| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I agree their tour is pretty poor. Not sure why they don't let you see all the models, I feel like they used to in the old version of the site. I think it is a decent place, especially for the price, but I didn't like their new site design - it was faster, than the slow ass old one but still sort of glitchy. Also, updates are slow, so I wouldn't antipate hanging around for long.
|
12-05-11 10:35pm
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm with elephant, 720p is my preferred size, I can't really tell much of a difference on anything higher so I don't think it is worth the extra space.
|
12-04-11 11:16pm
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
nice legs, for some reason that's what I always check out first...
|
12-03-11 02:01am
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slategrey's Reply
there are those that classify themselves as asexual, but it seems unlikely they'd frequent a porn review site. But perhaps they'd just be curious?
|
11-30-11 09:12pm
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm curious to see how many gay/bi votes come in, seem pretty under-represented...
|
11-30-11 12:02am
|
Reply
381
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Comment
If you click around a bit you can find thumbnails of most of their material, I'm not sure that you can get any additional trailers though aside from checking out sites that aren't supposed to be mentioned here.
It is a decent site, if you've never been on the network may be worth paying the $10 extra to get the whole network.
|
11-30-11 12:00am
|
Reply
382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I guess just when I get randy, never really thought about it. As far as buying, usually good reviews or nice discounts get me interested.
|
11-28-11 07:44pm
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm like cap'n, I try to trust them as soon as they seem trustworthy, and hopefully they'll contribute more.
|
11-26-11 06:27pm
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
no one has a fusilli jerry story? it was a million to one shot! unfortunately I do not either.
|
11-25-11 08:51pm
|
Reply
385
|
Massive Access
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
you are right, at 9.99 it is probably worth a shot at some point, but I do have a preference for the ability to preview the site somewhat.
|
11-22-11 09:37pm
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Haven't seen a site like this in years, Hustler used to do this way back in the day I believe.
|
11-22-11 09:35pm
|
Reply
387
|
Massive Access
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Nice review rearadmiral, too bad they don't have a better preview. Also, I tried clicking on the TBP link and got the 9.99 price, so apparently it has been updated.
|
11-21-11 05:58pm
|
Reply
388
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
Nice to know dracken, certainly a site that should have been a bonus a while ago!
|
11-20-11 11:02pm
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm with RustyJ as well, I'm sure some enjoy it, but it is sort of hard to believe many of them do these days.
|
11-20-11 10:56pm
|
Reply
390
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Same as slategrey, paris and kim.
|
11-18-11 10:53pm
|
Reply
391
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Like pretty much everyone here, I like to see it all, although prolonged closeups of any area aren't so good. In response to CT's intended question, I think I would go with pussy if I had to choose one.
|
11-17-11 10:10pm
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I understand your original point Jay G, I was just noting that I don't think just because a woman wants to slow it down she is necessarily crazy (although I am sure there are a few that are).
|
11-15-11 11:01pm
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Just curious Jay G, what do you mean by these kinds of women? I don't think the question implies any type of deceit, perhaps she just changed her mind, which she is free to do. It is not so uncommon for a woman to want to slow things down a bit when things are getting heavy...
|
11-14-11 11:23pm
|
Reply
394
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I agree, I have done the same thing, but it sort of annoying to go between IAFD or something and VB when they could just add a decent search function. They also seem to often have some comically incorrect model photos. I get the feeling the just don't care, their membership is probably very high, and site functionality and design improvements probably wouldn't make it any higher.
|
11-14-11 01:18pm
|
Reply
395
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Oswaldo's Comment
I agree it is worth visiting from time to time, they only seem to update 3x a week. I really like this site.
|
11-12-11 05:15pm
|
Reply
396
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
SexCliche's Review
Nice review Tobey666, although personally I think their new search engine is awful. Quite glitchy, so often it has no results for stars I know they have.
|
11-12-11 12:41am
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Occasionally to back things up, but like tangub I use externals mostly now.
|
11-12-11 12:38am
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm with picdude, and well said.
|
11-11-11 02:45pm
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Solo it is good, hardcore it sometimes seems a bit awkward when the girl just stares at the camera (I assume they are referring to eye contact with the camera not with their partner).
|
11-06-11 12:06am
|
Reply
400
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Is it even any different? Seems as though you still might have to pay extra for the .tv site. All it looks like is a revamped front page, who knows what it looks like inside.
|
11-05-11 09:23pm
|
