hard, forceful rough anal sex like no other site is what they promise and they do try their best to deliver. This material is not for those who are not truly into this type of video as they are not overselling you on just how rough they will get. Consider yourself warned.
In spite of what the models endure on this site, they do manage to get their fair share of well known A list porn stars who are put through the anal mill, to coin a phrase. I recognize Amber Rayne, Annie Cruz, Jackie Moore, Cassandra Cruz, Jaslin Diaz, Mika Tan, Max Mikita, Tabitha James, Tia Ling, Faith Leon and Daphne Rosen. If you are a collector of any of these stars, you probably don’t have any of these scenes. This is merely an add on archive site to a network that is nearly an archive itself. This site has not updated in over six years and the network itself is barely and irregularly updating. There are 10 sites in the network, so the total content is not all that bad, but there are many better and bigger networks on the internet.
The total video count is only 33 and only 19 are of true HD 1920x1080, 5200 kbps. The balance of the 14 videos are of dramatically lesser quality and are remastered from poor quality originals. Unfortunately these 14 videos are predominantly of the porn stars previously mentioned.
There are a few other serious negatives to add to the low video count and lack of updates. The downloads are seriously slow at about 1MG per second. To add insult to injury, the failure rate is about 10 percent, and they count towards the daily limit of 20GB. UGH!!. I complained to customer service, but they were of no help. Since the total content is about 18GB, it should take about two days to download so few videos.
What seriously turned me off though was not this so much, but that they charged me for two trials that were not even prechecked cross sells. They simply charged me for the two trials. If you click on anything on the trial preview page, they will upgrade you to a full months membership. I did not ask for or agree to a trial that entitles you to absolutely nothing at all. Anyone can check out a preview page without paying $1 for the privilege. I cancelled the two trials immediately and asked Segpay for a refund of the two dollars and they agreed. Yeah Segpay!! My feeling is that the site is grossly and blatantly dishonest.
There are just too many negatives to recommend joining. I think that PU should consider delisting the sites owned by the same company, which includes Facial Abuse now called FaceFucking and Ghetto Gaggers. Dishonesty turns me off big time.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network based around multiple fetishes.
- I'll go out on a limb and say this is a network with sites that used to be standalone. The big draw for me was Jerkoff Instructors. It's on here, hasn't updated since 2015, but I lost this content in an accidental hard drive purge. I don't remember it being part of a network when I was a member before.
- You're sure find something you like on this network and probably something that offends you too.
- One of the prettiest, best laid-out sites I've ever seen, but sometimes it does run slow and takes awhile to load.
- There's new updates, but it's not exactly easy to find them.
- Download speeds are very good.
- Goofy, campy porn. Kind of reminds me of 90s porn except they're really trying to convince you of the scene. It's a nice change of pace.
- Pretty models throughout the network.
Cons:
- Where in the hell are the new updates? I have to scan through every single site to find the newest scene from each site. It's not exactly the most user-friendly site.
- You kind of feel like there's a really rich 19 year old who owns this network. He sees October on the calendar and says, "Lets do a Halloween themed site!" Then it stops updating after 8 updates.
- Got me to join for a month, but no new updates on Jerkoff Instructors will stop me from joining again.
Bottom Line:
A few years ago, a site named Jerkoff Instructors became one of my favorite sites. It's a site that features pretty models, sometimes in hose (no panties), stockings (with panties), leggings (no panties). The models then tease, strip, sometimes masturbate and talk dirty to the viewer. It's good content. It's even now fairly unique content. You not only get the tease, panties, see-through hose fetishes in there, but also get the dirty talk fetish too. That was my reason for joining this network. I cleaned out my hard drives last year and mistakenly deleted all of the Jerkoff Instructors content. Bought myself a 4 TB external recently and wanted to add this content back.
The annoying thing about this network is it has a lot of potential. Someone working on this network has a pretty impressive programming background. The site is pleasant to your eyes, content loads as you scroll and they go for high production values, but they have ADD. No direction. No consistency. It really reminds me of that rich kid in college who is extremely smart and talented, but can't make up his mind on what he wants to do. An enigma, if you will.
Several of the sites try to take the angle of the dominating male against teen girl, but they're not rough enough to make it that believable and they're not offensive enough to make it believable either. And the girls are in no more danger than they should be, but they can't even act enough to convince you they are.
I can't really complain about their quality though. They have some 4K scenes, again, I don't have a 4K monitor so those don't matter to me, but they're there.
The majority of the sites do look similar to Kink sites. And are named like Brazzers sites, Teens in Woods, Teen Creeper, Helpless Teens, Brutal Pickups, but that's not to say there's nothing here worth looking at.
