I definitely agree all pay sites should use HTTPS. I've been noting whether or not it is in use in my reviews. It was the firefox pop-up that caused me to be aware of it in the first place.
Especially since some people use the same user ID and password in multiple locations, it's important to have encrypted logons everywhere, not just on banking sites.
I AM GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 79, BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WAS SCORED AS A STAND-ALONE-SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE LOWER,
BECAUSE:
1. THE LIMITED AMOUNT OF CONTENT AT THE SITE (80 VIDEOS).
2. THE SITE STOPPED UPDATING YEARS AGO.
3. THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS JUST OK. NO ATTEMPT IS MADE TO PRESENT THE MODELS AS ATTRACTIVELY AS POSSIBLE. THE SETTINGS AND CLOTHES ARE CHEAP.
regarding: "-NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
THERE IS A POP-UP WARNING ON THE LOGIN PAGE (WHERE YOU ENTER YOUR LOGIN DETAILS TO ENTER THE SITE) THAT STATES:
THIS CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE. LOGINS ENTERED HERE COULD BE COMPROMISED."
This is because the site does not use HTTPS. Your browser (not the site) is popping that up to warn you. (Firefox started doing this a couple of months ago on their browser, when they detect you are being prompted for a login with only HTTP). This will be true for any site that does not use HTTPS. If you are using cookies to log in to sites you may find that more sites than just this one are leaving you vulnerable in this regard (not because cookies are inherently vulnerable, but because you aren't noticing the warning message when being automatically logged on).
THE FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL SITE IS NICE-SIZED, WITH OVER 290+ VIDEOS TO WATCH.
IN ADDITION, YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE BASIC NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK, WHICH HAS--
22 SITES CATERING TO DIFFERENT NICHES;
6500+ EXCLUSIVE VIDEOS;
2500+ PORN STARS;
UNLIMITED ACCESS;
MULTIPLE WEEKLY UPDATES;
HD QUALITY VIDEOS.
SO YOU CERTAINLY GET ACCESS TO A HUGE AMOUNT OF HARDCORE VIDEOS.
AND SOME OF THE VIDEOS ARE OF VERY HIGH QUALITY.
THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE IS A GLAMCORE SITE WITH LOVELY MODELS, HIGH PROFESSIONAL CAMERAWORK AND SETTINGS, EXPENSIVE COSTUMES, THAT CAN COMPETE FAVORABLY WITH ANY GLAMCORE SITE ON THE INTERNET.
SO OVERALL, THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK IS A WORTHWHILE JOIN.
AND THE FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL SITE, WHILE NOT THE BEST SITE IN THE NETWORK, HAS SOME WORTHWHILE VIDEOS TO BE ENJOYED.
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE 0F 85, BECAUSE OF THE NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WAS A STAND-ALONE SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE MUCH LOWER.
I SHOULD ADD THAT YOU CAN DOWNLOAD ALL THE VIDEOS IN MULTIPLE FILE TYPES AND MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS.
THE SITE (AND NETWORK) IS NOT ONE OF THE NEW STREAMING ONLY SITES.
I used to do something similar. I would write my review on the web page, then copy it to word before submitting it. That's just a pain, though, when there are multiple text windows (i.e. pros, cons, bottom line).
I actually have a technique that works really well most of the time. If you maintain two tabs to Pornusers and then check to make sure you are still logged in on the other tab, you will still be logged in when you click submit regardless of how long it has been. The cookie applies to all tabs so if one works, they all will. For some reason I forgot to open another tab when I was writing this review. Eh, stuff happens. :-)
You're right. I just ran a speed test and I got 311 Mbps, which is obviously quite different from 311MBps. I didn't know the difference until now. Thanks for pointing that out.
I just did a test and downloaded a scene from Evil Angel and IDM showed I was getting 40 MB/s. It took maybe 30 seconds to download a 1.68GB scene. I thought that maybe I was capped at downloads but I now see that if I'm getting 40MB/s that's probably much closer to my capacity than I thought.
Thanks for shedding some light on that for a non-tech guy.
But... I get 40MB/s from Evil Angel and get less than 1/40th of that from Legal Porno. I'm still mad at them!
I think most of us will agree that Epoch and CCBill are the gold standard. Unfortunately, we don't always have options.
Japan HDV uses 3 processors, something I never saw before. I never experienced a site that uses different processors give the user an option which one to use, but then again, I haven't been around the block as much as you. One has to play games to get to use the processor of choice, like put in incorrect credit card info with a processor that you don't want to use and hope it defaults to the preferred credit card processor. I wonder what the rationale is behind this.
