| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
Yeah, I would think that's part of it too. :)
|
09-15-07 07:43pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I'm better about this now, but it used to be a problem especially when sites kept looking promising for my favorite niches. However, a lack of funds solved that pretty fast. ;)
|
09-14-07 07:23am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I think that webmaster response to a technical issue is crucial to the success of a site. Every site is going to have problems now and then, especially when it's new, but when those issues are addressed quickly my opinion of that site is always going to be positive.
|
09-12-07 06:51pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
First of all, I should say how great this thread has been. The ease with which we can communicate is simply awesome and I'm excited to hear that PU will soon be hitting the airwaves!
As for updating reviews, I think you should be able to edit the full review up to a month or so, but if that seems too long I'd say it should at least be more than 7 days. I haven't done a lot of updating to my reviews, but perhaps I should.
|
09-12-07 06:48pm
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I've definitely joined some sites with the discount that werew outside my primary niches, but wouldn't go to sites on completely different themes just becuase of a discount. However, if there is a good trial price that allows for access to an entire site for a good price, I'll always be game to check it out.
|
09-08-07 09:33pm
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I once had a friend come across it because the folder I had saved a vid to came up when he was using a different program. However, it didn't seem to bother him much. ;)
|
09-08-07 09:31pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Woodruff's Poll
I'd never join just based on that info, but I might see what else is said around the net if she really "did it for me". But by itself there's too much of a risk for my taste.
|
09-08-07 09:29pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
On the whole, I think they are usually just for upsells to other sites, but I have done a couple that at least had some minimal content. So, I didn't pick "They're a scam" since in those instances I did get what I paid for, but for the most part I think it's just a gimmick with deception in mind.
|
08-29-07 12:53pm
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I think it's a very good step and perhaps they'll find ways around it, but for now I think it addressed the "shill" issue quite well. At the very least, it shows how responsive PU is to our comments and questions about the site. Good work folks!
|
08-29-07 12:51pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have done it on ocassion, but usually was thinking with my libido rather than my brain. However, I think more sites should offer $10 rebills since I think you'd keep a lot of people that way. Once the newness of a site has worn off, most people balk at $25 rebills. Maybe they'd stay, as long as there is regularly updated content.
|
08-29-07 12:49pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
I have to admit that I move around quite a bit on sites and if there are any ones I want to subscribe to more than a month they'd have to be pretty special. There have been a few in the past like that, but now I tend to wait a few months and go back to get more material.
|
08-27-07 11:08am
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Original content really is everything, unless you are talking about a site like VideoBox. I don't like material that is supposed to look like it's exclusive and come to find out it's not. That really burns me to be honest.
|
08-21-07 06:39pm
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I honestly don't visit any other sites besides TBP and PU. I don't have to! :)
|
08-21-07 06:37pm
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think I tend to have really high expectations for sites and very often become dissappointed once I've joined. That's especially true when a site is more expensive, but I think that's understandable. I've definitely learned my lesson with more expensive sites that what you see in a tour isn't always what you really get. I think that's why I've stuck to cheaper sites recently, especially networks, so I don't feel stiffed. However, that can keep me from finding real gems.
|
08-21-07 06:36pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
I just visit a lot of sites is all. :) Plus, I really enjoy writing the reviews! I've been doing them since January, but sometimes it surprises me I've done so many. I really want that last badge, so that keeps me going.
Thanks for the comments! Make sure to check out my reviews!
-SD
|
08-14-07 07:24pm
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
My average day is probably less than an hour, but there will be some days where it's over 2. So, I selected less than an hour, but average might be higher than that.
|
08-14-07 07:18pm
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Poll
I would join a site that didn't use the better known billers, but I always feel better about joining a site when they use such services. It's easy to log in and check your subscription info, which is a big plus. Just a nice safety net.
|
08-14-07 07:14pm
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Price is always one of my top considerations and I'm definitely more lenient on a site that charges a low membership fee unless it offers nothing. Right now I have NetworkPass and it's main sites aren't that great, but does offer some quality feeds. If they chraged $20 or more I wouldn't give it the time of day, but for $10 a month and signs of trying to improve it will definitely earn a respectable score.
|
08-14-07 07:10pm
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I haven't had any problems, but I try to stick with sites that use reputable billing companies. I think it can be a real issue though and can have dire consequences. I think the pre-paid debit card approach is a good idea that I hadn't thought of.
|
08-07-07 05:00pm
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can't say my porn habits have ever taken it that far, but I could see adjusting one's schedule to catch a particularly good cam show. I think if you missed work more than a handful of times you might want to re-evaluate your habits, but of course everyone is different.
|
08-07-07 04:40pm
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use Norton weekly and assume it works. Probably a really stupid thing to do, but who has time to check for viruses? It's not like I work for the CDC or anything. ;)
|
08-07-07 04:34pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
It would totally depemd on the person and the circumstances, but as a general rule I would. As always there could be things that change my view of the otehr person, but many pornstars probably take more precautions than the average person anyway. Put another way, would I refuse to date someone solely because they are an adult performer? No.
|
08-01-07 08:18pm
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
I'm very much against limited trials, but understand webmasters trying to protect their comment. One idea I have always had is that you could have the entire site DRM protected fir teh trial side so you can see everything but not download. I have a feeling though that such a process would be difficult if not impossible. What I want to see is how the site is constructed to get a full view of how big it is.
|
08-01-07 08:14pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I just think it's disgusting since the girl can't be enjoying it very much, but then again I'd hazard a guess that most of them wouldn't like to be fisted either. In the end, it's just not something I find very erotic.
|
08-01-07 08:09pm
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually download my top stuff to DVDs, but I leave it on my hard drive for awhile to make sure it's something I really want to keep. To be honest, I have found that to be less true of the sites I have joined lately, but I'm not sure if that means the sites have declined in quality or my tastes have changed.
|
07-24-07 06:42pm
|
