I don't have anything to say in regards to the comment, rather this is more of an issue for Amanda. Namely, why are we letting producers post comments about their own sites? I got no problem with web owners and producers posting away in the forum, I just don't want to create a precedent for a bunch of shill posts in the "Comments" that drown out PU consumer generated comments.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ No cross sales on signup, bills through ccbill.
+ Tons and tons of average to good looking amateurs and teens, slightly more US girls than Euro girls. Not many tats and very little silicone.
+ Get to see early and exclusive scenes of starlets before they became famous.
+ Mostly exclusive content (I'd say about 90%).
+ Good download speeds – about 2-3 MB/sec which is good for me.
+ Model directory seems complete.
+ Decent sized photos (1500x1020 or better) for 90% of the sets.
+ Multiple daily updates – usually 7 per day.
Cons:
- Purely a softcore site now, hardcore stopped about 2 years ago.
- Navigation and search are functionally worthless.
- Website design hasn't changed in well over a decade.
- Primarily a photo site due to poor video tags and search function. Though many photo sets feel incomplete.
- Not all pic sets have accompanying vids.
- Most scenes are pretty generic and they get repetitive.
- No secure login on website.
Bottom Line:
TK Galleria originally stood for Amateur and Teen Kingdom and was a small site I occasionally went to when I first started being an online porn hound over 15 years ago for interesting amateur content. In another fit of nostalgia, I decided to venture back in time and see what was new since I was last there over a decade ago. In short, “nothing is new” which is not really a good thing.
The website looks like it did years ago which is not good when you got thousands of scenes. What they do is post daily updates and then about once or twice a month they group all the newest updates into galleries, each of which has multiple subsets, and post the galleries in numerical order. This is where the problems start.
Beginning with photos, they have photos split into hardcore and softcore galleries, although it doesn't matter since the content is the same for each. If you want to download a hardcore photo gallery it's not uncommon to find that the scene has been split up. For example, you might have to search the following categories to find all the pics from a scene: action, blowjob, foot fetish and a pose file. In short, the only way to functionally go through the site is to go model by model because all these subcategories can be split into multiple categories in multiple galleries for a single shoot. The downside is that if you only want certain types of scenes, you have too look through all the models to find what you want. This is due to poor or inconsistent tagging or nonexistent tagging (earliest scenes). It's only been in the last few years that the tagging has been better but with content going back to 2006 that excludes a lot of scenes. As an example, the site has 359 “action” scenes listed (meaning m/f hardcore), when in truth that covers about 25% of the hardcore content. Also, be aware that the starlets name used on this site may not match her name on other sites although the big stars do seem consistent.
With movies, it gets worse. If you click on the movie link you a 370 page list of movies in order of release. If you search by tags, know that there is only a single tag per movie (example, “toys” or “action”) so that's not much help. Again, model by model is the only way to go if you want to find anything beyond generic listings. The oldest vids have no descriptors or anything to indicate what's in them, just a model name with download options and sizes. They seem to have made the leap to HD around 2013 but there is very little 1080 and no 4k. You often don't know if you're getting 720 or 1080 until you actually download the video and look at it. Download options are mostly limited to mobile, standard and hd. For recent movies the stream function is smooth and has multiple resolution options and you can jump. For older movies you have to wait for the scene to load before jumping ahead.
While the production values are good there is nothing overly inspired or fresh here. They outsource all their production and have a stable of regular contributor producers. That said, things can get repetitive since some photographers shoot everything with the same few backgrounds with the exact same poses every time, especially with the hardcore.
If you're into softcore amateur photography and want to find some gems, it's not a bad site if you are willing to hunt and peck your way through tens of thousands of scenes. I did download a fair number of photo sets but I know that I'm going to have to piece together a lot of separate files in order to create a "full set" for my purposes. The reality is that this is a site that's been running behind the times for a long time and with the amount of content they have the cracks are really starting to show. Other sites do a better job with organization and have better production values so I can't really recommend it other than maybe a one off membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 30 site network with a lot of exclusive content in many niches (about 3200 scenes – about 85% hardcore) with a lot of Eastern Euro girls you won't see elsewhere.
