| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Hey Exotics: Just wondering what the current pic size is right now. I was a member a few years ago and just curious if they've boosted their pic dimensions at all.
|
02-17-10 03:51pm
|
Review
302
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Currently 305 scenes available, all with pics and vid
+ Newest max vid sizes are 1900x1080 with most maxing out at 1280 (smaller for the oldest stuff)
+ No DL limits and Downloadthemall DL manager works
+ Awesome $20 initial join fee (dropping down to $10 after 2 months) through TBP.
+ Access to 25 other sites including ClubSandy and PixandVideo right away.
+ Excellent search engine with 25 filter categories.
+ Model directory spans the whole network
+ Exclusive content with no apparent recycling
+ Loads of hot euro babes taking it where the sun don't shine (all HC content).
+ Professional photography and video with very good lighting.
+ Wide variety of content (MF, DP, Indoor/Outdoor, etc.)
+ Average sized watermarks in cornor |
| Cons: |
- Only 1 update per week
- Pic sizes are too small given the overall quality of this site.
- Some problems with downloads not coming through.
- Some problems viewing pics in the browser
- New site design is fine but navigation could be a bit better
- Logging in is a major eye strain (their teeny sized authorization letters you have to copy are almost impossible to read)
- Some of the action gets a bit rough and/or mechanical
- Some nonworking links (not many though and mostly individual pictures) |
| Bottom Line: |
If you can't even handle watching your dog/cat lick it's butt, then this site is probably not for you. It's all hot looking euro babes taking like champions where the sun don't shine. Here's the "scoop" (not to be confused with scooping your animals poop):
PICS: All pic sets have accompanying video (and seem to match the video in terms of content) and all sets have zip. Excellent quality with only a little air brushing from what I can tell. Bad news, pic sizes are only 1280x850. On average, you get between 100 and 180 pics per set with most pics being 250-300kb in size. Why do sites always seem to do this; getting hung up on video while neglecting their photos standards? These sizes don't cut it any more. Also, when viewing photos individually in the browser, I found that the landscape shots get cut off with a monitor setting of 1080x720. They have an up/down slider bar for portrait pics but no right/left slider bar for landscape. WTF?
VIDS: As noted elsewhere, newest max size vid downloads come in at 1900x1080 with most on this site being 1280 by 850. You can stream in browser at L, M and H and download in L, M and H in either .wmv or mp4 settings. File sizes on full length vids vary from about 2 gigs on the newest and largest to about 40 MB on the smallest. Each scene has 10 scene screen caps with scene and full scene download/stream options. Almost no music in vids and I haven't found any scenes yet with direction cues being shouted out. I did have a few problems with some vids just not downloading correctly and having to redo them.
They have redone their navigation on 21sextury so now after you log in you get a page that looks like a blog almost. It's easy to jump around but it takes a few clicks to get to what you want if just trying to find, say, all of the scenes in a single site. Once you get used to that, their filter system on the search engine is one of the best I've seen but the scenes aren't tagged very well so relying solely on the search functions will leave out some of the goodies that should be included.
Unfortunately, the action sometime gets a bit over the top with chicks just being pounded up the poop shoot because the shot calls for it. While these hot euro babes take it well, there's still a difference between just taking it and actual acting (same with the guys too). The overriding theme here is the anal action doesn't seem very spontaneous or a taboo thrill. The action can still be hot but it's just not all I hoped it would be.
I'm scoring this site an 87 on it's own. I'll be working a review on the whole 21sextury.com site soon, probably scoring the network in the low 90's. If you like butt sex, this is one of the best sites I've seen out there. Considering the network you get and the great price (after the second month you only pay $10 a month for a recurring membership) you simply can't go wrong in my butt ... er, I mean book. |
|
02-17-10 03:46pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
303
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Reply
Just checked it out and it seems to be working now. I'll be signing up in the next day or so on this one. Thanks.
|
02-16-10 03:25pm
|
Reply
304
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Again, so long as they are not posting multiple reviews every single week they don't really get any suspicion from me. In fact, it makes sense to save up a couple of reviews if what you're trying to do is maximize your odds of winning something in the weekly drawing. I could see someone joining maybe 5 or 6 sites a month on a realistic basis; beyond that I would start to have suspicions about their reviews.
|
02-16-10 03:17pm
|
Reply
305
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
I just tried linking into the site from TBP and the promo price you guys are advertising is not listed. Additionally, it says there is access to 25 out of the 40 sites but does not list the sites one gets for this offer. Thanks for letting us know this (potential?) offer, Ken.
