| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto that except that well produced softcore videos can really get my motor going as well. Generally, most photos no longer get my interest except when they are of my A list babes and are taken by a true pro.
|
07-29-09 10:19pm
|
Reply
602
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
PU first, then TBP if I need more info or if the scores are significantly different.
|
07-21-09 06:52pm
|
Reply
603
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Make me feel like a real old fart but yes, I had a friend who could get his hands on some "smokers" as they were then called, with stars like Bettie Page and Candy Barr.
With the thousands of girls now doing porn there still isn't anyone that comes close to either one of those two for basic, unadulterated beauty.
And "soundless." They weren't soundless. The projectors were always rather noisy. But yes, there was no soundtrack.
|
07-11-09 10:15am
|
Reply
604
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If my memory is accurate the first site I joined was SexyBabes.tv many years ago. I'm still a member although my tastes have migrated to video from photos with the advent of HD and the ability to download scenes as long as 1 hour in a single bite.
Candidly I've thought about dropping the site but with the addition of Babelicious to their lineup, while I don't get nearly as much material as I do with, say, Twistys, what they have is still very high quality.
The other end of the spectrum is Danni.com which I joined in 03 or 04 and loved it. The negative was their DRM, which they said would not stop me from creating my own stash on DVD discs that would still be viewable after I dropped my membership(they lied). But as long as I stayed a member and was on line I could acquire the requisite license.
Then when Danny Ashe sold it, the customer service and content slipped badly and their business practices started getting a bit sleazy. I quit the site, then tried a test month in 2006 only to find that it had remained rather bad,,,and still with the lousy DRM.
Haven't been back since and doubt that I ever will go back.
|
07-09-09 08:17am
|
Reply
605
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
Nope. If it's not illegal, it's just not right. I'll let people look at my stuff with me, but I won't make a copy.
|
07-08-09 09:19am
|
Reply
606
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I joined a Jana Jordan site (Jana Rocks) because she rocks my sox. It was not promoted as a non nude site but it turns out that it was and it is a total POS site.
But I'm into the nude female body so a site with tease before nudity is OK...but a site with no nudity might as well be a G rated tv show.
|
07-06-09 08:24am
|
Reply
607
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I am into the erotic female form and find nothing at all erotic about an underage girl or a model who appears to be an underage girl.
I pass on that stuff just as I pass on those BBW's who are just fat slobs.
|
07-06-09 08:17am
|
Reply
608
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The point of porn is the fantasy. The only thing that cannot be fantasy is that the babe must be at least 18 years old.
If a site posts a girl who was 19 years old at the time it was posted in 2006, should the site say that she was 19 when posted in 2006?
Personally, WGAF?. (Who Gives a Fuck?) If she was young looking back when the post happened that's all that matters anyway, isn't it?
|
06-21-09 03:49pm
|
Reply
609
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have a brother and a sister. My brother, a professional video guy, finds porn boring so it's unlikely he would ask. By brother in law (my sister's husband) works for the US gummint so he has lots of free time at work and frequently asks me for some of my stash. Again, no problem.
|
06-15-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
610
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Others have said similar things, but the issue with me is lousy quality sites. The saving grace is PU and TBP where I can check out every site before I waste my money on a crappy one.
There is no need for more hardcore sites whatsoever. We're swimming in them already. But there is a real need for new high quality hardcore sites and/or an upgrade of the mediocre hardcore sites..
|
06-12-09 02:25pm
|
Reply
611
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Agree, but the advent of internet porn has saved me tons of $ that I once spent on video rentals, magazines and other pursuits.
|
05-30-09 10:56pm
|
Reply
612
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Navigation and Searching. Considering that each of us has favorite babes, studios and genres, and that search technology is highly sophisticated, it pisses me off royally when I know a model is on a site but is virtually impossible to locate.
A similar beef is inaccuracy. On a great site like Video Box the one serious flaw is the inability of the webmaster to be consistent in spelling a model's name. That makes it so damned difficult to find all the content they have. Jenna Doll, for example, shows up as Jena Doll, Jena, Jenna Dall, and probably others. And it isn't the studio's fault. The cover usually has the correct spelling. It's just sloppiness.
|
05-29-09 11:04pm
|
Reply
613
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Jay G said, "Storage is incredibly cheap and the numbers, I agree, don't always mean quality, but I am sure getting pickier and pickier about a "quality look" to videos. Old stuff is seldom good enough for a spoiled kid like me."
That's me. Exactly. Three or four years ago I was ok with almost anything just so long as it displayed what I wanted...plenty of PTA*.
