There are porn babes that change their bods - by starving themselves - very common - or by getting unnattractive clown boobs - very common - or by getting unattractively overweight - not as common in the porn world as the real world, but it happens.
I'll still watch their older scenes enthusiastically, but I've never made a commitment to any porn performer that I'll love every thing they ever do. So if I don't like a new scene, I won't have a problem acknowledging that - and if, like Teagan Presley, the performer gets herself in scrumptious shape once again, I'll be quite happy about and, again, will have no problem acknowledging it.
Yeah, it's one of those "Oooooh, look how nasty I am" stunts. There are exciting ways for women to be nasty - creative dirty-talking, Careena Collins-level energy in their sexual performance, etc - that are a real turn-on for me.
Drinking cum out of something is not a turn-on to me. I like hot women - if I were all about male bodily fluids, I live in the Bay Area - I would have SUCH easy access.
There are comments and reviews about a lot of sites that I don't care about, so I don't see the need to segregate any particular niche - I just read about the sites that I'm interested in, leave the other ones to the people that are interested in those.
MetArt, Nubiles, ATKArchives all show models that are new to me on a consistent basis. They don't all rock my world and I don't go looking for what else they all may have done.
ALS Scan has a new model they rolled out this week - Bianca Arden - a tiny little gorgeous blonde. I was delighted to find, when I did some searching, that she's been a busy little honey - I'll definitely be looking for more of her work - what a babe!
If someone asks me directly, I'll answer honestly. But I've got friends that think that porn is the root cause of evil in the universe, pretty much, and believe the most sensationalistic bs out there - some friends of mine were going on the other day about how prevalent torture porn was, how it's all over the internet, blah blah blah. Is it even worth getting into it with people that are that convinced of their own utter correct-ness? No, not in my opinion, so I don't say anything at all about my own tastes and perspectives. If there's a reasonable discussion going on, I'll certainly jump in.
For me, this is one of the ways when I know that it's time to cancel a sub. If I'm not excited about checking out a site often, or I'm not excited by their content when I do check it out, or I find myself repeatedly disappointed when I check it out - by the lack of new content or the fact that I'm not interested in the new content that they posted - then it's time to cancel my subscription.
On the other hand, if I find myself consistently happy with a site, I'll stay a member.
I put "It depends", though I lean toward "getting better" - perhaps I should have flipped a coin.
How is it getting better? HD-quality - being able to see gorgeous women in such great detail is very cool - both for vids and pics, the better sites are presenting awesome material.
Accessibility - pretty much whatever you want is out there and quite accessible. When I first looked at porn, I could either wait for something to come to Pussycat Cinema or go to an adult book store. Now, whatever you want is accessible from your seat in front of your computer.
Where things are going south a bit is that some sites are getting more cookie-cutter, as per my criticisms of Babes.tv, SexyBabes.tv, Babelicious, etc. They've given up on trying to be anything other than a shell for licensed material - probably like radio stations that decided it wasn't worth it to be local & unique and decided to be an affiliate of a national corporate broadcast.
So that just means that porn consumers have to have their radar out to see which sites are changing for the worse and to let other consumers have a heads-up.
Being as I'm old enough to have gone to PussyCat Cinemas for a number of years, it's been-there, done-that for me - and I've got no great desire to repeat the experience. I like watching porn in the privacy of my own abode, where, quite frankly, I can masturbate without fear of being busted like Peewee Herman.
Actually, Monahan, those phone sex things are still going - were really popular & lucrative for a period of time in the mid-80's or so. A friend of mine in LA wrote scripts for them for a while.
I 3rd Monahan's term, since Twisty's often paints their pics to an infuriating degree for my tastes.
At the same time, when I see sites post pics of completely untreated pics, I'm not very turned on, since harsh lighting can make the girls look like they're ready for a police line-up or something.
I remember Alex at ALS Scan wanted to demonstrate the amount of treatment that they do and he used a pic of petite Latina Kat as an example. Due to being freshly-shaved for the shoot, her pussy had horrible razor-burn and other "issues" that were not in the least attractive and they had taken care of that with the treatment of the pic - they hadn't done much more than that and I think that they're one of the best sites because of that.
I think I've talked about this before, actually, but I also like the very minimal photo-treatment of solo-girl site photographers like Phil-Flash and Spunky, who is most well know for his work with Kate's Playground. They mainly deal with what they want to deal with in their lighting with very little photo treatment as compared to other adult photographers, and their pics have a lot of erotic power as a result.
Some solo-girl sites use cheap auto-treat software that gives all of their pics a lacquered look and takes all the eroticicm away.
Holly Randall frustrates the fuck out of me with her heavy painting of her pics - be a painter or be a photographer, I scream at my monitor. Make up your mind!
Nubiles.net is another site that gets it right for my tastes. They're certainly posting treated pics, but they're not painting them heavily and they're not lacquering them in an art-less way.
As a fan of hot erotic pics, this is a topic that I could go on about for a long while.