|
02-16-10 03:14pm
|
Reply
306
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Well, for starters, I figured most PUers would be glad not be on the receiving end of my b.s. Second, I would have to find some poor saps willing to suffer my existence in the internet. Third, if PU/TBP went away, a lot of us PUers could probably band together and start our site similar in nature. We all have review experience and know what a good consumer site should look like. Rick's loss would result someone elses gain ... maybe one of us?
|
02-16-10 03:06pm
|
Reply
307
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
That would be great news indeed. Although I'm not much into tracking individual models, she is one of my favs and one of the few starlets who have managed to stay incredibly hot for years. If true, I'd be looking at heading back there in a few months once she starts adding content again.
|
02-12-10 12:37pm
|
Reply
308
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
What's worse is when they get all the extreme fake cum shots (gallons worth). A wet t-shirt contest from girls gone wild is more entertaining.
|
02-11-10 03:35pm
|
Reply
309
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have to say that it's more of a fetish thing. I think most of us just fast forward through those sections to get to the stuff we like. Rarely does a hand/blow/anything-job get much more than a going through the motions (literally) treatment so I just take a pass on it.
|
02-11-10 03:33pm
|
Reply
310
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
One of the better PU reviews on this site that otherwise gets way too many reviews.
|
02-11-10 03:28pm
|
Reply
311
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
On a genetic level, it is only men who are truly bisexual because we all got the XY chromosome thing going on.
|
02-11-10 03:25pm
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Over the years I've noticed that my initial thoughts are perhaps a little more sexualized than what they might have otherwise been. However, it's usually just a second and then it's back to reality. You're not going to get too far with the ladies if you're a total perv about it.
|
02-04-10 01:50pm
|
Comment
313
|
Cute Couples
(0)
|
|
02-03-10 12:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
314
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Wow, I didn't realize that people didn't have cells in this day and age. I finally ditched my land line a few weeks ago and have gone solely cell for business and personal use.
I'm with most people in that I see no reason other than to damage my eyes for downloading to a cell. However, as time goes by I might see a reason in the future. For example, if cells get bigger memories you could DL during the day and then transfer to computer at night. The only way I see stand alone cell sex working is if they can integrate it into some killer gaming or similar typed apps.
|
02-02-10 02:13pm
|
Reply
315
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm into uniforms and lingerie somewhat because it's different than the usual "just get naked and do it" stuff and has a certain air of sexiness about it. However, it has to be done right. Don't stick some MILF or chubby girl in a school girl uniform; don't put some super tatooed goth like babe in a police uniform, etc. So long as the costume is believable with the model and so long as the model sort of plays up the costume instead of just treating it as a standard article of clothing then I'm all for it.
|
02-02-10 12:58pm
|
Reply
316
|
Virtual Fem
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
You definitely come up with some interesting sites to review. Not terribly interested in this sort of thing but I after looking at the tour I would note that unlike most games, you apparently get to permanently keep the girls that you download (I assume the interactive / AI part works after the membership expires too). Certainly an interesting concept; can't wait for software / AI to become better where you have a truly custom stuff done although that will probably be way too expensive at first.
|
01-29-10 01:32pm
|
Reply
317
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I take the Luddite position here on my own poll and say that I mainly take low end vids. Why? 1) I'm more of a pic guy than a vid guy so I don't care as much; 2) Presently I can't afford to be out buying a bunch of external drives to fill up with vids so there's that; 3) I only watch vids on my computer and I'm not running a monster 24" monitor so small works. 4) Cause I'm a cheap bastard I tend to join sites on a trial basis and so with limited time its just faster to download the smaller vids.
About the only exceptions I make are for really hot scenes where I'll then go big.
|
01-29-10 11:57am
|
Comment
318
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
|
|
01-27-10 10:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I saw an article today talking about T. Woods and the fact that the fact that he checked himself into a sex addiction clinic. I laughed when the article quoted someone as saying that if a person spends more than 2 hours day obsessing over or actively thinking about sex, pursuing prostitutes or looking at porn then they are a sex addict. I'm thinking I should be become a sex therapist (given the experience I have with my addiction) and will dedicate myself to helping young women understand and accept their sexual dependency issues while charging them money to do so.
|
01-27-10 12:21pm
|
Reply
320
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
It's not worth breaking it down, besides sometimes the reviews can be interesting to glance at as they appear on the PU home page. I don't read most reviews because the sites don't interest me. If I can't filter out the gay stuff searching through the content here then I'm really in trouble and lucky if I'll find my way back to PU.
