| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Good review exotics, you and I seem to be joining many of the same sites lately - I had actually started a review of this but it pretty much just echoed wittyguys review. I'm not a fan of the extended trial setup with the higher priced renew, and the fake breast quantity, but I guess you are right they don't get the models fake breasts (although they do chose to put them on the site).
|
07-25-11 10:27pm
|
Reply
477
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Like pat362 I got one free with a TV, and I think it is significantly better than DVD although I doubt I would have gotten one if it hadn't been free, but the expense is usually not significantly different (well Redbox is like 50% more, but that still isn't exactly expensive).
While Sony certainly fucked up the betamax thing trying to keep it a proprietary technology, they didn't do that here, and they developed Blu Ray with a bunch of heavy hitters in technology as I understand it.
I think its worth having if you have a nice, large TV, and I doubt it'll go anywhere anytime soon or at a minimum whatever comes next will be backwards compatable.
|
07-17-11 10:55pm
|
Reply
478
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yeah I poked around a bit after posting that, it does appear as though they have an excessive amount of fakes, but the price is pretty good.
|
07-17-11 10:49pm
|
Reply
479
|
Little Caprice
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the info.
|
07-17-11 10:48pm
|
Reply
480
|
Little Caprice
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Nice review, good information to know, are the bonus sites comparably sized and with similar connection problems?
|
07-16-11 12:49am
|
Reply
481
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm with Jay G on this one as well.
|
07-16-11 12:45am
|
Reply
482
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind it so much, the ladies tend to be quite good looking so I can overlook it somewhat.
|
07-14-11 12:39am
|
Reply
483
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
nice review wittyguy, this is one of those sites I keep thinking I should try sometime, but just never get around to it. Probably scared off by their homepage that tends to highlight the altered ladies.
|
07-11-11 08:40pm
|
Reply
484
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
ah, excellent variety of puns, but I agree it is quite a good value.
|
07-11-11 08:27pm
|
Reply
485
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually prefer the h.264 mpeg-4, which I guess could be included in mpg, but since that usually refers to an mpeg-1 or mpeg-2 I chose other. I find this question a bit odd. If it is referring to file extensions some of these can represent several different types of videos.
|
07-09-11 12:55am
|
Reply
486
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
enigma's Reply
Thanks. I agree it has some issues, but pretty good site nonetheless.
|
07-06-11 12:03am
|
Reply
487
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've got 2 widescreen and one standard, I prefer the wide.
|
07-06-11 12:02am
|
Reply
488
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm with Cap'n. Discounts are always good.
|
07-03-11 01:42am
|
Reply
489
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
just one dog, like Jay G mostly cause of the lady.
|
07-02-11 12:15am
|
Reply
490
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pretty much anything but a thong for me, never found that look attractive. I voted for grannies cause I thought someone should.
|
06-29-11 10:09pm
|
Reply
491
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Perhaps he is a sleep-adult-website-joiner? I knew a guy in college that would get up, make, and eat a sandwich in the middle of the night all while dead asleep.
Now that Cap'n has been outed as an employee he will have to create a new user ID, spend all that time building up a reputation here (certainly not using the "I only like soft core, full strip, no toys and must have custom zips" bit or everyone will know it is him), and post another review.
That's some dedicated marketing. ;)
|
06-28-11 04:29pm
|
Reply
492
|
Just Cute Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Interesting, never heard it used in that fashion before. Thanks for the information.
|
06-28-11 04:18pm
|
Reply
493
|
Just Cute Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Nice, informative review Drooler. Looked like too many tats for me on the preview.
Just curious, what did you mean by fate? Never heard that used in reference to a model's attractiveness before...
|
06-27-11 09:26pm
|
Reply
494
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
They scare me, even more so in person. I suppose I could turn that into a fetish if I gave it a chance.
|
06-27-11 09:18pm
|
Reply
495
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yeah, I don't mind photoshopping that much, it is certainly super common, particular on the art nude sites. it is just odd to see it and then it disappears, then see it again. Its sort of half-assed photoshopping, and distracts me for some reason.
|
06-27-11 09:16pm
|
Reply
496
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Reply
Download Them All worked fine for me as well, perhaps you should try it out.
|
06-24-11 08:13pm
|
Reply
497
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think it is somewhat important, although depends on the size of the site, not so important with smaller sites. I also think the model index is far more important than search.
|
06-23-11 07:47pm
|
Reply
498
|
STR8 Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
agree with otoh, it is good to see reviews of gay content here. Even though it isn't for me, I always wondered why there wasn't more representation here.
Also, the inadvertent link to massive entertained me. Surprised that hasn't happened before, seems like massive would be a commonly used word.
|
06-20-11 07:21pm
|
Reply
499
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
from time to time, although I'm sure what I consider extreme others might consider normal.
|
06-19-11 05:07pm
|
Reply
500
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As with many others, why no "no"? So other-no.
|
06-17-11 08:50pm
|
