Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : slutty (0)  

Feedback:   All (955)  |   Reviews (70)  |   Comments (65)  |   Replies (820)

Other:   Replies Received (467)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 526-550 of 958 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
526
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I've got 2 widescreen and one standard, I prefer the wide.

07-06-11  12:02am

Reply
527
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm with Cap'n. Discounts are always good.

07-03-11  01:42am

Reply
528
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

just one dog, like Jay G mostly cause of the lady.

07-02-11  12:15am

Reply
529
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Pretty much anything but a thong for me, never found that look attractive. I voted for grannies cause I thought someone should.

06-29-11  10:09pm

Reply
530
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

Perhaps he is a sleep-adult-website-joiner? I knew a guy in college that would get up, make, and eat a sandwich in the middle of the night all while dead asleep.

Now that Cap'n has been outed as an employee he will have to create a new user ID, spend all that time building up a reputation here (certainly not using the "I only like soft core, full strip, no toys and must have custom zips" bit or everyone will know it is him), and post another review.

That's some dedicated marketing. ;)


06-28-11  04:29pm

Reply
531
Visit Just Cute Girls

Just Cute Girls
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Interesting, never heard it used in that fashion before. Thanks for the information.

06-28-11  04:18pm

Reply
532
Visit Just Cute Girls

Just Cute Girls
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Review

Nice, informative review Drooler. Looked like too many tats for me on the preview.

Just curious, what did you mean by fate? Never heard that used in reference to a model's attractiveness before...


06-27-11  09:26pm

Reply
533
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

They scare me, even more so in person. I suppose I could turn that into a fetish if I gave it a chance.

06-27-11  09:18pm

Reply
534
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Yeah, I don't mind photoshopping that much, it is certainly super common, particular on the art nude sites. it is just odd to see it and then it disappears, then see it again. Its sort of half-assed photoshopping, and distracts me for some reason.

06-27-11  09:16pm

Comment
535
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)

Tattoo Photoshopping

Going through a couple of photosets from here, I suddenly realized that they edit out tattoos in some of their shoots, Now, I'm no fan of tramp stamps, but it seems kind of odd. Especially given the inconsitency, it is in one shot, gone in the next. Does make me wonder how much photo modification they do here...

06-24-11  08:21pm

Replies (2)
Reply
536
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of selphy's Reply

Download Them All worked fine for me as well, perhaps you should try it out.

06-24-11  08:13pm

Reply
537
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think it is somewhat important, although depends on the size of the site, not so important with smaller sites. I also think the model index is far more important than search.

06-23-11  07:47pm

Reply
538
Visit STR8 Cams

STR8 Cams
(0)
Reply of manholelover's Review

agree with otoh, it is good to see reviews of gay content here. Even though it isn't for me, I always wondered why there wasn't more representation here.

Also, the inadvertent link to massive entertained me. Surprised that hasn't happened before, seems like massive would be a commonly used word.


06-20-11  07:21pm

Reply
539
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

from time to time, although I'm sure what I consider extreme others might consider normal.

06-19-11  05:07pm

Reply
540
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As with many others, why no "no"? So other-no.

06-17-11  08:50pm

Reply
541
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The few times I have done it, I have done it via email.

06-16-11  11:44pm

Reply
542
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

I'm also with rearadmiral on this one. Well said. I also think some, especially some of the euro sites, could do a bit more editing, I don't really have a need for 40-60 minute scenes generally speaking and I have gotten too lazy to edit them myself lately.

06-14-11  08:26pm

Reply
543
Visit Private.com

Private.com
(0)
Reply of standard's Reply

No problem, just a pet peeve of mine! All of my friends do the same thing...

Again, welcome to PU, looking forward to hearing more from you.


06-11-11  10:55pm

Reply
544
Visit Private.com

Private.com
(0)
Reply of standard's Review

hey standard, welcome to PU, nice review.

Too bad download managers still don't work here. I also thought this site was pretty crappy for what you get.