|
01-26-10 07:55pm
|
Reply
321
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
From what little I've seen of the adult dating sites, they're mostly come ons for desperate men and haven for prostitutes to advertise their wares. I'm sure some people hook up but only after shelling out $$ for upsells and spending way too much friggen' time on it. If you're looking for a quickie, call a hooker. If you want a relationship, try a real dating site or hit the street.
|
01-26-10 07:52pm
|
Review
322
|
Twistys
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Tons of babes and content
+ 3 photo set and 2 vid updates daily
+ Pic sizes up to 3000 pixels
+ Vids from 2009 onward go up to 1280x720
+ High quality search and model directory
+ No download limits or DRM
+ Good 2 day full access trial for $2.44 through the bonus sites
+ 6 other sites offered of which only 3 have original content
+ Professional, high quality content
+ One of the better forums I've seen for members
+ Smallish or nonexistent watermarks
+ Good customer service |
| Cons: |
- Download speeds were a bit slow for me but it may just be a prolem on my end.
- Vids before 2009 mostly max out at 480x360
- Most of the pic sets clock in at 1020 x 720 or smaller
- Some advertising on the site but not terrible
- The 3k pixel photos only available in zip format
- A lot of nonexclusive content |
| Bottom Line: |
I was last here in '08 when I dished out an 81. Glad to see things have improved although, as we know, there's always room for improvement.
Pictures: About 9500 solo sets, 1350 HC sets and 880 lez sets. As noted, in '09 Twisty's started putting out 3000 pixel pictures but only in the zip sets. Why Shap? Especially since other sites go this big as an option and sometimes we just want to pluck the good stuff as opposed to downloading an 80mb file only to toss most of it later. Most sets have about 100 pics. Pics are professional and generally very good in terms of quality and lighting with some airbrushing, mostly on the solo sets. All sets have a zip function. Watermark is small, posting dates are included, and slideshow option is available (all definitely welcomed). About the only real negative is that most of the pics are 1020 or smaller but this is somewhat expected given the extensive history of content available.
Videos: About 1900 solo scenes, 950 HC scenes and 250 lez scenes available. As noted, the new stuff clocks in at 1280 sized and is very impressive in terms of quality. However, most of the stuff is 480x360. Once you go back more than about 18 months, you don't even get vid caps to see what the scenes contain (pain in the but). The oldest vids only come in clips, not full length scene. DL's available in WMV, MOV or pointless "phone" sized.
The model directory is excellent although, like most sites, sometimes models mysteriously pick up new names. The search has numerous variations available to sift through the content. Mostly, the tags seem pretty thorough but they are a bit weak on the oldest content in my opinion.
While they do have some exclusive content, most of the stuff is nonexclusive and can be found at other megasite / pornstar sites. Not necessarily bad, especially considering the trial price, but quality is sometimes downgraded in my comparisons to other sites when it comes to pic size, pic count per set, and video DL options.
The forum seems to be inhabited by people who are usually successful in getting their point across and they have lots of useful topics there. One of the better forums I've seen in pornland (excluding PU naturally).
I'm giving my score of 85 based solely on the Twistys content. Bump it up to about an 87 or 88 when you factor in the other sites (Annette Dawn, Bluefantasies and Naughtystaff are the only ones worth visiting).
Basically, you're not getting the cream of the crop of here in terms of quality or exclusivity. However, you are getting a ton of pretty good to very good content that keeps updating regularly and can keep you occupied for a while. This site should be rocking in a few more years when they get a lot more HD vids and if they bump the pic sizes to 3000 pixels outside of the zip only function. |
|
01-26-10 07:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
323
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do like women who are firm and well toned. Definitely pass on the chicks who look like Conan the Barbarian without the package.
|
01-26-10 01:29pm
|
Comment
324
|
Swank Pass
(0)
|
|
01-20-10 04:37pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
325
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Realistically, if you collect porn that features some young teens then you probably have jail bait on your drive. Not so much from the US, but some the Eastern Euro sites may take a more "lax" approach to age verification even when they have legal disclaimer language. My nuanced point is that if you pay to join websites and download from sites with the legal disclosures (that's almost all the pay sites today) you're probably safe saving content unless you actually know the model is underage even when common sense tells us some of this stuff may not be either due to the publisher or model lying about their age. I guess what I'm trying to say is that we're a bit naive if we think everything out there is legit.
Like most replies here, if you know it's a young 'un, you must delete. Being convicted of child porn and registering as a sex offender could put a real crimp in your life so the content ain't worth saving.
As for the 17 vs. 18 thing, it's not worth arguing about. Yes, there are people who could do porn at 17 and not be scarred forever just like there are people at 37 who couldn't handle it at all. At some point you have to draw the line and 18 is where it is for now.
|
01-13-10 07:06pm
|