I want to see the models, I want to see what they look like, I want to see why the photographer thought they were hot in the first place. I don't care how skilled their photo-shop guy is - he should go photo-shop pics of dolphins and wheat fields and leave the adult photography biz to people that want to see hot women looking like hot women.
I'm a cheap sob generally, so few sites that don't give me the opportunity to get a $20/mo price will get me to join, though I'm certainly willing to do a multi-month join to get that price.
If a site is more than that price, they'd better be bringing it in terms of both quality and frequency of updates.
I feel quite ripped off if I join a site and they aren't updating.
So give me a decent price & a decent rate of high quality updates, be honest about what I can expect and deliver what was promised and I'm happy.
Porn is performance. I like porn performers that understand that it's a performance, so, yeah, playing to the camera in a sexy way is definitely a good thing.
There are polls that are interesting and there are polls that, for me, are redundant, ridiculous or that I can't imagine why anybody would give a damn about - kind of like elections.
I vote and give feedback when I'm interested. I stay away when I'm not.
I'm a simple man - turn me on and I'm happy. There are photographers that obectively do good quality work that don't turn me on all that much, such as Dean Capture, the Twisty's guy. His stuff tends to be quite repetitive and it's got the predictable glamour thing and gets further removed from any real heat with the way the pics are finished - but then he'll turn in a set like the recent posting of Michelle Maylene and it's brilliant and mega-hot.
Phil Flash is a photographer I really like - mainly he's done tease stuff, starting with models such as Tiffany Teen. Technically, I'm sure he's nowhere close to a great photographer. You know what? I don't care. He gets great hot pics with florid colors and conveys and intimacy and immmediacy that's hot as hell.
Similarly, Alex of ALS Scan - I'm sure there are lots of technical things one could criticize about his pics. They're like blunt objects rather than anything all that artistic - where the girls are hurled into your face full-force. Me, I like it.
Among the better technical photographers, there are a number at Met Art that are doing fine work - the heat varies depending on the lushnessof the colors and crispness of the style, which is important to me, as well as the models, but there's no denying that they're showcasing a lot of fine work at that site.
I like the fantasy aspect of porn and I'm fine with seeing hot babes in their 30's cramming themselves into tiny schoolgirl outfits - it's even more fun in some ways when it's obviously done as a complete goof and lacks any of the "pedo" elements of having an 18 year old in a similar outfit.
But most women with a normal maturation pattern really don't look or count as "young" past the age of 23, which doesn't mean that they're not young if they were the president of a major corporation or whatever, but everything's relative, right?
Some clubs have a lot of bouncers, some have few - the one that I go to has security, but they only get involved in extreme situations, other than that it's up to the dancers to deal with, which also means less "suits" for the dancers to tip out to at the end of their shifts - and even clubs with security, you have dancers giving lap dances and nude private shows to guys - so most situations are still up to them. As to the heat - You don't know what you're talking about it until you've experienced it.
Dealing with the public - especially in an intimate way - is always going to be stressful and mentally taxing. Clearly the women that do it choose it, so I'm not saying that they need some public service awards, but they deserve acknowledgement for doing a challenging job well.
You doubt it's hard work to walk around for hours in crazy uncomfortable heels, dealing with really hot lights while on stage, trying to control a pack of guys, some of whom are drunk, some of whom are crazy and some of whom just think that they own women just because they paid their way into a strip club. Then they've got to look sexy and act like they're enjoying themselves with a variety of men that vary greatly in looks, attitude, hygiene and civility.
I think it's a damned hard job, one that I wouldn't be able to do, and I give full credit to those that do it well as a result.
Do some dancers use strip clubs as an opportunity for outside escort activity - sure. That's not even uncommon. Some clubs are fine with that, most clubs are not.
I like good strip clubs. Crappy strip clubs suck, but good ones are quite a lot of fun. And great strip club dancers, like great entertainers of all sorts should be highly valued.
Are there depressing strip clubs? Fuck yeah!
Are there depressing porn sites? Fuck yeah!
Are there depressing shoe stores? Fuck yeah!
Are there really fun strip clubs, where you can see great, hot dancers and hot porn babes featuring? Fuck yeah!
Kind of amazing that 8% voted that strippers are wrong at a poll at a site such as this one - but that's people for you - fuck, at forums that are directed at strip club fans, there are probably a fair number of people that think strippers are all this or that.
In my book, the most important thing is for them to act like they're turned on by the woman - Another reason why I dislike most porn churned out by the major porn companies is because the guys do that shit where they have their hands behind their back and the only contact with the woman is with their genitalia. I want to see fondling, groping, expressions of lust.
A Classic Example: There was a "Silence Of The Lambs" inspired scene where Stephanie Swift was with a guy who had a Hannibal Lecter and started out in a strait-jacket. Now, if the guy were in a strait-jacket filled with lust for a babe like Stephanie, when his hands were released, he'd want to use them, right? Well not in this worthless scene - where he had his hands behind his back and just used his cock where he was told - didn't even take the mask off so he could use his quivering tongue on her - boring!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