I not only appreciated being able to get all of my Jerkoff Instructors content back, but I also found their Footjob Addict site to be very good in a dying niche (It no longer updates either). Strap On Squad is another one I like. It's kind of like Kink-level lesbian scenes, but it stopped updating in September.
I should mention there's lots of tattoos on the models. I've been up and down the debate on tattoos on models and really don't mind them, but I know some people do.
This is my opinion on how to enjoy this network. You have to spend an hour or so finding the sites you like on the network. Once you do that, you can just select the site and download what you want. Until you do that, the network as a whole is a navigational mess. Down the whole main members page is a section for each site with a couple of the site's scenes. Up top in the navigational bar there's a tab for "sites", that's the most useful one. You can then go through each site and find the content you like. If you click "all videos" instead of all of the videos opening up with newest ones first, which is what 99% of sites do, you get a dropdown menu that asks what kind of video are you looking for. The choices are for example:
UHD - Teens,
HD - Bondage, Teens, Foot Fetish, Maledom, Femdom SD - Pretty much the same as the HD ones with a few more added.
If I click "all videos", why is there a dropdown selection box? Shouldn't "all" videos come up? It's again, frustrating. So just stick to using that "sites" tab and go about navigating the network that way.
There's also problems with the way the sites are counted/listed. Just a short explanation:
On the main page it shows 11 sites.
Near the bottom of the main page it shows 15 sites.
On the "sites" tab it shows 46 sites.
Get it together people. I tried to find some kind of logical reasoning behind the differences, but there's not any. Jerkoff Instructors is listed on all three of those locations and it's not updating, so it's not as if the "featured" sites or "top" sites are just newer sites that are updating.
Having complained pretty much throughout this review might make it sound really bad, but if you use that "sites" tab, you'll find quite a bit of unique content that you'll rarely see in this high of a number in quantity. Which should be their selling point to new members. A lot of the sites don't update anymore, but the content a lot of the sites have is content you rarely see. I ended up downloading over 75 GB in 3 weeks, which is quite a bit more than I've been downloading from other sites, at least recently. There's content here that I looked at and thought, "I might want to see that niche one day. I've not seen it anywhere else." I definitely wouldn't recommend it for anyone looking for mainstream content. The newer stuff is more mainstream, but the older stuff is where the value is.
I would recommend it to anyone who liked the Jerkoff Instructors since you can get all of its content here. Also those who are looking for something different. To me, it's a safe join for one month, but wouldn't recommend anything more than that.
Apart from kink.com, there are not many high quality bdsm sites available. For some reason, those sites are either insanely expensive, or they are offering low quality videos... or both. Fetish Network looks like a real exception to this, so I decided to give it a try.
The network is offering a bunch of different sites, each one focusing on one specific type of fetish: bdsm (doh!), spanking, smothering, brutal castin etc. However, many of those sites are dead, just a few of them are updated more or less frequently.
Navigation
The sites are all looking pretty similar, plain black/red layout, lots of stuff to click. Although the design is not as stylish as you could expect it to be in 2016, it does it's job. Browsing is the main issue. There is NO model directory! If you are looking for a specific model, you have to brwose thorugh the entire network update history to find her. Oh, there is a search bow, where you can enter the model's name, but unfortunately, it doesn't work.
Videos
Videos are coming in four different types (streaming or download)
-UDHD 4320p
-Full HD 1080p
-HD 720p
-SD 576p
A 16 minute UDHD video is about 1,5GB large, the corresponding 1080p video just takes 300MB of your hdd. Wait... 300MB for a 16 minute 1080? Right, that's what it is.
Surprise: the "UDHD" videos are actually 720p videos. This is simply cheating and false advertising!
Download
The second big issue I had with this network is the download speed. Sitting on a pretty healthy 60mbit pipe, I managed to get a whopping 200kb/s download speed on all videos, which means a 2 hour download for a 1,5GB file. I though the 90ies are over... little did I know.
Bottom line
This network is wasting a lot of potential. It could be a real alternative to the allmighty kink empire, but the drawbacks are just way too serious to make this happen. For now, my recommendation is to stay away.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large network (44 sites, close to 4000 scenes)
- Wide range of fetish niches covered
- TBP discount
- Updates often
Cons:
- Scene resolutions mislabelled
- Most sites no longer update
- Many scenes are repetitive with a specific site
- Download speeds drop off occasionally during every download
- Huge gap between top resolutions
- Can only advance through the almost 100 pages four at a time (but there is a work-around)
Bottom Line:
This is a difficult network to write a detailed review on because it’s so large and covers a wide range of fetishes. In some ways that’s good, but in other ways it means that many members will find a lot of scenes that they have no interest in.
