| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm with Wittyguy - so long as the girls are hot and so is the action, it's good. There can be some hot fantasies built around inter-racial stuff, though a lot of that has been tamped down on since the 70's where there were all kind of un-PC scenes like plantation scenes and home invasion scenes.
These days with Max Hardcore being convicted and Rob Black being pursued and Stagliano under indictment there's less room for that stuff so what you get is more rote and repetitive.
|
11-19-08 05:47pm
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
For me, it's all about the sexiness of the girl. I've cum as much to non-HC stuff as I have to HC stuff. I've got a good imagination to fill in the gaps to what's on screen if the girl on the screen is inspiring me.
|
11-17-08 07:00am
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
The most annoying things in porn to me are:
1) The guys who fuck women with as little physical contact as possible, just the cock in the pussy while they lean back like they're studying themselves in a mirror - are they gay? WTF?
2) The only-genitalia shots where you have no idea what woman you're looking at because all you're seeing for an extended period of time is a disembodied pussy or ass being fucked.
3) The no-lips "blow-job" where the woman just shoves her head back & forth over the cock and makes gross gagging sounds
4) The eyes-sealed-shut blowjob where the woman scrunches her eyes up tight before she ever has the cock in her mouth - like it's the most disgusting activity she can imagine engaging in, but she really needs the money.
|
11-05-08 10:21pm
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a boxing fan, getting interested in MMA as time goes on.
The Pavlik/Hopkins fight was a great example of why I love boxing - who would have thought that a 26 year old excellent figher would have been out-done in terms of speed, movement as well as strategy and intelligence by a 43 year old boxer - brilliant stuff!
|
10-31-08 11:11am
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I check my e-mail, then my favorite porn sites - sorry, but the truth is that it's a day or two before I check PornUsers.
|
10-28-08 09:04pm
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
In order of annoyance for me:
1) Lack of updates - nothing like a dead site to piss me off - at least if the site has claimed to be live
2) No webmaster response - I only contact webmasters if I'm having some problem - like getting access to the site - and if I don't get a response, that will become my #1 issue VERY quickly
3) Navigation nightmare - Well, if a site updates and you have access, but every time you click on something, you're waiting forever, that's a huge drag.
4) Slow downloads - If the site updates and you have access but it takes you an unusually long time to download anything, that's a paid - not a huge one, but it's a pain
5) Misleading advertising - ya know, at this point, I expect most sites to be engaging in misleading advertising to some degree - they'll say 3 updates a week and that will only be when you're really lucky. The sites that do what they promise in all regards are few and far between and I congratulate them for doing so.
Again, this is a good reason why this site is so valuable - to separate the wheat from the chaff.
|
10-24-08 10:33pm
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Poll
Ever watch Project Runway? I have a few times. I can't say that I've seen more than a handful of their models in all the episodes I've watched where I was thinking, "Damn, is she hot!" I see more hot babes at the gym I go to.
Like the tall, slender kick-boxing Black woman with the braided hair and the amazingly tight ass and long sexy legs and.....
Fashion models - blecchh!
|
09-13-08 08:11am
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Me - I'd rather check out hot babes in a sexy dress than babes with OK bods.
|
09-04-08 08:55pm
|
Reply
209
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Think about all the nameless hotties that have done scenes that you can't remember as soon as they are done and then the ones that stick with you for a long time - and I think you'll agree that it's all about the attitude. Of course having a bod AND an attitude are an unbeatable combo.
|
08-25-08 10:14pm
|
Reply
210
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I've seen many webcam shows at sites such Adriana Sage's and Phil Flash and Karen Dreams - they can be damned hot - even the tease ones, as Princess Blueyez - actually those tend to be more fun than the gyno cam shows where it's just a dildo going into a pussy for long periods of time. I was all excited when Sandy Summers started doing dildo cam shows until I saw my 3rd and found myself much more bored than when she used to chat and tease and dance and work at exciting us in all kind of unique ways. I probably wouldn't join a site that was just a webcam site, but having it be part of the site is certainly fun.
|
08-20-08 09:50pm
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Here's the way I look at it - short trailer that doesn't show much probably equals cheap-ass site.
Nice long, generous high quality trailer probably equals a higher quality site.
