| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
351
|
Gentleman Handling
(0)
|
|
09-03-12 08:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Totally agree with you BadMrFrosty - the sites are such poor value I'm amazed anyone uses them.
Maybe if they were very cheap they'd be a good way of previewing videos in full to decide whether to join a site or download an individual video.
However in reality they are so expensive I can only assume people who don't know about regular sites, or for some reason don't trust regular sites but do trust these, are their only customers.
DRM-free downloads all the way for me!
|
09-01-12 02:31am
|
Reply
353
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Do they use an independent biller? If so and you've already complained direct to the site and had no joy, contact them and say you want a refund based on the site not giving you what it promised. They often issue refunds in my experience.
|
08-30-12 09:57am
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never watch it, there seems no point with the censorship. I don't understand it - if they think porn is inherently degrading just ban it outright - the censorship is just porn rendered pointless.
|
08-30-12 09:51am
|
Comment
355
|
Str8 Hell
(0)
|
|
08-28-12 06:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
356
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Superb review - the gold standard I aspire to and haven't yet achieved! I gotta take some tips?
|
08-28-12 04:21pm
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
Only if exceptional, because I like dirty talk and roleplay and language is important in that. I guess in standard porn it doesn't matter, but I prefer some dialogue so it would be an issue for me.
|
08-28-12 04:19pm
|
Reply
358
|
Tokyo Hot
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
I wonder how they do this - I thought Japanese porn had to be censored by law? Perhaps it's okay to de-censor it outside the Japanese market? Perhaps this site isn't available in its uncensored form in Japan?
|
08-28-12 08:10am
|
Reply
359
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
dextro's Comment
I am amazed at the significant minority of sites I keep finding which are download-only. I've only joined one once when I didn't even realise such sites existed! I won't be fooled twice. Streaming sites just aren't worth it to me, especially as many of them charge the same price as download ones.
|
08-27-12 03:24am
|
Reply
360
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Review
Very comprehensive review, well done! Not sure I can suggest any improvements!
|
08-27-12 03:22am
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes absolutely. I won't join a site which doesn't use an independent biller that I recognise and trust - I simply don't trust a site which isn't prepared to do so.
It's frustrating because there's some great-looking sites out there that do their own billing and I am sure the majority are trustworthy, but I don't know which ones and I'm not prepared to take the risk.
I know it might seem obsessive but I've suffered bank fraud twice and whilst I got my money refunded both times, it's made me paranoid. The whole process is a real hassle and very stressful.
Ideally my favourite processor is Verotel, as I've found them the most helpful when I've needed support.
I will also use CCBill, but I find their support less helpful - often dismissive and slightly sarcastic - and of course CCBill offer regional pricing which I hate.
I haven't yet used any other billers, but I'd use Epoch as I've heard them mentioned favourably on here.
Any others people can confirm are safe?
|
08-26-12 04:20am
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I think bottom left, anywhere it doesn't obscure the view too much - and it should be small too - some are way too big!
They should also be static - one or two sites I've seen actually have moving ones which scroll down the screen - really distracting and I can't see why it's necessary.
|
08-24-12 02:16am
|
Review
363
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Incredibly hot, unique content - hottest porn site I've ever seen
* Allows comments/feedback which is responded to
* Safe billing with Verotel or Segpay
* No regional billing that I can see
* Loads of archive footage going back to 2007
* Very good range of guys
* Most inventive scenarios I've ever seen
* Updated regularly once a week on a set date which they stick to.
* 100% exclusive content
* FINALLY AVAILABLE IN UK! YES!!! |
| Cons: |
- Expensive (though worth it!) - $39.95 per month plus $1.95 one-off joining fee if you use Verotel
- No discounts to sister sites
- Concerned in case they start blocking it in the UK again
- Download speeds on the slow side
- Some files have little niggles, like mis-titled or incorrect size files etc. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been lusting after this site for over a year now and been so frustrated when I realised that, whilst it used to be available in the UK, they decided to block it from UK users before I could join. You can see my story about that in my comments on this site, but suffice it to say this studio has a history of abrupt policy changes and my one concern is that they might decide to block this site in the UK again... here's hoping they don't!
Anyway, this site is now on its third name, having previously being called "Molest a Straight" and "Straight Hell".
The theme is the humiliation and domination of straight men by gay men. There's lot of pretty hardcore BDSM and roleplay.
It's incredibly inventive - they use a massive variety of guys and very creative storylines and scenarios. There are more obvious scenes like police officers etc. but what they do to them - such as displaying them as an exhibit in a public art gallery, hiring them out as rent boys, dog training, public nudity and sex, etc. etc. is really hot.
