| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Just wanted to congrats on 500 freaking reviews! As usual, great stuff in the review. Keep on truckin'.
|
08-11-21 11:44am
|
Reply
2
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
There is more than just the content for Tricky Masseur. Part of the issue I think is that I've been combing through the earliest posts on Wowgirls and I think they used a lot of the TeenMegaWorld content just to help this site get jump started. So, for the earliest 1/3 of the hardcore content, I'd say it's pretty much all from the TMW site. You could very well be right as to the overlap of the more recent content.
I happened to notice that the 18xgirls is now closed. I used to join that site a lot and I believe that content just got wrapped into Wowgirls which is why I seeing so much duplication compared to my collection.
|
01-28-20 06:21pm
|
Comment
3
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
01-28-20 10:48am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
4
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Thanks for the review on this. As a clarification have they eliminated all the photo sets or have they just stopped adding photo sets to the newer updates? I know they still did pic sets here a year or two back.
|
06-20-19 09:54am
|
Reply
5
|
Kavya Sharma
(0)
|
Reply of
simmionline's Comment
Have to say that I don't recall seeing an ad for foreign escort services appearing at PU before. Love the gutsy yet clueless ploy. However, just pointing out to admin that they need to delete this post and probably this site from PU / TBP.
|
04-19-19 11:48am
|
Reply
6
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
Reply of
Jimmy Regina's Reply
Why does this webmaster still have an active account here. Offering free memberships is against site policy not to mention trollish behavior in general.
|
03-23-19 10:26am
|
Review
7
|
Blacked.com
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ 345 scenes of exclusive interracial porn
+ All scenes have vids in 1080 HD and pic zips
+ Good download speeds for me (5mb/sec)
+ Good selection of video download options
+ Pic sizes are 2000x3000 pixels
+ Top end production values
+ Mostly top female talent and the focus in on the women
+ Grabbed this membership on a $10 per month TBP holiday special
+ No download limits that I could tell |
| Cons: |
- Only updates 1x per week
- Canceling membership is a pain in the butt
- Prechecked cross sale on signup
- Site doesn't play well with Firefox browser
- No model information
- Tags are pretty generic and don't allow for much of a search
- Site would be better with a network
- Scenes are repetitive in how they're shot and edited
- Fewer photos in the more recent photo sets
- Pagination issues (manually type in page you want to jump to) |
| Bottom Line: |
I took a stab at this interracial site based on the holiday price that was offered a while back. While I can't say I was disappointed I can't say that I was blown away either.
The production values are top end with great lighting and video. I was glad to see that unlike other interracial sites that have a lot of talking during the scenes by the male talent this one is more subdued, focusing on the white lonely housewife or the come of age girl wanting to explore the black side. Most of the talent here is A and B list variety and surprisingly doesn't feature a ton of tattoos on the women (the dudes are another story). Most of the women are generally in the 18-25 range and quite attractive without too much enhancement.
There is some anal and a few DP scenes but it's mostly straight M/F sex with more of an emphasis on the girls enjoyment (I'd call this midcore porn as opposed to the heartcore or really hardcore stuff). So you don't get the relentless pounding or the screaming and/or dirty talk all the time which is good.
The main problem is that the scenes get repetitive real quick. The same general scene set up with the same positions and camera angles. Pretty much every scene is shot in a high end bedroom. The scene build ups are pretty short too, not gonzo but not far off either. While there is a lot of good quality stuff it sort of wears on you after a while.
Here's some more technical info:
PICS: All scenes have pics with zips and all photos are 2000x3000. The production value is top end. Very little stripping or scene build up in the pics, usually a few pose shots then it's straight into the action. The earlier photo sets generally have a few hundred pics while the newest material only has around a hundred pics. As is usual, there is generally more action / positions shown in the video than on the pics. You can also view the pics in browser and can explode them up to full size.
VIDS: The got all the bases covered here, you can download from 4k on most pics all the way down to 270 for watching on your phone with about 6 total size options. All of the sizes looked good on my screen and had good stream rates. While I almost never watch porn on my phone I did view a few vids this time and found it streamed really well and I had no navigation issues at all. The in-browser stream function worked really well with limited buffering. The vids from the last few years also have jump indicators on the time bar where you can jump to specific types of action. Download speeds were good for me at around 5mb/sec on a consistent basis.
NAVIGATION & SITE FEEL: I had problems getting scenes to download using Mozilla. I switched to Chrome and had no problems afterward.