By no measure is this a small network. There are currently just under 4000 videos spread across 44 sites and those sites cover a broad range of fetishes and offer some subtle differences between the sites within a fetish. The number of sites and the fetishes available are:
• 17 BDSM / Bondage (sites with coercion, kidnapping, rope, devices, amateur, etc.)
• 2 teen (brainwashing, step-siblings)
• 3 spanking
• 6 femdom
• 2 footdom
• 5 smothering
• 3 smoking
• 1 Taboo (step-father – step-daughter)
• 3 legs and nylons
• 1 jerk-off instructions (Seriously? Maybe I’m unique, but I think I have that pretty much under control…)
• 1 girl-girl domme
The update schedule is erratic as sometimes there is a new video uploaded every day but sometimes it can be three or four days between an upload. It should also be noted that not all sites update so if you join for one specific you may not see regular updates at that favorite site for weeks as the updates are spread among all the active sites.
Mbaya did a review of one of the sites on this network (Brutal Castings – which you should read even if you have no interest in that specific site but are thinking of joining the network) and noted that this site was very repetitive. I agree with mbaya and can report that this is an issue with several of the s active sites. Brutal Castings is probably the worst for being repetitive, but it isn't alone.
While no one can argue that the network offers quantity, quality may be an issue for many. The first videos on the site were posted back in 2007 so no one is expecting 2015 standards for these, but they should be better than what they are. For even newer videos many of them are only available in lower resolutions.
A beef I’ve had with several sites recently is that they have a wide chasm between the two top resolutions available. To make matters worse here though, the stated resolutions are far off what is really offered. The newest videos boast an available resolution of 4320p (does that exist yet?) which are actually 1920x1080 with bitrates that vary from 3000-9000kb/s. The next resolution available on newer scenes is billed as 1080p but those only come in at 960x540 and 1500 kb/s. Apart from false promises, this is a wide chasm between resolutions and for someone like me who likes to split the difference between appearance and file size this makes for a tough choice.
Slightly older videos (2013) still say they’re “4320p” but come in at 1280x720. By 2012 the best offered in 800x450 at 1500kb/s. By 2009 and older the resolutions range from bad to worse. Unless you really have a thing for a specific fetish these older videos are generally very poor quality.
Two things worth noting are that you can only advance the page views by four at a time, so if you’re looking to go to page 50 of 94 you’ll be in for a lot of clicking and waiting. The good news though is that you can enter a page number on the URL and go directly to a page. A site shouldn’t make you have to find a work-around just to advance multiple pages though.
The other issue is a bit more of a problem. On every video I downloaded I faced this problem. It occurred throughout my membership and occurred regardless of the time of day or day of the week that I downloaded: the video download speeds varied from very fast to abysmal during EVERY download. I would see speeds as high as 25MB/s and they would drop to 14kb/s for times during the download. Overall, the time to download a scene was about average even with the speeds dropping off occasionally.
One point that may be of interest to some is that the network site called Taboo Sex Diary is done by the same crew that now has the Desperate Pleasures site. For me, who likes the incest theme, this is good news. But the bad news is that these are possibly the lowest quality videos on the site, even though they’re dated 2014. My guess is that they were shot a while ago and only uploaded in 2014. Even though the thumbnails are branded as “HD,” the best resolution available on this site is 480x270 at 700kb/s. I guess their definition of HD is different from mine.
As for a recommendation, I’m really on the fence here. Some of the scenes are good if you’re into the specific fetish but that’s all this site has going for it. There is a TBP discount but considering the full price is $40 and the discount price is $30 it’s still expensive. I realize that fetish material is more expensive to make, but other sites do it better for the same fees. The deal-breaker for me though is the low scene resolutions on many of the scenes. My advice is that unless there is a site, niche or scene you can’t live without you’re better off spending your porn dollars elsewhere.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site has a very large quality amateur content.
-If you were a fan like myself of midnight prowl and fuck team five then this is a great network.
Cons:
-Navigation can be so much better especially a site as large as this one.
-Camera angles are just lousy, either the camera guy is a rookie or it is his intention to keep some of us in suspense w/o a money shot.
Bottom Line:
If you are a fan of British girls that enjoy getting fucked and love quality shot amateur movies this is the site. I do enjoy those dogging scenes. Those are content not shot here in the US unless staged.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
--The 15 different sites on this network try to cover all the sub-niches of panty fetish (up-skirt, young girls, shiny panties, UK panties, etc).
--All but one of the sites have both photos and videos.
--Site navigation is simple, in part because there is not a huge amount of content.
--Some of the material is pretty good--in particular some of the photo sets on Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys
--The flash player gets the job done.