+ Good download speeds (about 2-3 MB/sec).
+ Newer content has 1900x1080 vids and pics going up to 3500x2300.
+ Bills through Epoch.
+ Lots of cute “girl next door” Russian models with few tats and almost no implants.
+ Zip files for pics
+ In browser stream works well though I had to lower the resolution on newer vids to get smooth playback.
+ TBP discount is $20, half off the regular price.
Cons:
- Of the 30 sites, only 4 are currently updating and only about 6 have updated in the last 5 years.
- The vast majority of content is dated in terms quality (vids are mostly 520x280 and pics 1200x800).
- The photoviewer is clunky to use.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup and a tricky signup button.
- Only updates about once a week and about half the updates are nonexclusive.
- On nonexclusive content, model names are different than from other sites.
- No real model info though the directory seems complete.
- Not enough tags for any real type of search beyond each site or all content
- A lot of the content has an amateur production feel but it's not terrible.
- What little conversation there is in the vids is in Russian.
- Site overall is pretty repetitive in terms of content and how it's produced. No real reason why there are so many sites when the content frequently overlaps.
Bottom Line:
Full disclosure: I joined this site knowing what I was getting into. I had previously joined this site over 10 years ago (it was under a different name then) and sort of liked the photo content but one of the files I had with the content got corrupted. I also recognized a lot of the newer stuff as Teenmegaworld content on the previews so I basically joined in a fit of nostalgia. And nostalgia is what you get. With so few sites updating the vast majority of content is 2008 or earlier. The net effect is cute Russian lasses sporting underwear that was probably the height of fashion in the Soviet era; sets featuring fine hand me down furniture that only a gulag worker could love; and in the videos, scenes so lacking in sexual intensity and chemistry that it makes you believe the whole country was filled with sexual atheists then. Because so much of the content is old, you also get lots of fabulous electronica music scores that play throughout the whole scene.
What I'm effectively saying is that unless you enjoy lower resolution vids with the sound turned down that is primarily a picture site provided you can handle mostly 800x1200 sized pics. Still I kind of liked it because the girls are mostly ones you don't or didn't see elsewhere and they are pretty cute, having that eastern euro “girl next door” look and they aren't all tatted and siliconed up. Here's a quick run down:
PICS: Like I said, most fall in the 1200x800 size and all scenes have pics with zips. There are roughly 100 scenes in total that have larger sizes. As usual, a lot of the pic scenes don't have as much content as the vids.
VIDEO: Again, due to the lack of updates there aren't as many 1080 scenes as the low rez 520x280; probably a few hundred scenes and some of those are just standard rez scenes enhanced to HD sized. The early scenes have a lot of music throughout and the action isn't very hot. All dialogue is in Russian and only a few vids have subtitles.
NAV: Navigation is fine if you go site by site as opposed to viewing all the updates across the network when you run into pagination issues. Tags are worthless because there aren't enough of them. Model info is basically worthless. However, the stream function works fine and downloading is easy. Video download files need better naming too.
Signup can be a bit tricky. There is a prechecked cross sale and the actual sign up page, there are four boxes outlining the payment options and a box below that says “Create account for 30 sites”. If you don't click the monthly membership box above the “Create account” box, the confirmation page will want to automatically sign you up for a year in a manner you may not catch. I almost got burned by this.
With the lack of updates and the large quantity of older low rez content, unless you're a photo collector who is willing to tolerate a bunch of 800x1200 sized pics of cute Russian girls banging away it's probably not worth joining. The exception would be if you're into old/young content as there is a good amount of that that's exclusive and not all low rez. So, if you want to revisit the internet porn world from the early 2000's, this is a good place to do it.