There is a model directory but pretty much zero model info. Most of the talent here is A and B list variety and surprisingly doesn't feature a ton of tattoos on the women (the dudes are another story). Most of the women are generally in the 18-25 range and quite attractive without too much enhancement.
Pagination is an issue here as is the search function because of limited tagging.
There is some advertising on every page and an annoying “Notification” icon which merely tells you that they have a new update and can't seemed to be cleared or turned off.
You get standard prechecked cross sale on signup. The biller here is Rocketgate which I don't recall using before. My main beef with them is that you have to email, live chat, or telephone to cancel your membership. I tried canceling by email several times to no response and no success and then spent 15 minutes on live chat to accomplish the deed.
Overall, I have to say it was a pretty good site. It would be a lot better if the operators combined some or all of their sites into a network (they also run Blackedraw, Tushy and a few others). While the production value is great it just sort of left me feeling a bit ho-hum at the end of the day because of the repetitive nature of the scenes and probably because I like my sites a tad more hardcore than what they do. I echo what Exotics4me said in his review in that those who are newer to porn will probably really like this site given the production while those who know what appeals to them may be left wanting a bit. Still, it is on of the top interracial sites in my book and would recommend taking it for a spin for a month or so. |
|
02-21-19 05:51pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I said "weed" just because it's getting legalize everywhere. However, I'm sorta surprised there's never been a reality series take off where pornstars get put together and get voted off the island aka Survivor or Big Brother.
|
08-21-18 12:22pm
|
Reply
9
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RadioRikRoss's Reply
Sorry but I can't help you there. I've been a member several times over the last 5 or so years so I last downloaded any old content years ago and didn't even really look it this last go around. I'd suggest posting a comment on the "Brazzers" PU page asking your question, I'm sure you'd get a fairly quick reply.
|
08-08-18 12:32pm
|
Reply
10
|
Sex Babes VR
(0)
|
Reply of
Onyx's Review
I give you an "A" for effort on trying to show how you weighted your review but it is a bit hard to read at first (it took me a minute to see what you were trying to do).
I've occasionally thought that PU might want to develop a template to give reviewers the option of doing a "quick review" by just assigning a number to a few criteria without having to manually type out your thoughts. Something like that might be good for newbies who are intimidated by having to spell it all out.
|
03-02-18 10:33am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Poll
Mmmmm. A web site primarily dedicated to people who look at and talk about porn (an illegal subject in many parts of the world) wants to limit discussion about politics? The smell of hypocrisy and college "safe spaces" antics is just a tad too overwhelming for me on this one.
|
02-14-18 11:03am
|
Review
12
|
Brazzers
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ 8,000 exclusive porn scenes with updates 2x per day across 33 sites (only 17 currently update).
+ A wide variety of porn from teens to milfs, almost all hardcore, featuring most every US porn star you know.
+ 1080 sized vids going back to 2010.
+ Decent navigation though the site is a bit plain by today's standards.
+ In browser video streams are fast and smooth and the scenes have tags where you can jump to the type of action you want.
+ Good sized pics (2500x1660) going back to 2009 and a lot of them (about 500 per scene). All pic sets have zips.
+ Most scenes supply some sort of story line as opposed to the usual gonzo offerings of most sites.
+ Discounts through TBP (I got a $10 per month holiday deal).
+ No DRM or download limits.
+ Professional production standards for most all scenes. |
| Cons: |
- Prechecked cross sale on signup that's not entirely obvious (look at the top of signup page in a separately colored box).
- Uses Probiller for billing which isn't great on support.
- Lots of ads throughout the site.
- Slow downloads at times (don't use Firefox on this site).
- Lots of tats, botox and cosmetic surgery on the talent.
- A lot of overlap on the sites, no real distinction between most of them.
- Pics are basically HD screen shots from the videos so the quality is sometimes iffy. |
| Bottom Line: |
As most everyone knows, Brazzers is a classic hardcore mega porn site that offers something for most everyone at a decent price. The emphasis here leans more towards well known porn stars with big boobs and milfs doing straight sex, anal and most every other position. Not a lot of lesbian, group sex or DP scenes if that's your thing. It's basically your local diner that will fill you up but won't wow you. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: All scenes have pics with zips with 2500z1660 sizes going back almost a decade. Pre-2009 sizes drop to 900x600. The in browser viewer for pics is antiquated (can only view pics at 800x530 resolution). You get a ton of pics per scene (usually 500+) which can really means a lot of shots of the same thing. The good thing about all these pics is that if you like softcore photos about one half of the pics per set are the before pose shots where the girls start fully dressed and then strip down to nothing so you can build you own softcore galleries if you want. The action pics are screen grabs which are usually good quality but some scenes are way too dependent on a macro / fisheye lens setting which warps all but the center of the image and bad cropping (scenes where the models have no arms / legs). As usual, the videos typically show more action content than the pics.