--Photosets have zip files, and are small and download fast (usually in seconds).
Cons:
--One of the biggest problems I had with this site was the generally low resolution of the material, with photos ranging from 900 to 1280 pixels on the long dimension, and as many as one third of the videos below 640 x 480 resolution.
--Many of the photo sets and videos are named using a name that consists only of numbers and letters (e.g. 008ch). To make matters worse, on many of the sites, the models don't even have names. There are no model pages with links to all of a model's sets and videos--you have to find them among the single list of photo sets and/or videos.
--This is archival material that is really starting to show its age (older hairstyles, etc).
--Roughly 50% of the material is non-nude or non-fully-nude.
--The sites have updates, but the total number of photo sets and videos doesn't change, so it certainly appears that they use some type of content rotation system.
Bottom Line:
As a guy who loves to see a hot girl in a sexy pair of panties, I am often disappointed by the lack of attention paid to them on many standard softcore porn sites. So I decided to look around and join a panty site. I don't really like the British approach to "knickers", so I settled on All Panty Pass.
This is a collection of 15 individual sites, each of which focuses on a different sub-niche of panties. The sites are listed below, each followed by 2 numbers: the first being the number of photo sets they had when I was a member, and the second being the number of videos they had (my membership expired about a month ago).
I'll just cut to the chase and say that the site was really disappointing. This is archival material that is starting to show its age. Overall photo/video resolution is low, the file naming system and lack of model names is ridiculous, and the general quality of the panty content is good but not great.
The first thing I discovered when I entered the site and went to Panty Honeys was that a significant number of videos are low resolution. The first 3 I clicked on were all 320 by 240--so small as to be basically worthless. Just as I was starting to think I had been totally screwed, I clicked on one that was 640 by 480. The resolution of the videos is actually quite variable (Panty Honeys had 10 different resolutions among the 66 videos), both within an individual site, and across sites. The best site for video was Jeans and Panties, where they were all 720p. Most of the sites have some 720p, but the amount varies. The 2 biggest sites (Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys) each had a significant number of videos that were below 640 by 480 (20 out 66 on Panty Honeys). The videos are all downloadable with no DRM. The flash player works well and let's you scan through quickly.
The photo sets are the best feature of the sites. They are generally well lit and focused. However, the resolution is low (usually 1280 or 1024 pixels on the long dimension), and many are non-nude. Because of the small size, many zip files are less than 10 MB, and download within seconds.
The weirdest site was the Virtual Panty Girls, which consists of animated photo sets and a few animated videos. It must have taken a lot of time to create this material, but I didn't find it erotic at all.
Navigation is simple, and each of the sites has the same layout. The opening page shows the latest updates and upcoming updates, and has links to pages for all photo sets and all videos. When you go to the photo or video pages, there is a row of thumbnails across the top for individual photo sets or videos (varying from about 5 to 9 thunbnails). There is also a list of number links for the next page of photoset/video thumbnails. Because there are so few thumbnails on each page, there are more pages and clicking than there need to be. Each site also has a link to the main All Panty Pass page, which has links to the individual sites.
As noted above, many of the models are not given a name, and there are no model pages where you can find all of girl's photo sets and videos on each site. This along with the number/letter filenames means that once you've downloaded the material to your hard drive, you really don't know what is what. Forget about a search feature on the sites and network...they don't have one.
About one-third to one-half of the material is non-nude, or non-fully nude. Even though the focus is panties, I do want to see what's underneath, so this was very disappointing.
With the low resolution, aging material, and plain Jane site navigation, the site has the look and feel of a site that is 10 years old. The price was $21 and change for a month, and while I didn't feel screwed, I think they would generate more revenue if they lowered that to $10 or $15 a month.
Bottom Line: There is some content here worth downloading, but the cons outweigh the pros, and I find it difficult to recommend this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Small network with a couple of unique sites
- Some HD scenes
- Photos offered in some scenes
- Photos offered as singles and zips
- Streaming available
- Options available for downloads
- Good mix of known and amateur models
- TBP / PU discount
Cons:
- Three of the ‘sites’ can’t really be considered as such
- Only one (or maybe two) sites MAY be updating
- Some scenes don’t support download managers
- Older scenes are sub-par quality
- May be a bit too misogynistic for some
Bottom Line:
Hardcore Doorway is a small network of ten sites. Most of those sites are relatively small and three of them don’t really deserve to be called sites. Most of the sites haven’t updated in years and the most recent updates cause me to question whether the entire network is dead. The good news, however, is that some of the material is pretty good if it happens to be the kind of thing you’re into.