Again, like most I think space is the issue for me in that I stick to 720 most of the time. The difference between 720 and 1080 isn't great enough to justify the extra 3 gigs a scene. My preferences would be different if I watched porn on a big screen but watching on my monitor is plenty for me.
I also have Comcrap. I was wondering if you knew for sure that they slow download speeds or are just guessing? I've also seen the same issue with slowing download speeds and just thought it was more on the websites end as opposed to the middleman.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Scored a $10 Black Friday monthly membership from TBP (currently $18)
+ No cross sales on signup. Bills through Epoch.
+ Mostly attractive US models on the main sites.
+ Very basic web design but it works and getting around is easy.
+ Decent download and stream speeds
+ Good production standards (usually).
+ Good streaming video function in standard, 720 or 1080 for most vids.
+ Almost all scenes have pics and vids.
+ Good mix of known pornstars and amateurs.
Cons:
- This is a four network site and the only one that has any reasonable amount of content is Fuckedhard18. The rest are throwaway sites.
-No model info, just a girls first name. Limited search due to funky tagging.
- Limited updates (Fuckedhard18 no longer updates).
- Most pics are 1020 x 680 or less so it's not really a pic site.
- Fuckedhard18 is highly repetitive in its use of the set, shooting angles and “plot” development.
- The whole site is pretty much an advertisement to buy porn from other sites.
Bottom Line:
Like many Americans, I was still tripping on turkey tryptophan when I scored a cheap deal on a Black Friday and quickly came to regret the quality of my purchase. I sort of like the massage themed stuff which is what Fuckedhard18 is but I got pretty much caused me to abandon this network fairly quickly. Well, let's just break this network down by site since that seems like it will cause me the least amount of pain:
Newgirlpov: A 15 scene vanity project for the guy shooting it. Girl gets interviewed, screwed a little, dances in her undies to music and has more sex with the dude who makes her call him “Daddy”. Every actress gets a perfect score in the ratings categories the producer lists on every scene page. Yay, participation trophies for all. Just a few pics associated with the clips here. Nothing here you haven't seen done better elsewhere.
FuckedhardGFS: About 100 scenes of mostly pornstars posing and having sex in about 1/3 of the scenes. Hasn't updated in years. More amateur in terms of production value. Interesting but the quality is only OK.
Bangable: About 200 scenes of random amateur chicks in various states of undress dancing and prancing to music in video scenes that mostly 1 – 3 minutes long (almost no pics). WTF? The only thing that could have made this site enjoyable was if Rick Astley's “Never Give You Up” video came up in the background of every scene because to even call this erotica is just a Rickroll.
Fuckedhard18: About 350 scenes and no updates. To describe one scene is describe every single one. Girl walks onto cheapo massage parlor set, strips and gets interviewed by massage dude about pointless stuff. Guy fingers girl, they have sex in 4 or 5 positions while the guy sometimes still chats with her and gives onscreen direction (aka – no romance factor and little connectivity between the actors). Every scene is pretty much the same and involves the same positions and camera angles. The fact that every scene looks and plays out the same sort of killed it for me. Granted, the girls are good looking and some of the sex was OK but it wasn't enough to overcome the monotony for me.
TBP lists pics here as 1500x1020 but that's only for about 10% of the scenes. The rest feature 1500x1020 shots of the model posing but all of the action is shot in landscape mode and only reaches 1020x680. All scenes have zips.
I downloaded very little video so I didn't really track the specs on the vids and can only say they seem decent. No problems streaming or jumping around in a vid while streaming. The video download options are sometime weird: sometimes you get mp4 and wmv options, sometimes one or the other. I found that the “HDUltra” download option is 1080, the “Mp4HD” is 720 and anything else is either 480 p or standard def.