VIDS: I liked the in browser options for vids. You can play them at various speeds (.5 to 2x) and numerous resolution (phone to 1080). For the last several years, each scene has jump tags where you can click on the type of action you want to see and the video will jump to that part. Streams were fast and smooth. I had pretty good download speeds for me (1-3 mb/sec) but this varied on time of day; during evening prime time things really got slow to the point I gave up a few times. MP4 is the main video download format and they look good. I downloaded a lot in 480 resolution to save space and they look fine on my 22 monitor.
NAV: Navigation on a site this big works best if you go site by site as opposed the ginormous main update page where pagination becomes an issue. The individual sites look outdated but at least most everything works. There is a model directory which seems complete. You can also tag scenes, save favorite scenes, leave comments and rate scenes. They have a search function based on general categories or tags which seems more inclusive than most sites but still isn't close to complete.
I will note that I like Firefox but even with the most up to date version getting pages to load was terribly slow at any time of day. I resorted to Chrome which worked a lot faster here.
Probiller is not my favorite processor. You can only cancel via phone or email so plan on canceling at least a few days in advance. Customer service is a bit spotty too.
There is a certain lack of male talent here. There are only a handful of guys that appear in most scenes so if one or more of them turn you off then there's a lot you may not like.
Personally I'm not into the whole big butt / big breast thing (hell, I even saw butt implants here) but (pun intended) there is something for most everyone who likes hardcore. I like that they at least put a story line on almost all the scenes, not as well as other sites but it's an improvement over straight gonzo. The overall scene and production quality is not top end but it's better than average which pretty much sums up the site as a whole. |
|
02-01-18 12:15pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I look at the question from the perspective of sites that charge you more just to be able to download. So far I've avoided them but I'm guessing at some point this year I'll bite the bullet and do it.
|
01-03-18 01:47pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've done a few of these but I've always checked out the terms of use before doing it. Often you have to cancel immediately after you sign up to ensure you're covered. Don't really do them any more since most sites of any quality don't do them much.
|
11-23-17 02:39pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
While the male talent is unlikely to make a good scene great it can definitely make a good scene go bad. The latter usually involves guys who think they are the real star of a scene.
|
11-15-17 11:50am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
The best way to drop your IQ by a few dozen points is start reading scene comments. However, if you're looking for cheap trollish entertainment just start leaving negative comments on a really good scene and watch people explode.
|
11-13-17 10:24am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Man, I am so looking forward to buying some new socks!
|
11-08-17 11:04am
|
Reply
18
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
One of the things I have advocated members to do in the past when faced with spammers is to give the newbie member a negative trust vote. I tried to do this recently and noticed that I couldn't give a negative trust vote, only a positive. Amanda might want to check on this.
|
10-24-17 11:34am
|
Reply
19
|
Sensual Pain
(0)
|
Reply of
Jsnatch's Review
A sudden burst of newbies posting fake content about German Goo Girls and now suddenly this place? Clearly not a review by any means.
|
10-23-17 10:29am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Gotta be cell phone for no other reason than you can get a land line and answering service for home and mooch cell time from others when you're not at home.
|
09-19-17 12:07pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Part of my work goes into fixing the aftermath of office romances gone bad. So, what's good for me is probably not so good for you.
|
09-15-17 02:49pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Apparently people who don't write reviews don't answer poll questions either.
|
08-31-17 12:46pm
|
Review
23
|
X Empire
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Currently $15 a month through TBP.
+ Access to HardX, DarkX, LesbianX and EroticaX sites (785 vids and 1525 pic sets across all the sites).
+ Attractive, mostly American pornstarlets (teens to 20's mostly).
+ A variety of sex and setups. You probably won't get too bored.
+ Professional staging and production values.
+ 7 video download options from 1080 down to 160 (no 4k).
+ All pics 1920x1280 at 96 dpi.
+ Good download speeds for me (3-5 mb/sec). No download limits.
+ Good looking sleek site design.
+ Model directory appears complete.
+ Options for leaving comments and rating scenes.
+ Exclusive content with daily updates. |
| Cons: |
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Uses a credit card processor my card company didn't like.
- Photo sets and videos are found in separate categories and most don't cross link. Photo set file names are just numbers.
