| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I saw an article today talking about T. Woods and the fact that the fact that he checked himself into a sex addiction clinic. I laughed when the article quoted someone as saying that if a person spends more than 2 hours day obsessing over or actively thinking about sex, pursuing prostitutes or looking at porn then they are a sex addict. I'm thinking I should be become a sex therapist (given the experience I have with my addiction) and will dedicate myself to helping young women understand and accept their sexual dependency issues while charging them money to do so.
|
01-27-10 12:21pm
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
It's not worth breaking it down, besides sometimes the reviews can be interesting to glance at as they appear on the PU home page. I don't read most reviews because the sites don't interest me. If I can't filter out the gay stuff searching through the content here then I'm really in trouble and lucky if I'll find my way back to PU.
|
01-26-10 07:55pm
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
From what little I've seen of the adult dating sites, they're mostly come ons for desperate men and haven for prostitutes to advertise their wares. I'm sure some people hook up but only after shelling out $$ for upsells and spending way too much friggen' time on it. If you're looking for a quickie, call a hooker. If you want a relationship, try a real dating site or hit the street.
|
01-26-10 07:52pm
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do like women who are firm and well toned. Definitely pass on the chicks who look like Conan the Barbarian without the package.
|
01-26-10 01:29pm
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Realistically, if you collect porn that features some young teens then you probably have jail bait on your drive. Not so much from the US, but some the Eastern Euro sites may take a more "lax" approach to age verification even when they have legal disclaimer language. My nuanced point is that if you pay to join websites and download from sites with the legal disclosures (that's almost all the pay sites today) you're probably safe saving content unless you actually know the model is underage even when common sense tells us some of this stuff may not be either due to the publisher or model lying about their age. I guess what I'm trying to say is that we're a bit naive if we think everything out there is legit.
Like most replies here, if you know it's a young 'un, you must delete. Being convicted of child porn and registering as a sex offender could put a real crimp in your life so the content ain't worth saving.
As for the 17 vs. 18 thing, it's not worth arguing about. Yes, there are people who could do porn at 17 and not be scarred forever just like there are people at 37 who couldn't handle it at all. At some point you have to draw the line and 18 is where it is for now.
|
01-13-10 07:06pm
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I'm with Capn, whatever comes up is what I grab. I can't say I've ever searched for a model more than a few times. I have a few mental notes about ones I really like but I don't live for finding every last bit of stuff they've done. To me, it's like saying I really like so-and-so as a main stream actor and therefore I must own the DVD of every movie they've ever done ... ain't gonna happen.
|
01-05-10 12:02pm
|
Reply
182
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I prefer models screaming out in American Sign Language ;)
|
01-04-10 12:06pm
|
Reply
183
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Most everyday but that's mostly because I'm a cheap bastard and go for trial memberships so you're usually done with them in a few days. Otherwise, I'll log on most days for monthly memberships.
|
12-30-09 11:54am
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
For me, the hardcore stuff comes off as more of a gimmick and cheesey. The softcore stuff can be interesting but I find, like most of our beefs about porn, that it isn't done well most of the time so generally I find the holiday themed stuff to be a waste and it consumes very little storage space on my computer.
|
12-28-09 02:38pm
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
No one likes secondhand smut so why expose others to it. We're obviously too friggin old cause we don't view sex on our cell phones like everyone else seems to now a days.
