| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't have a foot or shoe fetish. If the model wants to wear high heels, that's OK by me. Or barefoot is just as fine.
|
04-18-12 09:26am
|
Reply
302
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Like most respondents, it depends. But watching too long gets boring.
|
04-17-12 10:41pm
|
Reply
303
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It seems like there are new models coming into the field all the time, almost every week.
|
04-14-12 03:20pm
|
Reply
304
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with the first 3 responses.
Actually, if I wrote a review of a site I am thinking of re-joining, I will read that as well. Because I know that I will be reading a review that is informative and well-written.
|
04-08-12 03:26am
|
Reply
305
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Bedroom, or indoors, has the most easily controlled lighting and sound control. Outdoor scenes need more professional shooting or the lighting/shadows//colors can get messed up, and random noises (passing cars, airplanes, etc.) can intrude.
|
04-06-12 06:29am
|
Reply
306
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I use Win7, because that's what came on my current computer.
But I liked WinXP just as well.
|
04-02-12 12:48am
|
Reply
307
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked the "I don't mind it" response.
I'm kind of bored by the shaven approach that is currently popular.
|
03-31-12 10:14am
|
Reply
308
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not really sure I have a single preference. Solo, with or without toys, girl-girl lite and hard, they can all be done well.
|
03-29-12 11:33am
|
Reply
309
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Depends on the tour. But the tour and any PU/TBP reviews help determine whether I will probably join a site.
|
03-28-12 02:58am
|
Reply
310
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think what rearadmiral said makes sense and is probably true: there is a disconnect between what people say in public and what they do in private.
|
03-27-12 03:11pm
|
Reply
311
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Mr. Frosty, is there some way you can put your download manager on the web, such as posting it on a new forum thread at PU?
I've tried download managers, but since I'm not technically inclined, have not had much success with them.
Maybe I (and other PU members) would have better success with the download manager you wrote.
I don't rip sites. But I would like to make downloading multiple files easier to do. Instead of manually downloading each file I want by itself.
|
03-23-12 06:59am
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Any of the first three choices sounds about right.
|
03-21-12 03:22pm
|
Reply
313
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Value. Content quality and amount. Versus price. Plus any information on how easy the site is to use: site design, download speeds, etc. Plus whether to site contents appeals to my tastes.
|
03-20-12 07:17pm
|
Reply
314
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
About the same. I still look for new sites that provide good content for the money.
|
03-17-12 06:17am
|
Reply
315
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I used to leave my desktop on. But now I use a laptop and normally turn it off when I'm off the computer.
|
03-16-12 03:06pm
|
Reply
316
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Poor content quality. Then slow download speeds.
|
03-09-12 12:32pm
|
Reply
317
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Anywhere from 2 to 4 days is fine with me. I could even accept 5 days if I have to. Does that make me easy to get along with?
|
03-07-12 08:19am
|
Reply
318
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
There are plenty of ways porn can be disgusting. When I see disgusting porn or abusive behavior, I just turn if off.
|
03-06-12 01:12pm
|
Reply
319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
First, I don't have any contacts in porn.
Second, I don't think doing hard-core porn is a smart decision. It might look like easy money, but that's an illusion. I think most girls would be better off looking to make money elsewhere.
Softcore porn (simple nudity) might be alright, but hardcore is a poor choice.
|
03-04-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
320
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Before I started using the Internet as a source of porn, I was mainly into softcore photos.
I paid little attention to hardcore videos.
If I wanted a video of a naked girl, I would watch a regular movie. Most movies are around 1 hour 30 minutes. And if there were one or more nude scenes, the total length of a girl flashing her breasts or ass was probably 45 seconds or less. (I'm talking about one of the starlets in the movie, not some gratuitous breast shots of some stripper.)
Since I got into the internet, and after joining PU, I've joined a number of hardcore video sites.
So I don't waste my time searching through a movie for the breast or ass shots anymore.
So did PU drag my tastes down, or should I be blaming the Internet?
But in general, I still prefer softcore photos over most videos.
|
11-18-11 12:53am
|
Reply
321
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I thought this was covered in a previous poll, which asked where the camera should be focused on in a video.
Anyway, the entire girl should be covered.
With less coverage on the stunt cock.
But the videos where they mask the stunt cock's head are just annoying. If he's doesn't want his face exposed in a porn video, just use someone else as the stunt cock.
|
11-16-11 06:05am
|
Reply
322
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Sometimes I admire the porn studs who keep going even when the woman says "Stop."
But that's not me.
|
11-14-11 05:05pm
|
Reply
323
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm like everyone else. External hard drives are the easiest and cheapest and fastest way to store. And trying to burn and manage a library of DVDs would be a nightmare.
|
11-12-11 07:11am
|
Reply
324
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Fully nude, right at the climax. Why make us wait for the good parts, right?
Afterwards, the performers can sit around and discuss how they could have made the sex scene even better.
|
11-10-11 12:50am
|
Reply
325
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for the well wishes, slutty.
Believe me, I wish I had never heard of gout myself. I thought that was a disease you only read about in old English novels.
|
11-04-11 06:40am
|
