| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I think it's pretty gross, actually - not a turn-on.
|
03-30-11 06:34am
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
There was no "it depends" option, which is the truth for me. If I'm with a girl that I've been wanting to have sex with for a while and we've only done "foreplay" before, and I'm ready to fuck and she's ready to fuck, then foreplay could be the time needed to get rid of our clothes the first time we do so - then I'll calm down and the next time I'll be more apt to spend a lot of foreplay time before or in the midst of fucking.
|
02-16-11 06:14am
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Gigi Rivera is my favorite new Latina - I know you said not US, but since when do I listen to those kind of rules? Latinas are Latinas.
Karla Spice is probably my fave all-time model.
Gigi Spice has an awesome bod. Too bad she isn't a better model.
|
02-05-11 09:47am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
I've know girls that liked having their assholes tongued - and fucked.
They don't taste good to me, unlike pussies, so I'd rather finger it as a substitute and fucking pussies is so interesting, that the asshole isn't all that appealing for that either.
|
01-16-11 09:14am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
A few examples
Sandy Summers started off as a tease babe, did one hard-core boy/girl scene for Vince Voyeur several years ago - Who's That Girl was the name of the DVD, decided she didn't want to do that, but she has done a lot of solo masturbation and girl/girl for her latest site, Sandy-Summers.com. She also did great material for ALS Scan/ALS Angels under the name Sandy Waldrick
Peachez was originally a very young non-nude model, Real Peachez - her newest site has numerous bj scenes and a lot of masturbation material. Peachez also has AMAZING material at ALS Scan - some of my fave stuff on the whole site.
Jana Jordan is another girl that started as a very shy non-nude model, got more risque through a succession of sites/names. She is one of the wildest, craziest girls on ALS Scan and has lots of girl/girl material on Sandy-Summers.com and ClubJanaJordan. She was also an exclusive performer for NinnWorkx for a short period of time, did a bunch of solo and girl/girl for him.
Dawn Avril was originally a fairly shy goth tease babe, now at Dawn-Avril.com, there's plenty of boy-girl action - not much in the way of pussy shots but lots of full nudity.
|
01-12-11 11:43pm
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Well, let me clue you in - many non-nude models started going mid-core and/or hardcore several years ago. The non-nude model thing is fairly moribund these days - there are some non-nude models, but nothing like it was during the hey-day of Tiffany Teen, Next Door Nikki, etc.
To make up for the fact that she still doesn't want to show much, Nikki "fleshes out" her site with licensed material of other full-nude models and partners with a variety of models, including hard-core models for her website network and cam show network.
|
01-12-11 05:54pm
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Lots of models have shifted their focus. Lots of models work the Am-pro market when they first get started, doing some work for Karups or ATK or Nubiles, etc and frequently that involves doing a hard-core scene as well as full-nude material - and then they decide that's not what they really want to do and they scale it back.
But the thing is with that material - the sites own them and the sites need VERY good reasons to take the material down - so it stays, to be discovered over and over and over again by new fans of the model for years to come.
Karen Dreams is a perfect example of this. People are still "discovering" her handful of hardcore scenes that she did for Karups, I believe, when she first started modeling. Then she went in a "tease" direction and has never repeated.
|
01-12-11 06:57am
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've joined sites that announced they were no longer updating the day after I joined - or stopped updating with no announcement. Or I had no access.
In those situations, I requested refunds.
|
12-05-10 04:57pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'm sure it goes on - in fact there are sites where the owner/webmaster/photographer brags about it. But the cool sites are run by pros that treat their models well and get great material from them because they're not all anxious about being taken advantage of.
The material on the other sites sucks shit because the only reason the assholes are running the sites is so that the losers can fuck their models.
|
12-04-10 04:41pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I went for "Roughneck & Jerking Around" because it "sounds" the most abusive.
I like rough consensual scenes. A lot of women like a certain amount of rough sex - they like being man-handled, they like being grabbed at the throat, they like light slapping, most sexual woman love being spanked hard if it's in the right place - they like the excitement of feeling like a man is mad for them.
But there's a line - and I witnessed it clearly when I saw stuff on Clara G's site - where it goes from exciting consensual sex to abusive bull-shit - and as a fan of rough sex, I feel that I have the responsibility in watching it to have my radar on very high. I hate the shit that went on between Raul what-ever-his-name-is and Clara G. It was the porn equivalent of Ike and Tina Turner - it wasn't sexy. You could see it in her flinching before she would paste on an "Oh-ha-ha-ha" smile.
That's the shit I absolutely hate.
As to the choking - it's definitely true that if it's going to be done, it needs to be done carefully and skillfully. I like women being grabbed by the throat. I don't like women being choked, because most porn guys don't know what the fuck they're doing. There's a scene that Madison Ivy did for Brazzers with Keiran Lee - "Sexaholic" on the "Pornstars Like It Big" site in their network. Keiran is choking Madison and she pretty clearly falls over unconscious. There's an edit and the scene goes on. They probably both figured it was all in a day's work and both have continued to work for Brazzers, but that's not safe - far from it.
|
11-30-10 05:58pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
IE is by far the shittiest, most glitchy, most hospitable to virus-makers, so I've been using it less and less - Firefox and Chrome for me
|
11-21-10 05:30pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Since this poll question and the choices are in complete contradiction, the whole thing really makes no sense, therefore my choice is to poke a hole in the dimensional rift and put my porn collection on the other side of the dimensional divide.
|
11-13-10 05:06pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
I recently had a computer virus attack that wound up completely disabling my ability to get on the internet or download any types of security updates that would have been able to deal with it.
