Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (0)  

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569)

Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 626-650 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
626
N/A Reply of manholelover's Reply

Or you could say that you get more pound for your pound... Yes, I know that's a really bad joke...

07-11-11  02:18pm

Reply
627
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It absolutely is an excellent value. There are some companies that seem to do their best to make it less so, but thanks to sites like TBP and PU it's a lot easier to avoid those ones.

07-11-11  03:53am

Reply
628
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I write reviews (as well as most comments and replies too) in MS Word. While that allows me to use spell check on them, my usual method is to write the review, safe it and walk away for a while. This allows me to rethink what I’ve written. I’d say most times I find a better way to say something or remember something important that I’ve forgotten so I can make changes.

Also, writing in Word allows me to delay posting so I don’t bump a recent review from the top spot after only a short time. This is just a personal preference, as we’ve discussed in the past.


07-07-11  04:15am

Reply
629
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'd have to have some interest in the site, obviously, and the reviews here and at TBP would have to say that there are no serious problems, and then a discounted price would pretty much seal the deal.

07-03-11  06:34am

Reply
630
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Only semi-related, but I remember someone describing the difference between cats and dogs this way: feed a dog daily and it thinks you are a god; feed a cat daily and it thinks it is a god.

07-01-11  11:32am

Reply
631
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Three dogs. I love cats too - they taste like chicken.

07-01-11  04:23am

Reply
632
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I voted thong, though I suspect that 'other' would have been equally appropriate. I love girls wearing 'boy shorts' underwear.

Fuck it... I'm changing my vote to 'other.'


06-29-11  04:12am

Reply
633
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm not sure that she'd qualify as a 'bodybuilder,' but the fetish model Wenona who does a lot of work on Kink.com sites is certainly more fit than most models and is quite toned and muscular too. She's a big favorite of mine, though I wouldn't normally be attracted to that kind of physique.

06-27-11  11:08am

Reply
634
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm with the 'somewhat important' crowd too. I use searching to find particular models, but I also like the ability to filter for certain themes.

06-23-11  04:10am

Reply
635
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

While I always appreciate a win, I don't usually notice for a while. While the raffle makes things more interesting, it is far from a big motive to hang out and post here.

06-21-11  04:07am

Reply
636
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I guess it depends on how ‘outrageous’ is defined. If the person setting the terms is into softcore solo girl material then I’m guilty as charged. But I also suspect that a lot of what I buy and download would be considered outrageous by the majority here too. I like a lot of BDSM stuff as long as it is clear that the woman is fully consenting. That’s one of the reasons I think that Kink.com is just about the best porn company on the net. I own a lot of stuff from Jim Powers and JM Productions, as well a lot of Max Hardcore stuff. I even had a membership to Facial Abuse which was a bit too extreme for me.

But… if ‘outrageous’ means looking for something that is illegal or even in a grey area, legally speaking, then I don’t seek that out. I may be sick and twisted to some, but even I have limits.


06-19-11  06:19am

Reply
637
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Thankfully I don't have many problems, but those few I've had my preferred means to get them solved is email. Recently on a VOD site that I trusted I used a pop-up chat window and that worked well too.

06-15-11  01:20pm

Reply
638
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

For me the issue isn't what kind of editing, as long as it is well done and doesn't ruin the continuity or mood of a scene. One of the things that really bugs me about some scenes is having a guy and girl start to fool around a bit and then edit to her naked and giving him head. What happened to her clothes? Seeing a woman get undressed or be undressed is a favorite thing of mine.

Back in 2006 Smash Pictures did a video called "Moving Violations" where they didn't do any editing. The camera and sound was turned on and the talent did their thing. Nothing got cut. It was interesting to watch, and I would have like to see a small series developed from it, but it did underscore the need for some editing.

And as for the fake moans and groans overdubbed on the scene - those have to go.


06-13-11  01:44pm

Reply
639
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I answered “yes, definitely, but for me, the better question would be “how often do you come across porn that causes a new fetish?”