- Until about May of 2017, photo sets were split into 2 separate updates: Glam shots and the Sex scene.
- Basically no model information.
- A fair amount of tatoos but not too bad on the amount of implants.
- Not all scenes have pics and vids.
- Navigation needs some work. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'd been thinking about joining one of these sites recently so when I saw that they had finally put all of them under one roof for $15 a month I jumped on it. As stated, you get access to all four of the X sites. For those not in the know, here's a brief autopsy on what each site gives you:
DarkX: 198 pic sets, 102 vids. All hardcore site featuring mostly white girls with the usual overhung black talent. A lot of anal and some dp here. For whatever reason, the girls featured here tend to be a bit curvier than the other sites (most models appear on most of these sites).
HardX: 880 pic sets, 450 vids. All hardcore with a mix of everything going on. Probably a bit more hardcore than a run of the mill hardcore site but not much extreme. Again, a fair amount of anal. Also, a fair number of BTS vids.
EroticaX: 406 pic sets, 210 vids. All hardcore with the heartcore or couples vibe going on. I liked in that the couples seem to put more effort into the scenes here than most heartcore sites. Very little anal and no dp action.
LesbianX: 40 pic sets, 22 vids. Self explanatory.
PICS: All photo's come in at 1920x1280 (or vice-a-versa for portrait) at 96 dpi and all photo sets have zips although the zip file names are just a number. The photo's are almost all shot very well with limited pixelation and generally good focus. When viewing in browser I wish they would put all the pics on a single page, some sets can have 15 pages of pics. Until you get to late 2015 / early 2016 the number of photos tend to be skimpy (20-40 usually). After that the pic count jumps up to about 100-200 per set or more. I wish they would have had more full body shots on the sex scenes than they did. As usual, the videos have more content than the pics but not by much.
My biggest beef with the pics is that until a few months ago the Glam shots are separate from the sex scenes which is unnecessary in my book. Also, the photo sets are separated from the videos and most sets are not cross linked so you have to search through the pics separately. Lastly, the photo sets are not date stamped but the videos are I'm guessing this is a new site snafu.
VIDS: I had very good download speeds for me. I liked the 7 download options (1080 down to 160). I found myself downloading a lot of 540p vids which look just as good as most 720p vids you see on other sites. The vids are all well shot and lit with high production values. They do have good file names for the downloads on the vids. You can watch the vids in browser (7 stream rate options) which is fast and pretty smooth with minimal buffer time when jumping around. There is preview popup icon on the the time bar when streaming which worked pretty well for all but the oldest vids.
NAV: The site looks good and has a sleek feel. You can view content by each site or overall (all pics or all vids) but you do run into some pagination issues on the latter. You can also watch dvd's although all it does is show which scenes are in a particular dvd. There are tags on the scenes but as usual I found them to be too generic to do a meaningful search. There is no model info but there is room for rating scenes and leaving comments. The biggest bugaboo here is the separate photo and video sections. I found it easiest to look things through going site by site.
This site bills through chargepay.net and is supported by something called openlife. Right after I joined I got a fraud alert text from my credit card company which I had to clear so that wasn't cool but I had no other issues joining (still have yet to cancel).
Overall, I was impressed with the site. While most of the girls are known commodities there is lots of stuff to see and almost all of it is well shot. As a picture lover, I wasn't thrilled with some of the picture issues but it certainly wasn't a deal breaker. At the current price, which I suspect won't last long, it's definitely on the must see list for most hardcore fans. |
|
08-17-17 01:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
24
|
Private.com
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Over 6,000 hardcore and lesbian scenes of mostly exclusive hardcore porn
+ A lot of attractive euro girls, mostly teen to early 20's with a few MILFs as well
+ $15 a month through TBP
+ No download limits
+ Good download speeds for me, about 2-3 mb/sec
+ HD files are not excessively large but no file size is ever given
+ Get to see a lot of porn stars, especially early in their careers
+ In browser playback is mostly smooth and you have different stream options
+ Allows for comments, saving scenes as favorites and rating scenes
+ Updates 6x per week
+ Mostly high production value, lots of exotic or unique scene locales too
+ About 90% exclusive content or at least Private media exclusive |
| Cons: |
- Prechecked cross sale
- Support is a bit questionable
- Almost, but not quite, a site for picture oriented porn geeks
- Limited model info, model directory not complete
- Search functions limited and scene tags are too broad for a decent search
- File names are terrible
- About 40% of content is not HD and there's some psuedo-HD as well
- Some scenes get repeated/recycled, especially early on
- Cannot download 4k vids, only stream them
- Just because an update occurs today doesn't mean the scene was shot recently ... or even this century (I'm not kidding).