Did you really only get 150kbps, or do you mean 150 KB/s? I seem to recall getting decent DL speeds here, and 150 kbps is aweful...


06-10-11  10:49pm

Reply
545
Visit Fame Digital

Fame Digital
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Hey man, no worries, I have brain farts all the time, I recommend you blame it on booze, almost always works (except with the ladies).

I have seen no notifications as to when HD downloads may be available, I tried all available sites with HD content to see if I could download and didn't find any. Evil Angel is not part of this network, but they may currently offer HD downloads although last I was a member they did not.


06-10-11  10:36pm

Review
546
Visit Fame Digital

Fame Digital
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Excellent price through TBP, $9.95
-Download managers work (DTA)
-No DRM
-Huge archive, 10726 straight scenes across network (1374 are HD but streaming only). 2614 photosets.
-Wide variety of content, from euro ladies to grannies to indian
-Video quality is acceptable, best I saw was 720x400 2000 kbps wmv
-Download speeds are decent, I typically got 1 MB/s using DTA
-Have scene ratings, favorites, and user comments
-Scenes have tags, but not exactly useful for a site this large
-Decent update schedule, about 1 DVD per day it seems
Cons: -Older content is of variable quality
-Navigation can be a bit annoying, a lot of scenes duplicated across titles. Not sure if they are counting the duplicates in their total.
-No zip downloads of phototsets that I found
-Not sure why the even bother having the multiple sites. I guess it is just for organization
-Few users seem to participate in the comments, or ratings. I have yet to see a comment on any of the scenes.
-Search function consists of pull-down menus with long lists of model names, movie names, etc. Not particularly functional
-No HD video downloads, streaming only
-Largely gonzo porn, although there are some parodies to be found, and some scenes with plots.
-Material can get repetitive, and is almost entirely hardcore.
Bottom Line: This site is definitely worth visiting, especially for the price, however its main drawback is the same as for many sites of this nature like Videobox and VideosZ, it is big and there is a lot of junk to sort through. Generally I like the content they produce, although I wouldn't suspect many would download more than 1% of it unless they had a boatload of time on their hands.

Overall I consider this a site worth joining at least once, definitely given the price. It would be nice if they made some improvements to navigation and added a more robust search function. It would be nice if more users participated with comments like on Videobox, but I guess there isn't really anything they can do to force the issue.

I generally find the model quality on this site to be slightly above their DVD competitors, but I consider their video quality to be slightly worse. The HD looked nice when streaming, but I am really not one for streaming so didn't watch too much of it. I particularly like that the model type is somewhat more variable than on similar sites, although it isn't super ethnically diverse.

If you haven't been a member before and have time to dig through it all, it is definitely a place to consider if you are into hardcore DVD content.

06-09-11  11:52pm

Replies (4)
Reply
547
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not so much now, perhaps as things improve I might be more interested. Although the 3D stuff I've seen in the theatre has given me a headache, don't know that I want that after porn viewing.

06-09-11  09:04pm

Reply
548
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Well, after enjoying some of the "MILFs" on a few sites lately, I guess I might be developing a fetish for older ladies. Oh wait, she was 25...

Although I'm sure it has happened for real on a few occassions, although can't think of any specific instances off the top of my head.


06-08-11  10:50pm

Reply
549
Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Yeah, there are some attractive ladies here, but the guy just irritated me so much I only kept like 6-8 videos from here.

I was poking around and noticed they do give a back-out discount to the price of $24.95


06-06-11  08:26pm

Reply
550
Visit Exploited College Girls

Exploited College Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

I don't recall any bonus sites lk2, perhaps it is new or I didn't notice. There may have been some non-exclusive cam sites and stuff, but I really can't remember even seeing that.

Edit, sorry should have re-read my review before responding, I did note some non-exclusive streaming sites so perhaps that is what it is, but I honestly don't remember. I'm sure if the sites were decent they would probably tell you what they were, the fact that they aren't I would think is a sign that they are worthless throw-in stuff.


06-06-11  06:46pm


Shown : 526-550 of 958 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.39 seconds.