Nice review dracken, I totally agree with your feelings on the HC scenes that feature pierre (I find them to be very subpar), although he does have some non-tripod stuff (with other men) which is pretty well shot. He definitely gets some of the hottest euro ladies around. I'm not sure why wake up and fuck isn't a part of this site, it is tiny, and overall pretty worthless as a standalone.
I agree with pat and badandy, although I am not sure sure that kindness and politeness are directly related to inteligence (although in a just world they most certainly would be).
CDs, what are those? I only listen to music on vinyl!
Seriously though, you carry CDs around with you when you go on trips and such? I used to find that such a nuisance, it is nice to have it all right there. If you ever get one, just don't get any of the HDD ones, they never seem to last - especially given your apparent clumsiness!
In regard to the poll, I hope I don't need to replace anything this year, the laptop is getting a little beat up, but I think I can get it to last a bit longer.
joymii is pretty high on my list, I will probably join it sometime soon, I have been curious for a while. Initially it seemed way too toy-oriented based on the preview, but seems better now.
I agree that this site definitely has a broader range of ages than X-Art, but I think the focus here is also largely on younger models, I'd say most are 18-25 (maybe 20% are older than that based on a quick review of the site's posted model 'ages'), although the ages they list are likely bogus - they say Piper Fawn is 24 and Zuzana Z is 27, both of which seem low to me (given what EBI says).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Attractive ladies, I believe entirely european
-Good variety of material, sotfcore, lesbian, some hardcore
-Good download speeds, maxed my 10 Mbps connection
-Okay navigation. Model index, search function, scene ratings.
-Zip downloads of photo sets, in 3 sizes, 1200, 2000, 4000
-Good video quality from a technical standpoint (1920x1080 4000 kbps HD mp4, 960x540 3600 kbps SD wmv, 1280x720 4250 kbps HD wmv)
-Most videos available in 8 formats, wmv, mov, mp4, and flv. I mostly downloaded the mp4’s even though it is categorized under the “mobile” section
-Videography and photography generally pretty well done. Decent lighting, decent focus, good camerawork in my opinon
-I like the style of most of the material, pretty much a euro copy of X-Art.
-In browser streaming works well and buffering is minimal
-Respectable biller, I had CC-Bill
-No issues with billing, no pre-checked cross sales, or problems cancelling
-I believe it is 100% exclusive content
Cons:
-No bonus content
-Update frequency somewhat slow: 7 videos and 6 photosets in June
-Small site, 161 videos, 71 photosets, 80 or so female models
-Some videos had odd playback problems, the wmv’s had buffering issues which I have never seen before, could be my computer I suppose
-More costly than their direct competitor
-Pop-ups on login
-No user interaction (comments, forum)
Bottom Line:
For some reason this site is somewhat hard for me to rate. I feel like the content is pretty good, although it is more or less a direct copy of the style of X-Art (they originally even copied X-Art’s website layout), it is reasonably well executed, albeit I don’t think they did it as well as X-Art. Given that and the fact that it is a smaller site, has no bonus material, and is more expensive than this site, I feel I should score it a good bit lower, but I probably didn’t score X-Art as high as I should have given my current feelings towards that place.
I think they have some really good material, and I like these new sites that feature a more “erotic” style of porn, and this is definitely one of them. As for the material, you will see many of the typical, perhaps more popular, euro models you see these days, as well as somewhat humorously many of the euro models that X-Art uses. They have a decent mix of somewhat older models such as Zuzana Z, Piper Fawn, Eufrat and some new favorites of mine Pinky, Caprice, Ivy and Abby are all present, although amongst these only Ivy and Zuzana Z do hardcore if that is something you are looking for. Generally speaking I find most of the models to be ranging from attractive to beautiful, with the vast majority being quite lookers. Although the models are pretty much all white (one Asian), and generally the same body type – thin, athletic, and small breasted. For me the petite/small breasted part is a positive, but some more ethnic diversity would be nice.
I did not have any interaction with support, so I cannot comment on that.
It may be worth joining now if there are some models here you really like, but the site is rather small at this point so it I’d probably just wait a few months to see how it grows. The current breakdown as I counted is, Photos - Solo: 22, Les: 24, HC 25; Videos - Solo:13, Les: 60, HC: 49. With videos especially there seems to be some favoritism towards HC and Les, so if you are particularly into solo videos this is probably not the place to go.
Overall, I think this site is pretty good, decent videos, decent camerawork and photography. I am glad that there are more of these erotic porn sites showing up (even if they are copying each other), and I hope they continue to become more prevalent in the future. If this is the type of site you are interested, I would definitely recommend X-Art above this one, but it is worth considering if you have already been there. If you prefer solo material, broader ethnic diversity, or more gonzo-style porn, I’d probably look elsewhere.
It would be funny if everything turned into something like Idiocracy, where everything on TV was either porn or guys getting kicked in the nuts. Well, sad too I guess.
Aww man, you got some hugs and kisses out of that comment, how come I never get those?
For some reason, I always get logged out when I click behind the scenes after logging in here. Of course apparently I'm one of the only few the like BTS content. But I agree, really good site.
Interesting ideas, although I doubt many sites would want to post the full hundreds of photos taken in a shoot, it would be nice if they posted a bit more. I always get the same feeling with X-Art, they post so few photos for one set, it leaves you wondering if their photographer is just terrible and they had to delete a crap load of them.
With regard to the poll question, personally I can't stand bad lighting, although I agree that all of the above is appropriate.
I totally agree they have some of the most attractive ladies on any site out there, nice to hear the photos are improving. Perhaps I will have to check it out again soon, although I was planning on waiting a while longer...
I as well poked around, and couldn't find any of it on DVD, I have some movies with a similar theme with many of the same ladies, but they aren't the same scenes.
Nice review pat, good to know their price is much more attractive now. I'm not a fan of the quantity of filler in the videos, but they do get some attractive ladies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