I hadn't been using external HD's for my collection - plus virtually all my "favorites" are porn-related.
The older Asian guy that fixed it for me was completely non-plussed by my porn - when I picked it up he was gleefully flipping through my favorites to show how good the navigation now was.
But I did learn the lesson - the pros use external HD's. There's just too many people with their own agendas out there for it to really be safe otherwise.
|
11-05-10 06:51am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
As with many responding here, I would never give a site a score of 100, because there's always something to point out about a site, which doesn't make it a bad site or one not worth joining.
But this is a Porn Users review site and how many restrictions do we really want to put on other reviewers?
"No, you can't score your favorite site 100 because the PU veterans say 'no site is perfect'"
That wouldn't be the way to encourage the largest number of participating reviewers - and I believe that we all win when there are a large number of participating reviewers on this site.
|
10-31-10 07:55am
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Some comments pertain to pricing deals or inclusion of bonus sites that are announced on the home page or site's tour - I have put many such comments - and I don't see why they would not be appropriate. Of course, if an offered deal doesn't turn out to be followed through on once someone has joined, I would hope that they would also make a comment.
I recently made a comment about New Sensation's tour having navigation that failed in every possible way. If a site is going to set up a tour, they should have links that work, rather than crash and I'll continue to make such remarks, because if the navigation on the tour crashes, I have absolutely no reason to believe that the site itself will function, so I'll spend my money elsewhere.
|
10-24-10 10:31am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Actually, I'm a big fan of really crappy infomercials - like the ones for Extenze. If I won the lottery and had lots of money to play with, I'd make fake infomercials. They're freaking hilarious.
|
10-17-10 03:08pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I can just picture the ad now - the guy walks downstairs, starts to walk into the kitchen, where his girlfriend is chatting with her bff's, stops short and listens from outside the door as his gf's friend commiserates - "Only 12 inches? I don't understand how you stay with him! You must be some kind of saint!" Her other friends laugh, one of them says, "Exactly! We're going to put you up for beatification right now!"
Shot of the guy looking all hang-dog and embarrassed.
The sexy 38-dd spokeswoman says, "Tired of being embarrassed with your mini-12-incher? Well, we've got the solution for you! Get-a-yard! With Get-a-Yard, you'll be able to grow your tool so big you can satisfy even the most demanding woman - maybe a woman like me!"
The male announcer in a staccato voice - Get-a-Yard - available now for only $99.95 for one month's dosage - not-recommended-for-males-between-the-ages-of-12-200-may-cause-heart-attacks-impotence-loss-of-digestive-functions-loss-of-eyesight-schizophrenia-in-most-individuals.
Sexy female 38-dd swinginging her tits into the camera says "Get-a-yard! Why wait?"
|
10-16-10 04:32pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I generally find Freeones or Peachy Forum the best places to search for work by a particular model - or one can always google the name of the model and a particular site if you're not sure if she's worked there - that often brings up a link where you can get the name she worked under on that site.
|
10-10-10 07:51am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Sites vary considerably. I've experienced sites that answered within a couple of minutes. I've experienced sites that I had to hunt down across the internet. One of the worst was joining Stephanie Swift's site years ago. She had some kind of "key"/password thing that didn't work for anybody. She had no help on the site and couldn't deal with it herself, so she didn't. Then she got upset that most of the posts on the forum were negative - cause people were paying money for nothing. I had to hunt down the guy who had worked on the web design, found a phone # for his company, gave him my info and he used his back-door that he was using to do the web design work to get me access.
On the other hand, Shap at Twisty's passed on a dinner with a porn babe to help resolve a problem where their new anti-hacker software had blocked me along with another Comcast customer's ISP because the other guy was some asshole hacker trying to rip them off.
|
10-04-10 07:11pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Yep - reduced pricing and great content on the site I joined are the key to me sticking around if I were going to leave in the first place.
ALS Scan just ensured that I'll continue with my ALS Angels discount membership by posting preview pics of an upcoming babe.
|
09-16-10 06:46am
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't even think there is a "we, as a society"
I don't see the "we"
There are tremendous segments of the population that couldn't possibly look at things differently than I do. The popularity of mega-churches, Rush Limbaugh, the 700 Club, Glen Beck - and I could go on and on - all point to a huge portion of the population that I feel completely apart from and there is no "we" in terms of "our" perspective on nudity - or a whole hell of a lot of other things.
|
09-12-10 07:16am
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I've seen some extraordinary bj scenes. In fact when I had a membership to the DDF network, I thought the material at Only Blowjobs was highly erotic.
Any sexual act can be boring in person or on vid - it depends on how it's presented.
|
09-11-10 04:07pm
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Tease is the key element to any material that is trying to be sexy. Can there be fully nude tease? Absolutely! Face close-ups with models that know how to use their eyes, mouths, tongues - mmmmm - tongues!!!! - can be great tease material.
And then there's leg, boob and ass tease - mmmmmm - the possibilities are endless. To ignore them shows that the people producing the material have no imagination, creativity or talent.
|
09-10-10 06:56am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's one of those things that I can see why it would occur to a single woman in a single instance to do on the spur of the moment, just cause, well, you've got panties, you've got a pussy, why not put one inside the other - but I don't get why it's a fetish.
Of course, I also don't understand why feet are such a turn-on for some guys, so...
|
08-28-10 11:05am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've seen sites where the webmasters lay out their hatred for IE and encourage people to use Firefox and I've seen sites where the webmasters say that anything prior to IE is not going to work well.
Like with most things, so long as the webmasters are being honest and informative, I'm fine with it.
|
08-09-10 05:48pm
|