This network is the one of two affiliated networks, the other being Adult Doorway. AD may be better known since it happens to be home to one of the most abusive, misogynistic sites on the ‘net”: Facial Abuse. The sites on Hardcore Doorway use the same male talent, the same sets and many of the same models, so it shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise that much of the material here is pretty extreme. This is definitely NOT porn for everyone.
The site is made up of ten sites, but I’d only apply that label to seven of those. These are (including some current details):
• Sperm Suckers: 258 scenes, last updated three weeks ago
• Latina Abuse: 135 scenes, last updated almost three months ago
• Amateur Throats: 26 scenes, last updated almost two years ago
• Anal Recruiters: 33 scenes, last updated about two and a half years ago
• Huge Rubber Dicks: 20 scenes, last updated about three and a half years ago
• Lesbians Love Sex: 46 scenes, last updated almost four years ago
• Sexy Suck Jobs: 26 scenes, last updated almost four years ago
So it appears that only Sperm Suckers may be updating. The earlier updates were posted about once a week so I can’t be sure if they’ve stopped given that the latest scene is now three weeks old. It is also possible that Latina Abuse is updating. The update schedule there is sporadic with past updates being posted as frequently as one every three weeks and sometimes just once every five weeks or so. I think it’s fair to say that the others are now dead.
The last update for each of these ‘sites’ was four and half years ago. The reason I don’t think these should be considered sites is because they offer limited scenes, those scenes are not exclusive, there is no scene information available, the scenes are only available as a series of small (20MB +/-) clips and they’ve obviously been abandoned.
I think given the fact that only two sites MAY be updating it is fair to say that no one should join this network expecting to stick around for a while to get more updates. So the question then becomes is this network worth a membership at all? Obviously the answer to this question will be different depending on what you look for in a site, but given that the material on the seven main sites is fairly rare (rough, hardcore anal with lots of genuine creampies and oral cum-play, for examples) and appears to be unique a membership here can be pretty good value, especially if you factor in the $20 price offered to TBP / PU members.
All of the sites (excluding the three non-sites as noted above) use the same simple but effective layout. There are 20 scene links per page in each of the sites and those links open into a separate page where you can stream or download the video. Streaming is in one resolution only, but the latest scenes do offer a lot of choice for downloads. WMV files are offered in 720x480, 640x480 and 320x240. There is usually an option for low-ish quality MPEG and MOV files too. In many of the newer scenes there is at least 720p offered and in a lot of scenes there is 720 and 1080p on offer. The 1080p comes in at 1080x720 at 5000kb/s and 30fps. Each scene is also broken down into smaller clips if that happens to be your preference.
Photos are available as singles and zips and they are pretty good at 1440x960.
Other minor issues are that some of the files wouldn’t queue up for downloading with a manager. But others would queue up. I have no explanation for this and can’t say exactly how many files fall into either camp. The other problem I had was that I fairly frequently got kicked off the site and had to log in again. Both of these are minor, but still frustrating. (Additionally, I always had to log in through the site I joined even though the network join in page was identical AND the network provided me with a link to sign in through the network. That was frustrating until I figured it out.)
So is this site worth the membership? My answer is a tentative yes. Tentative because there are few updates and much of the older material is low resolution, but on the plus side this is porn you won’t find elsewhere, and it is definitely some of the hardest stuff available. Add in the discounted price and I think this network is worth a look even if only for a one-time membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interesting niche material
- Good mix of known and unknown models
- HD available on newer scenes
- Photos available on most scenes
- Real anal creampies in many scenes
- TBP / PU discount
- Part of a small network
- Most scenes have download options
Cons:
- Problems with download managers
- Site kicks you out regularly
- Small site
- No longer updating
Bottom Line:
I’ll deal with the 800lb gorilla in the room first: this site is not for everyone. This is a site affiliated in some way with Facial Abuse and Facial Abuse is well known here as being among the most abusive, misogynistic sites on the ‘net today. Prior to joining this site I knew that there was an affiliation, but was unsure as to how close the connection was. The connection is close enough that this site and Facial Abuse use the same sets, the same male ‘talent’ and many of the same models appear.
First the good news: the scenes here are pretty interesting if you like this stuff. This is not porn that you’d sit down and watch with your wife or girlfriend unless you wanted her to leave you. The males in these scenes go out of their way to make the women feel degraded and abused, both physically and emotionally. For those readers who aren’t into BDSM material there is a vast difference between BDSM and abuse. Sites like those on the Kink.com network might be seen as abusive by the uninitiated but it is clear that the women are consenting and enjoying what is being done to them. At Kink, the models they use seem to genuinely get off on being submissive and those dominating them are actually giving those submissive models a lot of pleasure. Not so with Anal Recruiters. These guys abuse women for their own pleasure and either these female models are some of the best actors in the business or they are genuinely NOT having a good time. (As an aside, many of the models are quite attractive but I’ve not seen them elsewhere. I wonder if shooting for this site turned them off from porn.) The scenes don’t really follow a formula except that each scene involves finding ways to physically and emotionally degrade and abuse the models. Many of the models here seem to be in obvious physical pain. But… to be fair I have to point out that there are just as many who seem to take some enjoyment from their shoot here.
