| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
201
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
|
01-04-13 07:42pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
202
|
Anal Recruiters
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review as usual, admiral. I have never joined this network but one of the cons, for some of us, would be the use of condoms on many of their clips.
|
01-01-13 10:14am
|
Reply
203
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks Ik, best wishes and Happy New Year to you too.
I don't post in the forum much nowadays, but often look in to see what's happening. I am not at home as much as I used to be, which means I'm away from the computer too, so I don't watch as much porn as I used to. On the plus side, that stops me from getting jaded.
I was going to make a post about trying to find a porn site or network to join pre Christmas, listing all the ones I had to discount due to regional discrimination and cross selling, but I didn't find time to do it. I may find time in the next few weeks. At the last count I found 25 with cross selling and 9 with regional discrimination.
|
12-27-12 04:58pm
|
Reply
204
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
Very positive indeed. It's good to hear news about this sort of thing, so thanks for the observation, Marcus. They would go way up on my list of potential sits to join, but still have pre checked cross sales.
|
12-27-12 09:39am
|
Reply
205
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Another great review Ik2. This organisation would have had my money a long time ago but for pre checked cross selling. I simply cannot support a company that tries to trick its customers. On the contrary, we should be collectively boycotting those who try to trick us. A shame because their content looks good.
|
12-26-12 07:25pm
|
Reply
206
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Shame about the pre checked cross selling, otherwise I'd have joined ages ago. Can't trust any orgqnisation that tries to trick you out of your money.
|
12-10-12 09:00am
|
Reply
207
|
Casting Couch X
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yep, that's why I always give trials a misss. Same for sites with pre checked cross sells. If it looks like a site that is likely to try and trick you out of your money, it's best to give it a miss.
|
12-08-12 07:31pm
|
Reply
208
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Absolutely agree with you. It's a hideous name for a porn site. A real turn off.
|
12-08-12 07:25pm
|
Reply
209
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
tonguey's Review
That's two newbies with two 100 perfect scores in the last two reviews for this organisation. Hmm..
|
12-06-12 03:00pm
|
Reply
210
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes Capn, Epoch is number one with me for that reason alone. It appears CCBill doesn't exchange currencies at what I would consider to be a fair and reasonable basis. Sometimes they have outright regional discrimination. Either way it amounts to the same thing. I go with Epoch whenever I can. Probably the best customer support too.
|
11-28-12 10:31am
|
Reply
211
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
This sort of thing is a little worrying. DDF have a reasonable reputation, but are they resorting to desperate or dubious measures because of lean times? Seeing reports of customers being unable to cancel always sets off alarm bells with me. It may be a little unfair, but I'm not trusting them with my credit card. Using a prepaid card seems like a good idea on this one.
For me, seeing Epoch or CC BIll, as the sign up agent, goes a long way towards making me feel comfortable about handing over credit card details.
|
11-27-12 07:12pm
|
Reply
212
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Looks like they have both pre checked cross selling and regional discrimination in place. I wouldn't trust this lot with my credit card details. Looking at some of those free download places, DDF don't have bad stuff. They would have my money if they could be trusted, but I'm not touching them with a barge pole. Where's my money going next? Not to DDF.
|
11-27-12 06:30am
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Excellent observation which leaves me little too add.
I was expecting this to be a messmer poll.
I would say fully dressed, with a little teasing. I don't like too much talk, teasing, and oral. That is why I hate the 80's porn films. Twenty minutes of talk then ten minutes of oral, followed by four minutes of sex. Too much like reality.
|
11-14-12 09:41am
|
Reply
214
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Truly excellent review admiral. As a site contender I never had this in the rear view mirror, but it sounds better than I was expecting. Don't forget the pre-checked cross sales as a negative though.
|
11-06-12 08:44am
|
Reply
215
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Completely anal, but I still miss some.
|
11-04-12 10:17am
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
High average-superior would be my guess. Good poll graymane. I think you're right in that the quality of reviews and contributions means there's a high IQ present here. Strange but true given the subject matter of the forum. However go to a forum on some of the porn networks and you will see porn fans aren't necessarily intelligent. This is the way PU has evolved.
|
11-01-12 05:09pm
|
Reply
217
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Review
Welcome to PU. Good effort for your second review.
The one thing you don't mention in the cons, is the use of condoms in 90% of their clips. That isn't necessarily a con for some, but means it's a definite no goer for me. Even if it isn't a con I think it needs mentioning.
|
10-30-12 07:22am
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't like it at all. I agree with messmer in that it is also present in comments accompanying a picture set. It's the same for forums. Given some of the comments by porn fans on sites like VideoBox it's the same stuff. Some love it, I hate it. Maybe it's harmless, maybe not. It does worry me a bit.
|
10-27-12 10:55am
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, they and the Wittyguy forum awards, were two of the PU highlights.
|
10-20-12 05:05pm
|
Reply
220
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pawn3d's Review
Likewise welcome to PU.
I suppose it's all a matter of taste, but I am stunned by the number of high 90's scores I see given to Brazzers, Reality Kings, and Bangbros, so this well below the norm sort of score is a welcome balance.
Personally I don't agree with 50, or the reason given, as they don't claim to be a teen site (Try 21 Sextury or Teen Mega World), but given some of the stuff that has been written by PU members about the negatives of these companies over the years, I don't mind seeing them getting a 50.
Virtually every company claims to be the "best" or "world's best." Each and every one of them, except for one, is lying. That's porn.
I hope you stick around and let us know what you think of the teen sites.
|
10-15-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
221
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I think most of the regulars read the regulars' reviews, but don't leave replies, so I would imagine quite a few will have read your review, and will have appreciated it, even though they don't comment. I read tons of great reviews, and have to admit I often don't leave a positive reply, when I should.
For me the most annoying thing about doing reviews is taking the trouble to do one, then ten minutes later seeing it replaced on the "front page" by one about ten lines long that took all of five minutes to throw together. No, it shouldn't bother me, and yes I know how PU works, but it does.
Yeah I occasionally now do the Ctrl V thing. It's when I don't that something usually goes wrong. For reviews I simply open a file and over the period of membership, jot down any pros, cons, and bottom lines, whenever I think of one, then begin to put it all together after a few weeks.
|
10-14-12 04:31pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Nearly all of the above.
|
10-14-12 06:20am
|
Reply
223
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Cheers graymane, it's obvious you take the trouble to put together a really good review (which applies to most of the regulars here).
I have to admit to mostly reading reviews by regulars. Some newbies take to it like a duck to water, others take time to get used to it, but the best reviews for me are the ones with the required facts along with a unique slant that only that particular taste and personality can bring.
I have more than once had an hour's plus hard work wiped out by pressing the wrong button (NOOOO!!!) or my computer having a mind of its own. That can't happen with pen and paper - unles you do a Richard Pryor while writing.
|
10-14-12 06:18am
|
Reply
224
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Excellent, well written and informative review. I shall take note of your warnings. Some may be expecting more, given the name behind the site, but it looks like one to avoid.
|
10-10-12 01:14pm
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Either not worth the effort or they're a scam, so I went for they're a scam.
|
10-07-12 06:20am
|