Now, however, where the quality is so good even a gynecologist would be happy, and with a brand new Seagate 1.5 Tb hard drive ($129.99 + tax) joining my 640Gb, and two 500Gb hard drives, I'm like Jay, am totally spoiled. When I watch some of the older stuff that I used to watch over and over, I only wish it could be upgraded in quality.
The real question is, what's next? I can't imagine better quality than is now available. Maybe smell-o-vision or a form of 3-D?
*PTA - Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
05-24-09 10:12am
|
Reply
614
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler: "BTW I don't have an organization issue because I do it by model name --> source --> name of video or gallery. It's the last piece there that gets the treatment every long once in a while. Some titles just need ... help!"
I do the same. The model name gets adds at the end of the name, occasionally, such as (!!!), (.)(.) or ??? [when I think the name provided by the source is inaccurate]
The source is never altered.
The file name is where I use a touch of originality if the title from the source is not descriptive, but I try to be descriptive, not humorous...unless I can be descriptive and humorous at the same time.
|
05-23-09 12:09pm
|
Reply
615
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
BG or BGG - either one is fine with me. I want to see the babe and her assets and a good porno does that. A BBG is lousy because the two guys usually block the view so all we get to see is some guy's hairy ass and/or hairy balls, not what I watch porn to see.
|
05-20-09 11:08pm
|
Reply
616
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I will go up to $30 but no more...and think long and hard even then.Under $20 gets my attention and under $25 will get me but for no longer than 1 month max.
Interestingly when I cancel those sites over $25 I almost always get a "stick around" price. One site that started at $30 was persistent. Each time I answered NO to a reduced price I got yet a lower one. I finally bit aty $5.99 per month.
|
05-18-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
617
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Back in the good old days when unshaven bush was common, I really liked the snatch to match (nothing like a beautiful trimmed blonde snatch on a beautiful blonde babe), but now I like whatever color enhances the babe. I'm more into hairstyle than color.
One amazing example of how much difference hair color makes is with Victoria Vonn, who shows up with several hair colors, most of them OK but not great. But when she appears as a full blonde, Little Richard magically changes to Big Dick even before she gets naked.
Also the hairstyle on the babe can do wonders. Bald is awful but a pageboy of any hair color on a beautiful babe just drives me fucking wild.
|
05-16-09 08:15am
|
Reply
618
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Only once (where I was notified) a few years back. Of course it could have occurred since then where I've not been notified.
|
05-15-09 08:08am
|
Reply
619
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Simple. If the performers are over 18, are doing whatever they are doing voluntarily and with full and open mutual consent, no one is getting hurt and whatever they are doing is not being done in public where people who don't want to see it or who shouldn't see it can't see it, then have at it.
That's what I feel about prostitution as well. If Carmella Bing gets $1,000 to fuck someone in front of a camera and hets $1,000 to fuck some one in private in some hotel room, why is one legal and the other not?
|
05-10-09 04:13pm
|
Reply
620
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Ditto everything that Jay said. I agree with him completely.
|
05-04-09 09:25pm
|
Reply
621
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I still have most of my stash but I really haven't looked at very many since the web got really good with the quality and quantity. If I ever get around to it I will convert the really good stuff and/or the stuff that will never make it to the web to digital. Unfortunately I don't think that time will ever come. :-(
|
05-02-09 05:59pm
|
Reply
622
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like the idea.
When I post something in the way of a question or a reply to someone's post, I'd like to know that the person has logged on afterward to see if he/she has had a chance to see it.
|
04-26-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
623
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Ditto. After all, it ain't the phony screeching I care about. But when there's a quiet scene so you can hear the slurping of the pussy as the dick (toy, finger, tongue) is doing its thing is quiet, but erotic as hell.
And I don't give a damn when she had her first fuck, who it was with and how good it was.
|
04-24-09 11:30pm
|
Reply
624
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Cum swallowing is the one I'm curious about. The idea of external ejaculation was originally to avoid pregnancy, I thought, because exploding internally is, for me, the best part of a good fuck. In early porn you could see the frustration on the guy's face as he pulled out just in the nick of time and dropped his load on her ass.
Unless it's a humiliation thing that gets guys off, I don't see the appeal in watching a gorgeous babe with her face covered with spunk, or in her swallowing it.
My #2 is shitting. I'm OK with peeing but I'm seeing shitting creeping into porn now. That, to me, is a completely disgusting sight.
I don't get ass fucking either but I love watching a reverse cowgirl ass fuck because it shows off all the body parts in a spectacular fashion.
|
04-18-09 09:32am
|
Reply
625
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Right answer. I learned back with my Win2000 machine that NTSF was the only formatting a PC user should ever use.
|
04-16-09 11:55am
|