The other good news is that over half of the scenes on the site are offered in HD. (The bad news is that the HD scenes are only offered in WMV format.) Both 1080p and 720p are offered in most cases where HD is available. The 1080p comes in at 1080x720 at 5000kb/s and 30fps.
The newer scenes have download options available, though the standard format seems to be WMV. WMV files are offered in 720x480, 640x480 and 320x240. There is usually an option for low quality MPEG and MOV files too. Then there is the above noted HD option. (I don’t understand coding, but the 1080p files aren’t much bigger than the 720p so those are a good option.) The download options are reduced with the older files. The scenes are also available as smaller clips and streaming (in one resolution only) is also available. You can’t fault the site for providing options for members to access the material.
Photos are available, either as singles or as zips. Regardless of when they were uploaded they come in at 1440x960.
The site itself is small with only 33 scenes. And since it hasn’t updated in over two years I don’t hold out any hope for the site to keep growing. I know that’s an instant deal-breaker for some potential members, but if this is a niche you’re interested in or you want a scene with a specific model (for me it was a Veronica Jett scene…) the site might interest you.
The overall layout of the site is simple, but I found it literally ‘clunky.’ I’m assuming that this is a choice that the webmaster made, but the main page is set up so that when you scroll it doesn’t flow smoothly but clunks along often causing you to overshoot where you want to be. The main page shows the scenes available and you have a link to either the photos or the video which then opens into a new page with the available options for each.
Other problems are that I kept getting kicked out of the site and had to log in again. This may be a means to protect the site, but it is definitely annoying, especially since at one point my password stopped working too.
I can’t conclusively say that download managers don’t work, but I couldn’t use Internet Download Manager to queue scenes. It would work to download individual scenes and it would speed the process up. Download speeds were a bit less than average but still pretty good at 5MB/s on most files.
The site is part of a small network (Hardcore Doorway) which certainly improves the overall value of the site, though any prospective members should be aware that the abuse theme runs through most of the network too. Also adding to the value is the $20 monthly fee for TBP /PU members.
So would I recommend this site? Probably, but only to people who join with their eyes wide open and knowing that the site does at least as much wrong as it does right. This is a rare niche (thankfully!) and if it is something you’re interested in then it is probably worth a look. Otherwise, I’d steer clear.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of content. Some from good studios like Elegant Angel. You can download and have lots of choices for resolutions.
Cons:
Most content is over a year old. The site is not updating much. Once you join to get to the new content you have to buy a "premium" membership at a substantial cost. Overall this site looks like it is a has been ghost town. I would not recommend it... steer clear.
Bottom Line:
There are plenty of better, more honest choices out there. Steer clear.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Pix available in zip format.
- Giant network they celebrated their 5000 scene with a special of a month for $5.
- They often run specials - so watch for deals.
- they only have a little over 20 shoots - but there's great variety in those shoots: MFF, MMF, interracial, POV, Anal, damn near anything else you could want.
- .mp4, .flv, and .wmv formats available resolutions 480p, 720p and 1080p.
Cons:
- Site so far only just over 20 videos
- Dead site: Last update was Christmas 2009
- annoying pop-ups to sell me other sites
- most models have implants (not a problem for me per se but I know some object)
- most scenes are terrible formulaic - right down to the facial in almost every shoot (was that a pun).
Bottom Line:
While I like the concept of naughty country girls I'd like to see a little more variety - every shoot follows the same patter with too much rigor. And while I like a good facial, a little variety would be nice.
Bottom bottom line: If you join Naughty America check out naught country girls, with the shortage of videos it won't take long to find your favorites and leave the rest. I'm still hoping they'll revive the site and update it again.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HD movies are really HD - very crisp, well lit, in focus.
Vast archive - lots of girls - most are extremely pretty.
Good quality sets, costumes, filming (mostly) wide variety of scenes.
No bullshit extras that you don't want, like access to 100 other horrible sites.
Site navigation is crisp, fast and easy.
Cons:
Download speed quite slow - not terrible, but you will be waiting.
While there's a wide variety of scenes, it doesn't go to some places (femdom in particular).
For such a well put together site, it has no user input, comments favorites, forum etc. Not a biggie, but disappointing.
The pictures are all (I think) screencaps. I could do that myself.