Be aware that there are 22 sites listed in the pull down menu on the homepage. At first it looks great cause it shows Wowgirls, JulesJordan, JoyMi and others. The downside is that there is about 10 scenes for each of these sites and the quality available is less than you get from those actual sites. Basically, this networks seems to be geared towards generating cross sales to these places.
Overall, this site seems like it's dead or dying and you're better off saving a few pesos by skipping this one unless you're really into massage content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ $10 a month thru TBP (you can renew for less than that going through cancellation)
+ Bills through Epoch
+ Almost 7900 scenes of hardcore porn going back over 14 years over a 40 site network with thousands of porn stars (big emphasis on American babes)
+ All scenes have pics with zips and vid downloads sized from postage stamps to 4k monsters
+ Updates about 10-12 times a week
+ Navigation is pretty easy
+ Access to VR content without paying extra
+ Streaming vids have the small pop up window showing what action is occuring where when you move across the time bar.
+ Professionally produced content with good lighting and generally good production values
+ There is “live show” content that has been archived for those who like that stuff
Cons:
- Cross checked presale upon signup
- Ads, upsells and (new to me) offers to text with favorite porn star (cause you know all she's doing is waiting for you to send her a dic pic)
- Download speeds vary a lot, from acceptable (2 mb/sec) to 1990's call me in 3 days when the download is done (single digit kb/sec ... yes, that's “kilobyte per second”). Steaming at even the lowest resolutions can be challenging a times too.
- Things get real repetitive real quick. Very little imagination or originality here. Just a generic hardcore site.
- 40 sites on the network but the only two themes are co-eds and milfs.
- Lots of tats and lots of silicone.
- Some sites are dead and most only update sporadically but given the over all uniform nature of the site it's too big of a deal (the sites aren't really niche specific)
- Obviously, the oldest content isn't nearly as good in quality as the more recent stuff.
- Have do a “check the boxes that apply” captcha every log in (challenging for my IQ).
Bottom Line:
So, let's face facts. In short, given the sheer volume of downloadable porn at your finger tips you really can't go wrong for a $10 monthly membership. Hell, I spent more than that on a 6-pack at the store the other day. However, unless you're used to sipping the low end crapola (beer or porn, doesn't matter) you're gonna get tired of this place in short order. Yes, you do have some cuties in the form of co-eds and some mighty fine milfs but the lack of originality and repetitiveness of the scenes kill the fun fairly soon (Look! A big chested tatted up gal getting it on with the neighbor checking the usual position boxes. Repeat ad infinitum.) Toss in the god awful download speeds that rear their ugly head in seemingly random times and you won't be spending month after month here. Here's the details:
PICS: I have to say that pics are actually one of the highlights here for me now. The early stuff (start to early 2013) is only 1000x670 but after that it jumps to 1300x900 and then to 2000x1600 in 2014. Do note that the 1300x900 pics almost always come in 150 or 300 dpi so they're effectively twice that size or more assuming you adjust your pics for 72 dpi imaging on your display. As usual there is generally more action in the vids than on the pics. It isn't uncommon for the pics to not really have anything to do with the video scene either which is fine by me (2 for the price of one in my book). A minor beef is that once the resolution size jumps up to 1300x900 or more you get a lot of pics (often 250-400) but you get dozens of pics showing the same damn thing which gets annoying while creating unneccessarily large zip files (500 mb isn't uncommon).
VIDS: I know that my computer and my wireless router aren't setting any speed records but, as noted above, this place can make dying of boredom a real possibility at times. Assuming you get a decent connection the viewing ain't bad though. They claim 1080 going back to about 2009 but some of that I think is suspect since they have been remastering some older content and they claim you can download that in 4k … in other words all you're getting is lower end video fomatted as 1080 or 4k. However, within the last 4 years everything seems good. You can download the short 5 minute version in quicktime, you got mobile downloads, wmv clips and full length, and full length 480, 720, 1080 and 4k. You can stream in 480, 720 or 1080 although a few sites had problems loading streams for me. You also have roku options that I didn't use. VR comes at no extra charge but the VR scenes only come in VR, no 1080, etc. The vids look good even at 480.