In my case, I wasn't paying attention to the credit card processor being used and simply accepted the default. My bad and I'm paying for my mistake, if not monetarily then with a waste of time dealing with this now. I have to think most users don't pay attention all that much to credit card processors. This group happens to be a savvy bunch and we make a big deal about processors as we should.
On the plus side, for me anyway, I never lost a nickel. I have no issue disputing a charge with my bank. I've always prevailed in disputes and never had it backfire on me by being blacklisted anywhere. I also find that once you threaten a site or credit card processor with a dispute, they generally back off. I'm guessing that's because they don't want to lose their processing privileges.
As a 2 year member, I agree with the review. A one year subscription\on goes for $30 or $2.50 per month, about the same as one Starbucks small coffee. But the good part is that the majority of the new stuff has solo nutity and is a good way to discover new talent.
I was able to get in after changing my password (for no reason). And I got an email back that said "We see you logged in so everything must be OK now." No mention of the fact that my password was changed without my knowledge and I was charged for but didn't log in for 2 months because I thought the account had expired...the usual case when you can't log in using known-good account credentials. But they are in the business of taking my money, so they did, and technically don't have give any back for any reason, so they didn't.
Part of the problem is that the more obscure billing services, like the one that Diesel uses, Vendo Services, aren't on my checklist to review monthly like ccbill and epoch are. At least they send emails, though. One, ECHST, doesn't even send you a confirmation email when you sign up to a site they service or a cancellation when you cancel so you have no record at all of the charge other than the cryptic information on the credit card bill and no proof that a cancellation was processed.
I need to remember to include the billing service in my reviews...
Thank you!
I wasn't entirely serious, though it really does irk me to see newcomers with unhelpful reviews getting such merit.
However, I really don't think such a distinction is necessary. One can tell from reading a review whether it's reliable and/or helpful.
I know this is never gonna happen, but formatted or semi-formatted reviews that more or less force a reviewer to include certain information would go a long way to helping the quality of reviews. I think newcomers need this structure and I speak for myself when I was a newbie. But alas, this idea has been discussed and tossed in the trash bin.
Not to digress, but I want more trust badges! I have 1 lousy badge, always one of the minute irksome things in my life, haha.
Which reminds me of the Reggie Hammond character... when asked what kind of cop he was, he responded:
You know what I am? I'm your worst fuckin' nightmare, man. I'm a nigger with a badge which means I got permission to kick your fuckin' ass whenever I feel like it!
I put it in there on a whim. Wanted to see if it made a difference since I've been posting forever and haven't gotten a new trust vote in a long time. I'm about 5 votes short of getting that badge and I think it is the only one I don't have. No big deal. I'll probably pull the request since it seems a little tacky to solicit for votes....
I joined before I saw your comment. And then I realized that I was a member in the past. I must have deleted the videos in my purge of stuff I didn't care for.
Before I go further, a few general comments on the site. Your comments were very much on target. This is a well organized site with excellent support. One of the features I like a whole lot, one that I never came across, is hovering your mouse over a video image gives you a concise summary of the video. Very helpful.
I experienced technical issues in downloading from the main site, New Sensations. It turns out they upgraded that sub-site and it wasn't possible to download -- only on that site. I received a response from support within an hour. We went back and forth in trying to fix it until it was finally fixed. The point being is that they were very responsive and eager to make things right.
I did suggest offering a PU discount. It seemed the tech guy wasn't familiar with such stuff but he thought it a good idea and is going to pass it on.
Having said that, as you intimated, the site is not for me. Too many tattoos, implants and older women. This is a matter of personal taste. Btw, I did see the video you wrote about and I agree - very hot, one of the few I liked.
I meant among people you know in the real world. I figured that would be obvious but I suppose now that I read it over again it is a bit vague. My purpose of the question was to gauge how open us porn collectors are with people we know face-to-face as opposed to how openly we discuss it here on the internet.
How you are protected on your credit card information.
And other issues that could be important.
What impresses me is that most paysites do not clearly spell out most of these issues. Or even have a FAQ page that is easily found.
I also like the home page layout, that showcases links to the basic areas of the site/network, making navigation more easily understood.
There's a huge amount of content at the site and network, and the owners deserve credit for making the site layout easy to navigate. As well as credit for packing the site and network with a boatload of good to excellent hardcore porn.
Giving the site (and network) a score of 88.