Bottom Line:
Best British porn site, ever. Maybe one of the best in the world.
Beautiful girls, professionally filmed.
Vast amount of material, regularly updated.
But, no extras, no interaction and some fetishes very poorly catered for (but some are, like dogging).
On some other comments - I never saw a picset that wasnt screencaps - maybe I just missed some.
Also, HD mp4 can now be downloaded directly.
Agree completely on the model/scene thumbnails - these could be improved a lot.
D/L speed - I'm in the UK and I'm getting 1.6M so yes, location may matter.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It's hard to come up with pros for this site. Is it a "pro" if they are simply performing the most basic duties of a website?
The site is stable. I have never had much trouble logging in or connecting to pages.
I have never found a dead link.
I find their font sizes to be legible without my glasses.
The appearance and layout is functional.
Yes, this is sarcasm, but I am really having a hard time finding a lot to put in this category for them. Here's some stuff about their videos.
You get a choice between "High" and "Low" quality mp4s, or you can stream. The high res stuff isn't bad. Some of it is even HD, but not much.
They do have a pretty impressive selection of categories: BDSM, spanking, femdom, smothering, fisting, smoking, nylon/lingerie, jerkoff instruction, lesbian, and mixed kink (see cons about this).
Cons:
The one thing that annoys me the most is that there is no cross-listing or networking taking place here, and it is literally called the "Fetish Network." You have no real search capability, and if you do happen to find someone you think was really hot in something, there is no way to either find out who they are, or to easily find other videos with them on the site. In fact, the entire interface is definitely a 1990s design. Basically each "Site" under their network opens into a index of thumbnails for videos. The titles are fairly descriptive, but there is no way of knowing what will actually take place in the video. Arguably, this can make the videos more fun or exciting, but in dealing with subject matters such as this (BDSM generally) you kind of want to know what you're in for.
Aside from that, there is a distinct lack of variety. For as many videos as they have, they all just seem to be the same dozen or so, fat, middle-aged men, or whoever, doing the same stuff to girls.
Bottom Line:
This is a site that could be awesome for you if you are really into seeing all sorts of women get spanked, caned, whipped, or titty twisted. That seems to be about 75% of the material. The models are a mixed bag of nuts, some are pretty and young, others are amateurish and/or fugly. The girls doing the jerkoff instruction are all pretty hot, and jerkoff instruction isn't exactly a really prevalent niche, so I thought it was going to be awesome having so many of these videos. Instead, they are all pretty lame, a few of the girls actually know who to do it, but most just kind of model their pantyhose and don't talk that much. So, you can see where something like this may be very tricky. Looking at clips or a thumbnail of videos like these make it seem like they are a lot higher quality than what you get with the entire product. It's kind of like getting duped into paying $15.00 to see Prometheus.
This site doesn't offer much to anyone who isn't really, really, really into spanking, caning and whipping. Beyond that subject matter, it is very shallow. There is a lot of bondage, but you don't get to see a lot of the actual binding. The girl or guy just appears bound. The machine sex is pretty cheap stuff, and they are still really into putting dildos on the end of pool cues. Even when there are hot models involved, the production values are still very low rent.
Not all of the material is original, and stuff like the Rick Savage videos may have been around for awhile already. It is possible you have seen some of this stuff elsewhere. It is also possible that it is just so plain and generic that you think you've seen it elsewhere. They also tend to include duplicates of videos in the various sites.
I don't think a site should get any accolades for basically doing the bare minimum. Clearly someone updates the site, but no one seems to even try get organized. The videos are not enough to carry this site alone. They aren't horrible, but they aren't great either. Some customer consideration could go a long way into at least making the customer not feel as if they have just been scammed. But, unfortunately, once you shell out the money, you are immediately introduced to a site layout that screams "We got your money, what do we care?"
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Best quality British porn around.
Good variety of models, different looks, and most of a decent quality.
Good standard of filming.
Newer HD scenes are of a high quality, and some older scenes have been updated in HD.
Alot of content - I've filled up a 1TB hard drive!
Recent revamp of navigation has made the site easier to get a round and easier on the eye.
Download manager (IDM) worked perfectly.
Cons:
Expensive.
Can be repetitive.
Some of the girls really don't seem into it.
Older scenes are not very high quality.
Some of the 'sites' have discontinued.
Bottom Line:
If you're looking for British porn then I highly recommend this site. It is pricey but is worth it for the amount of content of a good quality. I would suggest a 3 month subscription (the three month option has the third month for free) as there is a lot of content to navigate around.