NAV: Navigation is not a total disaster here like it often gets on networks of this size. The best way to go is go through by site or by model. A few sites have a lot of pages but you can manually enter the page number in the url to get where you want faster. All scenes are dated. There is model directory that seems complete but has almost no useful info (lots of stars born on January 1, 1600) and the same dreadful lines are used to describe every starlet (“she has a body made for porn and is ready to f*ck”).
Like I said, there isn't a lot of originality going on here. It's all single camera action with the usual set ups and usual positions. There is a little POV but mostly standard shoots through and through. There's very little of anything other than white booty with big tits and tats grinding away. I have to agree with Exotics4me and his review (always read his reviews) that it's about 2/3 milf action and 1/3 co-ed action.
If I had categorize this site in two words it would be “Brazzer's Lite” - you get a lot of the same looking girls but without the production value and less originality (if you can call Brazzer's original but that's a story for another day). For me, this place gets an 81 mostly because of the crapola download speeds I suffered through. Still, for $10 a month, I'll probably come back again in a few years.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ 750 hardcore scenes of attractive nubile aged porn featuring a good mix of Euro and American girls (what's not to like). Also a good mix of pornstars and relative unknowns. Mostly b/g content with some lesbian and 3 some. Limited anal / fetish content.
+ All scenes have pics with zips and at least 720 HD video (Half the scenes have 1080 sized vids).
+ Almost all exclusive content.
+ Numerous download options for vids and numerous playback options for streaming. The site also remembers your stream preferences.
+ Good D/L speeds for me; about 1.5 - 2 mb/sec.
+ Some interesting niche sites like Petiteballerinas and several milf + younger girl on boy sites.
+ Bills through CCBill.
+ Mostly professional production level porn with good lighting.
Cons:
- Streaming playback was choppy for me at HD levels, had to resort 640x340 size for smooth playback.
- Only updates about once every 3 days.
- Limited model info.
- Tags and categories are bit too limited for a site this sized.
- There was a stretch of a few years where most of the models and scenes were basically teeenmegaworld / 3xgirls content (not exactly duplicates but the same models and style of shooting).
- Could use more dual camera work and some of the scenes do lack a bit of passion (just going through the motions). Limited story lines / plot if any.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup page and you can't chose your own password and username.
- Model names for the Euro girls, especially on older updates, is sketchy. File naming on downloads is also poor (no names, just numbers or scene names).
Bottom Line:
In a nutshell, this is the hardcore version of nubiles.net. Pretty much all the content on nubiles will be found here minus the softcore / solo stuff. Thus, what you get is banging hot young bods in banging action. Exoticsforme did a good review recently so I'm not adding a lot here other than to mostly echo what he said. Here's the skinny:
PICS: All scenes have zip downloads available. About half the scenes have 2400x1600 sized pics while the newest half (late 2013 onward) go up 5760x3480. As with most sites, there is usually less going on in the pics here than with the vids. As usual, most pics are just HD video screen grabs but overall they look pretty good with limited pixelation. Most scenes also have screenshots to view. In browser viewing is at the 2400x1600 level.
VIDS: Starting in late 2013, you get 6 download options (1080 down to 480). The other half (2013 and earlier) at least have 720 vids. Good production qualities overall with good download speeds. In-browser playback a bit choppy at HD levels for me. Limited dialogue and plot lines in the vids. Most vids 20-30 minutes long. The 1080 sized vid files can get overly large (3-4 gigs).
NAV: In a word, "meh". The easiest way to download (short of DL manager) is to just go through all 50 pages of the nubiles-porn site. All updates are listed on there. As a short cut, note the scene number you left off at and hand type it in when you next log in to continue. The tags and categories are too general to be of much use. There is "public tags" section here which is new to me but is worthless are it's mostly douche bags saying "hot girl needs anal". The model directory seems complete but has almost zero info on the girls.