I think that generally holds true, though probably not 100% of the time
|
08-16-08 12:48am
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I can't say that all that many softcore models do hardcore well - Amy Reid, Oh yeah!!, Sunny Leone, uhhhh, not really, but if I'm hot for a model, I'm pretty thrilled at hearing that she didn't some hard stuff - whether I'm thrilled when I actually see the material is another story altogether.
|
08-14-08 08:56pm
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't have a clue what you all are on about - lol
I'm a simple man - give me hot babes on a screen, if they look good, I'm happy.
|
07-28-08 06:18pm
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I only read them when they pertain to sites that interest me - otherwise, no. A lot of times the comments and the responses to comments have a lot of info - but if it's not a site that interests me, I couldn't care that much.
|
07-22-08 10:30pm
|
Reply
215
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've written before that I won't review a site until I've been there for several weeks, but that's not a standard for PU and I believe that there are numbers of people that write reviews for sites that they have been members of for only a few days.
If a reviewer is open and accurate about their membership and the membership is recent (the thing that burns me is when I see reviews of sites where the person hasn't been there in months), then I think it's OK. It's more info being shared, and that's the whole point, no?
|
07-04-08 07:43am
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Good idea. I know that I've rated sites highly that then flew down a rat-hole and other sites made some necessary adjustments to improve.
|
07-03-08 06:31am
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's hot if it seems like the girls are really enjoying it, like with ALS Scan's vids. It's not hot if it seems like the girls are only kissing each other because they were hired to be in a scene where they would be kissing each other and they expect the check to clear - like Sapphic Erotica - booooooorrrrring!
|
07-02-08 07:44pm
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Price affects my score a bit. Value counts. Would I have rated Babelicious as highly as I did if it were not part of a network that provided multiple updates a day for such a good price? Probably not, to be honest.
|
06-26-08 07:21pm
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm single, so I don't have a wife to have to explain it to or lie to. There's condoms to prevent STD's. If I could arrange it in a way that I could afford it, sure, I'd do it!
|
06-20-08 05:24pm
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Those who do it, and do it well, work their asses off and deal with all kind of flaky situations - models not showing up, including to expensive site locations, legal hassles, rip-offs of your material, web designers that suck, etc.
Here's a situation that would just kill me. Early last year, ALS Scan rented a villa in the Caribbean, flew in all of their equipment, set up shop - and only one of their models made it. All of the rest had various crazy visa or other hassles that made it impossible for them to get there. They had to have spent 10's of thousands of dollars and all they could do was just have a vacation with the one model that showed.
I just don't have the constitution to accept that madness easily.
That's why I give credit to those who work hard and do it well. It's one of the best things about this forum is being able to point others in the direction of those that are doing so.
|
06-18-08 07:00pm
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've contacted a few - most were quite nice, including Tila Nguyen before she was Tila Tequila, Miss MTV, etc. Masuimi Max was the one exception - not very friendly.
|
06-10-08 07:13pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said "Yes" but mainly so that I could post a comment wondering what this poll has to do with "porn users" - it's just a general opinion poll that to my mind should be put in the forum.
|
06-03-08 12:25am
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
There are adult models and porn performers, such as Katie Fey, Jenna Haze & Nautica Thorn, that are brilliant in terms of the use of eye contact, many others less so. If a woman has a fabulous body and uses it expressively, I can enjoy photos even if she doesn't use eye contact well. But when a model has an expression like she wants to be else-where, the photographer is a moron to just keep on shooting and think they are going to come out with something erotic. That was my complaint about Nubiles for a while, though they got lots better about that.
I know that Alex of ALS Scan has talked about the sunglasses issue and the quandary about shooting outdoors - some women are very sensitive to the sun and the choice is between getting an engaged set with them wearing sunglasses and a set where most of the material is worthless because the model is pre-occupied with her discomfort from the sun in her eyes, squinting, looking pained, etc. I've seen some pretty hot photosets of women in sunglasses, so it's not something that bothers me if it's a happy gorgeous woman in the sun wearing sunglasses.
|
05-23-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Good point. Fantasies are fine. Reality's much tougher and the two don't combine all that well a lot of times. I had a girlfriend and we used to talk about what female friends we wanted to have sex with together. We decided that we were mutually hot for one girl in particular and so we got her over and got her clothes off and I was going to fuck her, but that felt weird, so I fucked my girlfriend instead. The girl slept with us and we went out to breakfast together, but I can't say that it brought any of us closer at all - more the opposite. We had more sexy fun together, actually, on an earlier occasion when we just had an impromptu dance party together.
|
05-17-08 08:50am
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I believe that williamj was saying that Incredible Pass is the epitome of unethical porn sites.
I've never been a member so I wouldn't know, personally.
|
05-16-08 11:33pm
|