Anyway, I rarely watch movies while flying or riding in the car so why would I feel compelled to watch my porn collection ... god knows I spend enough time with it as it is.
|
12-28-09 02:34pm
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never an international phone call but I have had to call for customer service on an 800 number before. It's a tad embarassing until you think about it and realize the poor shmo on the other end is doing this all day long. I hate the phone call stuff and you figure it has to cost the website money but it might be enough of a deterence that causes lots of people to keep their memberships.
|
12-28-09 02:30pm
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
While many have carped about bad reviews being the reason not to join I say the main reason for me is crumby picture sizes. I like my pics and I've seen a lot of sites get good reviews that have garbage for photos so that's my vote and I'm stickin' to it.
|
12-22-09 07:45pm
|
Reply
188
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
Like others I was torn but had to say "definitely better" for no other reason than the vid and pic quality is getting better (who the hell wants to go back to the days of 800x600 pix and 320 pixel video downloads?). In terms of variety of content, nothing really has changed but then again I've seen a hell of a lot of porn. I think someone just starting a collection will have a lot more choices today than those of us who started 5 to 10 years ago.
|
12-22-09 07:43pm
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
And people thought the floor of their local movie theater was sticky enough already?
|
12-21-09 02:14pm
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I agree that it should be strictly enforced. The more that sites avoid it, the more likely that governments will start trying to regulate porn even more so. Abide by the basic disclosure laws and we'll all be happier in the end.
|
12-17-09 03:22pm
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I prefer toys but only if they're done right. Just hauling one out and slammin' away because that's what the shoot calls for doesn't do anything for me. As long as they look like they're enjoying it, go for it.
|
12-17-09 03:18pm
|
Reply
192
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Actually, I'll go diving into first amendment issues -- while you may not like it, it's there and it's legal and if you want to shut it down then a whole of other things that you might like are going to go too.
|
12-17-09 03:15pm
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I "do" like when they give the cam a glance. I'm not sure if I "fo" like it, eh Denner ;)
|
12-17-09 03:10pm
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
"Tweedle Dum" ; mmmm, sounds promising and with oh so much potential ... or lack thereof depending on one's perspective.
Back to the issue at hand, when you consider websites as a whole, then for god sakes yes do some re-touching. Most of the photographers taking pics out there don't understand that the dials and menus on cameras today are there to help make pictures look better. Leave your point and click at home and figure out what the hell you're doing.
As for the primo sites like Met-Art, there already is some airbrushing going on I bet but it's done well for the most part so I don't mind. It's when it goes overboard like Playboy or Suze that it sometimes gets annoying.
|
12-17-09 02:55pm
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I had to vote "yes" just because I didn't think anyone else would (apparently someone else came in with a pity vote besides me).
|
09-17-09 02:28pm
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It just overloads my tiny pervie mind seeing that much bootie together ;. It's OK once in a while but it's more about the "shot". I prefer just a couple of models at most in my collection.
|
09-15-09 05:19pm
|
Reply
197
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I really like the new format and feel that it's about as complete as we're ever going to find for a long time. For those who are saying that it's just an improvement I'm sort of wondering where they see gaps in the current format?
|
09-14-09 02:41pm
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
There would still be porn but it would be aweful from a guys perspective. Thirty minutes of interviews with the models talking about their thoughts, feelings and how they're committed to each other, 20 minutes of "Dining at the Y", followed by a couple minutes of gratuitous humping for the guy. No cumshots on the face, little anal sex, lots of sexy clothing, real dialogue, and real story lines ... say, actually isn't this stuff that a lot fo PUers say they want to see in porn :)
|
09-01-09 02:28pm
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The answer to this question is twofold. First, how quickly can you "rub one out" (are you Speed Racer or more like a Koala bear taking a eucalyptus numbing journey) because I sure as hell don't watch much more for its overall entertainment. Second, unless all you do is fire up the download manager and walk away you have to spend time on your collection or else it's a total organizational mess. That be the equation.
|
08-28-09 11:07am
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Like Drooler notes, it is deceptive but it's sort of par for the course in the porn world. So long as the content isn't stuffed to the gills with MILF's and the babes look youngish and have a fair amount of teen content then I'm satisfied.
Personally, I don't see the need to push a website as "teen" focused when it's not. If your content is hot just pic another name or focus less on the teen content in the preview. Doing so is just going to piss off the teen obsessed.
|
08-18-09 03:25pm
|