I can still remember (though the details are lost in the mists of time) when I discovered small breasts. Every guy, it seemed, was into big breasts, then one day seeing a petite lass with small breasts in a porn flick changed that whole outlook for me.

More recently, starting a few years ago, one of my stranger fetishes popped up. That would be seeing women have some liquid poured on them. It probably started with Alex Sanders’ series Tappin’ that Ass where he begins each scene by pouring honey on the models as foreplay to the actual scene. Naturally then, the Elegant Angel series Big Wet Asses is a favorite too – with baby oil being used in liberal quantities.

Developing out of that I watched some of Jay Sin’s work with Evil Angel, particularly his Milk Nymphos series, where a lot of milk is used. This series led me to develop some new anal-themed fetishes too, of which I have no shortage (weird insertions, gaping, milk enemas, fisting, etc.). I’d have to say that Jay Sin is probably my favorite director working today. I just wish he had more material.


06-07-11  04:25am

Reply
640
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What's available on the site is the most important to me, followed by how easy it is to get at that material. I really don't care about site design as long as it doesn't get in the way.

06-03-11  04:05am

Reply
641
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't buy the stuff anywhere, online or not. But if I ever had the urge, I'd probably buy online.

06-01-11  06:24pm

Reply
642
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have a bit of a foot fetish in real life, but have no interest in footjob stuff. Like most of you, I think the real interest is in what that foot is attached to.

05-30-11  06:37pm

Reply
643
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Agreed. And it usually raises the quality too. Being a guy just makes things so much easier...

05-29-11  07:40am

Reply
644
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'd never say 'never,' but it would be pretty unlikely. In the unfortunate event that my bride were to leave me or die, I'd rent from then on. It's cheaper in the long run.

05-28-11  05:16am

Reply
645
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

"All of the above."

05-26-11  03:41am

Reply
646
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The bad ones are pretty obvious. And 'bad' includes a petite woman who pushes the envelope with size. But I have a hard time telling if the properly proportioned ones are fake. It isn't like the old days with noticable scars.

Still...DON'T DO IT LADIES!!! PLEASE!!!


05-24-11  03:42am

Reply
647
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm not a big fan, mostly due to the limitations that it has. It isn't the best format for showing the girl off at her best. Having said that, while I don't actively seek it out, I have and will download it if the model is one I normally collect.

05-22-11  06:33am

Reply
648
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

Put me down for 'no' too. The convenience of downloading porn (legally and with payment) is just too great to overcome. But I have nothing against DVDs except that the price of adult DVDs is bizarrely out of touch with reality. I've commented on this before, but with most adult DVDs running at $40 how is anyone buying them. Unless it was Tanner Mayes finally doing anal. Fuck being rational then. I'd be like a kid who still believes in Santa at Christmas. While tuned up on massive amounts of sugar.

As for magazines, those are something that I haven't bought in a while. They're just too hard to store discretely. The last time I bought a magazine was maybe three years ago when I bought a package of two out-of-date magazines from an adult shop. For $10 I got two magazines. The problem was that while one of the magazines was Hustler or Club or something like that, invariably the second magazine was always something like "Hairy Fatties" or "Chunky Asses."

Not to drag this out more, but on her last birthday my bride asked for a Wii game console. As a joke, to demonstrate how out of touch I am with the modern world, I thought of buying her a copy of Oui magazine (assuming it still exists). Given that my young neice and nephew would be around for the gift opening I figured the humor woudl be outweighed by the anger. Stupid non-porn people!


05-21-11  05:43am

Reply
649
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Well, one advantage to being the first to respond to this is that I get to bask in the warming glow of the blue line that says 100% of respondents think there can never be too much anal!

05-18-11  03:13am

Reply
650
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It appears that we're a fairly representative group. I'd like to think that we accept the different tastes that others have.

05-16-11  03:56am


Shown : 626-650 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 1.76 seconds.