| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I don't care so long as I can tell what the thumbnail is supposed to be representing. Like Drooler notes, cropping seems to be occuring more and more these days. A lot of sites I've been to recently crop some or a lot of the picture which is a pain for the consumer regardless of whether you're zipping or not (why do I want to go through a zip file later if I don't know what's on it know).
|
08-04-09 11:03am
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I used to take the plunge all the time before finding out about porn review sites. At this point, I don't jump in unless it looks like darn good material and there is a full access trial. I can't see joining at full price (more than $15 a month) on just a hunch knowing that I've been burned before on sweet looking tours.
|
07-31-09 03:17pm
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That was sort of the intent of the poll question, focusing on animation that is almost indistinguishable from reality. I think that's probably about 10 years or so away, maybe less, before these types of sites start hitting the porn scene. I think a lot of people will be surprised at how good it is.
|
07-24-09 12:05pm
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Personally I'll want both but I sort of think that animation will have something of an edge because every individual will be essentially "perfect" as opposed to people who have their flaws and eventually get old. Life-like anime will also have the advantage of creating real stories, plot and action scenes that porn currently doesn't have.
|
07-23-09 11:29am
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Nothin' new here. Check PU and TBP. If there outside reviews that I trust (there aren't many other sites out there in my book) I'll look there as well. Then the site tour and then fork over my card.
I'm with Drooler in that I want to check out sample pic sizes before joining which they don't have here. Hopefully with the reformatting of TBP that will change. My only concern is that the TBP reviewers will only look at a few pics and post the sizes when in fact the older material on a site ain't worth beans.
|
07-21-09 03:38pm
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Isn't really every ones dream to be able to do what they want in their career. To be popular and good looking enough to land a contract with a production company is darn near the top in the porn biz for stars. They've earned it, they get to decide what they want to do. If they don't do "enough" then their contracts won't get renewed. That's business.
|
07-17-09 11:59am
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Zilch for me. I just keep a separate list of sites that I'm interested in joining. Why risk anyone stumbling across your bookmarks?
Actually, I should transfer my list to PU. You can add sites and make notes on them in the "favorites" section of your personal page. It'd probably be easier to keep all my stuff here but I've just been lazy.
|
07-15-09 11:07am
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Sadly, NeanderthalsGoneWild.com no longer seems to exist. Nor does the second site I joined, Cro-MagnonCumshots.com. Maybe I'm just getting old ? ;)
|
07-09-09 11:32am
|
Reply
209
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It has been very rare that I've passed on a model because she looked too young. It's usually something else that turns me off from the set/scene. I also like the "young look" (however, in reality they just look hot and then they open their open their mouth, guess I'm not going to be bagging any co-eds anytime soon) as its part of the fantasy aspect that I like.
|
07-07-09 03:27pm
|
Reply
210
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
All is mine. Since I tend to like pics and most people like vids my collection probably wouldn't impress most others. If asked I might share a few things with friends but I tend to believe that since porn is cheap in the scheme of life you're better off getting what you want from the sites anyway. I would never upload to some file share site.
|
07-07-09 03:08pm
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
For a pornstar to have a truly positive social impact it would have to be for something else they do/did besides porn. Additionally they probably could only be on the fringes of the industry such as being a producer of noncontorversial porn (standard generic porn) although they could have been a porn star in the past. Also, they would have to have a great ability to convey their message for their cause and the cause would have to be something not directly tied to the porn industry. Not asking for a lot America, are we?
Jenna Jameson is famous mostly because she's hot and has built a large successful business. I don't think anyone views her as a success because of how many scenes she's shot. I don't think many people outside the porn biz look at her for inspiration though.
|
07-01-09 12:03pm
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn. The porn awards pretty much go to, and are sponsored by, the major production companies. These are the people who typically do a lousy job of putting their stuff on the web. As such, I really don't care who wins the best MMF porn scene in a back alley award. I'll probably find it on line in a few years and care as much about it then as I do know.
|
06-29-09 12:35pm
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Tease is good but generally I want to see the the whole enchilada at some point. I said maybe since I haven't joined any in the past but some sites like OnlyTease look somewhat interesting and feature women who stay mostly clad. When I win the lottery I'll probaby be joining some of these sites ;)
|
06-27-09 11:37am
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I look at it this way. Once you're on the net, you're forever on the net and you'd be surprised at how many "nice" people look at porn sites. The last thing you'd want is your co-worker posting a print out picture of your online escapade on your desk some day. If I'm 80 then I probably wouldn't care, hell, in fact I'd be proud. Until then, it just seems a bit job / privacy risky for this dude even if you're somewhat obscured.
