| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I agree, I have done the same thing, but it sort of annoying to go between IAFD or something and VB when they could just add a decent search function. They also seem to often have some comically incorrect model photos. I get the feeling the just don't care, their membership is probably very high, and site functionality and design improvements probably wouldn't make it any higher.
|
11-14-11 01:18pm
|
Reply
427
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Oswaldo's Comment
I agree it is worth visiting from time to time, they only seem to update 3x a week. I really like this site.
|
11-12-11 05:15pm
|
Reply
428
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
SexCliche's Review
Nice review Tobey666, although personally I think their new search engine is awful. Quite glitchy, so often it has no results for stars I know they have.
|
11-12-11 12:41am
|
Reply
429
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Occasionally to back things up, but like tangub I use externals mostly now.
|
11-12-11 12:38am
|
Reply
430
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm with picdude, and well said.
|
11-11-11 02:45pm
|
Reply
431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Solo it is good, hardcore it sometimes seems a bit awkward when the girl just stares at the camera (I assume they are referring to eye contact with the camera not with their partner).
|
11-06-11 12:06am
|
Reply
432
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Is it even any different? Seems as though you still might have to pay extra for the .tv site. All it looks like is a revamped front page, who knows what it looks like inside.
|
11-05-11 09:23pm
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Why does everyone seem to have gout these days, there are like 4 people in my company that have it. Odd, I had never even heard of it before a few years ago.
Hope you get better, and stay away from the red meat!
|
11-04-11 12:58am
|
Reply
434
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Really wish I had caught this dispute earlier, so I could have joined in on the fun. I think Denner's points about content may be exaggerated, but there is a lot of material on your sites that is available elsewhere. I highly doubt your 95% statement, unless perhaps you are only counting material in the last few months. Which of your sites are still active, seems as though you show 9 having been updated in the last few months.
Your "upgrade" options are a bit odd, to ask those that joined the full network to pay extra when a new site is added seems a bit odd (although apparently this was resolved at some point, it is still an odd thing to do, unless it was an accident).
I like your sites, and like your content, it is much improved in my opinion since I posted my review. But, any percieved misleading practice is always going to draw the ire of PUers.
|
11-04-11 12:45am
|
Reply
435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm with lk2 on this one, and I have never heard of a Tens Unit either.
|
11-04-11 12:24am
|
Reply
436
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
From time to time I like to check it out, nothing too rough however.
|
11-01-11 11:37pm
|
Reply
437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Aside from taking too many shots to the nuts playing sports can't really think of anything.
|
10-28-11 12:15am
|
Reply
438
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I find it nice to see what other sites companies own from time to time.
|
10-25-11 12:29am
|
Reply
439
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Most of the above, unfortunately never had the opportunity with legal marijuana, just the illegal kind.
|
10-23-11 01:35am
|
Reply
440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer to see more or less the whole body including face. Also, legs.
|
10-21-11 12:08am
|
Reply
441
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Nice review lk2, I agree it is a decent site. I should probably update my old review at some point because the score is much lower than I think it deserves, perhaps next week.
Just wanted to add for others that I never had any download problems here, was typically getting 1MB/sec or more using DTA. Never tried any other managers though.
|
10-21-11 12:06am
|
Reply
442
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I agree with messmer, I'd go with nubiles over DDF. I also agree there is way too much makeup on DDF.
Nice review messmer, it is nice to see some high scores! I feel like I never give a site above an 80 these days.
|
10-20-11 11:57pm
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Poll
Very rarely will I join for more than a month, but I might join more than once in a year.
|
10-19-11 01:00am
|
Comment
444
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
|
10-15-11 09:35pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
445
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
Usually, unless I forget I contributed something.
|
10-15-11 12:52am
|
Reply
446
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
SexCliche's Review
Nice review Tobey666, welcome to PU.
|
10-11-11 08:06pm
|
Reply
447
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Stop yelling.
|
10-11-11 12:22am
|
Reply
448
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
No problem, is there a way for me to delete this comment? sort of pointless to keep it there? I will edit it to say nevermind, but can't figure a way to get rid of it.
|
10-09-11 01:08am
|
Reply
449
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I sort of figured they didn't have deadlines, but perhaps they do. I would think drugs and alcohol might be up there though.
|
10-09-11 01:06am
|
Review
450
|
Yes-Movies
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Decent sized collection, 954 main movies plus some hantai movies and 276 "hot girls movies"
-Attractive ladies
-Most scenes are uncensored
-Download speeds are decent (I got 1.7 MB/s) typically
-Video quality is acceptable, but not great, 1300 kbps avi, but reasonably crisp
-Decent navigation, scenes are categorized reasonably well
-Photos are good quality, although not a huge collecton
-No DRM
-Did not encounter any download limit
-DL managers work |
| Cons: |
-No zip downloads of photos
-Movies are very long (often 100 minutes or so) and quite large given quality, would be nice if they split the DVDs up a bit
-Content is not exclusive, it is mostly DVD content, some of which might be available elsewhere
-Very little in way of scene preview, just boxcover and in some cases just the front
-Photo collection is small
-No bonus content, rating system, or forum, search function while present was not particularly useful.
-No streaming
-Use an odd biller |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I think this is an above-average site, and they have a lot of positives. I have found that many Japanese DVD sites suffer from the same afflictions, and this site is no different.
While the DVDs are typically of one actress, it may make sense to put the whole thing in one video, it would be nice to split it up by scene. Zip downloads would also be a nice feature for the photosets, and I wouldn't mind a few more of them. A more in depth preview, or in-browser streaming would also be nice given the size of the files.
Like with all sites of this niche, expect to see some material that might be considered "odd", with many scenes being a bit more on the humiliation side. Also, due to the lack of good scene previews, I would expect to delete a larger than average percentage of what you download.
It is nice to not have the mosaic, but I must admit that the model quality in censored videos on sites like JSex seemed to be much higher - but perhaps I am just downloading the wrong scenes.
Decent site, worth joining if you are into this style of porn, but even given JSex's obvious drawbacks I would probably recommend it above this site. |
|
10-07-11 11:40pm
Replies (2)
|