As for content there is a good variety of themes and of girls - young, mature, white, black, posh, skinny, chubby, big tits, small tits, blondes, brunettes - basically something for everyone's taste. However the camera angles and general order of the scenes can become repetitive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Zips of picsets are available, almost for every scene (and not simply SCENE CAPS called picsets). Makes downloading the whole site a little easier.
* Plenty of HD content, with quality encoding (mp4 h264 @ ~4kbps).
* TONS of content. (I've downloaded 200GB and counting).
* Download Manager friendly (I'm using Internet Download Manager)...scenes have literally sat in the queue for 1+ day and still been good, downloading without error when their turn came.
Cons:
* Older scenes apparently are not being re-released in HD quality, as of yet.
* Standard-definition mp4 clips are badly interlaced (some are downright unwatchable).
* Although plenty of picsets are available, these pics could stand to be higher-quality (read: higher resolution, frame size); like that scene of most American-based production companies and could also include the model posing solo BEFORE the fucking.
* I would like to see faster download speeds, my connection seems to cap out around 830Kbps (my max is around twice this). However, maybe location has something to do with this? As I am on the other side of the planet :?
* $40/mo is kinda steep, but worth of cash if you can afford it.
* No "Favorite scene" feature seen on other sites (ala DogFart, Elegant Angel, etc).
Bottom Line:
First of all, there are boat loads of quality porn here. If you're like me, and love downloading gigs of porn at a time, then I suggest you pony-up the $40/mo and invest in a download manager as well cause the sheer volume of porn available is nearly overwhelming. As of now, I'm nearly at 200GB downloaded and have plenty more to go, I have no doubt of this. Be warned, that not all of the girls on the site have their own little "picture link" when you click on "Our Girls". I suggest you browse through the drop down tab and search there. Also, if you'd rather have an standard-definition mp4 copy of a scene rather than a wmv copy, you'll need to use a download manager and the "copy video from this page" feature. As mentioned above, the standard-definition mp4 copies that have download links on the page are BADLY interlaced, making most outright unwatchable.
happy fapping!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Relatively large network of sites 24 sites, 801 models on the network, and over 1000 total sets on this site alone.
-Many attractive, euro ladies
-Price is not bad if you join the network through this site, not sure why it is more expensive via other entry points
-Good download speeds, maxed my connection at 2MB/s
-Decent variety, hardcore, some midcore, anal, and a bit of lesbian
-Download managers work (DTA), no DRM, logins don't appear to timeout very fast if at all
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Video quality is mediocre-to-good depending on age of the scene, worst I saw was a pretty old Zuzana Z scene that was 384x288 1400 kbps wmv, best 1920x1088 8000 kbps wmv
-Billed through Epoch for me
Cons:
-At least partially not exclusive, seen some of these scenes at other euro sites
-Browsing is pretty bland, there are some site glitches
-Set ratings are provided, but participation isn't high. For some reason when I rated a set or listed it as a favorite, I got logged out, so I stopped doing it
-Older videos have substandard video quality
-Update schedule is inconsistent across the network, and it seems like they may be recycling content
-Photo quality is substandard for most sets I looked at, 1200 pix long end was typical
-Only one video size available for download, on newer HQ scenes file sizes can get quite large, and I would have liked a 720 option that was smaller.
Bottom Line:
Overall, I think this is a decent site, it could definitely use some improvements, but may be worth looking into if you are into mostly younger euro ladies. I would like to note that this review is for the entire network, not just this site (as it is dead, I would probably give this site along a 70), and I am just posting it here since it is the cheapest entry point into the network at this time, and there is no "main site" that I am aware of.
The network itself has a decent variety of material, including old/young, lesbian, group, anal, and even some pegging (I think, I didn't look to close). Most of them are pretty straightforward euro-style gonzo porn, some sites have a bit of setup (like a teacher talking to a student in Tricky Old Teacher, or a dude breaking into an apartment in Horny Thief).
I think it is worth considering if you haven't been here before, although the update schedule would prevent most from hanging around past a month, and the non-exclusivity would likely prevent many from joining again. I enjoyed many of the scenes, like a Pinky June one who is my new favorite no I suppose, and will be adding them to my favorites, although I wouldn't be surprised if I run across them elsewhere further down the line.
If they improved video quality on the older sets, updated their photo quality, and improved navigation and user interaction, it could be a very good site (though not great).
Network Statistics: I Fucked Her Finally - 78 combined photo/video sets (156 total)
18 Virgin - 223 combined sets Amour Babes - 1000 total sets Creampied Sweeties - 68 combined sets
Dirty A2M - 20 combined sets
Horny Thief - 44 combined sets Spoiled Virgins - 211 combined sets
Tricky Old - 128 combined sets
Most of the other sites were 20-30 sets of primarily non-exclusive content so I didn't look at them too closely.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