|
06-25-09 12:03am
|
Reply
215
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I normally watch my porn while wearing leiderhosen wrapped around my head, footsie pajama bottoms with cutout crotch, a Sponge Bob t-shirt and ... oh wait, this is a question about computer monitors ... never mind.
|
06-19-09 11:19am
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Here's the obvious moronic Wittyguy answer: We need more "quality" of everything damn it!!! Most everything coming out is mediocre at best in terms of quality, at this point I'm willing to take quality anything over the usual suspects.
|
06-11-09 01:38pm
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Definitely other. Who wouldn't want the "Sham Wow Guy" position ... cleaning up the furniture and props afterwards. My dream job.
|
06-08-09 10:55am
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I voted "other" because Khan just isn't getting enough face time on "The View" or in "People" magazine. I'm eagerly awaiting 'Khan Tweets' so we can find out about his exciting life ... "just nuked another dumbsh*t post"; "just approved Mbaya's 25th review of week"; "feel asleep reading the crap in the forum" ....
|
06-03-09 12:09pm
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
In order to settle the issue once and for we need to establish a base line for "taste". And the only way we're going to settle that issue is to have people sign up for the Wittyguy School of Advanced Muff-Diving. Please note that all participants must have passed muff diving 101 before enrollment and have their own super snorkel or be able to breathe out their ass (inhale, not exhale like all guys already do extremely well). For the amazingly low price of $39.95 (cash only please) you'll learn all my advanced secrets for Dining at the Y.
Can't distinguish premium beaver from muskox? Then you need this on-line computer course or else my name is Billy Mays! Once you've completed these advanced learning techniques (so secret that I had to pay a streetwalking Kama Sutra master a six pack of 40 oz. malt liquers to learn them), dining delicacy reviews will be posted on the school's website and the scientific community will be able to answer the putrid poon question once and for all. Don't be late, courses are filling up now. With my elusive money back guarantee you've got nothing to lose but the further deprivation of 'men-kinds' good taste. Act today and you'll get a FREE COPY of Dora the Explorer's video: Find the Man in the Boat!
|
06-01-09 01:35pm
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Is Drooler asking this because he knows or doesn't know, enquiring minds want to know ;)
|
06-01-09 10:41am
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
For me, it's mostly news, sudoku (I'm addicted) and a few odds and ends. Of course, PU tops the list ;) My favorite site for laughs on a daily basis is http://icanhascheezburger.com/ which is network of sites featuring viewer submitted pics (animals, celebs, news, stupid stuff) that have funny captions; always makes me laugh and it's clean enough to view at work/in public.
|
05-29-09 02:53pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I agree that 4000 pixel images are a bit over the top today but generally the stuff we collect we intend to keep for a long time so you have to look beyond today. It's already possible to hook up monitor feeds to tvs and as technology moves along our tv will also become a major feed for porn. Who the heck would want a 900x600 image on a 48" HD tv screen? So, while huge pics maybe overboard today, you may thank yourself for having big ass pics (or movies) in the future.
|
05-29-09 11:59am
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
This is one of those polls that is "loaded" in that it appeals to what you really want the most: pics, vids, or new content. I'll jump on the Drooler wagon and bitch about pics because I like them the most and they're probably the easiest for sites to fix.
Everyone shoots digitally today and no one uses cell phones to do professional shoots so were talking about pic sizes that well above 4 megapixels in size. But what do sites do? They think the pics are too big (apparently we can't handle the truth) so they shrink them down to 900x600 and call it good. NOT! A 2000 pixel image isn't going to take more than a second or two longer to download than a smaller one. The file size is virtually nothing compared to video sizes. This is an easy way to draw more customers (albeit a minority as most people dig vids more) with virtually no expense and effort other than changing the pixel sizes. Instead they're either just living in the past and think a 13" monitor is all anyone has or they're just lazy.
|
05-28-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
They obviously sell otherwise they wouldn't make as many as they do. For me, it's just an occasionally interesting gimmick since the acting is never very good and the plot is in the sex, not the story.
|
05-26-09 11:26am
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Of course we're all holding our breath ... when's the last time you smelled nasty dog drool breath ;)
|
05-22-09 02:10pm
|