OVERALL: Despite my usual gripes about sites this ain't bad. I pretty much go what I expected at a decent level of quality without too much hassle.
Do note the following: Most of the updates come in two sites: PetiteHD and Nubiles-porn. The other sites update just once a month. DriverXXX no longer updates and was stupid anyway with poor quality (the driver / male has his face digitized out in the vids but not the photos, give me a break).
A lot of the Euro girls are shot by the same guys who bring you Teenmegaworld / 3xGirls so if you don't like their stuff be warned. I did come across a couple of scenes though that already occupy my hard drive.
Most of the scenes are farmed out so quality can sometimes be a bit iffy (Teacherfucksteens has really poor sound quality).
Most of the scenes are shot using a single camera and single mic which is usually static and can be a bit dull after a while. There is some POV style shooting in the scenes for those interested in that.
If you're wondering if you should join here or nubiles.net, it doesn't matter. You have access to all the sites through here and price is the same. If you got time, browse the nonhardcore babes too as there's a ton of them (multiple daily updates).
Overall, this is a good quality hardcore teen oriented site. The action can be a bit repetitive or uninspiring but no real complaints. Gotta like that in my book.
Quick clarification. I think I saw someone mention that when MetArt took over they took down all of the older Viv Thomas hardcore content. Just wondering if that was the case or not.
Great review and pretty much sums up my declining interest in the heartcore genre. Another point that makes heartcore less interesting is the fact that most producers marry heartcore to the gonzo genre (no real lead up, just two people suddenly appear on your screen and start to go at it) and the fact that if you're shooting for an international audience you can't have much dialogue which diminishes the final product a bit too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Prior members look for occasional $10 a month memberships in your in box (otherwise $20 a month)
+ Access to the DDF Network of sites
+ Over 1000 scenes of mostly exclusive eurobabe hardcore action with updates roughly every 2 days.
+ Bills through Epoch
+ Very good download speeds (consistent 2mb/sec for me)
+ Excellent navigation
+ The last few years have 1920 x 1080 resolution vids. All scenes have zips but only in the max picture size.
+ Good model directory that seems complete and shows the tags associated with that model.
+ Pics come mostly come in 2000x1300 rez.
+ Professional high end production value.
Cons:
- About 20% of recent updates is "guest content" that only allows you to stream a video supplied by another site.
- Some older vids (I'm talking 7-10 years ago) don't have working streams even though it's indicated as available.
- Some content recycling (about 3-4 times a year).
- Some "Hidden" content that you can only find via the model directory (my guess is that it's waiting to be recycled).
- Searching via tags is, as usual, not really worth your time on a site this size.
- Quality still very good compared to other sites bit appears to be slipping a bit.
Bottom Line:
I was going to do a review on the whole DDF Network but exoticsforme just did a very complete review so I'll just focus on this site as it's the main reason I keep coming back to the network.
As you'd expect, DDF puts out high quality product and this site is no exception. Here's a quick run down:
PICS: All scenes have pics and zips but zips only come in one size (max rez). The oldest stuff is not worth it at roughly 500x800 rez but most everything the last 10+ years is 2000x1300 or 1600x1000 (for the older stuff). They've cut back a bit on pic count recently - usually topping out at about 100 while a few years ago they'd push about 150. My only minor beef with the most recent pics is "photo density": meaning you get a decent sized downloaded pic but the file size isn't that large. This is fine for monitor viewing like I do but for those who watch on their big screen tv's the lack of pixels will become apparent.
VIDS: The new stuff is very good at a very high bit rate (see the TBP review for more specs) and definitely HD but does not truly qualify as 4k. Download speeds are very good. Recent vids have 4 download options plus stream. For the last 2 years or so the stream function also has tags that let you jump to specific action in the vid with pushing the bar which is nice. With the exception of some pretty old vids the stream function worked well. The oldest content here lacks vids (yep, back in the day when pics were all you got - tells you how far back they go here).
