| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I definitely agree photos are getting pretty big, especially when you consider the vast majority are 72ppi JPEGs (web standard, intended to reduce load times), which are still compressed files no matter how well they were shot or edited. I still spoil myself and go for the biggest sizes when they are available but sometimes sites fall short of my screen-filling demands. Like my recent subscription to SimonScans which is really surprising me in the size, or lack thereof, in its photos.
|
01-29-10 02:26pm
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I know what you are getting at. As I wrote my remarks I was wondering if I was right in my knee-jerk reaction to the subject, after all we still watch Jimmy Dean, Elvis Presley, Clark Gable etc. But to me there's a huge difference between watching "Gone With The Wind" and "Cum Cocktails." While the porn starlets do scenes like that willingly (I hope), I would feel I was demeaning their memory if I watched a hard core scene of theirs after their death. But of course I don't expect the same reaction from everyone. I was just surprised to find myself alone in this.
|
01-21-10 12:55pm
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Great idea. If we kick all the pervert students out of school, there'll be no one left and our taxes will go way down.
Schooling is such a bad idea anyway: everything necessary can be learned at your local church, synagogue, or mosque. An example would be that sex is only for procreation in the missionary position and is sinful if there is any pleasure.
Science has always been a bad idea also: life would be so much holier without electricity.
|
01-07-10 09:24am
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Capn:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Very good!
I like that! ;0)
Cap'n :0D
|
01-02-10 12:47pm
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Good point. The expertise of the photographer (lighting, angles, etc.) is far more important than the costume. A sexy Santa outfit works if the photog knows what he/she is doing, and doesn't if it's a hack behind the camera.
|
12-25-09 11:45am
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from RagingBuddhist:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I don't like it at all. I think the people should ignore the camera as though it isn't a recording session.
And this was supposed to just be an answer to the poll - Looks like I hit the wrong button LOL
|
12-12-09 05:13pm
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
There are things that seem either too 'shopped or maybe not enough, depending. Majoly's work is one of the 'shoppiest, in my my book, and that hasn't changed. He's still the Master Shellacker.
Not enough 'shoppin'?: There was a recent set of Ralina A on train tracks that had the classic orange skin tone issue, which I really, well, ugghh! The only way that could be at all natural would be if she were an all-day carrot cruncher. I don't know if that's bad 'shoppin' or just bad color control.
Frankly, it doesn't seem to me that things have changed that much, except that Super 'Shopper Magoo isn't around much (thankfully) and that there isn't as much Tim Fox as before. His stuff looks good.
|
12-11-09 10:33pm
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from TheRizzo:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I got the iomega this last time and the drive inside is actually a seagate. So you can get Iomega for less usually.
However I've had less issues with Western Digital than Seagates in the past.
|
11-09-09 09:42pm
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You hit the nail on the head, lk2fireone.
There's a TV show "Hoarders" about people who can't throw anything away and live in houses full of junk that they can't use because everything is in chaos and mostly can't be found when needed. I've got to learn to throw away the junk to really enjoy the good stuff.
|
11-04-09 09:46am
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Should be, but that depends. If they show just 50% of what goes on in a scene -- which I've seen some sites do -- then maybe three's not enough. I don't know know why some sites fail to present enough of a comprehensive overview of their individual video content.
|
10-23-09 02:19pm
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I wouldn't have believed you if you had told me that you knew what
swallowing 12 loads felt like. You might be right that cum isn't as filling as I made it sound. Liquid diets always leave wanting more.
Since the poll was about dating a pornstar then I didn't give an opinion on dating an ex-pornstar. I agree that Marilyn seemed like a nice decent woman who just happened to have done porn and from what I read on many other sites. She actually was quite nice. It's quite hypocritical of me to say that I can jerk off to a pornstar but I wouldn't want to date one. I'm pretty sure that quite a few men slept with the schools easy lay but would never consider dating her.
I'd have no problem being friends with an ex-pornstar or even an active one. I just don't know if I'd be comfortable dating an
ex-pornstar. I guess it depends on how long ago she was a pornstar and whether I had seen her movies.
|
08-21-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Duante Amorculo:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree that many implants are due to the self-esteem of some of the porn stars as well as the perception that most males prefer big tits. However, I also think that getting the implants is a marketing strategy. If you realize, on sites such as boobsquad or many milf sites, majority of the actresses have big breasts. I think this is an indication that many niche sites prefer women with big breasts and so for a porn star to get more work and recognition, they get implants.
|
08-21-09 11:18am
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
That's always a great answer lk2fireone -- I think too many of us base much of our lives around how others feel, without ever seriously considering our own personal feelings. I am a little lost as to why we put so much judgmental weight on people's professions, but we shouldn't let others intolerance and ignorance dictate our happiness, even when (if ever) it comes to dating/marrying a porn star.