They use a wide range of models, mainly white but with a fair amount of black and Asian guys and lots of different types from 18 to about mid 30s. The top guys tend to be older, but they do vary them and I found the vast majority of the models to be attractive. Most of them act convincingly and many were believably straight.
The action can get pretty intense and includes watersports, spanking, bastinardo, CBT, bondage, verbal, spitting, enemas, and rough sex.
It's also well-shot and believably acted. I enjoyed the pre and post shoot interviews which let you know it was consensual but in a sexy way - they make them recount what happened to them for example - and it means a lot of the actors come across as believably straight. These are seperated from the main movies so you can avoid them if you wish.
It's updated once a week every Wednesday and every updated is clearly dated right back to 2007 so there's lots of content. As usual with this studio search isn't a strong point, but you can search by year or guy and the site is pleasingly simple and logically laid out, though occasionally file sizes and titles are incorrect, which is only a minor irritant.
Video quality isn't amazing - no HD content here. The largest video is a 540x960 WMV file at 25fps and a 2600k rate but they look clear enough. I did find downloads on the slow side. I'm not into photos but each scene does have a photoset - they seemed to be big and of good quality (I downloaded one to check for this review and it was 1200 x 675 in size and looked clear) bit I can't tell if they're vidcaps - if they are they're good ones. No zipped downloads though I'm afraid - it's one picture at a time!
I appreciated being able to comment on the videos and the webmasters do read and reply to them which is rare - and even rarer they do actually seem to take the comments on board for future videos.
Overall this is an incredibly hot, inventive site which is truly unique and has never been bettered by imitators. I had to knock off a few points for the minor flaws but really they don't bother me so much when the videos are so hot.
I really hope they keep this site available in the UK and don't block it again - it's one site I'm staying a member of as its worth every penny of its pricey membership fee.
Overall - a triumph. |
|
08-23-12 11:20am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
364
|
Jason Strong Tickling
(0)
|
|
08-23-12 02:57am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
365
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
|
|
08-22-12 05:28am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
366
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't really like pics so it's not an issue for me, but if I did I think it would be vital. I've seen "photo" sites which just forced you to download them one at a time - it would take forever.
I've never quite got my head around zip files though...
|
08-22-12 05:22am
|
Reply
367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
None - some have some interest in it but don't follow it in quite such a dedicated way!
|
08-20-12 04:10pm
|
Reply
368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
Um fellatio I guess, I'd see what I prefer to see!
|
08-16-12 08:51pm
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes a couple of times. Once I joined one gay site but received a subscription to another straight site instead - no use to me! Another time I joined a site and then when I tried to log in it said it was unavailable in the UK - odd it let me join then!
Still both times the biller was helpful and refunded me in full.
|
08-15-12 03:06am
|
Reply
370
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
lrn2spel's Comment
That is very poor service from CCBill - I am beginning to wonder about them as a biller.
Have you double-checked your spam/junk folder in case the sites support reply went there?
Check that and e-mail the site support once more. If not luck, get back to CCBill and tell them you've already tried the site's support twice and they haven't responded - therefore you cannot access the site and need a full refund.
They have a responsiblity to send you username and password and not to pass the buck if you don't get it.
Let us know how you get on... we need to know CCBill are living up to their responsibilities.
If all else fails I'd contact you card issuer and ask for the payment to be reversed back to you on the basis that you didn't get the service you paid for. I would - after all, if you can't access it but they've taken your money and won't answer your support e-mails, it's fraudulent.
|
08-11-12 02:16pm
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Hey laugh away, I can laugh about it now - I posted it to be funny!
Wasn't so funny at the time of course but hey I learned a valuable lesson!
The guy who recommended it was either a lying sadist or had a dick with much thicker and less sensitive skin on than mine!
I suspect the first - the bastard!
|
08-11-12 10:23am
|
Reply
372
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Sure - I think all ethnicities are pretty much represented in porn. More white people than any other in the sites I go to, but as they tend to be made in countries where white people are a majority it's to be expected.
|
08-10-12 09:30am
|
Reply
373
|
Alternadudes
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Reply
Cool, you can tri me anytime! x
|
08-09-12 03:22pm
|
Reply
374
|
Alternadudes
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Reply
Hey thanks mate! I have reviewed lots of gay sites if you check out my others. Are you bi then? Nice to see someone interested in a gay review!
|
08-08-12 01:24pm
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Looking at it from my perspective, being overweight can suit some big-framed guys, so I can enjoy those. I find sites which focus on larger guys tend to take it to extremes though and get the largest models possible - like with a lot of genres.
I wish they'd stop trying to out-extreme everybody and just focus on hot, quality content!
|
08-08-12 02:48am
|