NAV: Some of the best navigation I've seen in a while. You can select a site and search by update, year/month, or by tags. You get 20 scenes per page and you can page jump easily. Click on scene and the vid is on top. Scroll down and you get the first page of pics (you can easily go forward back on the pic pages without reloading the whole page). It saves you a lot of clicking and opening scenes in separate windows which is a nice change.
Overall, you really can't go wrong here if you're into hardcore. The only real downer is the more frequent use of stream only guest content and the occasional recycled scene. The last few years feature a fair amount of anal content if you're into that. I've noticed that they've expanded their stable of photographers (aka - "outsourced") which leads to some variation of scene quality.
Otherwise it's a good mix of b/g and multiple partner eurobabe porn (yes, the vids are in English although it's struggle for some actors). Not too many tatoos and not too many fake breasts which is a nice break too. On it's own I give this site an 89 but when you add in the network with multiple daily updates of high quality nastiness you're easily into a score of 90+.
Welcome to PU Bummsi. I'm from the US so I may not be directly on point but you shouldn't have a problem joining a pay site here that's listed here at PU. All these sites must be compliant with age verification and record keeping. While these types of sites emphasize "young talent" you shouldn't have to worry about getting caught up with possessing underage porn or violating decency laws (at least here in North America and Western Eurpoe) when you join reputable pay sites.
Trust me when I say that there's a lot "harder" stuff out there than the content on Teenmegaworld and the Germans have a reputation for publishing a fair amount of the that hard stuff (BDSM, pissing, fisting, etc.). Some countries like the UK and the Ukraine have laws about what kinds of porn can be shot or produced in their countries I'm not aware of any Western European countries that ban the viewing or possession of the type of the stuff you're considering.
I'm one of those who regularly approach the character limits but I don't mind the current limits. If figure if I'm going over the limit I'm probably just ranting too much or not clearly saying what I'm trying to convey. Nothing wrong with having to edit your work.
If you've been around this stuff for a while you pretty quickly figure out what you like and don't. When have limited time on top of that you tend to stick to what you like. At this point I don't think there's much new that would grab my attention.
I'm currently a member and I can tell you that Horny Milfs and Inked Girls are just compilation sites from existing DDF material (a niche site for those who are looking for this type of content without digging through all the tags).
Fuck in HD is a separate site (looks like a mix of DDF, teenmegaworld and some other stuff) and not included in the membership. Same goes for DDF Adventures, Girls in Love and DDF Cams. All four of these are listed under "Other DDF Sites" on my site page.
With my membership I count 9 sites plus the two niche (aka "repeat") sites for a total of 11.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ 4,000 interracial hardcore scenes spread over 23 sites covering a variety of niches. All scenes have pics and vids.
+ Bills through Epoch, easy cancellation.
+ Easy navigation and it works.
+ Most pics are 1000x1600 or better and come in zips.
+ Tags work and model directory seems complete.
+ Lots of fetish content (cuckold, bukkake, glory hole, etc.) if you're into that. Probably about 20% anal content overall.
+ Wide selection of girls (teen to 50+) and includes porn stars to amateurs.
+ Production value is mostly good.
+ Good file naming for organizing downloads.
Cons:
- Updates are spotty. Only 3-4 updates per week over the whole network, some sites go months without updates. Only a couple of sites update once a week.
- Late coming to the party with HD pics and 1080 vids not starting until 2013. Site also claims it shoots in 4k HD but there are no 4k downloads available.
- Some sites are very repetitive in theme and shoots.
- Lots of racism and misogyny, especially in the earlier years. The whole IR thing is overplayed to me.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Site is a bit slow. I never had download speeds cross the 900 kb/sec range.
- Had some issues with the inbrowser video player on a few sites - couldn't jump ahead in the video playback, had to reload the page a lot in order to get it to work.