Honestly though, I am in the "Not sure, it depends" category here. There have been quite a few models I thought I liked only to watch one too many behind the scenes videos, or read one too many interviews, to realize I really don't like a lot of them...but I am picky. I would think the porn could be a shared interest, though the fact that we approach it as fans, and the 'stars' approach it as a job, could lead to some problems.
This sort of goes back to a poll from over two years ago: "Would you date someone in the industry?" This poll was done before I even joined, but I will admit at least dating one is somewhere on my bucket list. :)
|
08-20-09 12:54pm
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from exotics4me:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I had other ones, but liked those 3 the best! Bond could possibly survive, depending on how many were scripted or not. I would give him a 0.07 chance if not scripted!
|
08-20-09 04:00am
|
Reply
140
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from asmith12:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
> Nobody expects 100% truth in advertising in the porn world
I do expect 100% truth in advertising, EVERYWHERE, including porn. So IF they have explicitly said that ALL their models are teens, I expect just it. On the other hand, if they just said that "MOST models are teens", or just included "teens" in the name of the site, it has much milder implications (the last one IMHO requires them only to have SOME really teen models on the site).
|
08-19-09 01:22am
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Duante Amorculo:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I intended "maybe" to mean an unsure probably and "not sure" to mean the opposite (an unsure probably not).
|
07-31-09 12:16am
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Not exactly for me means some pictures that used to turn me on don't anymore. I need prettier girls, more action, more passion now than years ago. A girl in a swimsuit could get me off years ago....not so often now.
|
07-29-09 05:02am
|
Reply
143
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from jd1961:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Because it's sleazy.
|
07-04-09 07:08pm
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Might as well call it "SuperNightGirls."
|
06-11-09 04:19am
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I keep all kinds of hours, but no time is the wrong time for porn, imHo.
But with you and BadAndy400 I do agree: There needs to be more QUALITY in EXCLUSIVE softcore sites. Some of the stuff that's come out more or less recently, like SuperNiceGirls and SweetAndNude have nice, big pics, but what's with this shooting the women in so much darkness? SuperNiceGirls is especially a noctural site at any hour! WTF!
Besides, I can NEVER get enough of good, quality softcore solo material that presents the women as craving a good booty-side rootin'.
|
06-11-09 02:56am
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Staying up a bit late are we lk2fireone? :) I guess I can not say much, it is 4:15 AM here. Boy do I need to get a life (job)!
I agree with you on that as well. Those are a little more prevalent than many of the fetish sites, but certainly can not touch hardcore.
I guess the point is that everyone needs to take it upon themselves to make their stuff better. I would not say that major niches like hardcore necessarily need more sites, but they like all others need to make what the have better.
|
06-11-09 01:16am
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GCode:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
When creating these polls, you only get 6 slots for answers to your poll. So, when making polls, you are sometimes limited to which answers you can put in. Usually when I make these, I want to put an 'other' option in or even more responses. However, for this particular poll, I also wanted to address these other options as well, so I did not want to leave any of these responses out :(
|
05-28-09 09:30am
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
"Community standards" can be an extremely dangerous defense, and it can also be blamed for making a lot of American porn only come from one or two places in the entire country (southern Florida being one of them).
These sacred "standards" -- if that even means anything -- could vary greatly from community to community, and could apply to all sorts of material in porn. What if interracial is frowned upon? How about MILF porn, or anything that involves models that vary greatly in age? Hell, why not ban material if the producers don't use energy efficient lighting or recycle properly? If anything might possibly offend anyone at anytime for any reason whatsoever just make it illegal!
|
05-10-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
149
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes. Another way of putting it: spin. There's nothing that the spin masters can't "spin" one way or another. Kerry actually SERVED in Vietnam; Bush did the National Guard. Then came the "Swift Boat" group ...
|
04-27-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
150
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You're absolutely right.
|
04-27-09 09:01am
|