The site is worth a join. The network access makes it an even better deal.
Giving Cruelty Party a score of 82.
If the site were scored as a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower. The main value of the site is in the network access, not in the site contents. The network videos are mainly professionally shot, with good lighting, good sound control, OK to good camera-work, but usually in a gonzo versus glamour style.
The Porn Pros network is not bad: You get a large collection of niche sites, with 1,000s of hardcore videos.
But the videos start to lose steam after a while, and you might want something different.
There are some good, hot videos at the network. You just have to search through a lot of OK to meh videos to find the ones you like.
They advertise that you get 24 sites with a basic subscription. That advertisement might have been true a year ago, but it appears that currently, you only get 16 sites with a basic subscription.
The basic pro with Cruelty Party is that you get access to the Porn Pros basic network of 16 sites.
This provides you with a lot of different niches.
The basic con with Cruelty Party is that it's a small site. Only 64 updates.
Cruelty Party was started around the beginning of 2010. It stopped updating in March 2013. That's about 4 years ago. So don't expect any new scenes. The theme was girls drinking and partying and having a good time, then having sex with one or more guys. I'm not sure where the cruelty fits in, because the sex is consensual, not rough, no biting, spitting, name-calling, or extreme gonzo action.
Maybe the owners thought that "cruelty" would be a selling point to attract subscribers. Except they didn't bother to follow through with putting cruel sex in the videos.
If group sex is your niche, the site provides 64 videos for your pleasure.
If group sex is not your niche, you get access to 15 other sites, most with more content to select from.
Most of the models at the network are attractive white teens. There is little variety, in age, race, or body type.
The teens are basically attractive, but they are not presented as glamour models: instead, the sex is hardcore gonzo, with little plot, little dialog worth hearing, little or no romance or affection--basically just suck and fuck.
If that's your bag, you have plenty of choices.
If you want more refined sex, more glamour, slightly more plot, go to a glamcore site, or visit a borderline glamcore/gonzo site like Diesel network.
My personal favorite site in the network is Massage Creep. Because I like the one on one (boy-girl), and the massage setup gives some variation and meaning to the sex. Where the masseur works to arouse the girl before he starts to bang her.
I'm with you on amazon. I spend a fortune with them and am a prime member in addition to prime fresh. Too bad they have bad (presidential) politics. But let's not go there. Jet has better prices on some items and carries some things that amazon doesn't. In my limited dealings with them, their delivery has been as fast if not faster than Amazon. The concept is basically the same though Jet carries only a fraction of the items that Amazon carries. Competition is a good thing.
As to how the bank allows duplicate authorizations - it's because they're for different amounts and the bank can't distinguish that it's a duplicate. Jet initially authorizes for the entire purchase. A day later, they authorize for individual purchases. For example, I purchased 3 items in my latest order. Immediately following placing the online order, they authorized the entire amount. The next day, they authorized each item separately. The bank told me that several of the authorizations were duplicates and they rejected them (I ordered 5 cases of water and apparently they tried to authorize each case separately).
I can't fault the bank - how are they supposed to know? Being a nut when it comes to these things, I called up Visa USA and asked for clarification about Visa's rules. Talk about bureaucracy! I got nowhere. I know I know, I'm an obsessive nut when it comes to these things. ;)
They need time to sharpen their pencils to write the cancellation order ;).
Not to digress.... coincidentally, I was just speaking with my bank about authorizations from jet.com - the company that aspires to be amazon.com. What a racket! It's my third time ordering from them and I keep forgetting about their ridiculous policy. They authorize all purchases twice thereby tying up available funds. The duplicate authorizations go away eventually, but that doesn't mitigate the hardship it may cause by having funds unavailable needlessly. When I questioned jet.com, I was told it was the way their system operates. Great answer! Calling my bank simply to find out if they're allowed to do this was an exercise in patience and I eventually hung up after being transferred around. I personally don't really care about the funds being unavailable - it's the principle. The experience was something out of Kafka. I don't know how they get away with it.
Nice review. Still trying to figure out how they decide something goes to WowGirls or WowPorn. Much of the content seems completely interchangeable.
Also, just FYI, in Met Art and a growing number of site on their network, there is an "options" link in the upper right hand corner on the main page that allows you to personalize you preferences. One of the options to sets whether or not images open on separate pages. Personally, I like the "open images in new tab" option, although it can create a lot of tabs of the images are really good. :-)
Easy enough to turn it off, though.
02-08-1710:20pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