- Almost all scenes shot using a single camera and mic which is a bit disappointing at times (Show me what's going on!).
- Large watermark in lower right hand of pics regardless of what it covers up, a few sites use multiple watermarks.
Bottom Line:
As the most interesting man in the world says, "I don't always spend $30 a month on porn, but when I do, it's spent on watching on monster black dongs doing unspeakable acts with caucasian women". If you haven't guessed it already, the main theme here is interracial porn featuring black men who ... well, let's just say that to call them "well endowed" is like saying the MVP of your favorite sports league has "some talent".
Blacks on Blondes is the headliner with scenes going back 12 years but the main focus of this 23 site network is having white women encountering these black goliaths. The remaining sites have only started in the last 5 to 6 years. As noted above, there is a fair amount of cuckold, bukkake and other fetishes explored, some (watchingmydaughtergoblack, watchingmymomgoblack, and cuckoldsessions) more watchable than others (theminion is almost unwatchable - literally "food porn"). There are also a few sites with feature girls dedicated to shagging only black men (SpringThomas, RuthBlackwell, etc). Overall, a good mix of girls in terms of age and looks and situations although I will echo the point one recent comment made in that the quality of talent seems to be ebbing a bit in the last year.
PICS: All scenes have pics with zip downloads. The earliest pics are just too small (only applies to blacksonblondes). The 1000x1600 sizes appear in 2007 and the 2000x3000 in 2013. Most sets come in with about 150-200 pics. As noted, the watermark(s) are unnecessary and too big. Most pics appear to be screencaps which means you have to deal with some blurry shots or overly narrow focus fields which is par the course now a days. In probably 80-90% of the scenes, the vids have more content than the pics.
VIDS: Current vids have 4 mp4 download options (1080 being tops), and one large wmv file. All scenes have in browser viewing with a popup showing what action happens when along the play bar. 1080 doesn't start until 2013 and 720 starts about 2007. Have to admit that even the earliest videos looked good on my screen. I had no issues with downloading but I don't use a DL manager. There are no 4k vids which are advertised on the home page.
NAVIGATION: It's easy and it works. You can only search by each site but that works for me. They have a page jump function for each page on a site and you get 5 scenes per page. Model directory is complete and covers the whole site. Tags are a bit general as usual but work.
OVERALL: This was mostly enjoyable site with decent content. One main beef is that, with the exception of the most recent year or two, when you put 2 or more brothers together in a scene they can't stop yammering on about whatever. The early blacksonblondes shoots also feature an off camera "interviewer" who won't shut up either.
A lot of the sites are overly repetitive in their shoots. For example, in Interracial pickups you know the guy will start with the guy driving in his car talking about the weather and what positions each girl will do when and how the photo shoot will look. Not a deal breaker but annoying after a while.
However, if you do get bored with the scenes, just read the scene comments. Between the outright misogyny, racism, and juvenile directing hints you'll feel like the most enlightened person on the planet. A lot of the shoots (especially the earlier ones) overly emphasize the whole IR thing and there's generous use of the "N" word by everyone involved. As with most sites, when you start getting multiple guys on a girl, the girl quickly becomes nothing more than a sex object. Not unexpected given the nature of this network but outdated and overplayed in my book.
There is webcam advertising on every page and the few "extra sites" aren't worth looking at. There are also 2 gay sites associated with the network but I didn't check them out.
Despite my complaints I still give this place an 85. Tons of content in various niches, lots of girls from smoking hot to totally not (most models are attractive) and generally good production value. I downloaded more than I thought I would going in. Probably one of the better IR sites out there but if you're not sure if that's something for you then at least you know what you're getting into.
Imagination (by either the author or reader) is not the same as reality. While shouting "Fire!" in a crowded movie theater is not necessarily protected speech, writing "Fire!" isn't going to get the same reaction. Two different beasts in my book.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