- Lots of anal and dp if that isn't your thing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This incarnation of the Private website started in 2010 and consists of 251 pages of updates as of August 2017. This site is really a tale of 2 halves. Keep in mind that the date a scene is posted is not when it was shot. Thus, the oldest 125 pages is mostly content shot in the 90's or early 2000's on VHS and converted in 480 digital format. Ouch! Because Private was mostly about producing porn in exotic locales a lot of the early scenes suffer from poor lighting, poor sound, not so special special effects, tons of shitty background music, and the then European obsession with endless closeup shots. Because some scenes were shot in a foreign language Private decided to have the dialogue and sex sound overdubbed on some of these. I challenge you to not laugh as a low quality, poorly lit scene streams hideous overdubbed sex sounds from a double penetration with smooth jazz blaring in the background. Some early scenes get recycled too.
Things finally change with roughly the updates from 2013 onwards (the most recent half). You get HD vids on most updates. By 2014 you start getting reasonable picture counts with sizes coming in at 1600x1060 (96dpi) with some sets getting up to 1500x2300. 4K vids arrive in late 2015 but you can only stream at 4k, not download. They also get away from the obsession with closeups and some of the ultra exotic locales in favor of more set work with higher production values.
Here's some specs:
PICS: Not all scenes have pics (even recent ones) and most are at 1000x1500 (96dpi) with 1600x1060 sizes or larger coming since about 2014. The pic count offered by TBP and the Private is exaggerated. The early scenes only offered a few dozen pics at best and the majority of pics are mostly the obligatory pre-scene pose shots. Starting around 2012/13 you get more scenes with reasonable pic counts (80-200 per scene) without the endless posing. Like most sites, the vids typically show more action than the pics. All scenes with pics have zip downloads although file names are just a series of letters and numbers. The photo viewer sucks though, you only get 8 pics per page and have to frequently jump though a lot of pages to see if you want to download the zip. Pics aren't always in order either when viewing in browser or opening the zip file. The pics tend to be good quality but limited size makes this an iffy site for pic lovers.
VIDS: As noted above, a lot of the early content is just old standard media shots or VHS shots converted into 480p. 480 is only download option for about 40% of the content, otherwise you have options of 480, 720, 1080 or phone. HD comes along in 2013 but, suspiciously, you have 720 or 1080p as options no transition from 720 to 1080 or i to p on the HD. I didn't dig into this deeply but given the age of some of these scenes there is no way they could have been shot at 1080p. Thus, my claim of psuedo HD on some scenes applies. Download speeds were good though and the file sizes were reasonable I download mostly in 720 and half hour scenes were usually 500-700 mb. Scenes range from a few minutes to almost an hour, most fall into 15-30 minutes.
Navigation needs some work. Pagination is limited, but you can manually adjust for page numbers to jump around as needed. Model info is limited. Tags are too generic for any meaningful search and some scenes are mislabelled or tagged as well. As noted above, the picture viewer needs work. The inbrowser stream player works well and has the pop-up screen shot available on the time bar for most videos although how well it works varies from scene to scene. Really the only way to view this site is to page by page.
You signup (less prechecked cross sale) through rocketgate. To cancel you have to submit a support ticket. I was canceled within minutes but I did a confirmation email. Private also makes pretty clear that they don't do support.
A lot of the older content is endemic of what Euro porn used to be: closeups, background music, actors looking at the camera, and very male-centric in that the hot girls are really just willing props with an orifice for you to stick your meat into them. Often, if it went into one orifice it was going into all three. More recently it's a lot more reflective of what you see on DDF, 21st sextury and teenmegaworld. I stunned to see some heartcore type as recent updates. The scenes also have more of a story arc (no dp's within minutes of a girl meeting 2 strangers in the woods) and less emphasis on exotic locations and more on production value. While the production value rises some of what made Private Private has disappeared. It's less focused on exotic locales and scenes with lots of hardcore action and is now more generic in that the scenes now look like they could be shot by any of the major Euro companies.
Overall, the site gets most of it's points from the fact that there is so much content. It's too big to fail but could be better. |
|
08-07-17 03:06pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I enjoy it but just not the herky jerky hand held camera movements that too many of the sites rely upon. A separate camera operator is really needed to make it work right.
|
07-31-17 11:39am
|
